Paper ID #12991Building capacity and social capital around interpretive research qualityDr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is the director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology, and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering
scores, schools payless attention to non-tested academic subjects2. As Diane Ravitch (2010) points out in her book“The Death and Life of the Great American School System” even the National Academy ofEducation worries we are apt to measure what we can, and eventually come to value what ismeasured over what is left unmeasured (p.167)3. In response to an educational background thatinforms the study habits of many students, this study is exploring teaching methods that focus ondeveloping students’ confidence in their actual abilities of visualization and graphic expressionthrough classroom experience and reflection. The experience in the classroom can either confirmstudents’ perception or broaden their framework. As Mezirow (1991) pointed out in his
question to assess understanding of the relation between form and forces in a suspension bridge. Image: Maria Garlock 4. To encourage experiential learning. Here we use a sequence of polling questions to guide students through an interactive lecture demonstration or handson activity. Encouraging experiential learning through lecture demonstrations and handson activities We typically implement an interactive lecture demonstration in three stages: predict experience , , reflectand [3]. In the first step, students make their predictions about the outcome of an experiment or
, whichbounces off a reflective surface and returns to the sensor. Then, using the amount of time it takesfor the wave to return to the sensor, the distance to the object can be computed.The ultrasonic range finder emits a high-frequency sound wave that alerts the robot to things inits path. A Programming Kit is needed to change the program in the VEX Controller. These arespecific behaviors achieved by the ultrasonic range finder: measure distances from 1.5in to115in; detect obstacles using high frequency sound waves; create more autonomous functions.The sensor can be used to determine distances to objects. It can be used as a tool to determine ifany objects are in the robot’s path at all. To increase the sensing range, the sensor can bemounted to a
staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research pro- ductivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engaging in STEM education equity work through a course: studying race, class and gender theory in engineering educationAbstractEach of the authors are currently enrolled as students or serving as an instructor in a graduate-level engineering education course which is cross-listed with the women’s, gender, and sexualitystudies program at a large research university in the Midwest. Through engagement withpodcasts, readings, reflection, and discussion with others, this course seeks to help
expand upon rotations, reflections, andtranslations. In addition, the course begins with mathematical formulas that speak to the issue ofgeometric shapes, followed by an intense development of the Fibonacci sequence and several of Page 13.1184.3its properties illustrating the utility of the sequence in the “real world.” In the current study,students were shown some past student projects submitted as partial fulfillment in the previousMATH 131 courses to introduce each new topic visually and were required to complete a muchmore comprehensive project component (hence the term Implementing Techniques for Project-Directed Mathematics). The students
onesemester. Student participants were freshmen who were involved in the required communityservice learning projects. Participating students were assigned to the community servicelearning sites, required to provide innovative solutions to the problems they identified on thesites, and facilitated with the designed interventions of question prompts on self-regulatedlearning and creative problem solving, which included metacognitive prompts, proceduralprompts, elaboration prompts, and reflective prompts, as well as prompts for creative problemsolving strategies. The presented results were based on analysis of data collected throughstudents’ process journals and project reports. The students’ utilization of question prompts, andself-regulated learning
’ metacognitive skills in learning andcreative problem solving in their engineering education. This will help students to enhance theiracademic performance and pursue engineering studies as their career goals. The outcomes fromthe prior implementation are outlined through students’ responses and reflections on theirlearning experience. It is expected that the presented scaffolding could have positive impact onstudents’ self-efficacy and higher-order skill development, and further experimental research isneeded to validate this conclusion. Page 25.575.2
