of the students from early in the process canprove to be instrumental in the future success of the maker space. As opposed to an “If you buildit, they will come” philosophy, it can prove of use to ask the students for input on the matter inadvance as you may find that there is not as big of a desire for a space as anticipated. That’s notto say that a maker space would not be a good addition to your university just that the type ofspace that the students are looking for could be different then you planned, (sewing machinesand vinyl cutters instead of CNC mills and lathes).The involvement of students also plays a crucial role later on the process once the space hasbecome established in maintaining and expanding your maker space. Students can
subjects while being fun at the same time. We intend to use the class as away for engineering students to build their own community and establish their own identity. Wenoticed students working in groups in this class tend to stick together afterwards in study groups,which contributed to their success in other classes. In addition to team building, we view theengineering design course as a “career molding” experience by showing the exciting, hand-onside of engineering. We believe all of these aspects contribute to the improvement of studentretention rates.In this paper, we will address the motivation for redesigning our engineering experience for firstyear students and re-shuffling of the CE 4-year plan based on observations and student
• Could give options of scenarios; different bridge optionsDiscussionThe pilot studies for new entrepreneurially minded learning modules in 2nd-year core engineeringcourses at Western New England University were completed in Spring 2015. Since the resultswere promising, the modules will be implemented in more sections of the respective courses inacademic year 2015-2016. Minor changes to the modules are planned to further address targetEML skills in the respective courses.IE 212Small changes are planned for the next implementation of this assignment. The module will bepitched to the students in a similar fashion; the students’ goal is to convince the CEO of theircompany to locate a new facility in a particular region. The assignment will be
Engineering (3) G * ‘C’ denotes Integrated lab component; & U – Undergraduate, G – Graduate; ** under development;3. Methods (Courseware) The overall goal of the EECE 6032 – Software Testing and Quality Assurance course was foreach student to understand the basic principles of software testing and quality, and their role incontemporary software engineering. An additional goal for graduate students was to examineresearch areas of interest, and be prepared to conduct research in software engineering in general.The ABET student learning outcomes of the course were:• To understand how to develop a test plan for a set of software requirements
to buy a product but they will only have that choice if the product can be made. Thus, students are introduced to manufacturing considerations and work with the instructor to validate the manufacturing and pricing assumptions.7. Technology roadmapping. The fact that this is a freshman level class with a one semester duration necessitates that the process be truncated. The students are required to make a technology roadmap, describing the technologies that need to be developed in order for the product to become a reality. They are, however, not required nor encouraged to embark on the technology development during the course. Instead, the students are asked to make an initial plan to develop these technologies in
professional engineering settings and related professional settings,5,6 as well as otherchallenging ethnographic field sites like family homes.7,8 Because of these prior fieldworkexperiences, we were—in addition to being hopeful—also realistic that negotiating accesssettings would present challenges because every new setting presents its own challenges.However, we had no reason to see these as insurmountable challenges. We were also as sensitiveas possible in our research design; we planned what we call a “sliding scale” approach to eachparticular focal research participant (i.e. new engineer). Depending on how she or he felt aboutthe research, we planned to vary the intensity of our field data collection, with an explicit plan todefer to more
orderto do so, the School of Engineering developed a zero-credit course that was given at the end ofthe sophomore year. This course was originally developed in response to the ABET 2000Criteria, and has been modified over the years to meet changes in protocol, curriculum, andtechnology8. During this course, the students go through an individual interview with theinstructor and take an exam based on the courses from the first two years of the curriculum. Thisinformation is then used during the department’s internal assessment process.This paper gives an overview of this exam, as well as how it is used to help in our internalassessment process and outlines recent plans to use the exam to aid students in their upperdivisional years as well. It also
