://www.pmi.org/about/learn-about-pmi/what-is-project-management[2] Accessed Feb. 6, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/about/learn-about-pmi/who-are-project-managers[3] Accessed Feb. 5, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/project-management.html[4] Accessed Feb. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/project-manager-qualities[5] S. M. Shariff et al., "Assessment of Project Management Skills and Learning Outcomes inStudents’ Projects," in 6th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching(InCULT 2012), Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) pp. 745 – 754.[6] P. N. Mustaro and R. Rossi, “Project Management Principles Applied in Academic
in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewersfor their constructive feedback that helped us to improve this paper. Lastly, we thank the studyparticipants themselves for allowing us to learn important insights from their lived experiencesof shame in the context of engineering.References[1] J. P. Tangney and R. L. Dearing, Shame and guilt. Guilford Press, 2003.[2] J. L. Huff, B. Okai, K. Shanachilubwa, N. W. Sochacka, and J. Walther, “Unpacking professional shame: Patterns of White male engineering students living in and out of threats to their identities,” Journal of Engineering
Undergraduate Education (EHR/DUE) and Division of Engineering Education and Centers (ENG/EEC), where she worked in multiple STEM education and research programs, including the IUSE, TUES, STEP, WIDER, S-STEM, Noyce, REU, and ERC. She also served as Associate Chair and was on the faculty in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering.Shelly B. Blunt (Associate Provost for Academic Affairs) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Capacity-Building to Transform STEM Education Through Faculty Communities in Learning Analytics and
as they are also at a point of transition to a new Director. Formore information about the evaluation, please feel free to contact the author team.References:Jordan, D., Spiegel, S., Sanders, M., Cutler, S., & Zappe, S. (2022). Lessons Learned: Findingsfrom an External Evaluation of a STEM Teaching and Learning Center (Lessons Learned Paper#2 of 2). American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,Minneapolis, MN.POD Network (2018). Defining what matters: Guidelines for comprehensive center for teachingand learning (CTL) evaluation.https://podnetwork.org/content/uploads/POD_CTL_Evaluation_Guidelines__2018_.pdf 5Appendix 1. 6
,” MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.[2]V. Vankatesh, and F. Davis, (2000). ”A Theoretical Extension of the Technology AcceptanceModel: Four longitudinal field studies,” Management Science, 46(2), 186.[3] J. Case, and G. Light, (2014). Framing Qualitative Methods in Engineering EducationResearch. In A. Johri and B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering EducationResearch (pp. 535-550). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139013451.034.[4] Vedel, J. Ramaprasad, and L. Lapointe, “Social Media Strategies for Health Promotion byNonprofit Organizations: Multiple Case Study Design,” J Med Internet Res, vol. 22, no. 4, p.e15586, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.2196/15586.[5] M. Jarvie-Eggart, A. Owusu-Ansah, and S. L. Stockero, “Factors
and experiences to develop student's leadership and other professional Experiences skills [41] 3 Undergraduate Coaching Developing the engineering leadership of undergraduate students through coaching [42] 7 Diverse Student Workshops Workshop-based co-curricular EL development for diverse student populations [43] Out-of-class 2 SHPE Social-cognitive Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE)'s Social-cognitive leadership theory [44] experiences Leadership Theory 2 International Experience International project-work/experiences for undergraduate students [45
ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award, the 2020 TEES Faculty Fellows Award, and the 2011 Charles H. Barclay, Jr. '45 Faculty Fellow Award. Hammond has been featured on the Discovery Channel and other news sources. Hammond is dedicated to diversity and equity, reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. She has also been recently appointed as the Speaker-Elect of the Faculty Senate. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu.Julie S Linsey (Professor) Georgia Tech © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Sketchtivity, an Intelligent Sketch Tutoring Software: Broadening
, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 163–166, 2013, doi:10.1002/sce.21032.[3] K. P. Cross, Adults as Learners. Increasing participation and facilitating learning. 1981.[4] P. Shekhar and A. Huang-Saad, “Examining engineering students’ participation inentrepreneurship education programs: implications for practice,” IJ STEM Ed, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 40, Jun.2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00298-9.[5] P. Shekhar, A. H. Saad, and J. Libarkin, “Understanding student participation in entrepreneurshipeducation programs: a critical review,” The International journal of engineering education, vol. 34, no. 3,pp. 1060–1072, 2018.[6] S. Harding, Objectivity and Diversity. 2015. Accessed: Oct. 02, 2016. [Online]. Available:http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books
housed within safety and health of industry. Since 1990’s, theconcept of ergonomic awareness became discernible within enterprises. The continuous researchhas yielded to a certain level of knowledge about how to improve product quality and productivity.Workers safety and benefits of process improvements are now widely acknowledged in industry[1] [2]. Meanwhile, the application of ergonomic process is very limited in household sector. Theword “housekeeping” has demonstrated as better technique that affect industrial quest forcontinuous improvement by eliminating of waste in a cluttered area [3]. Later, the housekeepingconcept turned out to be as 5S program.Main framework of 5S program was first proposed by Osada in 1991 [4] and then Hirano in1995
describing certain types of visualelements, such as phase diagrams and phase transformation plots in materials science andengineering, T-s, h-s, and P-v diagrams in thermodynamics, output response plots in controlsystems, as well as other common visual elements in mechanical engineering courses; and (4)Writing text for animated visual elements that describe in detail all dynamic processes andmovements in the animation. This paper describes our guidelines in detail, and presentsexamples from three different zyVersions used in mechanical engineering courses. Thesestandards can be modified for use across various engineering disciplines and will enable authorsof online content to provide higher quality material that meets accessibility
capturing video, the team developed themes of each video and created scripts andvisuals. Scripts included on-camera dialogue that presenters usually read like a news anchor.Scripts were kept simple with concise sentences for easy flow of information. Scripts included anintroduction and a body. The introduction was generally less than 1 minute to introduce thepresenter(s) and give audience a high-level objective of topic presented. The body consisteddetailed text and references to visuals and any drawing on the tablet.To align with attention spans of humans, engage a wide audience, and communicate effectively,each video was kept as short as possible with a goal of between 5 to 7 minutes. After videos wererecorded, the software application iMovie
held high agreement andfollowed the increasing velocity trend as set by the analytical solution. Radius Solution (m/s) Experiment (m/s) Percent Error 0.024 0.002 0.003 74% 0.033 0.009 0.003 63% 0.042 0.016 0.013 22% 0.051 0.023 0.022 5% 0.059 0.029
, itinvolves the visualization and recreation of mental images that are shared with listeners through adynamic interplay of verbal and non-verbal communication from both the speaker and listener(s).In the context of pedagogy, storytelling has been shown to encourage self-awareness [23],enhance professional development [24, 25], and cultivate empathy [26, 27].3 Our ApproachLegacy refers to the value we create for other people and places in the world. The story of aperson’s life reflects their legacy. In the Exploring LegaCs experience, we met for weekly, virtualmeetings to learn about effective storytelling, to share personal experiences, and to consider thelegacy that engineering students want to leave. The design of the Exploring LegaCs program
students had little to no prior experience in computing,they have made a smooth transition into graduate school and secured full-time employment inthe tech industry.SummaryOur iCAN program is the first of its kind in the state of Illinois from a large public university.Our graduate certificate in computing fundamentals provides a high-quality credential from aleading computer science department. Graduates of our program are prepared to pursue techcareers in industry or pursue a full graduate degree in computer science. Thus, our programbrings together non-computing college graduates from diverse areas of expertise andbackgrounds in an accelerated graduate certificate program that broadens participation incomputing.References[1] A. Ivey, S. R
similarpurpose to institutional honor codes (and will fully align with existing institutional policies) butwould have the advantage of being more clearly related to the opportunities and challengesassociated with engineering education. Student and faculty perceptions of these new codes ofethics will be assessed and reported.Additionally, given the similar nature of the two universities included in this preliminary study,further research in this area could be expanded to include different types of institutions withmore varied contexts.AcknowledgmentsAny opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of their institutions. The authors thank thestudents and
