, andexpertise needed in practical settings. At the final stage, students EVALUATE theirperformances and reflect on the knowledge gained.Sugiarti et al. [16] presented their findings on the impact of using the 5E model to developlearning materials for Thermochemistry. They presented that the Learning Cycle 5E basedSTEM learning materials are appropriate to increase students' learning outcomes in studyingThermochemistry. In teaching engineering subject principles in Japan, Yata et al. [17] mentionedthat it is critical to have a pedagogy that combines the learning process with activities. Duran andDuran [18] posited strongly that STEM education is best when carried out with an inquiry-basedapproachh. These reports show that 5E training has a clear
most recentassignments. The instructional staff can then contact the student with the specific details of whatthe student is missing and work with the student to get caught up.LimitationsIn this study, several factors were beyond our control and other factors were revealed afteranalyzing our results. Here, we discuss these threats to validity.This paper reports the final outcomes from only a single semester, which was the pilot for our newassessment scheme. We are still exploring how best to use early-term data to provide earlyinterventions for students who are not on track to receive an 80% or higher in the course. Nor dowe yet have the data to analyze the longitudinal impact of this shift to see whether students aremore likely to persist
support systems for clinical decision making and scientific discovery. For example, Prof. Markey leads a collaborative, multi- institutional team that is designing a decision support system to help breast cancer survivors understand their likely appearance changes following breast reconstruction and, therefore, enable them to choose a reconstruction strategy that will lead to maximal psychosocial adjustment. Dr. Markey has been recognized for excellence in research and teaching with awards from organizations such as the American Medical Informatics Association, the American Society for Engineering Education, the American Cancer Society, and the Society for Women’s Health Research. She is a Fellow of the American
.[23] C. Faber, C. Smith-Orr, W. Lee, C. Bodnar, and A. Strong, “Best Practices for Developing a Virtual Peer Mentoring Community,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://rdw.rowan.edu/engineering_facpub/20[24] A. Rockinson-Szapkiw, J. L. Wendt, and J. S. Stephen, “Outcomes for Mentors and Mentees 1 The Efficacy of a Blended Peer Mentoring Experience for Racial and Ethnic Minority 2 Women in STEM Pilot Study: Academic, Professional, and Psychosocial Outcomes for 3 Mentors and Mentees 4 Acknowledgements 13,” Journal for STEM Education Research, vol. 4, pp. 173–193, 2021.[25] J. J. Gish-Lieberman, A. Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. A. Tawfik, and T. M. Theiling, “Designing for Self-Efficacy: E-Mentoring Training
inferential method was a t-test. In an ideal case, apaired t-test would have been a desired selection since our objective is to assess an educationalintervention which is best performed with before and after comparisons with the same subjects.However, we did not have sufficient paired responses to obtain meaningful inferences.Therefore, we opted for a two-sample t-test.Methods The study reported herein is based on student responses to a 50-question EM surveyinstrument that was administered to 99 incoming first-year students in fall 2017 and to 68 seniorsjust before they graduated in spring 2021. The development and validation of this surveyinstrument is reported elsewhere [19]. Detailed analysis indicated that the 50 questions could
expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Program at Northeastern University. Recently, she has joined the expanding Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at NU to continue teaching Simulation, Facilities Planning, and Human-Machine Systems. She also serves as a Technical Advisor for Senior Capstone Design and graduate-level Challenge Projects in Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership Program. Dr. Jaeger has been the recipient of numerous awards in engineering education for both teaching and mentoring and has been involved in several engineering educational research initiatives through ASEE and beyond.Dr. Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University Dr. Courtney Pfluger received her Doctoral degree
, the course instructor recruited anengineering education doctoral student who was researching the Freeform environment forassistance on the project. The brainstorming blossomed into a partnership with both the facultymember and the graduate student sharing in the design, development, and implementation of theactivities. The partnership showcased the value of interdisciplinary and cross-level (faculty andgraduate students) collaborations for pedagogical innovations. In total, the instructor andgraduate student designed six active learning activities, targeting the concepts of: Poisson’s ratio,shear strain, strain in indeterminate rods, beam deflection, states of stress for combined loading,and Mohr’s circle.Theoretical FoundationsAll of the six
