“The Future of Engineering Education,” NASA Research Brief, Vol. 3, Issue 1, January 29, 20105 “Why Accreditation Matters,” Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology, www.abet.org6 “The Future of Engineering Education, II. Teaching Methods That Work,” R.M. Felder, D.R. Woods, J.E. Stice,A. Rugarcia, Chemical Engineering Education, Volume 34(1), 2000, p. 26.7 Fry, C., Jordan W., Leman, G., Garner, B., Thomas, B., “Bringing Innovation and the Entrepreneurial Mindset(Back) Into Engineering: the KEEN Innovators Program,” 2010 ASEE National Conference & Exposition,Louisville, KY, June 2010.8 Fry, C., Jordan W., “Engineering Education the Entrepreneurial Mindset at Baylor University,” 2011 ASEENational Conference & Exposition
holds a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Nebraska, an M.S. in Environmental Science and Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, and a B. S. in Civil Engineering from Assam Engineering College in India.Bruce Schumacher, North Dakota State University Bruce Schumacher is an ABD doctoral student in education at North Dakota State University. Schumacher holds an M.S. Ed. from Northern State University in Aberdeen, South Dakota, an M.A.T in Education and B. A. in History from Augustana College in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Page 15.367.1© American Society for Engineering
undergraduate, nonresearch institutions. However, the reality at such institutionsis that research is often not considered nearly as important or supported as much by theadministration or region as advertising implies, although a research record is usually critical topromotion, tenure, and merit raises and to one’s gratification, reputation, and marketability inengineering 2,3.This discrepancy motivates fundamental questions:(1) Should research even be a part of the official mission and promotion, tenure, and merit raisecriteria of such institutions?(2) If so, what contributions can such entities realistically make to the state-of-the-art, especiallyin expensive equipment and facility-intensive high technology fields such as engineering andscience?(3
called digital transformation, and it has begun to be undertaken in industry, federalagencies and in health and medical service organizations [1].Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) is a methodology that supports the management ofrequirements, design, analysis, verification, and validation of complex systems models - systemsconsisting of interoperating subsystems [4]. MBSE is expected to break the siloedresponsibilities and functions as it leverages digital tools and technologies to model and simulatesystems and represent them at different levels of abstraction to improve communication betweenstakeholders [5]. Graphical modeling languages have been proposed to support MBSE. TheSystems Modeling Language (SysML) is considered the industry
a survey instrument designed to measure self-efficacyin engineering, feelings of inclusion and outcomes expectations, and collected responses fromundergraduate women studying engineering at four institutions: Penn State University (PSU),Georgia Institute of Technology (GA Tech), University of Texas – Austin (UT Austin) andRensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI).The paper describes the development process for ensuring reliability and validity and also reportsthe preliminary results of the analysis to answer the following research questions. 1. Do students’ feelings of self-efficacy vary from one institution to another? 2. Do students with different year-standings answer the module items differently regardless of institution? 3
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring Engineering Faculty Views on Their Role in Broadening Participation in EngineeringAbstractBroadening participation in STEM is an initiative of critical importance within the United States.In order to maintain its global prominence in STEM fields, as well as maintain national securityand other technological advances, the US must produce over one million more STEMprofessionals than what is currently projected. Broadening participation is a term used todescribe increasing the participation of underrepresented groups in STEM fields. This includesproviding STEM exposure, access, and opportunities for individuals from underrepresentedgroups. According to the
Paper ID #8967Honest Expert Solutions Towards Cognitive ApprenticeshipDr. Sean Moseley, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Sean Moseley is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology. He received a B.S. from The Georgia Institute of Technology and an M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley.Ms. Rachel McCord, Virginia Tech Rachel McCord is a graduate student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Tennessee. Her research interests include engineering students
