engineering field.From the age of infancy to just before kindergarten, children absorb information like a sponge.The skills needed to become a computer engineer include heavy communication skills andanalytical/critical thinking skills. These skills needed to become computer engineers can betaught as early as The Children Center teachers fundamental motor skills to infants. Focusingchildren on LDC (language development and communication), MTE (mathematical thinking andexpression), and CD (cognitive development) can tune a child from an early age to have the mindof a computer engineer. Programs can be developed in schools and early childcare facilities likeTCC, for children to have like-minded computer-focused skills. These programs would be forlong
of theprogram’s leadership and faculty in order to guide the program more effectively. The advisorygroups are sometimes used to provide a certain type of membership status, for example inArchitectural Engineering Technology programs often seek out retired construction related firmleaders or potential donors. Keep in mind that advisory groups do not have formal authority togovern the organization, that is, they cannot issue directives that must be followed. Rather,advisory groups serve to make recommendations and/or provide key information, materials, andresources to the program’s leadership.3We have been fortunate to attract industry leaders from different parts of the constructionindustry to actively participate on the advisory board and
Pernicious Einstellung (Set) EffectAbstract – The Einstellung Effect occurs when the first solution that comes to mind, often triggeredby improper initial intuition, prevents a correct solution from being found. The Einstellung effecthas been a frequent stumbling block for students when learning dynamics due to their conceptualmisunderstanding. Although the phenomenon has been studied in cognitive psychology, it has notbeen seen in the engineering education literature. This paper will investigate how scaffoldingthrough proper question prompts could avoid this phenomenon. Examples and assessment resultswill be provided to demonstrate the effectiveness.By sharing our practice on the Einstellung effect prevention, we intend to inform
as “mother,” and one or moretopics in “daughter” and “son” roles. Once the family association is made, information about thefamily can be determined about parents and children, siblings, and even such things as cousins ina larger map.Topic mapping is similar to the much more widely known methodologies of concept mappingand mind mapping, but is relatively new and have not yet found wide use in educational settings.Topic maps differ from the others in several important aspects that should be useful for learningmany engineering domains. Concept maps (and mind maps) are both mainly used to representhierarchical information with the most important topic at the center (or top), and subtopicsarranged in a tree. Topics become farther from the main
Learning and Development”3 published in 1984 has become the foundation for the subject andmost, if not all, future work on this subject. David A. Kolb’s ideas have had a dramatic impact on thedesign and development of lifelong learning models. His work can be traced back to that famous dictum Proceedings of the 2007 Middle Atlantic Section Fall Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2of Confucius around 450 BC: "Tell me, and I will forget. Show me, and I may remember. Involve me,and I will understand."The concept of experiential learning explores the cyclical pattern of all
Paper ID #13115How Misconceptions Might be Repaired through Inquiry Based ActivitiesMs. Gina Cristina Adam, University of California, Santa Barbara Gina C. Adam is pursuing her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and a M.A. in Teaching and Learning at University of California, Santa Barbara. Her main research interest is conceptual understanding in engi- neering education. Additionally, she helped as a graduate student researcher in two large scale engineering education projects, one related to developing a taxonomy for the field supervised by Dr. Cynthia Finelli at University of Michigan and one on pioneers in
. Bransford, et al., Eds., How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2003.[9] C. Venters, et al., "Using Writing Assignments to Improve Conceptual Understanding in Statics: Results Page 23.1348.14 from a Pilot Study," presented at the ASEE 112th Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[10] J. H. Hanson and J. M. Williams, "Using Writing Assignments to Improve Self-Assessment and Communication Skills in an Engineering Statics Course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, pp. 515-529, Oct 2008.[11] P. Alexander and P. Winne, Eds
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings The Development of Low-Cost Programmable Logic Controller Labs for a Control Systems Course Benjamin D. McPheron* Devin J. Goodrich Michael Q. Mullinix Anderson University Anderson University Anderson University bdmcpheron@anderson.eduAbstractMany engineering disciplines require an undergraduate course in control systems, but fewintroduce students to programmable logic controllers (PLCs), which are commonly used toimplement real-time process control in industry. Curricular exposure to PLC systems is desirablefor many internship and full-time career opportunities for students studying
Session 005 E-COACH: Successful Career Advising Tool for High School Juniors Charlotte Welch Smith Counseling Department Frenship High School Jennifer Spurrier Higher Education Program Educational Psychology and Leadership Texas Tech University James Gregory Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Texas
Full Paper: Advice From a First Year StudentAbstractMuch attention is paid to the transition from high school to college. Students who haverecently gone through this transition may have some of the best advice to offer in-comingfirst year students. With this in mind, 152 students completing the second course of acommon first year engineering program were given team assignments (for a total of 42teams) asking them to provide approximately 6 pieces of advice for next year’s first yearstudents. Major advice offered by the students included the following themes: timemanagement, utilizing resources, hard work, preparation (the importance of which maybe emphasized by the “flipped “class format), teaming (which may have arisen due to theteam-nature