focuses on the development of scientific discourse among k-12 students in a context of perpetual STEM reform. He conducts sociocultural research to examine learning in science classrooms, with a particular emphasis on engaging students with histories of academic failure. He also researches teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM) innovations and their impact on the youth of today. His research has demonstrated that transformative and culturally relevant pedagogy along with mobile technology, live data collection, and citizen science approaches can engage marginalized students for improved STEM expertise. Among other projects, he has investigated how engineers in higher
coordinating institution, a better understanding ofprogram logistics, and new and strengthened professional relationships. We discovered a numberof challenges associated with providing intensive professional development opportunities tograduate students, including timing of experiences relative to degree progress, loss of connectionto the home research community, and financial impact, especially as it relates to travel andhousing.While a search of existing literature in professional development in higher education hasprovided best practices for existing programs, there is little to no available research highlightingbarriers that exist to offering different types of professional development opportunities tograduate student populations. These barriers
. Theseresearch efforts will inform the development of the three educational outcomes of theproject—an impact playbook that translates research findings into practice use, exchanges withthe engineering education community (e.g., dean’s council, townhall discussion with associateengineering professors, and graduate engineering education webinar series), and partnershipswith Virginia Tech’s College of Engineering and College of Science to implement best practicesfound in the playbook. A detailed description of the research design can be accessed in theprevious executive summary [10].Year 2 Research Activity SummaryWithin the past year, we focused on engaging in professional development activities to buildcapacity in storytelling and research-practice
research space. ● Networking & Pitching Workshop – The importance of networking is highlighted along with tips and guidelines for building and maintaining your professional network both online and in face-to-face settings. Students practice their skills through guided hands-on activities and a mock networking session. Students also prepare and practice delivering a 90 second elevator pitch of their project. ● Preparing for Graduate School – In this session students learn about the opportunities for graduate school funding such as the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program. The activity includes a discussion of best practices for preparing for graduate school including finding the right advisor and research
encourage the engineering profession to see all “ways of knowing” (especially those that are community-based and/or non-technical) as valued and integral parts of the community-based design process? What are best practices in terms of teaching our students and ourselves the critical importance of contextual listening? How do we use our engineering skills to tackle complex societal problems?Conclusion: lessons learned as a community-engaged faculty memberWhen I first ventured into service-learning, I had outcomes for my students in mind. I waslooking at the research compiled by Eyler and Giles (1999) which showed that service-learningresulted in deeper understanding of course content and an increased ability to apply
Elliott (Director, External Affairs)Lance Cooper (Associate Head for Graduate Programs)Julie Zilles Dr. Zilles is a Research Associate Professor in the Department of Crop Sciences at the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign. She received her B.S. in biology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her Ph.D. in Bacteriology from the University of Wisconsin Madison. In addition to research at the intersection of microbiology, agriculture, and environmental engineering, she leads the transdisciplinary Writing Across Engineering and Science(WAES) team, which is focused on promoting and adapting best practices from writing studies for STEM classes andcurricula. © American Society for Engineering
undergraduate program in Engineering that is current, vital,distinctive and consistent with the idea of engineering being a single discipline.IntroductionEngineering at Harvey Mudd College is a non-specialized multidisciplinary program, awardingan undesignated BS degree. The engineering major comprises one-third of the requirements for astudent to graduate from the college, with another third in humanities and social science, and theremaining third in a mathematics and fundamental science common core. Engineering sciencesand engineering systems courses complement the engineering design experience of the first-yearprojects course (E4) and the junior and senior year Engineering Clinic courses bringingprofessional practice to campus through industry
in maintaining a national network of engaged alumni.Spelman has recently been designated by the Department of Defense as a Center of Excellencefor Minority Women in STEM (COE-MWS) [28]. The goals of the COE are to strengthenfaculty and student research and engagement in emerging STEM fields; to develop students whoare interested in pursuing graduate degrees in STEM; to host conversations that showcasecutting-edge, interdisciplinary research that is conducted by prominent women of color in theSTEM disciplines; and to create and disseminate best practices for the preparation andadvancement of minority women in STEM. The COE is just one example of how Spelman excelsat identifying, implementing, and disseminating best practices on educating and