; manufacturing technology; and renewable energy. By utilizingdata in College, State, and Federal databases, the well qualified research team assembledfor this project will be able to analyze the impact of long-term NSF funding in thesetechnological areas and make recommendations for wider studies to assess post-grantachievement of students funded by NSF ATE, better elucidating the impact of the overallprogram.2.0 Building on prior NSF ATE grants related to this proposal and CREATEConsortium:NSF DUE: 9850283 (ATE Planning), 9950015 (ATE Project), ATE Regional Centers(0202396), (0602615), (1002653), (1239631), and (1345306).CREATE’s initial project had four primary goals: curriculum development, enrollmentand retention, work-based site experiences, and
. In addition, he is a reviewer for the Human Resource Development Review, the Human Resource Development Quarterly, and the Journal for Technology Education. In addition to his academic pursuits, Dr. Foster is President of Foster and Associate, through which he consults regularly in business and industry in the areas of training, facilitation, strategic planning, quality, team dynamics, organizational change, and technical problem solving. Dr. Foster is a certified flight instructor, and a master woodworker. He is an avid reader and regularly writes (sometimes even publishes) poetry. He is married with two children (a son and daughter) and two grandsons.Jason C. Dean, Indiana State University Mr. Jason C. Dean
Same 5 areas of emphasis as Group A. by external forces 3. The types of bonding in polymericPre-lab Followed by completion of a worksheet by each materials (i.e., strong covalent bondslecture student that involved sketching, developing a within chains and weak van der Waals hypothesis, and proposing a plan to test the forces between chains) hypothesis. (Appendix D) 4. How chain alignment can increase
research plan, separate but separate but simultaneous inductive and deductive analysisare underway on the interviews collected at the Bay Area and World Maker Faires to date.Following these analyses, a preliminary theory of Young Makers will be developed, informingtheoretical sampling during our data collection expedition to the Bay Area Maker Faire in SanMateo, CA (in May 2016). We hope to finalize our sampling at this Maker Faire.Maker Theory: Additive InnovationFindings from our qualitative artifact elicitation and critical incident interviews showed thatMakers demonstrate the characteristics of an Additive Innovation2,3 mindset that describes theopen community of sharing and learning that is in the Maker community. Introduced in thispaper as
was driven by the need to provide quasi-real timefeedback for students in project-based courses. In the Software Enterprise8,9 at Arizona StateUniversity, a project-based curriculum is offered to undergraduate and graduate softwareengineering students. In a typical project experience, students are grouped into teams, eachworking on building a software project by incorporating the principles of Agile. A course projectis typically divided into 4-5 sprints spanning 3 weeks each. The requirements for this projectedare accumulated into a product backlog created through a planning process. During each sprint,the team identifies a set of user stories from the product backlog and adds them to the currentsprint backlog. Teams then identify tasks to do
equipment are being used.The Woodshop consists of mostly low-level equipment, however there is a band-sawwhich requires support from faculty.The Outlet is slated to be open 24 hours a day, seven days a week to students who haveaccess through their student identification card. Access is given to students who sign auser agreement which contains the guidelines for use of the lab. Guests can be broughtinto the lab if they are accompanied by a Teslab user (someone who has ID card access)and sign in to a guest binder; the user has the ultimate responsibility for any guest theybring into the lab. Installation of a security camera is planned, due to the fact that the labwill be largely unsupervised.A different policy has been created for a student group
Engineer of 2020 - Visions of Engineeringin the New Century, which indicates that engineers in 2020 need to develop analytical skills,practical ingenuity, creative capability, communication skills, concepts of business andmanagement, leadership, ethical standards and sense of professionalism [9]. The RoyalAcademy of Engineering in United Kingdom published Educating the Engineers for the 21Century - the Industry view, highlighting future engineering graduates need to be equippedwith creativity, innovation and leadership to lead the industry to succeed [10]. A Plan forEducating and Training Outstanding Engineers published by Chinese Ministry of Educationproposed a list of competencies to be possessed by engineering undergraduates upongraduation
small proportion of students majoring inhigh-demand fields such as engineering. The National Science Foundation(NSF) reports that 39% of URMs "plan to major" in science and engineeringfields as freshman, but less than half of these earn an undergraduateengineering degree; rates are startlingly lower for Blacks and Hispanics.One way to increase retention and graduation rates in engineering for allstudents is to enhance their overall skills and readiness for engineering-related work by way of cooperative education (i.e., co-op) and internships1that offer students "real-life, hands on" experience in their major subject. TheCenter for Postsecondary Research at Indiana University identifies suchexperiences as a "high-impact practice" that likely
