views (n=12; 29%). The least frequently cited reasons for leaving the School of Engineering were: 1. I want to attend a school that is closer to my family (0) 2. I want to live in another part of the country. (0) 3. I don’t find my courses challenging enough. (0) A portion of the exit survey asked questions regarding types of instructional activitiescharacteristically linked to different learning styles. For example, a student who prefers activerather than reflective learning, and who felt their needs were not being met in the engineeringcurriculum, might be expected to choose the survey option “I want to take classes which give memore opportunities to: do hands-on experiments and laboratories.” On the
AC 2011-1650: STEM PROFESSIONALS WITH CLASSSharon F. Bendall, San Diego State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Sharon Bendall started her career as a professional physicist at IBM’s T.J. Watson Laboratory but early on switched her focus to physics education. She is an Adjunct Faculty member of the San Diego State University Physics Department and a Senior Scientist in SDSU’s Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education. As a nationally recognized materials developer and leader of professional develop- ment, she has been the PI or co-PI on many NSF grants in science. She has developed and implemented numerous content and pedagogical workshops for K-12 teachers, and is a
Faculty from a Research UniversityAbstractAs part of an extensive University - K-12 partnership program in STEM (science, technology,engineering and math) disciplines, more than 20 faculty members at Clarkson University havedeveloped and taught summer institutes and workshops for area middle and high school teachers.The goals of these interventions are to provide rigorous and state-of-the-art STEM contentknowledge, to model effective and active teaching strategies, and to prepare the teachers to bringthe new STEM content into their classrooms. The 5-day summer institutes provide rigorouscontent and hands-on activities for the teachers. The objective of this paper is to describe thedevelopment and assessment of the institutes.The design of the
, competency development, and understanding the experiences of traditionally marginalized people (e.g., Latinx, international students, Indigenous students) in engineering from an asset-based perspective. Homero is interested in understanding how to develop effective and culturally relevant learning environments that can promote the sustainable competencies engineering students require to succeed in the contemporary workforce. His goal is to develop engineering education practices that value the capital that traditionally marginalized students, bring into the field. Homero aspires to change discourses around broadening participation in engineering and promoting action to change. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching
of those particular courses. In this offering format, a program isstill able to teach the material that is deemed necessary for students to learn before they graduate,but allows students to apply that knowledge in particular applications that are of the most interestto them. For example, suppose that a program wishes to teach students how to design laboratoryexperiments. The program could teach this in one particular laboratory course. Or the programcould offer two or three laboratory courses that focus on different particular subdisciplines in thefield, and teach students in each of these courses how to design experiments. By requiring thatstudents take at least one of these elective courses, the program guarantees that the students
Paper ID #38870Adopting a Common Product Design Process across the UndergraduateMechanical Engineering CurriculumKatherine MathieuDr. Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Micah Lande, PhD is an Assistant Professor and E.R. Stensaas Chair for Engineering Education in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Dr. Lande directs the Holistic Engineering Lab & Observatory. He teaches human-centered engineering design, design thinking, and design innovation courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn and apply design
Paper ID #40818Promoting Successful Technical Apprenticeships: Aligning Industry andEducation Needs to Improve Employment Outcomes for Community CollegeStudentsDr. Guozhen An, Queensborough Community College Guozhen An is assistant professor of the Engineering Technology Department at Queensborough Com- munity College of CUNY. He received BS in Computer Science from Jilin University in China, MA in Computer Science from Queens College CUNY, and Ph.D in Computer Science from the Graduate Center of CUNY. He worked as researcher at SONY, AOL, and CUNY, and also has many years of teaching ex- perience at Queens College, York