their experience to lead.The Master of Engineering in Manufacturing (MEngM) at MIT was developed over a period of10 years, and has more than 200 alumni. It is based on the notion of a need for graduate leveleducation in the profession of engineering that is not fulfilled by the conventional research-oriented Master of Science degree. We have learned that there is a large pool of outstandingstudents who will seek out this degree once it is offered, and who have as alumni drawn stronglypositive reviews from their employers.Students in the program, a cross-section of the best and the brightest, are drawn to the notion thatmanufacturing is how technological advances and innovations become rooted in a nation'seconomy. They want to understand the
students to experience different ways of design and operation. 9. Have recognition of the need for and ability to engage in life-long learning. The BAJA students will be engaged in the automotive field even they do not work in it. The overall experience has improved practical ability of some of the best theoretical students, also making them more interested in automotive engineering. This will encourage them to stay engaged in the area and continue to learn, especially with the help of being more practical and confident. 10. Have knowledge of contemporary issues. The BAJA team members receive two periodicals, one in Automotive and the other in Aerospace Engineering
differences, it is important to have cultural training and to experience anotherculture in that particular country. One of the best ways for students to experience another cultureis to take part in a study abroad course and to immerse themselves in another country’s traditionsand customs. The Commission on the Abraham Lincoln Fellowship Study Abroad ProgramReport concluded, “What nations don’t know can hurt them. The stakes involved in study abroadare that simple, that straightforward, and that important. For their own future and that of thenation, college graduates today must be internationally competent.”5Not only should graduates be internationally competent, research indicates links betweenstudying abroad and improved graduation rates, as well as
, research, and teaching.Considering these challenges, there is an urgent need for empirical studies to assess the impact ofGAI on engineering learning experiences to address the potential challenges and concerns relatedto their implementation. This study aims to inform the field about the best practices forintegrating GAI tools into engineering education pedagogy and assessment.Purpose of this studyThis work-in-progress paper aims to describe our efforts to explore the impact of integrating GAIas a tool for enhancing engineering education. In this paper, we will discuss the methodology weplan to use to assess the impact of GAI tools on engineering learning experiences, including theselection of participants, data collection methods, and analysis
. Pellegrino, "A Paper Commissioned by the National Center on Education and the Economy for the New Commission on the Skills of the Amercan Workforce," National Center on Education and the Economy, Washington DC, 2006.[31] J. L. Herman, "Educational Measurement: Impact of Assessment on Classroom Practice," International Encylclopedia of Education, no. 3rd Edition, pp. 69-74, 2010.[32] R. M. Marra, "The Iron Range Engineering PBL Curriculum," in 3rd International Research Symposium on PBL, Coventry UK, 2011. Page 26.1507.18
for a Glider. ( rate of descend, payload, weight determination by major components- statistical analysis of aircraft data 3p)8. Basics of Glider Design - Aerodynamics – Forces in Equilibrium- Prototyping – Testing Evaluation – Fine Tuning –9. Weigh Analysis - Market analysis for Materials.10. Materials and Materials Selection - Examples and Practice - Boeing Selected Documents.11. Learning Styles – Kolb – Team effects12. Market outlook, market research. Importance of customer satisfaction. Example review The Commercial Satellite Market- US. Launchers cost per pound of payload.13. The Bernoulli’s Equation-Wind Tunnel – demonstration - Basic Wing section.14. Calculation of Lift and Drag.. Equations, NASA airfoil data discussion
, tight budgets are forcing some diversityprograms to downsize. In addition, at the graduate level, it is highly likely that diversity will alsobe negatively impacted by the decline in international students, which has been noted in recentyears and seems to be continuing6. Thus to achieve the desired diversity new strategies must bedeveloped.Compared to the undergraduate and postgraduate levels, relatively little research has focused onspecific strategies for diversifying the engineering graduate student population. In particular,relatively little research has examined the specific social and community needs of graduatestudents and how to support these needs in the traditional graduate education framework.Related questions about how best to
. In doing so, he focuses on Engineering education policies and practices in teaching learning processes, assessments, laboratories and practical internships. Mr. Halkiyo has been teaching different Civil En- gineering courses at Bule Hora University, Ethiopia, where he also served as a department head, and conducts various research and community projects. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Powerful Change Attends to Power RelationsIntroduction & BackgroundWhile changing engineering departments to become more inclusive and equitable is a commongoal, research repeatedly confirms that such change is rare. Notably, change efforts