beginning to make plans for the followingsummer. Guest lectures via video conferencing have been used for distant speakers, and also toallow capture for use within other classes to enrich the curriculum, or to allow students fromother campuses to virtually attend. 2.3. Engineering Alumni DinnerThe Engineering Alumni Dinner is part of an annual event held by the campus Office ofDevelopment. Engineering alumni are invited to the campus to attend presentations by studentsand a catered dinner. Senior design team students, along with groups of students participating inindependent research projects, present the status of their work to solicit feedback and suggestionsfrom the alumni. Typically, students are encouraged to emphasize the unique or
reflective and behavioral implications of survey-taking, the currentstudy investigates open-ended comments that students self-reported at the end of a recentengineering education survey. We gathered our data from the Engineering Majors Survey(EMS), a study of engineering students from a nationally representative sample of 27 U.S.engineering schools. The EMS is intended to follow junior and senior engineeringstudents from their undergraduate education into their career. So far the first (“EMS 1.0”)and second (“EMS 2.0”) waves have been administered, one year apart, with additionalfollow-up surveys planned. The EMS asks a variety of questions about engineeringstudents’ past academic and extracurricular experiences, confidence performing variousskills
includes flight simulation from 1986 to 1988, welding automation from 1991 to 1994, neurosurgical navigation (part-time) from 1995-1997, as well as open-source image analysis software from 2008 to 2011. He also did postdoctoral research at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) in Tsukuba, Japan from 2001-2005 and at Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS) in Leipzig, Ger- many from 2006-2008. He has patents in US and Japan on surgery planning. Since July 2011, he has been employed as assistant professor in Old Dominion University’s Department of Modeling, Simulation and Visualization Engineering. His research interests include medical simulation, medical image analysis
, Vietnam,Sri Lanka, Honduras, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Brazil, Jamaica, DominicanRepublic, St. Kitts, Ethiopia, Togo, Ghana, South Africa and Morocco 6.In this paper we will summarize our approach to integrating an international research (IR)experience for minority students in STEM in Sweden, the Netherlands, and Austria from 2008 topresent.NYC Alliance European Host Site Programs OverviewGraz, Austria - The Marshall Plan scholarship, funded by the Austrian Marshall Plan Foundation.It is an academic exchange program established to finance scholarships and fellowships foracademic exchange between Austria and the U.S., with a special focus on universities of appliedsciences, such as University of Graz (Uni Graz) and technical
know you well. Determine application deadlines for schools where you are interested in applying. Draft application statement(s).Most graduate programs in engineering expect that you will apply 9-12 months in advance of thesemester in which you wish to begin graduate school. Thus, during the fall term of your finalyear of undergraduate studies, you should complete the following tasks: Narrow your list of places to apply; generally 3-8 completed applications is a good goal. Ideally, you will apply to a range of schools (size, location, ranking, etc.) where you can make a strong case that you are a good investment and “fit” for their program. Identify your backup plan – “safety” school, work, volunteering
life forms a stable routine, I look for ways to change it. I’d rather be bored than surprised. If I were to be informed that there’s going to be a significant change regarding the way things are done at work, I would probably feel stressed. When I am informed of a change of plans, I tense up a bit. When things don’t go according to plans, it stresses me out. If one of my bosses changed the performance evaluation criteria, it would probably make me feel uncomfortable even if I thought I’d do just as well without having to do any extra work. 4Appendix: ENG1102 Entrepreneurial Intentions Survey - Fall 2017 6. For each
involving participants from different countries and cultures may differ greatlydepending on the educational traditions of the students’ homelands. We describe our internationalactivities with a focus on international students’ projects performed in cooperation with technicaluniversities abroad in order to offer the students the possibility to train their international skills.Developing and planning of such activities often gives some more practical challenges, such asdifferences in how engineering programs are designed, the differences in academic calendars andthe amount of credits given for projects and courses in different countries. In some cases, thedifferences in academic calendars are so big, that it is a major obstacle in arranging
