collaboration. This model suggests that effective collaboration depends onpre-existing capacity and contextual characteristics of stakeholders and their institutions.Project Timeline. Our project iteratively builds across three years such that year 1 cohorts haveat least two participating teachers per county who teach 6th graders. The year 2 cohort will add7th grade teachers from the same schools and year 3 cohort will be designed during year 2.Because the project adds new teachers from a consecutive grade level each year, we will havestudents participating who represent a mix of new to the lessons and activities as well aslongitudinal. This combination will be leveraged in the research plan to study impacts of thelessons and activities throughout the
our undergraduate students who plan to take thecourse discussed in this paper as an elective.The main goals of the course are (1) to teach students the fundamental concepts in the 4 areasmentioned before and (2) to clearly illustrate the way in which advanced FPGA-based systemsare designed on PYNQ platform, using computer aided design (CAD) tools. During the lecturesession of the course, the first 90 minutes are used to present the theory materials in the form ofpower-point slides and journal articles to not only reflect the current trends in FPGA-basedembedded system design but also enforce the basic concepts needed by the engineering and thecomputer science students. During the remaining 90 minutes of the lecture session, students
, social sciences/humanities, andeducation, it did not go into any detail within each of these concentrations.Bottia et al. [3] examined high school/pre-college experiences for students considering choosingSTEM majors and concluded that strong factors in declaring a STEM major are taking physics inhigh school, and, while still in high school, planning to declare a STEM major once in college.The paper also discussed the positive effect of extracurricular STEM activities in school, and thatincreasing these experiences for students will better the odds that students will pursue STEM incollege.A study by Xia [4] investigated more financial motivations. They estimated that students useinformation about their family members’ incomes as models for what
a simple filter.DiscussionVerbal comments during and after the labs as well as anonymous course evaluations (100%return rate; 16 and 22 students, respectively) allowed for the instructors to study the students’experiences with the laboratory activities in a qualitative way with a goal of understanding howto improve the results of this initial trial of the concept of such “math labs” for follow-on years,both with respect to the planned second year of the trial within the Biomedical Engineeringdepartment and as part of the integrated experience within the expected new Engineering Designmajor, in which the mathematics courses are intended to be even more closely coordinated withmaterial taught in the studio classes. The mathematics department
quinoa should ASOPROQUINUA produce? This new approach to thechallenge was based on the lack of knowledge about standardization and good production practiceswithin the group of associates. Currently (in 2018), the students are designing with the Association,tools to quantify production while accompanying it in the participation of the program proposedby the Government. Under this last dynamic, the students have learned how to plan a productionprocess with incomplete information and other difficulties that the Association has, related to thelack of knowledge from an organizational and business perspective. 4. ConclusionsThe Humanitarian engineering approach is a growing perspective in the academic context. In thecase of Humanitarian Engineering
how to provide “higher qualityhealthcare to more people at lower cost” andtrain bioengineering leaders of tomorrow todrive “Moore’s law for health care14.”Change TheorySince a core goal of our effort is to execute asignificant change to our department’scurriculum and norms, we briefly discuss ourtheory of change to explain how we plan toredefine our curriculum. Organizationalresearch amply demonstrates that “howchanges are made and communicated” mattersmore than “what changes are made15.”Members of a community undergoing changeare keenly attuned to just treatment16. To foster Figure 1: Symbiosis between project objectives.a sense of just practices during a changeinitiative, administrators must engage stakeholders (faculty and students) in
[5-10] in recent years. This paper is a continuationof the progress from the first three years of the Clinical Immersion Program beginning Summer 2014,including changes implemented in Summer 2016 as well as further modifications planned for the 2017Program [1]. Interest in this program has been strong and grows every year demonstrated by the increasein applications to the program from bioengineering students. Feedback from past participants (see section4) support the value of experiential learning which introduces students to clinical end users and teachesstudents valuable industry skill sets previously only available as “on the job training.”The Clinical Immersion summer program provides a valuable opportunity for students to observe