Energy (DOE) for the year 2016-2021 with total funding of $1.8 million. For those not familiar, the Industrial As- sessment Centers help small and medium-sized U.S. manufacturers to save energy, improve productivity, and reduce waste by providing no-cost technical assessments conducted by university-based teams of en- gineering students and faculty. He is actively teaching several courses and pursuing research in advanced (smart/cyber) manufacturing and energy management to improve energy efficiency (reduced energy, cost, and throughput) for small to medium-sized manufacturers. In addition, he is a Matrixed Professor in the ENDEAVOR Digital Manufacturing Maker Space located in the new ENDEAVOR building, which is a
engineering education.Mr. James M Muscarella, Plymouth Whitemarsh High School Jim Muscarella is a physics and engineering teacher at Plymouth Whitemarsh High School in Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania. Over the past decade, he has created and developed an engineering program for high school students. Jim holds both a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and a M.S. in Education from Drexel University.Jessica S Ward, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Jessica S. Ward serves as the Director of Operations for DragonsTeach and the Program Manager for the Experiential Practices in Education Research and Teaching in STEM (ExPERTS) program. During her tenure at Drexel University, Ms. Ward has successfully coordinated with multiple
2011, Dr. Barankin was a lecturer at the Hanze University of Applied Sciences in Groningen, where he taught both in Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado
, ethical, and economic impact. 2(2) The students are walked through the process of solving the problem posed in the case studyin three steps: (2a) Use teaching techniques that help each student individually remember and understand concepts needed in solving the problem outside of the classroom. (2b) Maximize the time faculty are able to actively interact with students by using time in-class to let student teams apply what they know in analyzing the problem under faculty and TA guidance. (2c) Support student teams as they first design a solution to the problem, then implement that solution in the laboratory/class by using the tools and techniques
”, Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, USA, June 23-26, 2013.7. Y.-C. Liu, F. Baker, W.-P. He, and W. Lai, “Development, assessment and evaluation of laboratory experimentation for a mechanical vibrations and controls course”, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 47(4), 2019, 315-337.8. Y.-C. Liu and F. Baker, “Development of Vibration and Control Systems through Student Projects”, Proceedings of ASEE SE Section Annual Conference, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, March 10 – 12, 2019.9. M.A. Creasy, “How do you teach vibrations to technology students”, Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18
program administration, co-teaching the courses offered, and mentoring students in the program.Ms. Andrea L. Gorman, Marquette University Andrea L. Gorman is the graduate assistant for Engineering Leadership Programs in the Opus College of Engineering at Marquette University. She received her bachelor of science in business in supply chain and operations management from the University of Minnesota – Carlson School of Management and is pursuing a master of education in college student personnel administration at Marquette. As the graduate assistant for Engineering Leadership Programs, she assists with the administration and instruction of Engineers in the Lead (E-Lead), a people-centered, technical leadership program.Dr
to multidisciplinary engineeringprinciples through application to artificial organs. This project adapts and implements researchequipment and methodology used by medical and engineering researchers to teach engineeringprinciples. At the freshman level, students will be engaged in the scientific discovery processusing exciting hands-on design challenges to analyze artificial organs. In more advanced coreengineering courses and laboratories, students will explore the function of artificial organs in thelaboratory and investigate the variables affecting their performance.The engineering goals of this project are: (1) to explore the function of human and artificial or-gans; (2) to apply current research methodology state-of-the-art medical
. Transform Teaching and Learning: Improved retention as a result of expanding our undergraduate teaching assistance (UTA) programs and institutionalizing a formal UTA training pedagogy. A working knowledge in best practices will enable them to be both effective and engaging in the laboratory and/or classroom. 2. Increase Faculty and Student Interactions: Improved retention as a result of implementing University-wide and discipline-specific (intentional) community building activities that foster STEM students’ sense of identification with STEM departments.This project’s conceptual framework is built around three mutually intersecting groups: STEMfaculty, STEM undergraduates, and STEM Undergraduate Teaching
