AC 2012-4280: ASSESSING MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN IN A ROBOTICSENGINEERING CURRICULUMProf. Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Michael A. Gennert is Director of the Robotics Engineering Program at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where he is professor of computer science and professor of electrical and computer engineering. He has worked at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Mass., the University of Califor- nia/Riverside, General Electric Ordnance Systems, Pittsfield, Mass., and PAR Technology Corporation, New Hartford, N.Y. He received the B.S. in computer science, B.S. in electrical engineering, and M.S. in electrical engineering in 1980, and the D.Sc. in electrical
engineering building was constructed on thecommunity college campus at a cost of $8.3M (locally generated dollars). The programs wereofficially started up in the summer of 1997 with 5 students (1 CME and 4 ME students).II. Program DescriptionThe Kentucky Council on Higher Education Resolution included an explicit directive to UK,MSU, and PCC to cooperate in developing two new undergraduate engineering programs, one inchemical and one in mechanical engineering. In 1996, the Dean of the UK College ofEngineering, the Dean of the MSU College of Industry and Technology, and the PCC Presidentjointly assembled a team of approximately 20 faculty and staff to develop these two newbaccalaureate programs. This group included a representative from the Kentucky
AC 2011-915: SUMMER BRIDGE PROGRAM: A JUMPSTART FOR EN-GINEERING STUDENTSDanny King, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Danny is the Associate Director of the New Student Academic Advising Center within the School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. In addition to his advising duties, Danny teaches in the First Year Experience Seminars for Engineering students, and has taught the Summer Bridge Program’s Engineering section for three years. Danny has a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University, an MS in Higher Education and Student Affairs from Indiana University, and is currently a doctoral student in Higher Education and Student Affairs at Indiana University.Laura Masterson
Engineering in 2010. His research interests include success in first-year engineering, introducing entrepreneurship into engineering and engineering in K-12.Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is a graduate student in the Engineering Education Program at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes and interventions aimed at improving learning objective attainment. Prior to his University as
our thinking. Instead of permitting engineering educationto lag technology and society, “Should the engineering profession anticipate needed advancesand prepare for a future where it will provide more benefit to humankind?”[3]So the question becomes, how do we train engineers to be more entrepreneurially minded?What is an Entrepreneurially Minded Engineer? Page 22.244.2According to Dawn Tabat, Chief Operating Officer of Generac Power Systems (and a group ofthe company‟s engineering executives), Entrepreneurially Minded Engineers (EMEs) “act like aproduct manager within their engineering discipline”. In other words, “EMEs are not justworking on
generate another report for presentation at the quarterly Director’s meeting to take place in Maui, Hawaii, in November. Figure 2. Example of one challenge used in Bioprocess Technology, fall 2001.Topics addressed in this challenge include microbial kinetics, stoichiometry of growth andproduct formation, biomass formation and substrate utilization. Similar to the bio-optics and Page 7.230.7biofilms courses students worked in teams to solve the challenge and engaged in class “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for
Paper ID #45824Generative AI in Engineering: Tool or Trouble?Dr. Claire Lynne McCullough PE, High Point University Dr. McCullough received her bachelor’s, master’s, and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Vanderbilt, Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of Tennessee, respectively, and is a registered professional engineer in the state of Alabama. She is currently Professor and Founding Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at High Point University, and teaches courses in such areas as Engineering Ethics, Controls, and Engineering Design. Dr. McCullough has over 30 years’ experience in
Paper ID #34990Activating and Engaging Students in Online Asynchronous ClassesDr. Nicolas Ali Libre, Missouri University of Science and Technology Nicolas Ali Libre, PhD, is an assistant teaching professor of Civil Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. He received his BS (2001), MS (2003) and PhD (2009) in civil engineer- ing with emphasis in structural engineering, from University of Tehran, Iran. His research interests and experiences are in the field of computational mechanics, cement-based composite materials as well as in- novative teaching techniques. Dr. Libre is the manager of Materials
Paper ID #13389UTILIZING THE EFFECT OF AIR SPEED TO IMPROVE AUTOMOBILEMOVING PERDORMANCEDr. Masoud Fathizadeh, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology) Masoud Fathizadeh – PhD, PE Professor Fathizadeh has been with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Purdue University Calumet since 2001. He has worked over 15 years both for private industries and national research laboratories such as NASA, Argonne and Fermi National Laboratories. Dr. Fathizadeh has established his own consulting and engineering company in 1995 spe- cializing in power system, energy management and automation systems
Paper ID #26181A Long-Term Study of Software Product and Process Metrics in an Embed-ded Systems Design CourseDr. J.W. Bruce, Tennessee Technological University J.W. Bruce is with the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Tennessee Technological University in Cookeville, Tennessee USADr. Ryan A. Taylor, University of Alabama Dr. Taylor received his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Mississippi State University in 2018. He is currently an assistant professor at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. His research interests revolve around remote sensing and engineering education
