Paper ID #33693Sustainable Bridges from Campus to Campus: The Creation and Conduct ofOnline Synchronous Summer Bridge Programs in 2020Dr. Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University Catherine Cohan, Ph.D. has been a research psychologist for over 20 years. Her areas of expertise include engineering education, retention of underrepresented students, measurement, and assessment. She is currently an Assistant Research Professor and coordinates the Sustainable Bridges NSF IUSE project (Peter Butler, PI). Previously, she was the project coordinator the the Toys’n MORE NSF STEP project (Renata Engel, PI).Dr. Lauren A
-based models impact the validation and recognition of students and communities of color as holders and creators of knowledge. His current work seeks to analyze and describe the tensions, contradictions, and cultural collisions many Latino/a/x students expe- rience in engineering through testimonios. He is particularly interested in approaches that contribute to a more expansive understanding of engineering in sociocultural contexts, the impact of critical conscious- ness in engineering practice, and development and implementation of culturally responsive pedagogies in engineering education.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University in Materials Science and
Paper ID #34600Mini-Workshop Series for Minority Serving Institutions with ECE ProgramsDr. Kenneth A. Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is an emeritus professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engi- neering (ECSE) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) where he taught courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research in- volves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photonics, biomedical sensors, engineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology enhanced learning. He
Paper ID #32260Championing Hispanic Student Success following Natural Disasters inPuerto RicoDr. Carla L´opez del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Dr. Carla L´opez del Puerto is a professor in the Civil Engineering Department at the University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez (UPRM). She received her Ph.D. in Higher Education Administration from Saint Louis University in 2009, M.S. in Construction Management from The University of Oklahoma in 2003 and B.S. in Architecture from Universidad de las Am´ericas Puebla, M´exico in 2000. Prior to joining UPRM, she was a designer and cost estimator for The Benham
Paper ID #32962Expanding Access to and Participation in MIDFIELD (Year 5)Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and the M.S. and Ph.D. in EE from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of diversity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She is Co-Director of the National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI). Her research has been sponsored by the National Science
system forces which would be a helpful reasoning pattern; however, thepresence of the friction force seemed to call on other knowledge that pulled from personalexperiences with objects on surfaces with and without friction – an unhelpful reasoning pattern. Table 1. Codebook for Question A. Code Student Example Explanation Friction will Reduce Acceleration “Since there are no friction forces acting on The presence of the friction force will reduce the block in system A, the block in system A acceleration, regardless of the net forces. will accelerate faster than B.” Friction Force Determined by Normal and “They accelerate at the same rate because the
subsequent cycles. This approach was used in the development and testing of thetwo Virtual Biomechanics Laboratory (VBL) modules discussed in this paper.A request to use students as humanresearch subjects for the coursewas approved by the University ofTexas Institutional Review Board(IRB) under protocol #2002-02-0139. Students were asked to signa human subject consent form andall 28 students graciously obliged.Before the first VaNTH challengewas assigned, the class randomlydrew a slip of paper from a hatwith either the letter A or B writtenon the slip. Based on this randomdraw, the students were assigned toeither Group A (control) or GroupB (trial). This group assignment Figure 1: The Legacy Cycle Framework.3was maintained for
Figure 1.a. (a) (b) Figure 1. Toy balance bird (a) with a reaction force in line with the center of gravity below the beak, (b) fixed connection on the wing.The resultant force (𝐹𝑅 ) is the summation of the weight (𝑊) of all the parts, or the integration ofthe weight across the whole body. Equation 1 illustrates this calculation if gravity points in thenegative z-direction. 𝐹𝑅 = −W 𝑘̂ = ∑ −𝑊𝑖 𝑘̂ = − ∫ 𝑑𝑊 𝑘̂ ⃑⃑⃑⃑ (1)The resultant moment (𝑀𝑅 ) about the origin requires the cross product
