: Specific announcements of students groups winning design competitions with a description of the building. 2. Modified educational and promotional pamphlets that include how the hobbies relate to each major. Allows incoming students to recognize that the types of projects they would get to work on reflect their personal interests. Example: Show a CNS student site surveying a sports arena or large performance arena/hall. 3. Incorporate gender recognizing there are consistent differences in preference. Allows incoming students to see that a hobby they are passionate about or want to pursue is available with these majors. Example: Female
STEM related academies.Enrichment OpportunitiesDuring the CU Engineering and Applied Mathematics Summer Academy, selected high schoolstudents work in teams and apply mathematics through the engineering design process toresearch, design, test, and redesign a project. Since its inception in 2016, projects includedesigning (i) a rocket that safely transports an egg, (ii) a windmill that can charge a cellphone,and (iii) a portable water purification system. In addition to the design competition, teams createPowerPoint presentations focused on reflection and participate in an Academy JeopardyCompetition. The academy collaborates with industry in the form of industry tours related to thecontent of the academy and professional talks with networking
) underGrant No. 1734347. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] X. Chen, C. E. Brawner, M. W. Ohland, and M. K. Orr, “A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices,” 120th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2013.[2] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of Direct Matriculation, First-Year Engineering, and Post-General Education Models,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, 2012.[3] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, M. W. Ohland, and R. A. Layton, “The Effect of Required Introduction to Engineering Courses on
, what do you think was good about it? Student feedback is also solicited to allow for self-reflection 8) Thinking of your original project’s documentation, and to assess the projects plan for the design team that was what do you think was bad about it? temporarily assigned to their project. 9) Describe the current state of your original project (completeness, correctness, etc.). RESULTS 10) Describe the current state of the newly assigned project (completeness, correctness, etc.) Each instructor assigned a score for each criterion using
encounter similar events in their future. Over the course of the term, the students began toanticipate the impending change, and it became a point of enjoyment for them to prepare for thenext adjustment. Such changes were also reflected in their term papers, as some portionsrequired re-writes due to the revisions in the assignment.SolutionsThere a number of actions that could help address the problem. First, inter-departmentcommunications on content and structure of technical writing would help students understandingof the difference between writing and technical writing. The Engineering Department couldprovide specific research-like projects that could be undertaken by the pre-engineering students Proceedings of the 2019
in Baylor’s Hankamer School of Business. However,1. Introduction engineering students may also satisfy this requirement byInstilling an Entrepreneurial Mindset in undergraduate taking Global Business Economics and Communicationstudents is a foundational goal of the Engineering programs (GBEC), an elective course offered by Baylor’s School ofat Baylor University, as reflected in the mission statement of Engineering and Computer Science. This course is intendedthe Mechanical Engineering Department: for engineering students with deeper interests in exploring value creation opportunities from
laboratory experiments that will be described in Section 4. We adopted a combination of the aforementioned laboratory experiments in our study abroad course at Aalto University. The radio link lab, in particular, was a good example of hands-on experiment to understand microwave point-to-point links at 58 GHz. In that experiment, students used the reflection of a nearby building
. training design was illustrated in Figure 1.1. Introduction Critical thinking is defined as “the intellectuallydisciplined process of actively and skillfullyconceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/orevaluating information gathered from, or generated by,observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, orcommunication, as a guide to belief and action.[1, 2]Different practice guidelines and resources have beenestablished and available for instructors to follow forcourse design and instruction.[3] However, recent reportshave illustrated the failure of improving critical thinking inhigher education.[4, 5] Such failure is partially due to themissing training modules specifically for critical thinkingskills in our higher education