AC 2010-843: PROGRAMMING FOR PRE-COLLEGE EDUCATION USINGSQUEAK SMALLTALKKathryn Rodhouse, Missouri University of Science and Technology KATHRYN N. RODHOUSE is a Computer Engineering undergraduate at Missouri University of Science and Technology. She has interests in programming and is active in Eta Kappa Nu.Benjamin Cooper, Savant LLC BENJAMIN COOPER is CTO/Managing Partner of Savant LLC. He is an entrepreneur with experience in several start-up companies. He attended Emory University and the University of California, San Diego.Steve Watkins, Missouri University of Science and Technology STEVE E. WATKINS received his Ph.D. from the University of Texas - Austin in Electrical Engineering in
majority of faculty who teach engineering studentsbelieve that the education of undergraduate and graduate students in either ethics and/or thebroader impacts of technology in their program are inadequate [16]. Topics included andmethods used to teach ethical issues in engineering vary widely [17], but often include codes orrules (85% in [17], 48% in [18]) and case studies (81% in [17], 67% [16]). Service-learningexperiences where engineering students work directly with impacted people and communitiesmay be particularly valuable for the ethical development of students [19, 20]. Emotion has beenfound to be a key element in the success of service-learning [21-23]. There may be a linkbetween the ethics educational outcomes and the emotional
EngineeringEducation, 2(2), 1-17.5. Reisel, J., Jablonski, M., Hosseini, H., & Munson, E. (2012). Assessment of factors impactingsuccess for incoming college engineering students in a summer bridge program. InternationalJournal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(4), 421-433.6. Honken, N., & Ralston, P. (2013). Freshman Engineering Retention: A Holistic Look. Journalof STEM Education, 14(2), 29-37.
: Rethinking Measures of Integration,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 30–55, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1002/jee.20184.[6] L. Benson, C. Bolding, J. Ogle, C. McGough, J. Murphy, and R. Lanning, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Belongingness in Civil Engineering,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32737. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32737.[7] “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2021.pdf.”[8] J. M. Smith and J. C. Lucena, “Invisible innovators: how low-income, first-generation students use their funds of knowledge to belong in engineering,” Eng. Stud., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2016.1155593.
this time, she served as co-chair of the White House’s Office of Science & Technology Policy Task Force on Research and Development for Technology to Support Aging Adults. She was recently named to the National Academy of Medicine’s Commission on a Global Roadmap for Healthy Longevity. She has just completed her 5-year appointment as a commissioner with ABET’s En- gineering Accreditation Commission and currently serves as a member of the ABET Board of Delegates. She is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the Biomedical Engineering Society, and the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering. American c Society for
pursue a individually tailored upper level program of study to earn aBachelor of Science in Engineering. The flexibility offered by the MDE program will enableresponsiveness to emerging technologies that lie between traditional disciplines. For thisprogram to be successful foundational coursework that provides problem solving context whilesubstituting for existing engineering courses such as statics and dynamics as well as physicscontent such as electricity and optics that have historically required mostly beginning-collegemath skills for problems solving. The first MDE course (MDE 1) will be developed to presentphysical properties of matter as they interact within engineering systems and is entitled PhysicalProperties in
native of Dayton, OH and a graduate of Dayton Public Schools. Dr. Long’s research interests include: (a) technology use, (b) diversity and inclusion, and (c) retention and success, with a particular focus on students in STEM fields. He has conducted and published research with the Movement Lab and Center for Higher Education Enterprise at OSU. Dr. Long has taught undergraduates in the First-Year Engineering Program and Department of Mechan- ical Engineering at OSU and served as a facilitator for both the University Center for the Advance- ment of Teaching and Young Scholars Program at OSU. Furthermore, he has worked in industry at Toyota and has a high record of service with organizations such as the American Society
Paper ID #10480When Engineering Meets Self and Society: Students Reflect on the Integra-tion of Engineering and Liberal EducationXiaofeng Tang, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Xiaofeng Tang is a PhD candidate in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Page 24.1374.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 When Engineering Meets Self and Society: Students Reflect on the Integration of Engineering and Liberal EducationIntroductionA
Paper ID #12602Engineering together: Context in dyadic talk during an engineering task (K-12 Fundamental)Dr. Brianna L Dorie, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Dorie is a current graduate ofDr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Gina Navoa Svarovsky, University of Notre Dame Gina Navoa Svarovsky is an Assistant Professor of Practice at the University of Notre Dame’s Center for STEM Education and the College of Engineering. She has studied how young people learn engineering for over a decade
the individual parts. Alexander’s mom reports, “So I would say he’s aself-directed learner. We don’t do a lot of those [technology] things in school because he doesthem spontaneously.” Elizabeth’s mom describes her daughter’s motivation in day to dayactivities, saying, “We were just today out at Tractor Supply to look at the little baby chicks andall she kept saying was, ‘We could totally build this chicken coop. We wouldn’t even have tobuy one. We could just build it.’” Page 26.961.6Parents’ successful identification of appropriate resources for supporting engineering learningAs previously mentioned, the homeschooling parents who
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences1. ABET, ABET 2004-2005 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore, MD.2. Black, J.M., Bower, K.C., Mays, T.W., and Dion, T., “Multi-Disciplinary Capstone Design Class: Integrating Specific Civil Disciplines, Teaching Styles, and Teaching Effectiveness to Meet ABET Criteria,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Southeastern Section Conference, Auburn, AL, April 4-6, 2004.3. Catalano, G.D., “Developing an Environmentally Friendly Engineering Ethic: A Course for Undergraduate Engineering Students
Analysis Financial Statements Simulation methods Bottom Tier (< Financial Statements Bottom Tier (< Valuing Stocks, Bonds, and IPs 2.6) Valuing Stocks, Bonds, and IPs 3.5)Bibliography1. Farragher, Edward J., Robert T. Kleiman, and Anandi P. Sahu, “Current Capital Investment Practices,” TheEngineering Economist, Vol. 44, No.2, 1999, (pp. 137-150).2. Klammer, T., B. Koch, and N. Wilner, “Capital Budgeting Practices – A Survey of Corporate Use,” Journal ofManagement Accounting Research, Fall 1991, (pp. 113-130).PAUL KAUFFMANNPaul J. Kauffmann is Professor and Chair in the Department of Engineering Technology at Old DominionUniversity. His
andcorporate executives with backgrounds in engineering, in propagating the growth of corporatecapitalism and shaping the positions of engineers within corporations. Noble describes howengineers leveraged their societal relationship to technological development and production by“informing their work with the historical imperatives of corporate growth, stability, and control… the engineers, moreover, went a step further to ensure that their technical work meshed withthe imperatives of corporate social relations; rather than restricting their attention to technicalmatters, they consciously undertook to structure the labor force and foster the social habitsdemanded by corporate capitalism” [1]. As engineers serve capitalism via industry, they rejecttheir
, no. 1, pp. 30–55, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1002/jee.20184.[6] L. Benson, C. Bolding, J. Ogle, C. McGough, J. Murphy, and R. Lanning, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Belongingness in Civil Engineering,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32737. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32737.[7] “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2021.pdf.”[8] J. M. Smith and J. C. Lucena, “Invisible innovators: how low-income, first-generation students use their funds of knowledge to belong in engineering,” Eng. Stud., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2016.1155593.
. ACTFL Japanese Proficiency Guidelines. Foreign Language Annals,vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 589-603, (1987).MICHIO TSUTSUIMichio Tsutsui is an Associate Professor of Technical Communication and the Director of the Technical JapaneseProgram at the University of Washington. He has earned a B.S. in naval architecture from Osaka University andan M.A. and a Ph.D. in linguistics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He is actively involved inlanguage education for engineers and scientists and research in technology-enhanced language learning. Page 4.357.7
background information) and then merging teams into larger groups as the exerciseprogresses. The workshop will investigate several engineering practices including aspects ofengineering design (defining a problem, developing potential solutions) and the interdependenceof science, engineering and technology. Key habits of mind will also be emphasized through thematerials presented in the example problem. These include asking questions, building models,interpreting data, applying mathematics and designing solutions. The field of Industrial andManagement Systems Engineering (IMSE) and its toolkit will be explored throughout the exercise.This provides an opportunity to introduce this important field to an audience typically not familiarwith the
, "Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth," Race ethnicity and education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69-91, 2005, doi: 10.1080/1361332052000341006.[6] M. Denton, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, "Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 556-580, 2020.[7] C. C. Samuelson and E. Litzler, "Community cultural wealth: An assets‐based approach to persistence of engineering students of color," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 93-117, 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20110.[8] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen
), working on initiatives to protect the watershed by bringing value to waste up-stream and transparency to the state of water quality. ● Twain High School, partnering for the participation of pregnant and parenting teens in a USD interdisciplinary course, Creative Minds, that combines ways of thinking from theatre, mathematics and engineering, to create tools or manipulatives that can be used by young children to facilitate mathematical learning. ● Viejas Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, enabling USD engineering students and Kumeyaay children to exchange ideas, collaborate, and share cultural knowledge in their Science Technology Engineering Art and Math (STEAM) lab. ● Waste for Life, supporting communities to develop
interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21673Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer-ing and Science Education from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Normative and Non-Normative Engineering
Natasha focused on the ease with which engineers conquer the math and sciences --“Ithink an engineer is someone who uses science, math, technology and stuff to solveproblems”(Rogue). Natasha pointed out the tinkering nature of engineers by describing hercolleagues as men that are “[…] at home playing with Raspberry Pi [a small, inexpensivecomputer, namely used by programming hobbyists] and building Ham radios.” They often spokeof these traits as if they were not traits that they possessed themselves, but they acknowledgedthem as traits of “true” engineers. “I don’t relish in wanting to tinker with something that’sbroke. That’s, I feel, like a trait of engineers that I don’t possess” (Natasha).Personal. When the women described how they saw