Paper ID #11480Recruiting and Retaining Women Engineers: An Analysis of a SuccessfulCollege ProgramDr. Andrea L Welker, Villanova University Dr. Andrea L. Welker, PE, is a professor in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University. Dr. Welker teaches a variety of geotechnical undergraduate and graduate classes, including soil mechanics, foundation design, geoenvironmental engineering, and geosynthetics. Her re- search focuses on the geotechnical aspects of stormwater control measures and the use of recycled materi- als in plastic pipes. In addition to teaching and performing research, she
printing techniques and are highly visual and interactive, allowingstudents to see trends in pressure, flowrate, and fluid paths, as well as manipulate and measureflow rates and temperatures while collaborating with their peers. Due to their compact size, lessthan 10 by 10 inches for most modules, LC-DLMs have been employed in a variety of classroomorientations including traditional classrooms containing tablet arm chair desks and largerlaboratory spaces. Compared to traditional laboratory teaching equipment, LC-DLMs are simpleto transport, construct, and deconstruct. Examples of current vacuum formed LC-DLM cartridgesformed over 3D printed molds are shown below in Figure 1. A B C Figure
WIPstudy are highlighted in Table 1:• Q14 – How do you think you are doing in your science course?• Q15 – Have you received any extra help outside of class from your science instructor or graduate teaching instructors?• Q18 – About how many hours outside of class each week do you spend studying material in your science course?The responses to these three questions, along with final science grades, are used to answer thefollowing questions:• What is the relationship between surveyed science grades and whether or not a student asks their science instructor or laboratory graduate teaching assistant for extra help?• What is the relationship between surveyed science grades and how much time each week is spent studying outside of class
Susan McCahan is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the Uni- versity of Toronto. She currently holds the positions of Vice-Provost, Innovations in Undergraduate Ed- ucation and Vice-Provost, Academic Programs. She received her B.S. (Mechanical Engineering) from Cornell University, and M.S. and Ph.D. (Mechanical Engineering) from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. She is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in recognition of contribu- tions to engineering education has been the recipient of several major teaching and teaching leadership awards including the 3M National Teaching Fellowship and the Medal of Distinction in Engineering Ed- ucation from
concerning innovation and creativity.• Instill Innovation across the curriculum (that is, within the teaching environment of all departments in the college).• Continue to support and further enrich the innovation-oriented classes that are currently in the curriculum of the college.• Establish an Innovation and Creativity Laboratory.• Establish an annual product innovation contest (with prize money) that encourages students to develop their own product ideas.In addition to the outcomes and recommendations listed above, SPIAC also crafted a matrix ofthe student characteristics exemplified at each of the four learning levels (shown previously inFigure 2) for each of the focus areas. Our intention is to use these characteristics as part of
sub-discipline of mechanical engineering and the coursesequence mentioned above. A lecture was first provided as an overview of the field of robotics.Historic development of industrial, walking, and mobile robots was reviewed with reference totechnical challenges and by highlighting the underlying dynamics and control problemswhenever appropriate. Furthermore, examples of contemporary uses of the robotics technology,such as robot-assisted surgery, the mars rover, robotic prosthetics, etc., were used to provide asense for where the future applications of robotics may go. In the next lecture period, studentsmet at the robotics laboratory. After a brief introduction about how to program a robot, eachstudent was given a chance to teach a couple
supported in part by NSF Award DGE-0538476.References1 Roth, W. M. Learning science through technological design. J Res Sci Teach 38, 768-790 (2001).2 Puntambekar, S. & Kolodner, J. L. Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. J Res Sci Teach 42, 185-217, doi:Doi 10.1002/Tea.20048 (2005).3 Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L. & Kolodner, J. L. Designing to learn about complex systems. J Learn Sci 9, 247-298 (2000).4 Wolf, S. J. & Fraser, B. J. Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Res Sci Educ 38, 321-341, doi:DOI 10.1007/s11165-007- 9052-y (2008).5 Mayer, R. E. Should
students, and her research in the areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 tech- nical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings – over 60 with students. He has authored three engineering texts on classical controls, linear systems, and multivariable control. Dr. Rodriguez has