societies, managers of large federal facilities• Goals of ASEE Advocacy – Conducting outreach to Congress to support funding and sound policy for engineering research and education – Supporting ASEE Councils to enhance advocacy goals of deans and other constituencies – Engaging the Administration and federal agency officials to inform future programs and create new opportunities – Elevating the role of ASEE within the Washington, DC-based scientific, STEM, and higher education advocacy communities and ensuring community advocacy reflects ASEE prioritiesAdvocacy: What’s the Point?Why Advocate?• Advocacy: The process by which ordinary citizens make their interests known to Congress• You can help Members of Congress make informed decisions on
other constituencies – Engaging the Administration and federal agency officials to inform future programs and create new opportunities – Elevating the role of ASEE within the Washington, DC-based scientific, STEM, and higher education advocacy communities and ensuring community advocacy reflects ASEE priorities• 2018 Efforts and Successes – Increased funding for the National Science Foundation and Department of Defense basic research – Engagement in federal STEM education strategic plan – Outreach and awareness of engineering technology – Enhancing Department of Defense workforce and industry collaboration – Ensuring engineering is included in federal K-12 education investmentsASEE/EDC Congressional Priorities• Advocate for
environment where we must become adept atlearning. We must reflect on what we do, learn how to learn and find out how totransform our organisations, institutions and societies34.Academic Change InternationallyThe pressure for change in Ireland is a fairly recent occurrence. But earlier developedeconomies have already addressed many of the issues now facing higher education inIreland. Let us examine how the pressure for change elsewhere has impacted on thosesystems. The credit framework, the movement towards transferable skills rather thandiscipline content, modularisation and semesterisation, accreditation of prior andexperiential learning, the increasing diversity of student intake and the increasingdemand for accountability have put pressure on
identify these portions due to the distinct boundary observablefrom samples of cross-sectional specimens which had not been further cut to produce cubiccentimeter cortical specimens.IV. Reflections After teaching the course and conducting the first iteration of the bone laboratoryexercise, one of the primary faculty completed the 1st semester of medical school, and felt someadditional changes could be made to the format of the biomaterials block by incorporating thestudy of cartilage and bone as a lead into the bone lab. If the students were able to learn aboutcartilage and the formation of cartilage from chondroblasts through appositional or interstitialgrowth, then they would be able to more clearly understand the development of bone
ASCE Committee on Sustainability published Sustainable EngineeringPractice: An Introduction in 2004. This report …is intended to be a ‘primer’ on sustainability that … can inspire and encourage engineers to pursue and inte- grate sustainable engineering into their work…and describes the state-of-the-art at the time of its publication. A great deal of practical materialis assembled in this document.The NAE convened important symposia in 2004iv and 2005v to address engineering and engi-neering education reflective of contemporary challenges. Sustainability was clearly emphasizedas part of this: An even greater, and ultimately more important, systems problem than homeland security is the ‘sustainable development’ of human societies on
theirown courses.IntroductionService-learning is the integration of academic subject matter with service to the community incredit-bearing courses, with key elements including reciprocity, reflection, coaching, andcommunity voice in projects (Jacoby, 1996)2. Service-learning (S-L) has been shown to beeffective in a large number of cognitive and affective measures, including critical thinking andtolerance for diversity, and leads to better knowledge of course subject matter, cooperativelearning, recruitment of under-represented groups in engineering, retention of students, andcitizenship, as well as helping meet the well-known ABET EC2000 criteria (a)-(k) (ABET,2005)1.Service-learning team projects have the potential to ensure students learn and
told what they knew and then eitherasked for a hint on how to proceed or requested some clarification to get them over a stumblingpoint. Since the instructor can frequently refresh the webpage that shows the student responses,he/she can monitor the responses submitted and provide immediate feedback to help studentsmodify their misconceptions. Students can then amend their responses to reflect their newunderstandings.2. Greater differences in rate at which students work on questions posed. Addressing thisdifficulty actually opened the door to introducing more differentiated learning experiences inlarger-enrollment classes. Each InkSurvey question can be designed to probe a particular level ofstudent learning. Then, a menu of two to four