attract college STEM majors into the teaching profession and bydeveloping a rigorous middle grades teacher preparation program that reflects core commitmentsof effective middle grades educators. We will present some of our progress thus far related toSUSTAINS development.IntroductionBeginning in 2012, teacher educators throughout Pennsylvania launched programs to prepareteachers who specialize in middle grades (4-8). The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s newemphasis on highly qualified middle grades teachers provides a unique opportunity to impactchildren at a crucial time in their formal education experience, when they are developing a senseof their efficacy as learners, exploring career aspirations, and developing as adolescents alongsocial
emerged over the years: the publication now servesas a research aid to members of the engineering technology community. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 9.1258.1 Copyright 82004, American Society for Engineering EducationTrendsIn addition to providing an annual snapshot of engineering technology scholarship, thebibliography also reflects changes within the discipline. The first bibliography, which listed1986 publications, included just a few entries for computers and electronics: SPICE was the ragefor teaching electronics, and computer-aided
meet a specific industry'sneeds, a model using the PBL-approach will be presented. In this model, an interdisciplinarydevelopment team, consisting of technical and general education instructors familiar withinterdisciplinary and problem-based instruction, is formed. Through interviews with plantemployees and visits to the plant floor, the team evaluates the scope and sequence of an existingcourse and identifies potential PBL modules to fit both the educational requirements of thecourse and workplace activities. Workplace scenarios are written, reviewed with industrypersonnel, and modified, if necessary, to reflect actual workplace situations. When the material ispresented, students are presented a problem that relates to their workplace and
to monitor or control any aspect of cognition, forexample, memory, attention, communication, learning, or problem-solving.Metacognition is also about learners’ ability to set goals, consider the nature of a taskand reflect on their learning [7]. In the context of technology education, successfullearning also involves the intentional use of strategies, techniques or heuristics thatcan help in the process of problem-solving and invention.The motivational aspect of SRLT refers to students’ intrinsic satisfaction from beingengaged in challenging assignments and their self-efficacy beliefs about their abilityto accomplish a task [8]. According to Bandura’s [9] socio-cognitive theory, self-efficacy beliefs are determined by previous positive
first two exams for study.For the first step of the exercise, students need to correct the mistakes on their exam. I allowthem to use any resources to find an acceptable answer, including discussions of the problem withother students and asking me for advice. If the problem is not reworked correctly, no credit isallowed as the follow-up steps are likely to be invalid.The second part of the exercise challenges student performance; finding what “caused” themistake(s). Students need to recall and reflect on their own thinking during the exam. They alsoneed to think about their study habits and learning styles. There is a tendency for all of us to avoidthinking about our failures. We can help students to be more comfortable about reflecting on
historical context using a variety of instructional modes and pedagogicalinnovations.This paper presents the experience of developing and teaching MMW for the first time in 2020 inthe midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. MMW was designed and co-taught by an interdisciplinaryfaculty teaching team from the departments of history, theology, and environmental science. As adesignated “Complex Problems” course, a type of first-year interdisciplinary Core course, MMWoffered 70 students the opportunity to satisfy BC’s Core requirements in Natural Science andHistory through three linked pedagogical components: lectures, labs, and reflection sessions. Ourgoal was to integrate engineering, the history of science and technology studies, and ethical andmoral modes of
technical skills.Although these are necessary for career success and productive work, students must also developcapacities for authentic engineering practices within authentic engineering communities.Specifically, they must develop practices for engaging ill-structured, ambiguous problems, andnavigating complexity and uncertainty through careful, creative application of deep knowledgethat characterize engineering design1. And they must do so in collaboration with others,communicating successfully with diverse stakeholders in formal and informal settings2. Finally,they must cultivate the ability to reflect on the quality of their innovation and communicationefforts3.The NSF and other sponsors fund research experiences for undergraduates (REU
. Establishing an environment of trust (362) 2. Creating an empowering space (362-363) 3. Setting a Clear Focus (363) 4. Creating an open space (363) 5. Encouraging Collaboration (363)These five values reflect our objectives in integrating a community mapping and participatorydesign methodology into our project. We assumed that our student participants (like the youthAmsden and VanWynsberghe engaged with) were seldom invited to shape the design ofprograms or engage in bottom-up critique. We created an iconographic mapping in lieu of acommunity map as an invitation to discuss/critique the whole gamut of places and people thatcomprised their experiences in the [engineering school].The iconographic map (see Figure 1) functioned much like a
targeting the motivation and engagement of the students.Presented here are those changes and the associated findings.Design Project (Original Implementation)In 2018 there was a celebration for the 200th anniversary of the novel Frankenstein [8]. Asreported previously [7], in collaboration with faculty in the humanities department, the designproject for a first-year mechanical engineering course was altered to incorporate an explorationof themes from the novel. The students were required to read/listen to the text and to extractthemes that would then be incorporated into a robotic display. The students were led through theprocess with periodic “reflections” that they were to write after completing a certain portion ofthe text. Once a theme was
on these choices and to exercise control over the self and the environment” (p.5),may be used to understand and examine how motivation and self-direction are realized. Beingthat the focus of the study is on non-traditional students, the utilization of properties of humanagency as described by Bandura (2006) will help reveal the motivations and interests, goals andoutcomes, action plans and self-regulators, as well as self-reflection and evaluation of these non-traditional students who are pursuing a doctorate while working full-time.Methodology This study seeks to identify factors that impact the agency of individuals pursuing theirgoals in dual roles, as doctoral students and higher education administrators, by analyzing theirlived
Inclusion, Director and Assistant Director of the Centerfor Diversity in Engineering, Clark Scholars Director (4)2. Accessibility Specialist, Assistant Dean of Student Safety and Support, 2 Counselors (4)3. Associate and Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Affairs, Director of Undergraduate Success,Engineering Undergraduate Registrar and Office Manager (5)After describing the context and our team, we will provide multiple reflective prompts for audiencemembers to think through ways to identify researched student barriers in the first year and more specificto first year engineering, followed by four case studies. Our case study include barriers well documentedin literature which first year face: financial, racial minoritization, disability
combinetheory and practice, and design to establish knowledge base in system thinking concepts andtools, and focus on the unique challenges for management, governance, communication, andpolicy in the FEW nexus. Course grading includes reflections and analyses, creating systemcomponent maps with Loopy (a free online tool for thinking in systems), and a final project, anintegrated system map. All assignments are individual assignments. The NRT external evaluatordesigned an annual NRT survey that assesses the NRT program at our university, including theimpacts of the NRT Integrated FEW Systems course. Student ratings about their perceivedability to perform interdisciplinary systems tasks improved from the beginning to the end of thecourse, from ‘somewhat
is certainly not a new one.Various institutions have aimed to formalize how they develop their student’s non-technicalskills. These are skills that institutions deem important for their students’ future. For example, theUniversity of Central Oklahoma (UCO) relied on the theoretical base of transformative learningto develop their Student Transformative Learning Record (STLR) [1]. The transformativelearning theory is based on the work of Mezirow which argues that in order for authentictransformation to occur, learners need to reflect on their relationships with themselves, others,and the world they live in. Learners may have transformative experiences if they are willing toexplore other ways of thinking [2]–[4]. The STLR focuses on six tenets
trunk.The simulated reflection response (S11) of the antenna is plotted in figure 2, which indicatesdifferent resonance frequencies for different stages of RPW infestation. Note a damaged tree turnksuperstrate with r=50.7 caused the antenna to resonate around f=0.83 GHz. For a partially damagedtree trunk with r=35.3 the antenna resonated at around f=0.863 GHz and for a healthy tree trunkwith r=30.3 the antenna resonated around f=0.923 GHz. Note that the change in the dielectricproperties of the infected tree trunk is mainly caused by increasing wet oozing discharge within theinfested trunk. The simulation results can be made more accurate by carefully adding water contentsto the simulated model. This novel approach can be integrated with
engineers relating events in their careers. e. Student product is a reflection about the sectors that appeal most to them. 2. Explore the 14 NAE Grand Challenges (GC). a. Description of each with an example of a solution being pursued. b. Students reflect and record their thoughts on groupings of 3-4 GCs. c. Student product is a passion reflection about the GC that appeals most to them. 3. Address college life such as balance/wellness, time management, and teamwork. a. Describe the life change about to occur and how to prepare. b. Share some studying strategies within a time management structure. c. Note the importance of building teamwork skills. d. Student product is their