) is used to transform a time domain signal x[n] sequenceto a frequency domain X(k) sequence.The frequency response of a sequence and its DFT are related as expressed in equation 1. , =2 /N, =0, 1, 2, .,N-1 (1)The elements of X( ) a b a d a a a d c c ac d 2 /Napart. This is the natural spacing of the transform, which doesn't need time information toperform properly, but to find actual frequencies, we need time information. This is contained inthe true frequency spacing of the a , ,a d d a (2). M byields the frequency of that point on the transform in Hz. = 1/T0
perception of their own creativity and howthey think others view their creativity. The surveys were marked with “A” or “B” and handed outrandomly. The participants with “B” on their pre-survey were led to a different room, while theparticipants with “A” on their pre-survey stayed in the same room.Group “A” completed a creative activity called “30 Circles,” created by IDEO [30]. This creativeactivity was chosen, because after completing a pilot study, the participants seemed to be able tocreate more sketches after completing this activity. Figure 2 shows two examples ofinterpretations to the 30-circle activity. One participant made every circle into individualcreations; therefore, each circle became a fish, a flower, sun or a ball. The participant
circuit, were used to accomplish the goals ofthis lab. For the circuit in Fig. 3(a), students manually derived the output voltage (Vout) infunction of V1, V2, R1, R2, R3, and R4, then used the 741 Op-Amp model in the Multisimlibrary to create and simulate the circuit. The measured output voltage, Vout, was comparedwith manual calculations.For the circuit of Fig. 3(b), students created the circuit, measure Vout, and compared it with thesource voltage VS. In addition, the currents going into terminals 2 and 3 were measured as wellas the current flowing out of pin 6. Students were asked to answer a few critical questions aboutthe operation of the circuit and its usefulness. R2
/.[12] Looi, C.-K., Wong, L.-H., So, H.-J., Seow, P., Toh, Y., Chen, W., Zhang, B., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2009). Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1120–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.021[13] Gao, Y., Gonzalez, V. A., & Yiu, T. W. (2019). The effectiveness of traditional tools and computer-aided technologies for health and safety training in the construction sector: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 138, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.003[14] Sacks, R., Perlman, A., & Barak, R. (2013). Construction safety training using immersive virtualreality, Constr. Manag. Econ. 31 (9) 1005–1017, http
considered the Inertial or World Frame, {A}. The other frame isthe Body Frame of the object, {B} in this case, the wheel. The two coordinates are depicted inFigure 3. Note that the vector At represents the origin of Frame B with respect to Frame A. 𝐵 𝐵 𝜃 𝐴 A (𝑥 ) t 𝐴 (𝑥 ) MATLAB Inertial Frame Figure 3: Rolling wheel kinematicsFor our illustrative example, the wheel rolls and travels at a constant linear velocity, 𝑣𝑥 andtherefore the total distance travelled with respect to Frame A is 𝑥 = 𝑣𝑥 𝑡, where
andHydrology. A detailed description is included for the assessment process involving the design ofexperiments to investigate rainfall-runoff processes using a bench-scale hydrology table. Thepresentation includes methods for (a) communicating the design process to students, (b) settingexpectations for classroom theory to be investigated, (c) working within the capabilities ofequipment, and (d) assessing the student-led design process.IntroductionExperimental design is an important skill for undergraduate engineering students to acquire.Hands-on exposure to the constraints of experimental variables, equipment capabilities, and theresolution of measurement techniques at the stage of experimental design gives students anopportunity to think critically
withthe building model produces aerodynamic forces on the building, which will be computed andplotted in the later section. In Fig. 2, the face “ABFE” is the top face whereas the face “BDHF” isthe front face of computational domain. The top view and the front view of computational domainare shown in Fig. 3 (a) and (b) respectively. E Outlet F G A Inlet
faculty reflection logs written by twoengineering professors at a public university in the United States. The research was reviewed byour university’s Human Subjects research review board and all data collection and analysis wasconducted according to the resulting protocols. The faculty reflection logs cover two differentclasses of the same university over two semesters each, Spring and Fall 2019, for a total of fourfaculty reflection logs. In some cases, these logs refer to prior faculty reflection logs created by afaculty member at a nearby university, University B. Each class was taught by the sameprofessor for both semesters; we call these professors Professor A and B, as shown in Table 1.Both are part of the broader research team and co