-college collaboration aimed at reducing attritionamong STEM majors. Faculty from the College of Arts & Sciences, the J.B. Speed School ofEngineering, and the College of Education and Human Development, work together in tacklingidentified hurdles that contribute to poor retention and thus lower graduation rates in ourrespective undergraduate STEM programs.The University of Louisville’s 2020 Strategic Plan, a business and growth blueprint for thecurrent decade, states that we will “Implement STEM initiatives leading to more graduates withscience, technology and mathematics majors; more students majoring in engineering; and anincreased cohort of science teachers for K-12.”. The 2020 Strategic Plan sets year-by-yeartargets using 2008 graduation
about proper executionmay result if the evaluation and measurement processes are not planned well before projectapproval. This challenge does not exist in business because companies evaluate the revenues oftheir projects based on solid financial analysis before proceeding. Professionals in governmentwho must produce a cost/benefit analysis or a business case for their projects come face to facewith a unique challenge unknown to their counterparts in private industry. They ask questions likethese: How do you write a business case if you are not in a business? How do you find financial benefits for a government organization besides cost savings? How do you use financial metrics such as net present value (NPV), internal rate of
, and CNC machine tools in the areas of system design, production planning, and control and manufacturing. Edinbarough also served in paramilitary forces and in the Air Force. He is a Life Member of the ISTE, a senior life member of the IE (India), a member of ASEE and SME, and a licensed Professional Engineer (P.E.) in the state of Texas. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assistive technology based on IoT in building automation: a multidisciplinary engineering projectAbstractNowadays, most of our daily activities can be performed indoors; according to the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), on average, an American spends 90 percent of theirlife
include student development of identity and motivation in graduate engineering environments and understanding creativity in engineering design processes.Mr. Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno Derrick Satterfield is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and Chemical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Nevada, Reno. He graduated from the University of Nevada, Reno in May 2017, and plans to pursue a career in academia in the future. His research interests are in graduate student attrition rates within academia, engineering identity development and the factors that influence decision making on persistence.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering
Department of Pathology. In 2006, she served the College as Associate Dean for Academic Affairs. After eight years, she returned to faculty and developed a passion for the best practices of facilitating learning and the mentoring process.Dr. Janet E. Rechtman, University of Georgia Dr Janet Rechtman is a Senior Fellow at J.W. Fanning Institute for Leadership Development at University of Georgia. With more than 30 years of experience as a volunteer leader and consultant to nonprofit or- ganizations, Janet provides technical assistance to nonprofit organizations in areas of strategic planning, evaluation, marketing and communications, as well as individual coaching and leadership development. Her doctoral
students as seniors, comparing the maleversus female students.Another area where gender showed differences was the change in skills reported by thestudents between freshman and senior year. As shown in table 1 there was some change ineach skill for both genders, however the women had much greater variance betweenfreshman and senior year. The male students did not have any area that changed more than10%, while the women had several. They had a greater than 10% decrease in DecisionMaking, Flexibility, Futuristic Thinking, Goal Orientation, Interpersonal Skills, Leadership,Persuasion and Presenting. The two areas they had a greater than 10% increase wereDiplomacy Tact and Planning Organizing.Table 1: The percentage change in soft skills between
the female STEM student data. Using the emerging themes, suggestions ofpossible action for colleges and universities to take within their STEM program to increase thesuccess of the STEM students and STEM female students were made in this paper.Questions from the SurveyAs described earlier, the approximately twenty minute survey was composed of a wide variety ofquestions. The authors developed all the questions to the survey with the feedback andsuggestions of others who often work with the STEM student population on our campus. Beloware example questions from the survey (Table 1).Table 1: Example Survey Questions Are you majoring (or planning to) major in a STEM field? Yes No Are you or have you been a
Paper ID #22175Work in Progress: Baseline Survey about Community and IdentityAbigail M. Clark, Ohio State University Abigail Clark is a graduate student at The Ohio State University. Prior to coming to OSU, she earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Ohio Northern University and spent several years working at Battelle Memorial Institute in Columbus, Ohio. Her research interests include women in engineering. She is currently a Master’s student in STEM Education and is planning to pursue a Ph.D. in Engineering Education.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor in