Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. Anderson-Rowland was named a top 5% teacher in the Fulton Schools of Engineering for 2009-2010. She received the WEPAN Pres- ident’s Award 2014, WEPAN’s Engineering Educator Award 2009, ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. She has over 190 publications primarily in the areas of recruitment and retention of women and underrepresented minority engineering and computer science students. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and
Paper ID #11893Raising the Bar for Engineering: Why ABET is Necessary but not SufficientProf. Stephen J. Ressler, U.S. Military Academy Stephen Ressler, P.E. Ph.D. is Professor Emeritus from the U.S. Military Academy (USMA) at West Point and currently serves as President of the Board of Directors for Engineering Encounters, a non-profit organization founded to promote K-12 engineering outreach. He earned a B.S. degree from USMA in 1979, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 1989, and a Ph.D. from Lehigh in 1991. As an active duty Army officer, he served in a variety of military engineering
Paper ID #11553Reflection and Evaluation Data from e-Learning Modules on Learning Stylesand MotivationDr. Michele Miller, Michigan Technological University Dr. Michele Miller is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Technological University. She teaches classes on manufacturing and does research in engineering education with particular interest in hands-on ability, lifelong learning, and project-based learning.Parijata Prabhakara, Michigan Technological University Graduate student in Mechanical Engineering Peace Corps Masters International Program at Michigan Technological University; currently serving as a
the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. Anderson-Rowland was named a top 5% teacher in the Fulton Schools of Engineering for 2009-2010. She received the WEPAN Pres- ident’s Award 2014, WEPAN’s Engineering Educator Award 2009, ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. She has over 200 publications primarily in the areas of recruitment and retention of women and underrepresented minority engineering and computer science students. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and
Paper ID #13116Student-Generated Videos for Thermodynamics Teaching and LearningDr. James P Abulencia, Manhattan CollegeDr. Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering and an associate dean of engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also
various engineering, IT, and data analysis positions within academia and industry, including ten years of manufacturing experience at Delphi Automotive.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh Cheryl A. Bodnar, PhD, CTDP is an Assistant Professor (Teaching Track) in the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She obtained her certification as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques
Paper ID #13569A Preliminary Evaluation of Elementary School Teachers Willingness to GainCertification in Science or Mathematics in an Effort Towards Achieving School-wide STEM Certification (RTP, Strand 3)Dr. Stephanie C. Vereen, University of Alabama Dr. Vereen is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental En- gineering at the University of Alabama. Her research focus is on ensuring a sustainable and resilient workforce for engineering and skilled labor occupations.Ms. Allison D. Vereen, North Douglas Elementary, Douglas County School System Ms. Vereen is an Instructional Lead Teacher
Paper ID #11381Cross-Cultural Communication Training for Future Engineers - a model de-veloped at the Kazan National Research Technological University to preparestudents for mobility programs and the global market placeDr. Inna Mikhailovna Gorodetskaya, Kazan National Research Technological University Inna M. Gorodetskaya is associate professor at the Department of Engineering Education and Psychology of the Kazan National Research Technological University (Russia). She has PhD in Social Psychology and also works as a Head of minor degree program in Psychology at the university. Scientific interests: motivation, value system
Paper ID #12592Incorporating Engineering in the Biology Classroom (Curriculum Exchange)Wendy A Niesl, University of Minnesota STEM Education CenterDr. Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Guzey is an assistant professor of biology and biology education at Purdue University. Her research and teaching focus on integrated STEM Education.Dr. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and Director of STEM Integration in the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration
Paper ID #11691Multi-Course Problem-based Learning Module spanning across the Juniorand Senior Mechanical Engineering Curriculum: Mechatronics, Fluid Me-chanic, and Heat TransferDr. James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University James A. Mynderse, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. His research interests include mechatronics, dynamic systems, and control with applications to piezoelectric actuators, hysteresis, and perception. He serves as the faculty advisor for the LTU Baja SAE team.Dr. Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological
Paper ID #12830Video Based, Game Integrated Concept Tutors – Effectiveness in FreshmanCoursesDr. Eliza A Banu, Auburn University Dr. Eliza Banu has a Bachelors degree in Electrical Engineering from Polytechnic University of Bucharest and completed her Ph.D. program in Mechanical Engineering at Auburn University in 2014. Dr. Banu’s research interests are in the dynamics of impact of rigid bodies and human with granular matter as well as developing innovative instructional materials. She has been working with LITEE (Laboratory for Innovative Technology and Engineering Education) at Auburn University since 2010.Mr. Sai
Paper ID #11666Examining Relationships and Patterns in Pedagogical Beliefs, Attitudes andClassroom Practices for Faculty of Undergraduate Engineering, Math andScience Foundational CoursesProf. James A Middleton, Arizona State University James A. Middleton is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Director of the Cen- ter for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology at Arizona State University. For the last three years he also held the Elmhurst Energy Chair in STEM education at the University of Birmingham in the UK. Prior to these appointments, Dr. Middleton served as
Paper ID #13509An Analysis of Engineering Credits in ABET Accredited Engineering Man-agement ProgramsDr. Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., East Carolina University Paul J. Kauffmann is Professor Emeritus and past Chair in the Department of Engineering at East Car- olina University. His industry career included positions as Plant Manager and Engineering Director. Dr. Kauffmann received a BS degree in Electrical Engineering and MENG in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State and is a registered Profes- sional Engineer in Virginia and North Carolina.Dr. John Vail Farr
Paper ID #11765Leadership Capacity Building for Manufacturing EducationDr. Niaz Latif, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology) Dr. Niaz Latif is the Dean of the College of Technology at Purdue University Calumet (PUC). He has served for two years as the Dean of the Graduate School and additional two years as the Interim Asso- ciate Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Studies at PUC. He has been Principal Investigator for National Science Foundation grants and US Department of Labor grant. He oversaw more than eighty sponsored research/project grants with a value of more than $20 million. He has authored/co
Paper ID #13709Sometimes, Faculty Matter: The Contribution of Faculty Support to FutureEngagementDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence.Prof. Diane Carlson Jones Ph.D, University of WashingtonProf. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the
Paper ID #13794Collaborative Research: Center for Mobile Hands-on STEMProf. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is a professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering (ECSE) where he teaches courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research involves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photon- ics, biomedical sensors, engineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology enhanced learning. He learned problem solving from his father (ran a gray iron foundry), his
Paper ID #14090International Applications for Project Integrated Learning through Engage-ment in the Partnership for the Advancement of Collaborative EngineeringEducation (PACE)Dr. Patricia A. Sullivan, New Mexico State University Patricia A. Sullivan serves as Associate Dean for Outreach and Public Service and is Director of the En- gineering New Mexico Resource Network in the College of Engineering at New Mexico State University. She received her PhD in industrial engineering and has over 31 years’ experience directing statewide engineering outreach services that include technical engineering business assistance
Paper ID #14292Presentation of SALEIE- project supported by the EU-EACEA in the frame-work of Lifelong LearningProf. Anna Friesel, Technical University of Denmark Anna Friesel is Professor at the Center for Electro-technology, DTU Diplom - Technical University of Denmark, Campus Ballerup. She is also the president of the EAEEIE - European Association for Ed- ucation in Electrical and Information Engineering, which is a European non-profit organization, with members from nearly seventy European Universities, most of them teaching in the area of Electrical and Information Engineering (EIE). Anna Friesel is a member of the
Paper ID #11929Early Incorporation of Design for Manufacturing in the Engineering Cur-riculumMr. Aaron Lalley P.E., South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Aaron Lalley P.E. Instructor – Mechanical Engineering Department- South Dakota School of Mines and Technology RESEARCH AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Aaron Lalley is an instructor at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSM&T). His current research includes chatter modeling of a machin- ing process with fixture optimization. Previous research includes manufacturing process development for advanced solar cell production, ion implantation for
Paper ID #14154Using Baja SAE for International Student OutreachDr. Dale A. Wilson, Tennessee Technological University Dale Wilson is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at Tennessee Technological University. He received his BS, MS and PhD degrees from the University of Missouri-Columbia, all in Mechanical Engineering. He previously served for four years as department chair at Tennessee Tech and has thirty years of academic experience, and six years of industrial experience as a Senior Engineer at Pratt & Whitney Aircraft. He has applied research projects with numerous companies and government agencies. His research
average. It appears to be a growing trend that universities avoiddefining grades where a student is above average or below average, or compared to theperformance of other students in the class. Some describe grades such that all students in a class Page 26.856.3are “excellent” and have “superior achievement”. Some institutions only state that the student’sperformance in academic work is expressed by the following grades with the traditional list ofA=4.0, B=3.0, C=2.0, D=1.0 and F =0 for computation of a grade point average. Table 1. Common explanation of grades. Grade Grade Meaning of Grade
Paper ID #11719ENFUSE: Engaging Fundamentals and Systems Engineering in IntroductoryCircuitsDr. Paul G. Flikkema, Northern Arizona University Paul G. Flikkema is Director of the Informatics & Computing Program and a Professor of Electrical Engineering at Northern Arizona University. He is broadly interested in the properties of distributed natural and synthetic networked systems that sense and react to their environment, including decentralized and resilient systems. His current work includes research and education in energy-efficient embedded systems and networks and wireless sensor/actuator networks for monitoring
similarand all students take a multidisciplinary two-semester Introduction to Engineering course.Students in the first-semester Introduction to Engineering course work in teams to complete anumber of laboratory activities resulting in multiple team-authored reports. In Fall 2014 teams inthree sections of approximately twenty-five students were assigned to Treatment A and teams inthirteen similarly sized sections were assigned Treatment B. In Treatment B, faculty of varyingexperience and ability developed their own frameworks for forming, managing, and evaluatingteams. This makes the experiment somewhat un-controlled, but there was no way to create auniform framework in the Treatment B sections.The sixteen sections had 12 different professors. The
B R I A N L U K O F F, P H . D .APRIL 14, 2015BUT EVERYTHING MADESENSE IN CLASS! But everything made sense in class! The exam was nothing like the homework! The test wasn’t an accuratereflection of my true knowledge!Three problems1. Students don’t understand fundamental concepts1. Students don’t understand fundamental concepts2. Students don’t know what they don’t know1. Students don’t understand fundamental concepts2. Students don’t know what they don’t know Source: Poh, M. Z., Swenson, N. C., & Picard, R. W. (2010). A Wearable Sensor for Unobtrusive, Long-Term Assessment of Electrodermal Activity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 57(5).1. Students don’t understand fundamental concepts2. Students
interaction scaffolding that specifies roles, sequences group activities, and provides question prompts for social interactions among student team members to effectively engage them in task-related social interaction. The other is the cognitive cooperation scaffolding that guides students’ cognitive processes relating to the specific learning tasks at hands. Detailed description of the two types of scaffolding can be retrieved from the previously published ASEE conference paper 21. Table 2 Different students’ team groups and corresponding instruction (input variables) Team Groups Instructional Materials Provided to Students A Collaborative learning requirements only B Collaborative
y a x3 b x2 c x (30)where a , b , and c are presumed to be positive constants. This particular equation, referred toas the cubic law, is selected because its graph has the following additional properties, beyond theproperty described above, which qualify it to be a suitable approximation for an actual trajectoryof a projectile: 1. The graph has an intercept at the origin (corresponding to the projection point). 2. The graph has a relative maximum (i.e., an apex for the projectile trajectory) at b 2 3a c b x (31
effectiveness in regards to the project’s purpose and information’s credibility. One of the librarians presented an option to use for evaluating information sources. The ABCD process was adapted from a pneumonic that was used at Harvard University Libraries. The “A” represents Authority---who provided the information and what is the affiliation of the person. “B” represents bias. Is it obvious that the creator has a specific point of view or is there an effort to represent the entire picture? Bias is not necessarily bad, but must be recognized and used properly in the project. “C” stands for how current the item is. If recent information is required on a topic, something from 1975 probably will not be adequate. Students were
Measure of Similarity Classified Course A AND / OR Classified Course B Quantitative By Outcome Summary Figure 4: Depiction of the Function of the Mathematical Model Page 26.795.7Use of the Proposed Methodology Thus FarIdentify System to ModelClearly, the first step in
, mechanical, aerospace, andchemical engineering involve the study of interconnected dynamic systems modeled bydifferential or difference equations, such as feedback control systems. The traditional frameworkfor the analysis and design of such systems is based on the transfer function, which modelssingle-input single-output (SISO) linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. It can be defined by takingthe Laplace transform of a differential equation (in continuous time) or the z-transform of adifference equation (in discrete time).In the continuous LTI case, the differential equation may be written the form ua(D) = yb(D),where u ∈ C∞ is the input signal, y ∈ C∞ is the output signal, a, b ∈ R[x] are real polynomials withb = 0, and D is the differential