” building technologies.These green or “sustainable” building technologies and materials are evolving at a rate thatexceeds the potential for significant documentation, testing, and practice, thus presenting achallenge to architectural and engineering educators. Characterized by an integrative designprocess, green building projects require professionals to work in new, non-sequential ways. Inaddition, many of the key issues surrounding sustainable design are contested and subject todebate and misconceptions. For educators, the question arises: How do we effectively exposestudents to these emerging technologies, while simultaneously engaging them in the integrativedesign processes specific to these technologies?This paper describes an
faculty director for a scholarship program to recruit and support high-performing, low- income civil engineering students. Dr. Watson is also interested in understanding and assessing students’ cognitive processes, especially related to sustainable design. Dr. Watson is the proud recipient of seven teaching awards and six best paper awards.Dr. Simon Thomas Ghanat P.E., The Citadel Dr. Simon Ghanat is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel (Charleston, S.C.). He received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Arizona State University. His research interests are in Engineering Education and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. He previously
experience of science in society and the workplace [1]. Consequently, central to the structureof the NGSS is an emphasis on science and engineering practices [1]. Additionally, the NGSSare designed around a unique three-dimensional approach. Dimensionone focuses on the science andengineering practices that scientistsand engineers employ in developingknowledge and solving problems.The second dimension identifies thecrosscutting concepts, or themes,that are reflected throughout alldomains of science. Dimensionthree identifies essential scientific Figure 1: NGSS structure and impacts on teaching and learning science.knowledge required for basicliteracy in science. Thisorganizational shift away from conventional
involvessupervised team or individual research. In one such effort, a team consisting of one graduate electricalengineer and three mechanical engineers designed an IR camera payload with a color-wheel filtermechanism for a UAS allowing the study and characterization of volcanic plumes and wildfires.Another team of graduating students tackled the development of a specialized UAS sensor that samplesaerosols, such as ash from a fire. Last semester three seniors, two in electrical engineering and anotherin mechanical engineering, integrated this sensor onto a UAS for study of wildfires and volcanicplumes, as well as measurements of air quality and various pollutants. This sensor is being tested thisspring for applicability in measuring airborne residue from
developing a coursethat provides a service learning experience is to expand each student’s perspective that engineerscan have a positive impact on their community and the world. This paper presents themotivation, content, and the assessment process of such a course.MOTIVATIONThe College of Engineering (CoE) at Wichita State University (WSU) has a very activeIndustrial Advisory Board (IAB) that recommends our graduates have a competitive advantagethat includes more than just the technical skills of an engineering degree. CoE faculty and theIAB have launched a strategic initiative, Engineer of 2020, in order to prepare graduates foreffective engagement in the engineering profession in the year 2020. This initiative is in partmotivated by two reports
the literature that students have only a 17% chance of taking a course related toclimate change. Through the introduction of course modules 100% of the students that passthrough the Civil Engineering program are exposed to climate change and its impacts and theresults support that this structure is effective and has achieved the desired results of betterpreparing students to be able to address the future challenges that climate change will present.Future WorkThe results presented in this research effort represent a mid-course assessment and thus theresults may improve beyond those at present. As part of the course design, practical applicationprojects are included that will expose students to real-life problems that incorporate
participate across 66 projects (8 projects did not match with anystudents and so were dropped from the program). Each project currently has 1-5 first-year studentsworking on it, often alongside more senior undergraduate researchers and/or graduate students andpostdoctoral researchers. In January 2022, the Office of Undergraduate Research started anUndergraduate Research Peer Mentor Program, with more established student researchers servingas optional peer mentors to existing First-Year Scholars. The peer mentors hold office hours andlead workshops on topics relevant to new undergraduate researchers.Case Study ExampleEngaging in a well-defined research study under a qualified mentor is the most impactful learningopportunity for a freshman engineering