-the arttechnology knowledge, in comparison with company engineers who may have graduated five toten years before. This new information from classes provides a way of thinking outside the boxand allows fresh minds to suggest new ideas [1].Also, there can be some synergy between the classes, the internship and the research project asshown in Figure 1. First the student gets a strong background in classes. During the graduateinternship, the student gets a deeper background and foundation on the topic. Additionally s/helearns the constraints, limitations and other issues that must be addressed within the industrialenvironment that might be overlooked in academics. Next, the student takes this industrialrelevance and applies it to future classes
Paper ID #11769Developing and Advancing a Cyberinfrastructure to Gain Insights into Re-search Investments: An Organizing Research FrameworkDr. Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Ann F. McKenna is a Professor in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and Director of The Poly- technic School at Arizona State University. Prior to joining ASU she served as a program director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education, and was on the faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Segal Design Institute at Northwestern University. Dr. McKenna received her
Paper ID #6112Developing Mathematical Intuition by Building Estimation SkillsDr. Rebecca Bourn, Tribeca Flashpoint Media Arts Academy Dr. Bourn designed the math curriculum for the Core Studies Program at the Tribeca Flashpoint Media Arts Academy. She received her PhD in Applied Mathematics from the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science.Dr. Sarah C. Baxter, University of South Carolina Professor Baxter is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of South Carolina. She received her PhD in Applied Mathematics from the University of Virginia School of
topics such as environmental engineering. Weare therefore recommending the implementation of a Mechanical Design for the Environmentcourse as an advanced undergraduate elective course or a graduate course. The course will serve as an introduction to green technology and design for theenvironment. With this objective in mind, the course is divided into two parts. Topics of eachpart are shown in Table 1 below.Table 1: Course Outlines Part I Part II 1. What is Environmental Engineering? 7. The Manufacturing Process Design Rules. Page 3.563.7 2. Green Engineering and Environmentally 8
Paper ID #41510Unpacking Critical Socializers Impacting STEM Students’ Motivation at aMinority Serving InstitutionDr. Jeffrey Stransky, Rowan University Dr. Stransky is a post-doctoral research associate in the School of Applied Engineering and Technology at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He obtained his PhD in Engineering Education and MS in Mechanical Engineering from ¬¬Rowan university. Dr. Stransky seeks to understand the engineering ideologies that promote potential disparities between engineers’ practices and their micro- and macroethics. Dr. Stransky is passionate about developing innovative educational
Paper ID #11016Methodology of Creativity and Creative Thinking: Structure and Content ofEducational ClusterDr. Lev Vadimovich Redin, Kazan National Research Technological University, Russia Ph.D. in Engineering, Dr. of Engineering and Educational Sciences, Cand. Tech.Sci., Chief Designer, Associate Professor, Inventor (88 Patents) Institutions: Kazan National Research Technological University (KNRTU) • Institute of Additional Pro- fessional Education • The Department of Engineering Pedagogic and Psychology Official address: Kazan National Research Technological University (KNRTU) Institute of Additional Professional
]. Page 7.1213.1This would eliminate the down-time often associated with training. Second, there would “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education” Session 1520a smaller chance for the learners to forget the knowledge required to performed their task.Finally, the use of strong visuals such as pictures, diagrams and movies would minimizemistakes resulting from misidentification of tools or parts. This was the argumentpresented by Morales at an Information Systems Division session during the 2001 ASEENational Meeting [2].In this
Paper ID #9774Transfer-to-Excellence: Research Experiences for Undergraduates at Cali-fornia Community CollegesDr. Sharnnia Artis, University of California, Berkeley Dr. Sharnnia Artis is the Education and Outreach Director for the Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science, a NSF-funded Science and Technology Center at the University of California, Berkeley. She oversees undergraduate research programs to recruit and retain underrepresented students in science and engineering and science and also outreach to pre-college students to introduce them to the exciting career opportunities in science and engineering. Dr
a young age when their minds are capable of freelyexploring and brainstorming new and creative ideas. K-12 students are at a perfect age to betaught the basic principles of nanotechnology so that they may gain an interest and pursue a Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Arlington, March 21 – 23, 2013. Copyright 2013, American Society for Engineering Educationcareer in this rapidly growing field. Teaching K-12 students is an important concern becausetheir knowledge and interests will transform the future of nanotechnology. These students needthe motivation to instigate a thought-provoking interest in bio
Software Engineering: Concepts and Techniques. In: Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech (eds.) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, pp.1-48[8] Fischer G, McCall R, Morch A (1989) Design Environments for Constructive and Argumentative Design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Wings for the mind, New York, NY, US, pp. 269-275[9] MacLean A, Young RM, Bellotti VME, Moran T (1996) Questions, Options and Criteria. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds.) Design Rationale, Concepts, Techniques and Use, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 53-106[10] Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action
