offer an interaction aspect yet shows effectivenessin visualizing complex fluid power systems. In their later work on fluid power education, Azzamet al. [8] focused on integrating VR into the laboratory work of engineering technology courses toteach students about hydraulic gripper components and assembly in a construction environment. Figure 3. The hydraulic grippers in the developed VR construction-like user interface [8]Furthermore, students shall develop solid foundations in electronics, instrumentation, dataacquisition, and programming of pneumatic and hydraulic systems, as they constitute value-addedskills for fluid power professionals [3]. Nevertheless, previous fluid power laboratory practiceswere insufficient in tackling the
, student became familiarized with the various components(resistors, capacitors, inductors, integrated circuits, etc.) that comprise the electronic device. Theexercise strengthened laboratory skill of students such as reading and understanding electronicschematics, determining resistor values, and soldering components on a printed circuit board.Lastly students gained an appreciation in how empirical data is recorded, analyzed and modeled.3.3 Protein Crystal Growth ExperimentBiotechnology is an area whose importance in addressing problems in health, agriculture, and theenvironment is expected to increase in the future. For several years, the Texas Space GrantConsortium has sponsored a State-wide Protein Crystal Growth Experiment as a means
the self-excited wind turbine require asomewhat deeper understanding of induction machines including the per-phase electrical model inFigure 8 and, for the DFIG turbine, the dq model.14 These experiments may not be appropriate forentry level classes but could be integrated into later courses in electric machines and apparatus.All of the experiments could be considered for upper-level undergraduate classes in renewableenergy or wind power. UT Austin already offers an annual course in wind power and will takethis approach. UTPA will integrate the experiments into several courses in the electricalengineering curriculum.We intend to develop additional advanced experiments covering such topics as wind powervariability at the system level and
Experiments and Blended Learning in Engineering Education: A Framework for AssessmentAbstractThis paper presents a comprehensive framework for refining desk-scale experiments andimplementing an impactful blended learning curriculum within the realm of chemical engineeringeducation. The primary focus is on evaluating the influence of these enhancements on studentlearning outcomes and the overall success of educational transformation initiatives. The studyaddresses two central research questions. The first question centers on improving the studentunderstanding of topics related to graphical flow characterization by using a desk-scaleexperimental module. We consider critical factors such as ease of installation, safe to operate, andability to
engineeringdesign process. For example, Wendell, Wright, and Paugh [4] describe the reflective decision-making practices observed in 2nd through 5th grade classrooms as students completed designactivities within the Engineering is Elementary curricula. Previous research on the middleschool curriculum described in this paper [5] utilizes longitudinal interview data to documentprogressions in how individual students describe their work with the stages of the engineeringdesign process over the course of several exposures to the curriculum.Researchers have also investigated how integrated STEM curricula promote the transfer ofknowledge from one STEM subject or context to another, ultimately enhancing student learning[6], [7], [8]. Because STEM integration
learning and increasing teachers’ use of effective STEM instruction in the elementary grades. More recently, her research has focused on using literacy to support scientific inquiry, engineering design and STEM integration.Mr. Aran W Glancy, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Aran W Glancy is a graduate research assistant at the University of Minnesota pursuing a Ph.D. in STEM Education with an emphasis in Mathematics Education. He received his M.Ed. in Science Education (Physics) from Lehigh University. Prior to enrolling at the University of Minnesota, Glancy spent six years as a high school mathematics teacher and two years as a high school science teacher. His research interests include STEM integration, modeling
semester along with the prior semester’s survey data at a special faculty meeting.The matrix provides information on overall program evaluation and completeness. It also servesas a basis for illustrating how the courses that constitute the program collectively meet theprogram outcomes defined in Table 1.As part of the assessment improvement process, this curriculum matrix was presented to an industrialmembers committee on July 18 and July 29, 2003 respectively. This committee was asked toassess the program for its effectiveness in meeting the program educational objectives. Afterreviewing the information provided in complete curriculum matrix and supporting materials, thecommittee was convinced that the program looked effective, and would achieve
inwhich students design, build, and test a complex project. These programs are increasinglyindustry sponsored 1, and expose students to many of the real constraints engineers face.Capstone courses are the primary mechanism used by many universities for integratingcommunication, and teamwork skills and social, economic, and ethical issues into theengineering curriculum 2. The capstone concept has been extended by other schools such as theDesign4Practice program at Northern Arizona University and the projects program at WorcesterPolytechnic Institute 3-5 in which dedicated design courses are integrated into all four years of theundergraduate curriculum. Improvements in student performance following capstone programshave been observed in several
knowledge, skills, and values totackle real-world issues, while fostering a sense of civic duty, empathy, and self-improvement[1].Examples of service learning projects include designing and building a toy for a disabled kid,fabricating laboratory equipment for a science teacher, developing a playground for an under-served community, and participating in an environmental clean-up initiative. Service learningcan be integrated into various academic fields, including but not limited to, education,psychology, sociology, public health, and environmental studies.Service learning offers numerous benefits to students, including developing leadership skills,promoting civic engagement, and gaining hands-on experience in their field of study. It alsopositively
experimentation(increased research and development costs) can have on Wall Street’s perception of acompany. Our university recently merged the colleges of Business and Technology andApplied Sciences resulting in a cross-pollinated faculty and the establishment of coursesin the graduate and undergraduate curriculum where business and engineering technologystudent’s work together on class projects, many of which involve an innovationcomponent.It is interesting that many of the faculty who incorporate a discussion or exercise relatedto the innovation process in their classroom have had extensive experience in anindustrial setting prior to joining the university faculty. Industry seasoned faculty bringtheir “real-world” experience to the classroom and
received an MFA in creative writing from the University of Arizona; her research interests include narrative theory in health communication.April Kedrowicz, University of Utah Dr. April A. Kedrowicz is the Director of the CLEAR (Communication, Leadership, Ethics, And Research) Program at the University of Utah, a collaboration between the College of Humanities and College of Engineering. The program was developed in 2003 through a grant from the Hewlett Foundation, with the goal of integrating communication (speaking and writing), teamwork, and ethics into the curriculum of every department in the College of Engineering. Dr. Kedrowicz’s work with Engineering began during her tenure as a
(DLE)10 for all majors, defined as “discovery-based and experiential learning that involvesinstructional experiences out-of-class and beyond typical curriculum courses” under the Page 15.299.8supervision of a faculty member. BREG 365 will include professional preparation for theDiscovery Learning Experience (DLE) – either undergraduate research or an internship in the ETprogram. Students will be encouraged to develop versions of their ePortfolios that can bereleased to potential internship sponsors or employers.Table 2. Revised ET Program: Courses in the New Seminar Series: New Courses and Catalog Descriptions
innovative curriculum activities thatcultivate inclusive engineering identities and demonstrate how the engineering professionbenefits from diversity. We intend to expand first-year engineering student perceptions aboutwho can be an engineer and what engineers do. This effort aims to create a cultural shift inengineering departments so students think beyond stereotypical perceptions of who belongs tothe engineering profession (White men) toward more expansive notions about how theengineering profession needs diversity to thrive. Arguably, inclusive engineering departmentswill contribute to the retention and success of students who are underrepresented in engineeringin terms of gender and race, but also in terms of backgrounds, talents, and
Teaching Professor) Marko Lubarda is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, San Diego. He teaches mechanics, materials science, design, computational analysis, and engineering mathematics courses, and has co-authored the undergraduate textbook Intermediate Solid Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020). He is dedicated to engineering pedagogy and enriching students' learning experiences through teaching innovations, curriculum design, and support of undergraduate student research.Alex M PhanNathan Delson (Professor) Nathan Delson is a Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. His research interests include
engineering education. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Jennifer Courtney is an Assistant Professor of Composition and Rhetoric at Rowan University and received herPhD from Purdue University. Her interests include gender and communication and information literacy.Kevin Dahm is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D. fromMIT and his B.S. from WPI. Among his areas of interest are computing and process simulation in the curriculum,and integrating economics and design throughout the curriculum. He has received the 2003 Joseph J. Martin Awardand the
provides students witha broader context to the material learned in class. With project-based learning students shift froma passive to an active learning pattern that is likely to improve knowledge retention as well as theability to integrate material from different courses.1 Each project provides students with the Page 25.1084.2opportunity to apply the knowledge they have learned in classes, and each problem they face inthe project inspires them to explore the material more deeply in future study 2.Project-based learning can develop the ability of students to work in interdisciplinary teams.Interdisciplinary teamwork is not only an expectation of
andacademic development workshops into the curriculum of an introductory engineering class. Inaddition, this paper discusses the importance of a peer-to-peer mentorship program, specificallyfocusing on utilizing the course teaching assistants (TAs) as role models and mentors. Thestudents’ demographic data, the development workshop topics and content, and the impact andoverall effectiveness of the interventions implemented in this study are discussed. The researchproject explores the implications of future iterations that integrate the lessons learned from thisanalysis and propose the next steps to ensure a replicable positive impact on the students.MethodologyOverview of Introductory Engineering CourseAt the University of Texas at El Paso, first year