programwith career professionals (mentors) and undergraduate college students (ambassadors). Duringprogram activities youth from underrepresented groups are paired with a mentor employed in aSTEM-related agriculture field. Cultivate ACCESS ambassadors are University of Nebraska-Lincoln students who study a STEM-related major. Mentors and ambassadors are recruited fromdiverse backgrounds that reflect the demographics of high school scholars. Scholars receivementoring from an adult and a peer who physically looks like them and can share personalstories of overcoming obstacles and facing adversity that youth may have encountered.Participation in mentoring experiences aids students in gaining scientific knowledge and engagesthem in career exploration and
year 3Background and Context• STEM Teaching Fellowship: – Teachers apply in school teams of 3-4; typical composition includes both science and mathematics teachers, mostly middle school – Three main strands: STEM Integration, Core Teaching Practices, Schoolwide STEM Strategic Plan 4Background and Context• Approach to STEM Integration Strand – Experience STEM integration as learners – Reflect and unpack as educators – Introduce tools, strategies, and templates to empower teaching fellows to engage their students in STEM Integration• Summer 1: Platform Design• Summer 2: Flint Experience
Feedback e Research from other fields suggests the practice of video recording presentations andreceiving feedback yields even greater gains in communication skills. The use of video to recordpresentations and review for feedback has been referred to as the “gold standard” ofcommunication education, and is widely used in professional education in the “helpingprofessions” such as education, medicine, psychology, and social work[13]. Video recordingallows for students to reflect on their presentation at a distance, and offers a realistic picture oftheir abilities[14]. Furthermore, the video medium offers the ability to parse out specific aspectsof communication, such as
a data-intensive approach to study one of the most fundamental research topics inlearning sciences and engineering education: “How do secondary students learn and applyscience concepts in engineering design processes?” We have collected data from over 1,000middle and high school students in Indiana and Massachusetts through automatic, unobtrusivelogging of student design processes enabled by a unique CAD tool that supports the design ofenergy-efficient buildings using earth science, physical science, and engineering scienceconcepts and principles of design. Data collected includes fine-grained information of studentdesign actions, experimentation behaviors, electronic student reflection notes, and virtual designartifacts. These process data
career. In academia, thus, understanding anddesigning programs to enhance professional identity is vital to the successful placement ofgraduates into industry. This study will use Higgs’ [1] definition of professional identity as aperson developing “the attitudes, beliefs and standards which support the practitioner role andthe development of an identity as a member of the profession with a clear understanding of theresponsibilities of being a… professional.”As students apply and intentionally pursue a degree in a specific discipline towards becoming aprofessional, they are acting as agents per Bandura’s [2] social cognitive theory of agency intheir own future and make decisions according to their self-reflections, identified desires
perceptions of the peer review process.The study was implemented over two semesters with iterative revisions in instruction madebetween semesters based on initial findings. Results suggest that peer review can increasestudent performance, as long as reflections are used to prompt student revision, regardless of theclass delivery method or assignment type.IntroductionEarly in their careers, engineers spend 20-40% of their time writing; as they move to middlemanagement, the writing requirements increase to 50-70% of their day; finally, engineers insenior management spend 70-95% of their days writing [1]. Despite job requirements for writingthat cut across professions [2], in most disciplines writing is rarely emphasized outside of Englishcomposition
integrating mechanical, chemical and quantum devices into circuits and communication links. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Relating Level of Inquiry in Laboratory Instructions to Student Learning OutcomesAbstract -- This research paper will describe the results of an experiment in which the level ofinquiry in a laboratory manual is varied from guided inquiry to open inquiry by reducing thespecificity of the instructions in the lab manual. The hypothesis is that less specific instructionswill cause students to reflect on their actions in lab and, as a result, circle further around Kolb’sexperiential learning cycle during each step of the lab. This should result in improved recall andbetter