Control Charts for Variable Subgroups/Moving Averages Chapter 7.8 Control Charts for Linear Trend/ Medians Control Charts for Attributes Chapter 8.1-8.9 P, np, c, u, U charts Process Capability Analysis Chapter 9.1-9.7 Capability Indices; Capability Ratio Acceptance Sampling Plans Chapter 10.1-10.8 Standardized Plans Reliability Chapter 11.1-11.4 System Reliability: series and parallel Experimental design Chapter 12.1-12.5 Factorial and additional
PolytechnicState University of San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly). The platform is shown below in Figure 1. Thecourse and platform are being developed by students at Cal Poly, in collaboration with aprofessor who has a vision for the course. What follows is a description of how the course willprepare students for careers in industry; a look at similar courses at other universities; anoverview of the course; a summary of the SSIV development; and a plan for evaluating thecourse. Figure 1. The Small Scale Intelligent Vehicle (SSIV) in its current state of development.Tailoring the Course to Meet Industry NeedsAt Cal Poly, we wanted to make sure that our course in intelligent vehicles would effectivelyprepare students for a career in the industry. To better
satisfied with the amount and quality of feedback about my progress 3.94 ± 0.98 toward course objectives that I received in this course.Grading Strategy and Student MotivationStudents were asked to respond to the following open-ended prompt: “How did having a choiceof grading strategy affect your motivation and learning in this course?” Out of 51 responders, 15(29%) reported that the choice of grading strategy increased their motivation and incentivizedand/or improved their learning in the course. Twenty-two students (43%) reported that thegrading strategy had no effect on their motivation, and 14 (27%) of these students indicated thatthey planned from the beginning of the semester to complete all assignments independently ofthe
majorinfluence on secondary students’ motivation to study STEM fields in and after high school.This work explores a team of ExPERTS (Experiential Practices in Education Research andTeaching in STEM) composed of an engineering Ph.D. student, a biology undergraduate studentpursuing secondary certification, and a high school biology teacher. There are two main reasonsthat identifies this work as unique; First, the teamwork that requires individuals to be responsiblein lesson planning and performance based on their background an expertise; Second, the topicselection of the Module series which is around optics and its implementation in biology andbiomedical research, that not only introduces different areas of STEM fields concerning itsinterdisciplinary
2017, the author was awarded the permanent title of University DistinguishedTeaching Scholar at Kansas State University. This award is only given to one faculty member ayear and carries the responsibility of improving faculty teaching for a year. The author chose todevelop a workshop on improving student engagement in the classroom. The workshop coverstechniques to passively engage students and several active learning techniques. Understanding that faculty time is valuable and that the author had not been to any teachertraining over the past 15 years, the author chose to create an extremely short workshop that onlylasted one hour. The plan was to offer four workshops during the first semester and several thefollowing semester. The first
sites based on their research projects, thereis still a need to provide new PIs with guidance on the different aspects of an REU site such asidentifying resources that can assist in recruiting women and underrepresented minorityapplicants, providing training for graduate students acting as mentors, and strategies for keepinga mentoring connection to undergraduate researchers after they return to their home institutions.Currently, REU site preparation and orientation for new PIs is a face-to-face process thatrequires careful planning and significant travel costs. The REU PI Guide, a set of web-basedresources at https://www.vrac.iastate.edu/cise-reu-pi-resources/, was developed to share bestpractices of experienced PIs and build capacity within
Plan from 2009-2014, and Chair of the American Public Health Association’s Physical Activity Section from 2015-2016. Dr. Bornstein currently serves on several national committees including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Committee on Physical Activity Communications, the American Heart Association’s Expert Advisory Group on Physical Education and Physical Activity Policy in Schools, and he’s currently Chair of the National Physical Activity Plan’s Communications Committee. Locally, Dr. Bornstein is a member of the Mayor’s Health and Wellness Committee for the City of Charleston, and he is Chair of The Citadel’s Fitness Pillar.Mr. John H. Lewis Jr, The Citadel John Lewis has worked at the OECD
consider as they redesign their courses. The specific questions are discussed in more detail in aChange article11. Instructors are required to produce three main deliverables associated with theircourse transformations: a redesign goal, learning outcomes, and a course redesign plan (Table 1).There is a monetary incentive attached to each deliverable. Session Unit Topics Deliverables 1 Welcome to IMPACT 2 Student Characteristics Learning Outcomes (Initial) Motivating Learners 3 Motivational Theories Redesign Goal (Initial) 4 Learning Outcomes
-factor analysis, which identifies and addresses those factors that need to be inplace if the project is to be sustainable. Faculty are interviewed before and after implementingchanges. Midterm course evaluations provide student input on their perceptions of the changesintroduced by faculty and provides an opportunity to examine differences between males andfemales in a School of Engineering whose student body is approximately 30% female.Results & DiscussionLimiting Factors AnalysisFaculty wrote reports at the end of the first summer of their Foundations work (i.e., Fall 2016) inwhich they outlined their plans for adopting evidence-based practices to address issues of studentmotivation and relevance of course content to students’ lives and
as a small meal allowance. Each teacher has received up to$2000 for the supplies in their lesson plans. Teachers worked in teams on their respectiveresearch projects. The teams worked closely with the engineering faculty members supervisingtheir projects and graduate students. In addition a number of group activities were alsoorganized. These activities include industrial sites visit, research seminars and some professionaltraining such as CAD, machine shop and 3D printing. Besides research activities in the researchlab, the faculty member from the School of Education and Human Resources offered a project-based learning workshop each Thursday. This aims to help the RET teachers to transform whatthey have learned from the research project to
’ productcatalogs. Figure 3 shows a load table from a steel joist manufacturer’s catalog that helpsengineers select a joist size and type based on the joists span and allowable load for that span.Figure 3: Load table for steel joists based on their span.To use this table, the structural engineer needs to determine the span of their joists and theirloading to ensure they select a joist with enough capacity. If the framing has already beendetermined, this information can typically be found on structural drawings, but the structuralengineer often has to work with an architect and architectural drawings to see where joists can beplaced, spaced, and what type of loads they might support. Figure 4 shows a preliminary sketchof a framing plan for a roof that was
experience was a fully functional tiny house that was taken to competitionand then later used as a research platform and a promotional tool for the department of energy.Students learned construction techniques and building from specified plans that they participatedin creating. Students experienced every aspect of home construction along with installing solarand converting DC power to AC. Many students have never had the opportunity to see how asolar panel or system are integrated into a home electrical system in practice. Student successwas measured based on direct feedback from students throughout the build as well as commentsreceived after the project completion including student reports of successful job-interviews citingtheir involvement in the
maker cultureinto our STEM courses to increase the enrollment as well as the retention rate ofunderrepresented students, including females and minorities. This improvement of teachinginfrastructure and pedagogy at a minority serving institution will significantly enhance theteaching quality and eventually will have a positive impact on the US's economy and well-being.The main question that will guide the investigations of this study is: “What are the effects of thecontextualized and student-centered instruction in computer science courses on students’learning outcomes and experiences?” This paper reports our planned activities that will beimplemented in Fall 2019 semester.2. BackgroundHow People Learn (HPL) framework [11] and the student
± 0.5 5 ± 0.0 4.3 ± 0.5 Stakeholders? Target Niche?Current Market Who are the current 3 ± 0.0 3.7 ± 0.5 3 ± 0.0 competitors? What are their weaknesses?Solution Is the idea novel? Does 3.3 ± 1.7 3.2 ± 0.8 2.7 ± 0.5 it work better faster or is cheaper than the competition?Future Plans Are the plans to move 3.3 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.9 forward logical and feasible? FDA path?Total Score 19 18.8 15.75.3 Course
to practice independently, coding a similar task given specified parameters. This istypically discussed between nearby students and presentation of their successful solutions ishighly encouraged. The second half of each lecture is devoted to introducing the IAT,contextualizing the day’s coding topic within the IAT and applying the newly learned material tothe next stage of construction of the IAT.Figure 2: Lesson Plan – Four week plan to introduce and compile the components of an IAT withthe associated coding topics.The first week of the module begins with students completing the pre-survey which measurestheir baseline knowledge of implicit attitudes, if they have previously taken any psychologycourses and has them complete a rating of
. The challenges and lesson-learned on the collaboration between the two participating universities, communications withindustrial partners, recruitment of the students, set up of the evaluation plans, and developmentand implementation of the program will be discussed. The preliminary evaluation results andrecommendations will also be shared.IntroductionWith increasing demands for high performance in structural systems, Smart StructureTechnologies (SST) is receiving considerable attention as it has the potential to transform manyfields in engineering, including civil, mechanical, aerospace, and geotechnical engineering.Within the area of civil engineering, in particular, extreme events such as earthquakes,hurricanes, and tsunamis can have fatal
energy industry. Both programswere two-days long and focused on two key aspects of high value manufacturing: manufacturingoperations excellence and manufacturing quality excellence. The professional developmentsessions were focused on materials and inventory planning, production economics,manufacturing quality, non-destructive evaluation, statistical process control, and lean/ six-sigma. The continuing education programs and course materials were developed based on thefeedback from the industry advisory board for the Manufacturing Center of Excellence atHouston Community College, which is a collaborating partner on the ATE Grant. As a part ofassessment of the programs, industry participants in the both sessions were given comprehensivesurveys
appropriate for their course, teaching practices, experience, and instructional goals. • There is a preliminary four-year match period with potential renewal so that each pair can lead twice during each rotation period. Pairing is ultimately a personnel decision, but the chairs of the CBEE Curriculum and ABET will provide consultation. • Part of the annual performance reviews will contain a meeting between the School Head and the faculty pair where the activity and accomplishments of each member will assessed and evaluated. • New faculty will be paired with more experienced instructors. There will be documented development plans for new faculty that can become part of their teaching portfolio for P&T
, underrepresented students and engages time assisting the McNair Scholars Program at Cal Poly Pomona.Ms. Suzanna Conrad, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Suzanna Conrad is the Head of Digital Services & Technology in the University Library at Cal Poly Pomona. Suzanna obtained her MLIS from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign in 2011 and her MBA from the University of East London in 2006. Suzanna provides leadership for the planning, implementation, and support of digital collections and services for the University Library. Suzanna is the Convener for the ACRL Digital Curation Interest Group. Suzanna’s research interests include human- computer interaction, scholarly communication, and ethics in
event during thesummer break). We provide lunch in order to foster camaraderie, and participants both enjoy thefellowship and appreciate the gesture as a sign of support from the college administration. It isour intent to keep these sessions positive, friendly, informal, and open.We (the authors) have planned, coordinated, and facilitated most of the sessions to date. Whilesome of our meetings involve socializing and free discussion, we also draw on suggestions fromthe participants for discussion topics. Such topics have included survey results of participants’work situations, information-sharing about the college’s administrative stance on teachingfaculty, teaching assistant supervision, and ideas for professional development. A recurrent
lacking of natural resources. Therefore, the Ministry of Education in Taiwan haspromoting cultivation of creativity and innovation in all levels of schools including fundamentaland higher educational ones for more than one decade. The white paper on creativity educationby MOE announced six action plans through 2008.11 According to The Global CompetitivenessReport 2014-2015 released by the World Economic Forum, Taiwan has ranked as top 10 in 144economies in the world in terms of the innovation index.12 Under the umbrella of the ImaginationResearch Projects Program raised by the Ministry of Science and Technology, the College ofEngineering in National Sun Yat-Sen University is responsible for conducting a three-yearintegrated project entitled
. This mentoring and counselling helps us as we individually create and advancecareer pathways. Also, the Jr. Chapter representative helps coordinate a build calendar with theJr. Board, in order to plan ahead for any activities or events throughout the semester incollaboration with their high school and community events. Advisors President MAES VP SHPE VP VPE- VPE-Jr. Secretary VP Internal Treasurer Historian Webmaster Corporate Chapters Jr. Chapter Jr. Chapter Jr. Chapter Jr. Chapter Jr. Chapter
) wasapproved by Purdue University under the College of Technology as an academic Center inFebruary 2009. At that time, the underlying foundation for ProSTAR’s professional educationactivities was a Master of Science degree with a primary focus in technology leadership andinnovation skills including tools for process improvement and quality management.In addition, this program incorporated other innovations beyond its delivery system, scheduleand fee structure. To be consistent with its goal of developing practical skills and knowledgeimmediately, or at least quickly, applicable to business and industry, its plan of study2incorporates a base of essential core studies, flexible and easily tailored courses to insurerelevance to emerging technologies, and