audience interested in the field of bioengineering. Afterwatching these student-produced videos, new students can assess their own understanding andperception of learning via suggested questions and surveys. This approach, namely the use ofvideo medium and student voice, has the potential to benefit both the creator and consumer ofthe videos, specifically in communication skills and understanding of courses.References Cited[1] D. Zhang, L. Zhou, R. O. Briggs, and J. F. Nunamaker, “Instructional video in e-learning:Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness,” Information &Management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 15–27, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004.[2] D. S. Kreiner, “Guided Notes and Interactive Methods for
, pp. 295–307, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1778336.[4] A. J. Carroll, S. J. Hallman, K. A. Umstead, J. McCall, and A. J. DiMeo, “Using information literacy to teach medical entrepreneurship and health care economics,” Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 163–171, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.577.[5] K. M. Klipfel, “Authentic engagement: Assessing the effects of authenticity on student engagement and information literacy in academic library instruction,” Reference Services Review, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 229–245, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1108/RSR-08-2013-0043.[6] J. Borycz, “Implementing Data Management Workflows in Research Groups Through Integrated Library Consultancy,” Data Science
figure to identify the probable mode(s) of heat transfer.During the review period, groups of students work together to come up withpotential exam problems related to the covered content and then identifystrategies, methodologies, and/or relevant equations to obtain solutions. Theprimary role of the instructor during these activities is to ensure that thediscussions are relevant to the upcoming exam’s content or focus. Reviewsessions are typically held the day before the exam, and the preview figures areprovided in advance. The review activity is based on various studies supportingcollaborative learning as study strategies that lead to enhanced academicperformance. The majority of participating students are in the third year of theirdegree
California and B.S. in Electronics and Communication Engineering from India.Dr. Pramod Abichandani, New Jersey Institute of TechnologyMs. Heydi L. Dominguez, New Jersey Institute of Technology Heydi Dominguez is a fourth-year undergraduate student pursuing her Bachelorˆa C™s Degree in Me- chanical Engineering and minoring in Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. Heydi is a first generation college student who isCraig IaboniKevin Alexander Nino ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Using the ARCS Model of Motivation to design 9-12 CS CurriculumAbstractThis ongoing project provides an overview on the use of the Attention, Relevance,Confidence
seventies,” Hum. Relat., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1179–1204, 1982.[5] S. Assegaff and A. R. C. Hussin, “Review of Knowledge Management Systems As Socio-Technical System,” p. 6.[6] E. Molleman and M. Broekhuis, “Sociotechnical systems: towards an organizational learning approach,” J. Eng. Technol. Manag., vol. 18, no. 3–4, pp. 271–294, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(01)00038-8.[7] T. Reiman and P. Oedewald, “Assessment of complex sociotechnical systems – Theoretical issues concerning the use of organizational culture and organizational core task concepts,” Saf. Sci., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 745–768, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.010.[8] S. Winter, N. Berente, J. Howison, and B. Butler, “Beyond the
teachers developed an engineering learning sequence thatconnected to a design opportunity within their local context (see Hammack et al., 2022 foradditional curriculum detail). After developing the lessons, participating teachers enacted thelessons with their elementary students. Participants included 43 4th and 5th grade students dividedinto two groups, those who attended school on a Native American reservation (n=23) and thosewho attended a small town school not located on a reservation (n=20). To measure the impacts ofthe program, students completed the Students Attitudes towards STEM survey ([S-STEM],Friday Institute, 2012) and the Engineering Identity Develop Scale ([EIDS], Capobianco et al.,2017) before and after engaging in the community
