Paper ID #18255The Role of Andragogy in Mechanical Engineering EducationLt. Col. Richard Melnyk, U.S. Military Academy LTC Rich Melnyk is an Army Aviator and Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point. He was an Instructor and Assistant Professor from 2004-2007 and returned to teaching in 2015. He has a PhD in Aerospace Engineering, a PE in Mechanical Engineering, an MBA in Technology Management and recently commanded a Battalion at Hunter Army Airfield, Savannah, Georgia.Lt. Col. Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy Brian Novoselich
-Ljungberg, D. J. Therriault, and I. Krause, “Undergraduate Students Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 560–584, 2016.[5] S. Schrader, W. M. Riggs, and R. P. Smith, “Choice over uncertainty and ambiguity in technical problem solving,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 10, no. 1-2, pp. 73–99, 1993.[6] E. Frenkel-Brunswik, “A Study of Prejudice in Children,” Human Relations, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 295–306, 1948.[7] E. Frenkel-Brunswik, “Intolerance Of Ambiguity As An Emotional And Perceptual Personality Variable,” Journal of Personality, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 108–143, 1949.[8] A. Furnham and J. Marks, “Tolerance of Ambiguity
Paper ID #16838Adding ’Professional Awareness’ to the Software Engineering CurriculumDr. Dan Budny P.E., University of Pittsburgh Dr. Dan Budny joined the University of Pittsburgh faculty as Academic Director of the Freshman Pro- grams and an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering in January 2000. Prior to that time he served as Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and Freshman Programs at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. and M.S. degree from Michigan Technological University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. degree from Michigan State University. His research has focused on the development of programs that assist entering
Paper ID #16519Research and Instructional Strategies for Engineering RetentionDr. Claudia J Rawn, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Claudia Rawn is an Associate Professor in the Materials Science and Engineering Department at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She is also the Director of the Center for Materials Processing. Prior to joining the University of Tennessee full time she was a Senior Research Staff Member in the Materials Science and Technology Division at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and a Joint Faculty Member in the University of Tennessee’s Materials Science and Engineering Department. She received her
ensuring students and teachers in many K-12 classrooms across theUS will be engaged with engineering education. The framework upon which the NGSSis based states, “Students should learn how science is used, in particular through theengineering design process, and they should come to appreciate the distinctions andrelationships between engineering, technology, and the applications of science”2.Science and engineering complement each other in many ways, but teach studentsdifferent, yet equally important, skill sets. “If the core of science is discovery, then theessence of engineering is creation”3. The challenge of including engineering in schoolprograms is evident4, especially at the elementary level where time dedicated to scienceinstruction is far
and conference proceedings and two invited book chapters. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and serves as an ABET program evaluator. Sriram is a steering committee member for the International Conference on Wear of Materials and an executive committee member of the Mechanical Engineering Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). He serves as their delegate on the ASEE diversity committee and also on the ASME Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Committee. He received his B.E. degree in Mechanical Engineering from The Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (India) followed by M.S. and PhD degrees in Mechanical Engineering from The Ohio State
acknowledge the help of Ms. Linda Steele, who prepared Tables 1 and 2 -Undergraduate Programs in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering - Curricula, respectively.References1. McIssac, M.S. and Gunawardena, C.N., Distance Education, in Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology: A Project of the Association for Educational communications and Technology, Jonassen, D. H. (ed), pp. 403-437, Simon, Schuster & MacMillan, New York, 1996.2. Jepson, N.A. The Beginning of English University Adult Education - Policy and Problems, Michael Joseph, London, 1973.3. Jones, E.C., Jr., Distance Education, Undergraduate Programs, and Accreditation, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