othereducational institutes ranging from elementary schools to the college. The strategies and plan for enhancing manufacturing program is the response to the needs ofour industrial partners and manufacturing community. The implementation of the plan is the workin progress. As more work is being done, more reflection and data will be reported in the additionalpapers. Page 12.1185.5Bibliography 4[1] MET Department Industrial Advisory Board Meeting Minutes, University of Cincinnati, March 2006[2] MET Department Industrial Advisory Board Meeting
discipline, reflecting international trends. This paper suggests that a study ofthese disciplinary subcultures may clarify the persistence of this differential participation ,and lead to the formulation of new approaches to increasing women’s participation inengineering education.Introduction Is it a self-fulfilling prophecy that engineering disciplines with more women develop cultures that attract more women? Can, and should, this pattern be disrupted?These questions arose in the context of a cultural analysis of engineering education, whichprimarily sought to explore the interaction of the participation of women (the feminine) witha culture which has often been named as masculine (i.e. not feminine). The masculine natureof the culture of
, students explain theresults of their exploration and the teacher helps facilitate this explanation with the vocabularyrelated to the topic. The elaborate phase requires the students to apply this new knowledge tonew problems. The final design and construction of the LEGO assistive device will be theelaborate phases of the curriculum. Students testing their designs and reflecting on theirfunction is the evaluate phase. During this phase, the teacher is also assessing students’ learningof the topics. Page 12.828.3Teacher Professional DevelopmentThis new engineering curricular unit will only be successful if the teachers implementing it do
, I modified the syllabus to reflect how I had learned patent law in law school. Iincorporated the Socratic Method and taught from a law school casebook6. The class includedlively debates over the intricacies and nuances of the law, such as the Festo rule7 (the exceptionto the exception to the exception to the rule of infringement). One of my main goals for thecourse was to teach engineers how to determine whether their invention is patentable andwhether making and selling their invention infringes upon a competitor's patent. Despite thesolid attendance by the students and my detailed explanation, some of my students still confusedthe patentability and infringement tests on the exam. Some of the students applied the
assertion made by the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) that engineering curricula should include courses in engineering ethics.As a result of this study, an action has been suggested which targets provision of shortcourses or periodic seminars to increase awareness and to teach the skills on how to preventand how to deal with ethical issues, especially for those who haven’t previously received anytraining in engineering ethics. Another outcome of the study reflected that the difference incultural norms and laws in Cyprus might be yet another reason necessitating professionalethics education.IntroductionThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires that allengineering programs they accredit or give
surveying to be aware that error exists in allmeasurement values.The concept for theme of error in measurements originated at a teaching workshop on campus.A question was posed to attendees, “what do you want students to know three to five years afterthe class”. The author decided that one aspect of class that students should know years later isthat error occurs in all surveying measurements. This is one piece of knowledge that may serveuseful in many types of work. This knowledge reflects recognition that a student knows theissue of quality if pertinent to all surveying measurements. TAC-ABET program criteria includea “commitment to quality” (ABET). Even though a small number of students who actually takean elementary surveying class will
social welfare benefits aregetting stricter, but in case of an unemployment situation, still one can rely on this. Tofacilitate all these benefits, the income tax rate is relatively higher than in the US. In contrast, the US has an economy of capitalist at its best. Relatively, there arevery little social welfare benefits for the poor and under achievers. One needs to managehis/her health care provision and higher education expenses. People at the lower earningband need to work long hours to manage their livelihood. On the other hand, the US is stillin the growing phase, and one can have success with hard work and smart thinking. As itappears, the US is still considered as the land of opportunity and that also reflects throughthe current
% worded and was revised for future 17 18 19 20 21 22 assessments. Question #(3) Students improved their ability to answer questions about windmills and bladematerials. Students performed consistently better on post-assessments than on pre-assessmentsbut not all changes pre- to post- were significant. Page 12.649.5CIESE staff collected the reflections and observations of the teacher participants using informalsurveys and classroom visits. A summary of teacher comments indicate: • Teachers discovered that
were diverse due to the varyingcircumstances of interference in the 2.4 GHz band. The outcomes reflected the fact that thereis some sort of interference that will occur depending on the different sources of interference.As the Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11 continue to grow and gain popularity, it becomes apparentthat more studies should be conducted to avoid the interference issue in the 2.4 GHz band. Toachieve this, IEEE 802.15.2 Task Group has been formed specifically to consider proposalsfor mechanisms to improve the level of coexistence between Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11devices and to come up with recommended practices derived from these.Although different authors discussed the effect of Bluetooth on IEEE802.11b and vice versa,none of them have
operate the equipment – similar to watching a professional athlete “effortlessly”perform their craft at the highest levels. Individuals lacking an accurate understanding of therequired knowledge and skills may see a potential career in manufacturing as simply “pushingbuttons” – reflecting the EGR #4 finding that “…individuals considering manufacturingemployment tend to think in terms that jobs that pay well rather than careers that are personallyfulfilling.” Conversely, advanced manufacturing technology may also intimidate those who areless confident in their abilities, but no less able to succeed in a manufacturing career. The Purdue guitar manufacturing workshop seeks to directly address this disconnect inperceived personal fulfillment by
. For fall 2006 and 2007, there is a stronglink between the course and the peer mentoring program counts.Course Evaluation Data summarizing evaluation of EngE2984 for both runs are presented in Table IV.Those items preceded by an asterisk are student response items that were extracted from theusual SPOT (Student Perception of Teaching) course evaluations administered on the last day oflecture. The values reported for these items are response averages for the fall 2006 and thesummer 2007 runs. The last four items in Table IV reflect actual student success in the course. Page 13.1297.8Table III. A summary of fall participation in the NETS peer
CurriculumCommittee to be submitted to the Faculty Senate). Again, discussion on the proposed content, aswell as the intent, of the class was discussed. After the initial meeting, there were other meetingheld, however, much of the work was then conducted via e-mail. Revisions, mark-ups, andsuggestions went back and forth over the next four months. The end result produced slightrevisions to existing courses to better reflect current construction industry trends. The newproposed courses now have better direction without having to be taught “a few times” to get abetter feel for how the class should be taught.It was also decided that the entire committee would work together on the curriculum. Having theentire committee involved in all the discussions was at time
answer “journal” questions based on thereading and turn them in at test time. Grading for these assignments was time-consuming,leading to delays in providing feedback to students. The following semester, similar questionswere posted online, but responses were not required; instead reading was checked at thebeginning of class periods through short reflective questions answered through MessageGrid4, aweb-based response system. While this eliminated paperwork, it added set-up time, and somelevel of distraction for the students, as they did not otherwise use their laptops in class. Studentsurvey results indicated that this approach did not do much to increase the students’ emphasis onreading, perhaps due to an overly generous grading policy for the
characteristic of a magnet school is the employment of an educational theme thatattracts a broad spectrum of students. By their nature, academy models focus instruction arounda “theme” or academic discipline. Magnet schools use an academic model to motivate students tostay in school, make learning relevant and fun, and to focus students on their futures (eitheracademic or employment). In addition to developing qualified faculty and rigorous and relevantcurriculum that supports the magnet “theme”, the school’s physical appearance needs to beenhanced to reflect the theme. This visual and sometimes tactile alteration of the school servesas a constant reminder to students, teachers, parents and visitors that the school’s curriculum isanchored to its
datain the microcontroller to reflect the units of the sensor being measured. The microcontrollercould also store the data as it is measured, and dump it into labview later, for self contained datalogging. The freedom to modify the software to suit the project is one of the biggest advantagesto using a microcontroller over a traditional DAQ unit.The DAQ system compares quite favorably to the commercial units, especially considering theparts cost (without the breadboard) is less than $20. A printed circuit board for this design wouldbe small and likely to cost less than $10, so the system cost would be reasonable if assembledinto a dedicated device.The data is logged with less precision (10 bits vs. 12 or 16 on the National Instruments DAQdevices