use the physical models for theory demonstration,while others use them for hands-on problem-solving; it is unclear whether the physical modelshould be used in classroom demonstration and/or in the laboratory session. This study seeks toanswer whether the use of hand-on problem solving (representing textbook problem) inlaboratory sessions improves comprehension and retention in Dynamics; as well as how tobridge the gap between the textbook problems and commercially available models?ObjectivesThis study aims to introduce and assess hands-on problem-solving in Dynamics for improvedcomprehension and retention. This goal is achieved by following steps: (a) identify the criticalconcepts that students mostly struggle with, (b) select textbook
. After alsocomparing the results for support B, students are asked to write a summary of what they haveobserved about the behavior of the loading as their first exposure to superposition. Figures 3 and4 are reintroduced in a later class when superposition is formally introduced.The final two loadings demonstrate distributed loads and resultants. Figure 5 represents a five-inch-long, uniformly-distributed load of 2 grams per inch spaced evenly beginning at ½ inch frompoint A and ending at 5 ½” from point A. Students must reflect on the possible support reactionsif they summed the reactions for each individual 2-gram load. They must also indicate what thetotal load is on the beam (10 grams) and identify where the center of mass occurs for this
-structuredesigned and built by Team I was to receive the ball from Team H and pass the ball to Team J.As COVID-19 did not allow for members of each team to meet physically during the term, eachsub-structure was to be designed by that team such that it could be broken up into three or fourmodules. Each team member was responsible to construct one of these modules. Figure 1bshows an example of a 2D sketch drawn by a student team that illustrates the ball’s intended paththrough their sub-structure. In this case, the ball is received by the first module (labelled asModule L), travels through Module Z, X, and B in succession, and is subsequently delivered tothe next team.At the end of the term, each team member was required to deliver their constructed module
of malfunction since the material is notas sturdy as other materials. (a) (b) (c) Figure 6. Initial hand-drawn engineering design options for proposed prosthetics (a) spring attached, (b) various damping attachments, (c) a detailed 3D-printed prosthetic cutawayConstruction Phases of the both projectsLadder Activity BoardThe top, bottom, and sides of the board are constructed by plywood. The wood glue was used tohold the board together. The spray paint was used to finish the painting of the board. A 4’x4’CNC mill was planned to be used to precisely cut the board in the production lab. Instead,students used a laser cutter after learning how to convert an AutoCAD
carbonaceous films.Palladium samples tended to achieve thick carbon films (>40um) with relatively low flow ratesand temperatures. The palladium samples grew carbon films most readily at the inlet portion ofthe furnace, especially position #3 (see Figure 1). Flow rates of 15 sccm (1:1) for as little as 1minute have shown uniform and complete surface coverage. Longer deposition times yieldthicker films which after ~30min yield 3D macroscale features. Pd also showed carbon growthat temperatures of 350 oC with 100sccm (1:1) of gas flow. The film characteristics of Pd tend tobe dominated by filaments which assume a woven appearance (See Figure 2 a and b). Thesefilaments range in diameter and wrap around themselves and each other. At lower temperatures
choicelearning assessments in both courses to participate in a think-aloud study. We incentivized theirparticipation with a small financial reward. We combined selected questions from the twolearning assessments so as to (a) develop a combined assessment that can be finished in athink-aloud interview within an hour and (b) have all the key topical areas in each coursecovered in the new subset. The original fluid mechanics and mechanics of material assessmentsin 2019 had 36 and 20 problems, respectively. In 2020 we combined 11 of the fluids with 19 ofthe solids problems into one assessment for the think-aloud studies. Two researchers in our team each conducted four interviews for a total of eight. To definea measure of how our participants
sequence. Overarching goal: prepare ChEn students for professional practice and for possible research careers in computationally-intensive ChEn fields and applications In each following core ChEn course, students then completed numerical projects building on principles of that course The Numerical Methods course was built on concepts from linear algebra: linear e a e , ea e a e , ea de a d e , b da a e be , a d de Advantage: After that key Numerical Methods course, students were proficient at programming, at formulating numerical approaches, and at coping with challenging numerical problems Problems: In
printing history and asked aboutthe design process, intended use, and success of each of their prints. The interview questions canbe found in Appendix B. After the interview, a third party transcribed the interview, removed anyidentifiers in the transcript, and destroyed the video recording files.ResultsFifty undergraduate engineering students were surveyed in the study. Descriptive statistics of theparticipating students are presented in Table 1. While students were given nonbinary choices whenasked for their gender identity, very few identified outside of the male and female categories,and so results given here are for those two groups (referred to as men and women, respectively,here).The majority of men and women sampled entered college with no
system. Gears Sensor Motor Arm Figure 1: DC motor and arm setupFigure 2 provides a more detailed schematic of the motor and load, and also provides a blockdiagram for the continuous control system. The parameters of the system are given in Table 1. Figure 2: a) System schematic and b) Control system block diagram 3 The plant model was derived from the schematic in Figure 2, using the parameters in Table 1,which were obtained from motor manufacturer specifications
Dean, and Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Program. Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference (a) (b) (c)Figure 2 – a) Child using his redesigned/modified bicycle, b) child positioned at her learningcenter, and c) light activity box showing arrangement of peg holesENHANCEMENT OF DESIGN EXPERIENCEFrom these projects for special needs children, we observe how the design experience for thestudents has been enhanced as follows: Solve real life problems with a sponsor or client. Introduce, interact, and serve students with special needs. Design unique and challenging projects for special needs. Provide a
Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationOutcomes Required to Achieve ObjectivesThe faculty members in each department have developed a set of outcome statements forachieving program objectives. The mechanical engineering department has identified a total ofthirteen (13) outcomes. The relationships between student outcome statements and theobjectives A, B, C, and D are shown below.Student Outcomes for Objective A: Students in this program will develop the followingabilities through their undergraduate education in this department:A-1 to use the principles from chemistry, physics, statistics, and
that is beyond the undergraduate level. Inaddition, CFD analysis is still somewhat of an art form where the adjusting of multiple solution a ame e can change a ele m del in a b , h icall eali ic m del. In deprovide undergraduate students with the necessary background, the basic theory for pressure-based solutions on regular, structured meshes is often presented with simple numerical examplesto reinforce the lessons. The theory and the examples are limited in scope and they discuss only afraction of the available CFD techniques. The course discussed here utilizes a final project toaddress these shortcomings. Each student designs their own problem at the beginning of thesemester with guidance from the instructor. As a result, students
cleartrends for the study.MethodsDuring the academic year, students were assigned various tasks to complete per week (AppendixA1 and 2). Group “A”, comprised of 9 students, worked on a project to build a moving devicewhich would be tested for dynamic performance, while Group “B”, comprised of 7 students,worked on building a structure to be tested for load-bearing performance.Students reported their previous week’s results using an individual-based Project Status Report(PSR), in which they also enter the time spent on all of the previous week’s tasks. The number oftasks to perform and points to be earned varied by week, and therefore a weekly percentile scorewas determined to be compared against the reported work time for that week.At the end of each
was initiated to determine (a) existing levels of knowledge among the students, and(b) efficacy of brief, course-relevant lessons at increasing student awareness of the intersectionbetween course topics and social/environmental justice. To assess awareness across the range ofthe students in the department, surveys were conducted in the Introduction to EnvironmentalEngineering and Introduction to Civil Engineering classes, as well as the EnvironmentalEngineering Senior Capstone class. Students were asked to complete an anonymous surveyassessing knowledge and awareness of social and environmental justice issues before and after asocial/environmental justice lesson was delivered to the class.The following research provided a preliminary step