-site courses at two to five different sites. These are delivered as single courses or part ofa degree program for the academic year. Summer offerings are rare except for laboratory coursesthat are included in the degree programs. These courses are also taught by part-time lecturersthough occasionally due to unique circumstances by full-time faculty as overload compensation.Examples of On-Site ProgramsBoston-North Shore Test Equipment ManufacturerAbout ten years ago the School of Engineering Technology was approached by a SoftwareEngineer to teach an on-site Associates Degree program. The majors were Manufacturing orElectrical Engineering Technology and Business. This paper addresses only the technologyprograms. Northeastern has an accredited
Facilitators forthe clustered courses. These students undergo extensive training during the summer andthe academic year. They become part of the instructional team for the orientation andlearning communities and are involved in the planning of activities and teaching. Forexample, the Orientation Leaders are an integral part of the planning process for theOrientation. They develop the instructional modules, write the skits and oversee theengineering design project and the science laboratory experience.Peer facilitators in the Seminar participate in teaching xourse material and are rolemodels for the entering students. In addition, they are tutors and act as “translators” andmediators, helping students make sense of the university and university
research interests include students’ wellness, scientific history, inclusive teaching, and food engineering. She has piloted a new class that focus on student’s well being and success, community building, and providing academic support for chemical engineering courses.Dr. Jason White, University of California, Davis Dr. Jason R. White is an Associate Professor of Teaching in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of California, Davis. Dr. White has been a faculty member at UC Davis since 2015, and he teaches process design and economics, process safety, bioseparations, and senior laboratory courses. He has helped lead the creation of the CHEM E CAD and Industrial Automation club at UC Davis, and he has
AC 2011-1073: ENGAGING CSULA ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN BIOMED-ICAL ENGINEERING LEARNING ACTIVITIES WITH THE TABLET PCDeborah Won, California State University, Los Angeles (CSULA) Deborah Won joined the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at CSULA as an Assistant Professor in Januray 2009. Her specialization is in biomedical engineering, and she has launched 3 new courses in biomedical engineering. She also enjoy teaching a variety of courses ranging from electronics to signal processing. She conducts research in the area of bioelectrical communication.Huiping Guo, California State University, Los AngelesJianyu Dong, California State University, Los Angeles
summary, and poster or video presentation. When theannouncement arrived, one of us (REY) was teaching Agricultural Engineering 423: Irrigationand Waste Management System Design, a one semester class that normally includes a teamdesign project, while the other (DRR) was contemplating co-teaching Agricultural Engineering433: Bioprocess System Design and Analysis for the first time, the following semester. As weconsidered the possibility of entering the Padnos competition, we realized that we could enhancethe students’ design experience by linking Irrigation and Waste Management System Design andBioprocess System Design and Analysis with a common design project. Furthermore, entering thedesign competition provided a hard deadline requiring clearly
software and laboratory technology into courses. 5. Introduce synthesis/systems/design perspective at an early level and reinforce it through later work. The “Aero Curriculum 2000” committee was charged with designing a framework for anew undergraduate curriculum for the department that helped the department accomplishits mission by addressing the goals and objectives listed above. While the college-wideCurriculum 2000 initiative instigated the formation of the committee, the opportunity wasused to design a curriculum that addresses issues raised by alumni surveys, industry feedback,the departmental review, and faculty discussions. Besides the inputs mentioned above, thecurrent curricula at MIT, GA Tech, Maryland, Ohio State and Purdue
Session 1608 The Use of Student Portfolios in Biological Engineering Instruction Ann D. Christy, Marybeth Lima The Ohio State University/Louisiana State UniversityAbstractThe creation of individual student portfolios to document and enhance the learning process hasbeen used with success in various teaching venues (e.g. architecture, fine arts and writingclasses). However, the use of portfolios as a learning tool in biological engineering instructionhas not been documented in the literature. Student portfolios were listed as a means ofassessment under the