established.So far, there has been support from organizational structures and changes in individual coursessupport existing learning outcomes.References[1] K. Haas, “Sankey Diagram Analysis: Undergraduate Program Updates 2017-2019,” 2020.[2] N. Desai and G. Stefanek, “A Literature Review of the Different Approaches That Have Been Implemented to Increase Retention in Engineering Programs Across the United States,” in ASEE Zone II Conference, 2017.[3] Georgia Institute of Technology, “Deliberate Innovation, Lifetime Education: Final Report of the Commission on Creating the Next in Education,” 2018.[4] K. D. Hall, D. G. Linzell, B. S. Minsker, J. F. Hajjar, and C. M. Saviz, “Civil Engineering Education Summit: Mapping
Science, vol. 37, pp. 331-356, 2007.[4] W. Faulkner, "Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox," Engineering Studies, vol. 1, pp. 169-189, 2009.[5] M. Tremblay, T. Wils, and C. Proulx, "Determinants of career path preferences among Canadian engineers," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 19, pp. 1-23, 2002.[6] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, "Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis," Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 47, p. 36, 2000.[7] R. W. Lent, H.-B. Sheu, C. S. Gloster, and G. Wilkins, "Longitudinal test of the social cognitive model of choice in engineering
. She holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Minnesota. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering a Transfer Friendly Experience with Alternative Pathways to ExcellenceAbstract:The Alternative Pathways to Excellence (APEX) program is an NSF funded S-STEM Track 2project that seeks to strengthen efforts to recruit and retain STEM transfer students by integratingfinancial, academic, and practical supports.The APEX program provides student support services, formal and informal mentoring, curricularand co-curricular supports, and cohort building activities all formulated to create accessiblepathways into engineering careers for a population
Cincinnati. Along with his current role as the Manager of Diversity, Inclusion, and Community Engagement for the Co ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Greater Equity, Access, and Readiness for Success in Engineering and Technology (GEARSET) - An Alternate Pathway to Engineering and ETIntroductionThe Greater Equity, Access, and Readiness for Engineering and Technology (GEARSET)Program, an NSF funded S-STEM program was developed to address several institutional needsat the university. The original target population for the GEARSET program was identified as asubset of the students who applied to the College of Engineering (COE) at the University ofToledo (UToledo) and do not meet all the admissions
out a brief reflectivestatement to share in the main room.Workshop design strategies used within each component were guided by literatureEach workshop component utilized a variety of strategies [33] to ensure active participation andcreation of a safe environment (Table 1).Table 1. Workshop features selected during the design of the workshop. Workshop Design How it was employed Literature Basis Strategies Common vocabulary The workshop pre-work and A common vocabulary can help introduction component(s) participants feel comfortable using contained definitions of appropriate words to engage in common diversity, equity, and
, “Reading mastery as pedagogy of erasure,” J. Res. Rural Educ., vol. 26, no. 13, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/26-13.pdf.[16] E. Shizha, “Indigenous knowledge systems and the curriculum,” in African Indigenous Knowledge and the Disciplines, G. Emeagwali and G. J. S. Dei, Eds., Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2014, pp. 113–129. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6209-770-4_11.[17] M. Kovach, Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press, 2009. Accessed: Sep. 23, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://read.dukeupress.edu/ethnohistory/article/58/4/727/26209/Indigenous-Methodolo gies-Characteristics[18] G. J. S. Dei, “Indegenizing the school curriculum
engineering ethics, writing in the disciplines, and the development of professional skills.Shelly Sanders, Mississippi State University Shelly is currently an instructor in the Shackouls Technical Communication Program in Mississippi State University’s James Worth Bagley College of Engineering and has taught technical writing as well as various English composition and literature courses at MSU since 2005. She also tutored writing with the English department’s Writing Center from its inception in the early 2000’s until 2015. She holds a bachelor’s degree in English from The University of Alabama and a master’s degree in English from Mississippi State University. ©American Society for Engineering