%, but the number ofengineers that US colleges and universities send into the workforce annually has stayed the sameat around 120,000. The increase requested is 8.33% in engineering degrees. “By contrast,roughly 1 million engineers a year graduate from universities in India and China. This educationdisparity threatens to slow our economic recovery, stunts our long-term competitiveness, andleaves technology firms in a skills crisis.”1It is well known that about 40% of students enrolled in science, technology, engineering andmathematics leave their major after the first year. Less than 50% of the students who start inthese majors actually complete their degree. Although this percentage is about the same as theattrition for non-technical majors
AC 2012-5188: ASSESSING EVOLVING CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGEIN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING STUDENTSProf. Kevin A. Gary, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Kevin Gary, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering within the College of Technology and Innovation at Arizona State University’s Polytechnic campus. At ASU, Kevin led the development of the new bachelor’s of software engineering program, and the revised design of the master’s of computing studies. Gary designed and implemented the Software Enterprise, an NSF-funded hybrid pedagogical method for conducting project-based courses. More than 40 industry projects have been conducted by the Software Enterprise over the past eight years, and the
thedifficulties faced by some engineering courses. An alternative course structure is presented,which allows for the new principles and concepts, and consequently might make advances inengineering education. The proposal is focused on the Systematic Planning Approach and bringsan instrument - a Knowledge Based System which embodies the new principles and concepts - topragmatically assist course designers in the development of their tasks. Some preliminary resultsfrom ongoing experiences are discussed. IntroductionAn evolutionary revolution has been taking place in the world due to the impact of technology ingeneral and information technology in particular, both of which are expanding at ever increasingrates
-phase 2 goals were development of the Iron Man version of the Guide Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @ 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationbased on the feedback gathered in sub-phase 1 and an extensive review process similar to thereview process for the Stone Man phase.126 Accreditation Initiatives In order to understand the accreditation initiatives for software engineering, it is worthwhileto examine the accrediting agencies here in the United States. The Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) is a federation of 28 professional engineering andtechnical societies. Representatives from these societies, who
ISU he worked in the Smart Home Lab researching topics in Software Engineering, Smart Homes, Pervasive Computing, Formal Methods, and Wireless Sensors. He published several papers and completed his dissertation entitled ”A framework for safe composition of heterogeneous SOA services in a pervasive computing environment with resource constraints”. In ISU he was also involved in several other activities like organizing the GMAP Symposium, participating in student organizations, and working as research assistant. After graduation he worked for a trading software company in New York City but once again his love for academics brought him back, this time as a professor in Computer Engineering Technology at CUNY - New
undergraduate student from the New York City College of Technology. Her major is in mechanical engineering technology. Her interest is in mechanical design, mechatronics and computer aided design.Ehab A. Ahmad, Mr. Ahmed is an undergraduate student at New York City College of Technology. He is pursuing a degree in mechanical engineering technology. He has technical skills in mechanical design, computer aided design, and product rapid prototyping.Mr. Ali Harb, New York City College of Technology Ali Harb Computer Integrated Manufacturing teacher at Brooklyn Technical High School and College Laboratory Technician at New York city College of Technology. I am experienced in robotics, design, and fabrication. I coach and
Institutional Diversity. She received the Harold R. Johnson Diversity Service Award (2015), and the Sarah Goddard Power Award (2012), from the University of Michigan for her work on diversity-related issues.Lorelle A Meadows (Founding Dean of Pavlis Honors College) Dr. Lorelle Meadows joined Michigan Technological University in 2014 where, as founding dean, she led the creation of a new honors college uniquely committed to inclusion and equity and eliminating barriers to high impact educational practices. Dr. Meadows received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Oceanic Science from the University of Michigan, College of Engineering. As an educator and administrator in higher education, she conducts interdisciplinary research at the
AC 2011-2162: RET PROJECT IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURINGLisa Denny Choate, Cannon County High School Lisa D. Choate is a mathematics teacher at Cannon County High School in Woodbury, Tennessee. She teaches Algebra One, Honors Algebra Two and Geometry.Kenan Hatipoglu, Tennessee Technological University Kenan Hatipoglu is a graduate research assistant at Center for Manufacturing Research and Ph.D. student at Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Tennessee Tech University, Cookeville, Tennessee. His research interests are in power system design and smart grid applications.Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Ismail Fidan is a faculty member at the college of engineering of Tennessee Tech
Paper ID #17818Development of a Laboratory Module in 3D PrintingDr. Spencer Seung-hyun Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Dr. Spencer Kim is an Associate Professor in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Technology Department (MMET) at RIT, and serves as Associate Director of American Packaging Corporation Cen- ter for Packaging Innovation at RIT. He previously worked in the semiconductor industry. Dr. Kim, as a PI or Co-PI, received grants and sponsorship from NSF, SME, SPE, universities, and industries. In 2009 and 2013, he was nominated for the Eisenhart Award for Outstanding Teaching, RIT’s premiere teach
Paper ID #38145Scaffolding Social Justice in the Engineering Classroom:Constructing a More Restorative, Inclusive, EngineeringPracticeSydney Turner Sydney Turner is a Doctoral Fellow at the University of Virginia in the Department of Engineering Systems and Environment. With her research focused on the intersection of access to safe drinking water and the reduction of mosquito-borne diseases, she finds herself drawn to multi-faceted public health solutions that build empowerment and resilience in underserved and historically marginalized communities utilizing inclusive and universal design principles
Paper ID #24028Engineering/Design Frictions: Exploring Competing Knowledge Systems viaEfforts to Integrate Design Principles into Engineering EducationDr. Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma is Associate Dean for Curricular Transitions, Associate Professor in Science and Technol- ogy Studies, and Director of the Programs in Design and Innovation at Rensselaer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering/Design Frictions: Exploring Competing Knowledge Systems via Efforts to Integrate Design Principles into Engineering EducationIntroductionHuman-centered design
rather than just recipients ofengineering expertise and technology” (p. 3). In association with sustainability education,DuPuis and Ball [33] “promote receptive / reflexive exchanges and deliberation” using “carefullistening techniques taken from nonviolent communication.” Lucena [34] extensively analyzesthe interplay between sustainable development and listening to clients, stakeholders, users, andcitizens.Despite the importance of listening, engineering classes rarely give students the opportunity tointeract with communities to develop this skill. Service-learning and community engagement(including co-curricular activities such as Engineers Without Borders) may be notable exceptions[23, 35]. Listening skills are also essential in Participatory
Hopkins University Whiting School’sEngineering Management & Leadership Course Complements Senior DesignIntroduction According to the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), STEMgraduates must be “prepared with the knowledge, skills and aptitudes to meet workforcedemand” [1]. ABET adopted Engineering Criteria 2000, updated several times since, thatfocused on what students learn rather than what programs teach. The new framework includedskills such as “critical thinking, communication and teamwork” [1]. The guidelines areinfluenced strongly by industry workforce needs as hiring managers turn to ABET-accreditedprograms because they know graduates will have certain skills based on student outcomes” [1]. To prepare
and M. C. Linn, “How Does Identity Shape the Experiences of Women of Color Engineering Students?,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 14, pp. 483–493, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1007/s10956-005-0223-1.[19] H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” in Political Psychology, 0 ed., J. T. Jost and J. Sidanius, Eds. Psychology Press, 2004, pp. 276–293. doi: 10.4324/9780203505984-16.[20] J. Buontempo, C. Riegle-Crumb, A. Patrick, and M. Peng, “EXAMINING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ENGINEERING IDENTITY AMONG HIGH SCHOOL ENGINEERING STUDENTS,” JWM, vol. 23, no. 3, 2017, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017018579.[21] M. R. Kendall, M. Denton, N. H. Choe, L. M. Procter, and M
two years, the effect of this program on retention is promising. The Fall 2006 program hasbeen enhanced and is anticipated to further increase continued enrollment. Assessment of theprogram will be ongoing, focusing on retention and academic performance.IntroductionAs the economy changes and more emphasis is placed on jobs in technology-related industries, itfalls to the higher education system to prepare students for careers in these fields. Many collegesof engineering, especially those with an urban mission, have recognized that a poor preparationin math and science reduces their students’ chance for success in an undergraduate engineeringprogram. However, for many students it is lack of opportunity – rather than lack of ability – thatis
battalion, a SEABEE Regiment, and all Reserve CEC officers for the Atlantic Division of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. He is a retired Captain in the Civil Engineer Corps (CEC) of the U.S. Naval Reserve. Page 13.1004.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Professional Practices in Civil Engineering: Meeting and Exceeding the New Civil Engineering Program CriteriaIntroductionThe emerging global nature of the worldwide marketplace for products and services coupledwith the exponential rise in technological advancement in the industrialized world has led to thenear-term, long-term, and
Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE, Indianapolis, Indiana.10. Barr, R., Krueger, T., Aanstoos, T., and Juricic, D. (2003). Engineering and Computer Graphics Workbook Using SolidWorks 2001Plus, Schroff Development Corporation, Mission, Kansas.11. Engineering Accreditation Commission (2002). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), Baltimore, Maryland.AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to acknowledge the following corporations who contributed to this educational researchpaper:a. Ford Motor Company and Applied Materials for sponsorship of the Project Centered Engineering Education (PROCEED) grants to the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at
identifying high school factors that influence thepersistence of females in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines.Funded by the National Science Foundation, PRiSE is a large-scale study that surveyed anationally-representative sample of college English students about their interests and experiencesin science and engineering. The development of the PRiSE survey was guided by three majorcomponents: i) an extensive literature review to extract factors that might influence persistencein STEM fields, ii) open-ended, free-response questionnaire responses from 259 high schoolscience teachers and 153 scientists/engineers on what factors, especially in high school, influence
physics, or Page 11.901.2engineering science, as many of these are institutions that do not offer doctoral programs inengineering and are therefore included in this list.The U.S. News Methodology and Self-DescriptionThe following heading and self-description were given by U.S. News for the most recent surveyand report: “Methodology: Best undergraduate engineering programs” “The U.S. News rankings of undergraduate programs accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology are based solely on the judgments of deans and senior faculty who rated each program they are familiar with on a scale from 1 (marginal) to 5
includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and
’ epistemic thinking. Considering theimpact of students’ epistemic thinking on their academic performance, this study focuses onunderstanding the impact of international collaborative engineering education uponengineering students’ epistemic thinking. To achieve this goal, we examine engineeringstudents from an international joint program.Context of the StudyThe international joint program described here aims to help Chinese engineering studentsdevelop different global competencies through various in-class and out-of-class activities.The SPEIT (SJTU-ParisTech Elite Institute of Technology) program was established underthe strategic alliance of the Paris Tech Group and SJTU on 2012. The whole education lasts 6years, composed by two cycles (Figure 1
engineering significantly increased immediately after the Engineers Weekevent. This finding agrees with those reported in much of the literature1-13. Although,there is a significant drop in student interest in studying engineering one year afterparticipation in the Engineers Week activities, the percentage of students interested inengineering one year after the event was still higher than the percentage found in theinitial pre-exposure results. What is the reason for this decrease in interest? Based on theone-year after survey results, 11.5% (22 out of 192) of students said they had participatedin some other engineering-related activities during that year. These activities includedscience events held in another university, drafting and technology
Engineering in 1998 and Missouri University Science & Technology in Civil Engineering in 1999, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 2004. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Michigan.Dr. Bret J. Wagner, Western Michigan University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Leadership for Engineers: A Course for Developing Professional and Business Skills for EngineersAbstractEmployers consistently cite leadership and professional skills as some of the most desirableabilities for engineering graduates. Unfortunately, it is rare to have these skills explicitlytaught to engineers in the classroom, so graduates are left to develop these skills on theirown