effectiveness within four categories, learning achievement, self-efficacy, satisfaction, and climate. Compared to traditional TVLE where the participants are allstudents; our participants range from pre-college to college students, faculty, and staff. AlthoughTVLE was created with students’ learning in mind, the framework applies to all educationalvirtual environments where learning is an integral outcome part of programming.ParticipantsThe research reflects the experiences of four practitioners at the University of Cincinnati Collegeof Engineering and Applied Science (CEAS), a historically white tier-1 research institution. Thepractitioners voluntarily agreed to participate in this research study and to have their recordedexperiences included as part
AC 2009-1879: THE BIG PICTURE: USING THE UNFORESEEN TO TEACHCRITICAL THINKINGChristy Moore, University of Texas, Austin CHRISTY MOORE is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin where she teaches engineering communication courses and a signature course on “Society, Technology, and the Environment.” Her pedagological and research interests include service-learning projects, engineering ethics and professional responsibility, research ethics, and strategies for advancing students' analytical and rhetorical skills. She is co-PI on an NSF project, The Foundations of Research Ethics for Engineers (FREE) and collaborated on the
AC 2009-1469: INSIDE THE DESIGN CHALLENGE: MOTIVATING STUDENTSTHROUGH THE DESIGN PROCESSDebbie Mullins, Texas Space Grant Consortium Debbie Mullins has a been a Higher Education Program Coordinator for the Texas Space Grant Consortium (TSGC) since 1999. She was instrumental in designing the features of TSGC's flagship higher education program: The TSGC Design Challenge Program in 2002 and has been responsible for managing the program since its inception.Wallace Fowler, University of Texas, Austin Wallace Fowler is the Paul D. & Betty Robertson Meek Centennial Professor in Engineering and Distinguished Teaching Professor at the University of Texas at Austin. He was the 2000-2001
further confirmation that the capstone experience was the appropriate vehiclefor achieving the course outcomes.On the items relating to more general social and communication skills (Figures 11 and 12), thecourse did not seem to make much impact, at least in the students’ own minds.5. SummaryThe second of two courses whose development was funded by an NSF CCLI grant has beendescribed. The courses address a critical need in the development of mechatronics systems, amultidisciplinary area of increasing importance in products and processes in engineering,particularly in the automotive industry. A major aspect of the course construction was tosupplement theoretical treatment of sensors and actuators with laboratory exercises that requiredworking with
Paper ID #12160Enhancing TA Grading of Technical Writing: A Look Back to Better Under-stand the FutureDr. Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the connection
Paper ID #11806Constructionist Learning for Environmentally Responsible Product DesignProf. Kyoung-Yun Kim, Wayne State University Dr. Kyoung-Yun Kim is an associate professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Wayne State University, where he directs the Computational Intelligence and Design Informatics (CInDI) Laboratory. Dr. Kim’s research focuses on design science; design informatics; semantic assembly design; transformative product design; product life-cycle modeling; design and manufacturing of soft products. Dr. Kim has received external funding from several U.S. federal agencies including NSF
Paper ID #26315Avoiding the Pitfalls in International Collaborations - A Case StudyDr. Cem Karacal, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Dr. Cem Karacal is a Professor of Industrial Engineering and Dean of the School of Engineering at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. He obtained his Ph.D. and M.S. degrees from Oklahoma State University in 1991 and 1986, respectively. His received his B.Sc. degree from Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey in 1982. He has experience in industry and academia. His main research and teaching interest areas are simulation modeling, quality control, operations research
Session 1566 Teaching Finite Element Analysis as a Solution Method for Truss Problems in Statics Jiaxin Zhao Indiana University–Purdue University Fort WayneAbstractFinite Element Analysis (FEA) is a very powerful tool that is used in virtually every area in thefield of Mechanical Engineering and many other disciplines. It is beneficial for the mechanicalengineering students to have exposure to this tool as early as possible and as frequently aspossible in their engineering education. The earliest time comes when they are taught the trussproblems in Statics
Freshmen Seminars [1] and Introduction to Aerospace and Design,which is the topic of this paper. Other students may be interested in aerospace engineering but areuncertain whether to select it as their field of study, while a third group of students desires someexposure to aerospace and design. The MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics first cre-ated the Freshman elective Introduction to Aerospace Engineering to assist students interested inmajoring in the field. To make the course more exciting, the design and construction of a modelblimp was integrated into the subject. Over the past three years (1995–1998) several innovations have been introduced in the courseand the name was changed in 1996 to Introduction to Aerospace and Design to
experience. In industry they saw that new engineers often had not learned thefundamental considerations in choosing an appropriate material or shape in their designs. Thispaper provides all necessary details to recreate these labs and discusses two years of instructionalexperience obtained under NSF-ECSEL sponsorship.LAB 1- Choosing from Commonly Stocked MaterialsThis lab addresses the different materials stocked in lengths, such as steel or aluminum bar, pipe,structural shapes, or rectangular tube. It provides a hands on view of the material obtained fromfour processes: Hot Rolling (HR), Cold Rolling or Cold Drawing a.k.a. Cold Finished (CF),Extrusion, and Roll Forming. The students learn how each process affects geometry, strength,stiffness
dominated by nanotechnology, bioengineering, andother promising but potentially problematic technologies (in his 2006 Liberal Education DivisionDistinguished Lecture “The Unleashed Human Mind: Liberating Education for the 21stCentury”18).We chose the learning outcomes and formal title (“Engineering Professional Development 690:Social and Ethical Impacts of Technology—Literature and Discussion”) with an eye toward ourexperiences with the pilot course, the mission of our department within our College ofEngineering, and the ABET “professional skills” criteria. The five learning outcomes wedesigned for students were • Outcome 1: Articulate connections among engineering, ethics, community, history, social change, and politics by actively
Paper ID #34240Learning a Second Language and Learning a Programming Language: AnExplorationMs. Jutshi Agarwal, University of Cincinnati I am a PhD candidate in Engineering Education with a research focus on professional development for future faculty. Currently, I am the Lead Graduate Teaching Assistant for the first year engineering design course with an enrollment of 1300 students across all engineering majors.Dr. Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati Gregory Bucks joined the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati in 2012. He received his BSEE from the Pennsylvania State University
Paper ID #34230An Undergraduate Course on Renewable Energy Systems with EnhancedMarineEnergy ContentDr. Radian G. Belu, Southern University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Dr. Radian Belu is Associate Professor within Electrical Engineering Department, Southern University, Baton, Rouge, USA. He is holding one PHD in power engineering and other one in physics. Before joining to Southern University Dr. Belu hold faculty, research and industry positions at universities and research institutes in Romania, Canada and United States. He also worked for several years in indus- try as project manager, senior engineer
Paper ID #19316A Socio-cognitive Framework and Method for Studying Technology-mediatedProblem SolvingDarren K. Maczka, Virginia Tech Darren Maczka is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His background is in control systems engineering and information systems design and he received his B.S. in Computer Sys- tems Engineering from The University of Massachusetts at Amherst. He has several years of experience teaching and developing curricula in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech.Dr. Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering
Paper ID #25687Board 1: In the Business of Innovation: Development of a Canvas Tool toPromote and Sustain Pedagogical Risk Taking by FacultyRohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University Rohini Abhyankar is a third year graduate student at Arizona State University’s Engineering Education Systems and Design doctoral program. Rohini has a Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Syra- cuse University and Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in Physics from University of Delhi, India. Rohini has over ten years each of industry and teaching experience. Her dissertation focus is on understanding the strategies adopted by early
Culture Shock: Acclimating as a New Faculty Member Adrienne R. Minerick1, Jason M. Keith2 1 Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical Engineering Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS 39672 / 2 Department of Chemical Engineering Michigan Technological University Houghton, MI 49931AbstractNobody said that the first year of teaching engineering and mentoring graduate studentsat a college or university was going to be easy. With the
front of experiencedinstructors who provided me with valuable feedback. Page 7.1005.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002 American Society for Engineering Education During ISW, I was exposed to a vast curriculum of teaching principles including Felder’slearning styles, Bloom’s Taxonomy, classroom assessment techniques, effective questioning, andactive learning. As a new instructor, I was not expected to master all the valuable informationthat went racing past me. But this formal training left me with a binder of
Paper ID #6942PERFORMANCE-CENTERED ADAPTIVE CURRICULUM FOR EMPLOY-MENT NEEDSProf. Clara P´erez-Molina, DIEEC - National Distance Education University Clara P´erez Molina received her MSc degree in Physics from the Complutense University in Madrid and her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the National Distance Education University (UNED). She has worked as researcher in several national and European projects and has published different technical reports and research articles for journals and conferences, as well as teaching books. She has received the UNED’s Social Council Award for the best Didactic Materials in
-termchallenges and operating in reactionary mode. There was a sense of cultural decay, as leadersstruggled to notice what the organization was doing well. The dean, his executive team, and theDirector of Leadership Development began to lay plans for a concerted, systemic leadershipdevelopment program that would help College leaders to remember and imagine the organizationat its best, with its strengths at the forefront of their minds. Carrying these goals, the leadershipdirector then partnered with a positive leadership external consultant to produce a year-long,research-based Michigan Engineering Positive Leadership Program, driven by several questions:What kind of culture do we hope to create with the engineering leaders? How can we focus onthe
differential contextdependence across courses and disciplines. This research is vital, however to be able to useinterview methods to investigate individuals’ understandings of engineering phenomenon.References1. Andrews, B., S. Brown, and D. Montfort, Student Understanding of Sight Distance in Geometric Design: A Beginning Line of Inquiry to Characterize Student Understanding of Transportation Engineering. Transportation Research Record, 2011.2. National Research Council How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. ed. J. Bransford, et al. 1999, National Academy Press: Washington, D.C. xxiii, 319 p. Page
] P. E. Doolittle, “Understanding Cooperative Learning through Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development.,” 1995.[3] J. G. Greeno, A. M. Collins, and L. Resnick, “Cognition and learning,” in Cognition and Learning, 1996, pp. 15–46.[4] L. S. VYGOTSKY, Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, 1978. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.[5] A. Bandura, “Albert Bandura- Social Learning Theory,” Simply Psychology, 1977.[6] J. P. Martin, D. R. Simmons, and S. L. Yu, “The Role of Social Capital in the Experiences of Hispanic Women Engineering Majors,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 227–243, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1002/jee.20010.[7] S. Freeman et al., “Prescribed Active Learning Increases
Paper ID #36987Using Six Sigma to Improve Student Teamwork Experienceand Academic Performance in Circuits Analysis CourseAdel W. Al Weshah (Lecturer) Dr. Al Weshah is a lecturer in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the College of Engineering at the University of Georgia. He is also affiliated with the Engineering Education Transformational Institute (EETI). His engineering educational research interests include remote labs and developing innovative instructional materials and techniques.Ruba Alamad Limited-term Assistant Professor in Industrial and Systems Engineering at Kennesaw State
instrumentation and measurement solutions for manufacturing systems and medical diagnostics and imaging systems.Mr. Sangwoon KimDr. David Donghyun Kim, Massachusetts Institute of Technology David Donghyun Kim received a Bachelor of Applied Science in Mechanical Engineering with Manage- ment Science Option from the University of Waterloo and received Master of Science and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from MIT. He is interested in mechanical design for robotic systems. His fundamental research background in CAD/CAM, mainly focusing on 5-axis CNC milling, allowed him to design with manufacturing in mind. He invented and developed multiple mechatronics systems pushing the limits on the current industrial standards
Paper ID #32763Instruments Used to Capture Instructors’ Experiences During a ForcedMove to Remote InstructionDr. Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Grace Panther is an Assistant Professor at the University of Nebraska Lincoln. She has experience con- ducting workshops at engineering education conferences and has been a guest editor for a special issue of European Journal of Engineering Education on inclusive learning environments. Her research areas include spatial visualization, material development, faculty discourses on gender, and defining knowledge domains of students and practicing engineers.Prof. Heidi A
Paper ID #33061Analysis of STEM Students’ Ability to Respond to Algebra, Derivative,and Limit Questions for Graphing a FunctionDr. Emre Tokgoz, Quinnipiac University Emre Tokgoz is currently the Director and an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at Quinnipiac University. He completed a Ph.D. in Mathematics and another Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineer- ing at the University of Oklahoma. His pedagogical research interest includes technology and calculus education of STEM majors. He worked on several IRB approved pedagogical studies to observe under- graduate and graduate STEM students’ calculus and
undergraduate programs. As part of this expansion, thiscourse has been re-designed, with the following primary goals in mind: • To re-design major courses in computer science programs as school initiated ABET accreditation process in 2016, • To align with newly offered undergraduate programs in computer sci- ence and engineering within the school, • To introduce project-based components to a sophomore-level computer organization and architecture class, 4Figure 2: Program of study by percentages (N=42). One student in Fall2019 cohort is studying two programs: Computer Science and Cybersecurity.WCBT Undecided are those undergraduate students, who have not decidedon their major studies yet
Paper ID #30667The RED Teams Start Up Session: Leveraging Research with Practice forSuccess in Academic ChangeDr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, In- ternational Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly, among
The Practices of Play and Informal Learning in the miniGEMS STEAM Camp Chaoyi Wang, Dr. Michael Frye, Dr. Sreerenjini Nair Autonomous Vehicle Systems Laboratory, University of the Incarnate Word 4301 Broadway Street, San Antonio, Texas, 78209, the United States E-mail: chwang2@student.uiwtx.edu Abstract on providing learning and research opportunities for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics underrepresented communities.(STEM) play an important role in the educational reform miniGEMS has developed very fast in the past threeand global economy. However, STEM
Paper ID #11519Improving Image Quality of a Color Infrared Digital Camera mounted on aSmall UAV Platform: An Iterative Active Learning ExperienceMr. Christopher E Hartman, University of Maryland, Eastern ShoreDr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Dr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri is currently a Professor in the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences at University of Maryland Eastern Shore. He is a member American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and, American Society for Agricultural and Biological Engineers(ASABE) and is actively involved in
interest in higher education pedagogy. He was Professor of Communications at Kettering University prior to joining the faculty at Michigan Tech. While at Kettering, he received the Distinguished Teaching Award and the Charles L. Tutt, Jr. Innovative Teaching Award. He has published extensively in the area of pedagogical design, innovation, and experimentation. Page 12.1078.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 MOM in Action1. IntroductionThe application of mechanics of materials continues to grow beyond aerospace, civil and mechan-ical engineering where it