he was full professor at the Instituto Polit´ecnico Nacional, within the Applied Science and Advanced Technol- ogy Research Center (CICATA) in Queretaro, Mexico. He was part of Mexico’s National Researchers System in the period 2007-2021 at Level I. He was awarded the Prize for Best Research at IPN 2010 in the category of young researcher. He has more than 35 technical publications in academic journals, and has participated in academic and technological forums related to nuclear energy and applies physics, both in Mexico and abroad. Since August 2021 he is associate teaching professor at the Ken and Mary Alice Lindquist Department of Nuclear Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University
Journal. She received her B.S. from Missouri State University, and M.S. and Ph.D. from Purdue University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com WIP: Incorporating GDT into Engineering Graphics CoursesAbstractThis work in progress describes efforts to enhance the pedagogy in engineering graphics courseswith respect to geometric dimensioning and tolerancing.The Mechanical Engineering Technology curriculum at Penn State Behrend includes severalcourses in engineering graphics, covering topics ranging from hand sketching to advancedtechniques in computer aided design. One of the topics in the advanced course is
, she has a passion to tackle diversity and inclusion issues for students and faculty in institutions of higher education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Women Engineers in Entrepreneurship (WE²): An Alternative PathwayIntroductionThe majority of the population in the United States (US) are women, 50.7% (United StatesCensus Bureau, 2014). Women earn more overall undergraduate degrees than men, yet remainunderrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduatedegrees and workforce (NSF, NCSES, 2015). Women represent a total of 31.7% in theengineering workforce as engineers (12.9%) and engineering and related technologist ortechnician (18.8%, NSF, NCSES, 2015
of the Executive Board for the Continuing Professional Development Division of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE-CPD) and a member of the National University Telecommunications Network (NUTN) Advisory Board, the SUNY Plattsburgh Alumni Association Board of Directors, the SUNY Prrovost’s Open SUNY Advisory Council (POSAC), the Faculty Council on Teaching and Technology (FACT2), the SUNY Council on Assessment (SCoA), the SUNY Shared Services Steering Committee, the SUNY Language Consortium, the SUNY Alliance for Strategic Technologies, and the Executive Board for the SUNY Information Technology Ex- change Center (ITEC). Kim received her bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from SUNY Plattsburgh
the engineering education front inthe 1990’s. The following quote from the EWB website explains their philosophy: Poverty is not about weakness. For the 800 million people who go hungry each day and the one billion who lack access to clean water, poverty is an absence of opportunity. Engineers Without Borders is responding to this urgent need, helping people in developing communities gain access to technologies that will improve their lives. We believe that technology, when appropriately incorporated into each community's social, cultural, economic and political context, can drive extraordinary change.The focus of EWB is on developing the technical capacity at the local level in developingcountries to ensure that innovative
Paper ID #17381A Fully Online Accredited Undergraduate Electrical Engineering ProgramProf. Stephen M. Phillips, Arizona State University Stephen M. Phillips received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Stanford University. He has served on the faculty of Case Western Reserve University from 1988 to 2002. He joined the faculty of Arizona State University in 2002. In 2005 was appointed department chair and in 2009 he was appointed director of the newly formed School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering.Dr. Marco Saraniti
1802 Filament only 50/kg 40 kg 2000Recently, a MakerBot Replicator Z18 3D printer was purchased. Unfortunately, large failed partsdo not fit in the plastic shredder. For now, they are cut manually to a size adequate for the plasticshredder in the engineering machine shop. An undergraduate engineering student group isdesigning a pre-shredder cutter to complete the current recycling system.At this time, most known inexpensive 3D printers based on FDM technology use non-proprietaryfilament, either 1.7 mm or 3 mm and print in ABS and/or PLA. Even XYZ 3D printers that haveproprietary filament cartridges have been successfully re-filled with third-party filament. Therecycling system for 3D
2006-1309: A PROJECT EXPERIENCE IN POWER ENGINEERING DESIGNASPECTSGiri Venkataramanan, University of Wisconsin-Madison Giri Venkataramanan received the B.E. degree in electrical engineering from the Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, India, the M.S. degree from the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. After teaching electrical engineering at Montana State University, Bozeman, he returned to University of Wisconsin, Madison, as a faculty member in 1999, where he continues to direct research in various areas of electronic power conversion as an Associate Director of the Wisconsin Electric Machines and
technology and widespreadavailability of computers have resulted in the use of World Wide Web (WWW) as a teachingmedium in engineering education1, 2. Thus, more and more educators have developed web-basedteaching and evaluation tools to facilitate and improve the learning process of students. In thispaper, the development of two web-based tools for use in Energy Engineering course wasdiscussed and presented.Course Description Energy Engineering is a multi-disciplinary subject that encompasses thermodynamics,fluid mechanics, engineering economics, energy conversion, energy conservation, energy auditand management, and environment. Energy Engineering course is a senior elective course in thedepartment of mechanical engineering at Lamar
AC 2010-1747: INTEGRATING THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUM THROUGHCROSSDISCIPLINARY STUDIOSNadia Kellam, University of Georgia Nadia Kellam is an Assistant Professor and engineering educational researcher in the Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at the University of Georgia. She is co-director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER) research group. Her research interests include interdisciplinarity, creativity, identity formation, and the role of emotion in cognition.Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Joachim Walther is an Assistant Professor with the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Georgia
set of teachers for the entire school year also allows for asustained effort in technology/engineering education. Other GK-12 projects have developed“showcase” type projects. These projects involve developing an attention getting demonstrationalong with a well developed set of worksheets and handouts. This method of presenting thematerial to the students and teachers is great at peaking interest but, in our experience, does littleto promote continued learning after the presentation has left. The Tufts University program haschosen to have their fellows work with the same teachers instead of hopping from program toprogram to promote interest in technology/engineering throughout the entire school year. Theprogram is structured so that continued
Session 3242 Engineering Leadership and Teamwork Development Through Experiential Learning Kenneth W. Hunter, Sr., Jessica O. Matson Tennessee Technological UniversityAbstractThe development of teamwork skills has become an established goal of engineering education,and in recent years the development of leadership skills has begun to receive more attention.Experiential learning programs, including activities such as ropes courses and adventure training,have been extensively used in both the corporate and military sectors for teamwork andleadership
being developed as a collaborative NSF-funded projectbetween the Civil Engineering Department and the Interactive Multimedia Program at SouthernIllinois University Carbondale. This presentation will be an overview the preliminary developmentand a summary of the formative assessment during the first semester of the two-year project.The labware is intended to enhance student learning through the development of and exposure toricher learning tools, resources, and advanced technologies. The pedagogy promoted by ourapproach is to engage students in active learning. The approach is to develop an interactivemultimedia program for the laboratory component of the courses, which in turn strengthens thebridge between application and classroom theory. For
Session 3460 Changes in Engineering Education in the United Kingdom Darwin Liang*, William Shepherd**, Brian Manhire** *University of Bradford, UK / **Ohio University, USAAbstractThis paper provides an overview of the current status of engineering education in the UnitedKingdom. A comparison of traditional undergraduate and post-graduate engineering pro-grammes offered by universities and technical polytechnics against proposed engineering &technology programs is highlighted in view of recent changes. In addition, current issues in-cluding student enrolment and graduates’ professional development are
evaluated after three years.IntroductionCentral Washington University (CWU) is a state-supported university that serves approximately8,000 students, including graduate students. In the Industrial and Engineering Technologydepartment, there are eight majors offered to students. Among these choices are MechanicalEngineering Technology, Flight Technology and Construction Management. In all of theseprograms, women are underrepresented. It became important to work towards a more diversecomposition of students. The ACE Academy evolved from this necessity.In the summer of 2004, 23 girls (age 13-16) were accepted at the workshop. Next year, the campwill be expanded to 36. The academy begins on a Friday afternoon with girls getting to knoweach other and
). Page 7.207.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationTable 2. Total AP Enrollment and College Career Choices for AP Physics StudentsTotal AP AP Engineering Science or Pre- Social Business FineEnrollment Physics Choice Mathematics Med Studies Choice Arts Enrollment Choice Choice Choice Choice294 64 32 (50%) 17 (27%) 5 (8%) 6 (9%) 1 (2%) 1(2%)The career choice for the high school seniors in seven high schools who answered anoutside survey 17 (N=692) that included technology (there was no breakdown specificallyfor
the idea of using an aquarium to promote engineering concepts for a wideaudience is innovative and exciting. A creative initiative between the College of Engineering atRowan University, Cumberland County College (CCC) and the New Jersey Academy of AquaticSciences (NJAAS) to enhance STEM education at all levels has been undertaken by receivingsupport from the National Science Foundation. There is a growing realization amongengineering faculty that a new vision for the education of engineers needs to evolve to keep thiscountry at the forefront of technology. Science and engineering are essential for paving the wayfor America’s future through discovery, learning and innovation [1]. A recent report [2]indicates that the United States lags behind
the idea of using an aquarium to promote engineering concepts for a wideaudience is innovative and exciting. A creative initiative between the College of Engineering atRowan University, Cumberland County College (CCC) and the New Jersey Academy of AquaticSciences (NJAAS) to enhance STEM education at all levels has been undertaken by receivingsupport from the National Science Foundation. There is a growing realization amongengineering faculty that a new vision for the education of engineers needs to evolve to keep thiscountry at the forefront of technology. Science and engineering are essential for paving the wayfor America’s future through discovery, learning and innovation [1]. A recent report [2]indicates that the United States lags behind
suchentrepreneurship education expressed positive feedback to the value of the programs forproviding engineering students with professional skills and an entrepreneurial mindset [6], [13].Entrepreneurial activity in engineering has even prompted some to suggest a change to ABET(Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology), the organization which overseesaccreditation of engineering schools, outcomes to further develop business and entrepreneurshipskills. In their article, Sababha et al. [2] wanted to add the following ABET learning outcome:“to develop and evaluate a business plan that transforms an engineering design (system,products, services, and solutions) into a business opportunity utilizing entrepreneurial skills andknowledge” [2, p. 2]. They go
students, with a unique learning opportunity. In this paper we describe the Engineeringand Public Policy undergraduate program and curriculum leading to this course, and the structureof the course itself. We provide perspectives on the course from the undergraduates taking thecourse and doctoral students serving as project managers. The lessons learned beyond the directlearning objectives contribute to the success of our graduates, and the long-lasting success of thecourse itself.The Engineering and Public Policy Undergraduate Additional Major ProgramEngineering and Public Policy in Carnegie Mellon University’s College of Engineering is aunique department that works to solve problems at the interface of technology and society.Academic programs
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”Standard Content CD applicationKnowledge of Students will describe, Students will be able to demonstrate aNumber represent, and apply numbers knowledge of number relationships andRelationships and their relationships and will computation in conjunction with theand Computation estimate and compute using process standards: problem solving,(6.0) mental strategies, paper/pencil, communication, reasoning, and and technology. connections.Process of
AC 2011-1234: INCORPORATING LABVIEW(R) IN JUNIOR ELECTRI-CAL ENGINEERING LABSBill Yang, Western Carolina University Dr. Yang is currently assistant professor at Western Carolina University. He holds Ph.D. degree in Elec- trical Engineering from Princeton University. Prior joining WCU he has worked more than 7 years at Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technology, Inc. as Member of Technical Staff and Ciena Corp. as Principal Engineer, doing research in photonic networks and optoelectronics. His teaching interest focuses on the project-based learning (PBL) model of engineering education with self-directed learner as enhanced edu- cational outcome. His research area focuses on optoelectronics, semiconductor lasers and
occur, which is the fundamental reason forthis program. Our experience is that both group learning and independent thinking are enhanced,and the curriculum provides first-hand experience in the development of space technology aswell as opportunities for discovering new knowledge.I. Program Objectives and BackgroundOur fundamental goal with the USAFA small satellite program is to provide a broad,applications-oriented experience of space technology for our undergraduate students.Technology can be defined as the “application of science, engineering, and industrialorganization to create a human-built world.”1 Designing, building, and operating a smallspacecraft is the focus for experiencing all these aspects of technology. The specific objectives