Paper ID #10351What is Design for Social Justice?Dr. Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines Jon A. Leydens is an associate professor in the Division of Liberal Arts and International Studies at the Colorado School of Mines, USA, where he has been since 1997. Research and teaching interests include communication, social justice, and engineering education. Dr. Leydens is a co-author of Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (2010). He recently served as guest editor for an engineering communication special issue in Engineering Studies and won the James F. Lufkin Award for the best con- ference paper—on the
active learningand scaffolding in mind. Additionally, students walk away from the lab proud of creating auseful product – a set of course notes looking like a regular softbound textbook.Curriculum ContextEngineering of manufacturing processes is a four credit-hour, one-semester engineering courseoffered once a year to juniors, seniors and graduate students in the three engineering programs atColorado State University - Pueblo, BS in Industrial Engineering, BS in Engineering withSpecialization in Mechatronics, and MS in Industrial and Systems Engineering. The course isrequired for students in the two BS programs, industrial engineering and mechatronics.Therefore, students of somewhat varying engineering backgrounds and affinities enroll
Computer Assisted Learning, 23, pp. 111-119.3. McKeachie, W.J., P.R. Pintrich, Y-G Lin, D.A. Smith, and R. Sharma (1990). Teaching and Learning in theCollege Classroom: A Review of the Research Literature (2E), Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.4. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience,and School (Expanded Edition), Washington, DC: National Academy Press.(http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6160)5. Larkin-Hein, T., and D.D. Budny (2001). “Research on Learning Style: Applications in the Physic andEngineering Classrooms.” IEEE Tr. Ed. 44(3), pp 272–281.6. Felder, R.N., and L.K. Smith (1988). “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering.” J. Eng. Ed.78(7), pp 674–681. (See also a recent
a member of the educational team for the Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN).Dr. Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University Dr. Johannes Strobel is Director, Educational Outreach Programs and Associate Professor, Engineering & Education at Texas A&M, College Station. He received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in Information Science & Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri. His research/teaching focuses on engineering as an innovation in pK-12 education, policy of STEM education, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering, engineering ’habits of mind’ and empathy and care in engi- neering. He has published more than 140 journal articles and
AC 2011-404: JUST-IN-TIME APPROACH TO INTEGRATE A DESIGNPROJECT INTO MECHANICS OF MATERIALSJoseph J. Rencis, University of Arkansas Joseph J. Rencis is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. He was Head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering from 2004 to 2010. He held the inaugural en- dowed Twenty-first Century Leadership Chair in Mechanical Engineering from 2007 to 2010. From 1985 to 2004 he was professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. His research focuses on boundary element methods, finite element methods, atomistic modeling, and en- gineering education. He currently serves on the editorial board of Engineering Analysis
putstudents in the position where they need to sort out for themselves what parts of the taxonomyare relevant to the problem at hand. Students may find this approach more demanding at first,but we believe that this will better prepare them for the workplace and for life-long learning.(This work was supported primarily by the Engineering Research Centers Program of theNational Science Foundation under Award Number EEC9876363).Bibliography1. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.2. Schwartz, D. L. & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition Instruction, 16, 475-522.3. Schwartz, D. L, Brophy, S., Lin, X. &
Paper ID #15001Using Transnational Online Learning Experiences for Building InternationalStudent Working Groups and Developing Intercultural CompetencesMr. Dominik May, TU Dortmund University Dominik May holds a degree in Industrial Engineering from TU Dortmund University (Germany). Cur- rently he is a research associate and doctoral candidate at the Center for Higher Education at TU Dort- mund University in the area of engineering education research. In his position he is managing several research and development projects on engineering education and technical training. Furthermore he of- fers workshops on professional
Paper ID #41768Nurturing Student Innovation and Leadership through Student-Initiated InterestGroupsDr. Match Ko, University of Hong Kong Dr. Match Wai Lun Ko is a Senior Lecturer and MSc(Eng) in Mechanical Engineering Programme Director in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, the University of Hong Kong. He is also fractionally appointed in Innovation Academy, Faculty of Engineering of HKU. Dr. Ko obtained his B.Eng and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Before joining HKU, he was an Assistant Professor in Nazarbayev University, Postdoctoral Fellow in the Hong Kong
Paper ID #27333Partners in Professional Development: Initial Results from a CollaborationBetween Universities, Training Programs, and Professional SocietiesDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Assistant Dean for Graduate Student Services at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her
Paper ID #23157A Model for Spurring Organizational Change Based on Faculty ExperiencesWorking Together to Implement Problem-based LearningProf. Shannon Massie Chance, Dublin Institute of Technology Prof. Shannon Chance is a licensed architect with 18 years of experience teaching three major subjects: ar- chitecture (at Virginia Tech and Hampton University, where she was Professor of Architecture), education (at William and Mary University), and engineering (at Dublin Institute of Technology in Ireland where she serves as Lecturer in the School of Multidisciplinary Technologies). Alongside teaching, Shannon earned a PhD in