thehigh school to college. Although similar arrangements may be common between othercolleges and high schools, this program is unique in that the Penn State Harrisburgcourses are taught at the high school during the day and integrated into the student’s classschedule. This allows a senior to complete their high school requirements and attendPenn State Harrisburg as a college student at the same time. Typically, over 25 Hersheystudents per year, start their college experience at Penn State University. This programgives these students an early opportunity to start their Penn State course work while stillcompleting high school. However, the program is not just for students bound for PennState. If the high school student chooses to go to another
Assessing teaming skills and major identity through collaborative sophomore design projects across disciplinesAbstractCollaboration and student projects than span multiple departments are often seen as too difficultto pursue due to administrative, topical, or other logistics related barriers. This projectdemonstrates an approach at introducing true interdisciplinary design projects within asophomore level materials and energy balances courses in both Bioengineering and ChemicalEngineering programs at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Engineering curriculahave been focused on integrating design in the freshman and senior years but often fail tointegrate projects into the sophomore and junior year courses. The study
, as it involves a cultural change from the silo approach to a holistic approach. TheABET-required senior capstone multidisciplinary design course too often becomes a design-build-test exercise with the emphasis on just getting something done. Students rarely break outof their disciplinary comfort zone and thus fail to experience true multidisciplinary-system,model-based design. What is needed are multidisciplinary systems courses, with a balancebetween theory and hardware, between academic rigor and the best practices of industry,presented in an integrated way in the 2nd and 3rd years that prepares students for truemultidisciplinary-system, model-based engineering at the senior level and beyond.Do technological universities and industry have
engineeringeducation field in general, a number of investigations have been conducted to explore therelationship and importance of empathy, self-awareness, and social-awareness in engineeringstudents [11-14]. These studies reveal the importance of empathy for effective innovation andengineering design. In biomedical engineering design, a more in-depth understanding of theentire patient experience may provide for more innovative and effective design alternatives.The efforts discussed in this paper to address the inclusion of the disease pathway and the entirepatient experience into the educational opportunities for biomedical engineering students are onestep to more effective integration of the liberal arts and humanities into an engineeringeducation. Previous
Engineering EducationThe different roles assumed by faculty members reflect the type of curriculum used in theengineering classrooms. Some instructors enjoy the authoritarian stance and provide students thetraditional education 38. In the traditional education format students are told what they areexpected to know and concepts are presented deductively 10,16. Other instructors become toolaissez-faire and become a silent member of the classroom or mainly an observer—whereinstruction primarily allows students to grow and learn on their own with little or no extrinsichelp 25.The role of the instructor in the classroom for course development in engineering educationcannot be divorced from the understanding of theories of learning and the effectiveness of
AC 2008-84: IMPLEMENTING RESEARCH–BASED INSTRUCTIONALMATERIALS TO PROMOTE COHERENCE IN PHYSICS KNOWLEDGE FORTHE URBAN STEM STUDENT.Mel Sabella, Chicago State University Mel S. Sabella is an Associate Professor of Physics at Chicago State University (CSU). His interests focus on improving STEM education for underrepresented students. Sabella is the director of an NSF – CCLI project that integrates research-based instructional material in the introductory urban physics classroom. He is also director of the Physics Van Inservice Institute, part of a project supported by the Illinois Board of Higher Education. Sabella earned his PhD. in Physics Education Research from the University of Maryland
-ment simple combinational circuits such as AND, OR, and NOT gates, or simple sequential circuitssuch as D or JK flop-flops. TTL MSI (medium scale integration) packages contain 10 to 100 gates,and implement more complex circuits such as small adders, decoders, and counters. As complex programmable logic devices have become more available and affordable, manyschools are incorporating them into their undergraduate laboratory curriculum.2, 4, 7 In some cases,they are completely replacing the discrete TTL DIP implementations described above. Programmable Logic Arrays (PLAs) are single chip packages (available in DIP format) that im-plement an array of logic: the inputs can be ANDed together in any combination, and the productterms generated
Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education 12 References1. Knight, Daniel W., Lawrence E. Carlson, and Jacquelyn F. Sullivan. "Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team based, first-year design projects." In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Engineering Education. 2007.2. Olds, Barbara M., and Ronald L. Miller. "The effect of a first‐year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study." Journal of Engineering Education 93, no. 1 (2004): 23-35.3. Fuentes, Arturo A., Horacio Vasquez, and Robert A
, andimprove the use of mathematics and the understanding of science among its students byintegrating mathematics, science, and engineering design within every subject and across eachgrade level at Jamerson Elementary.D.L. Jamerson’s overarching goal is to present required standards-based curriculum as a learningadventure that is enriched by applying engineering skills (integrated knowledge of mathematics,science, language, history, and the arts) for problem solving and higher order thinking at theappropriate level in all classrooms and subjects. The execution of its curriculum is not theproduction of a collection of miniature things like pyramids or volcanoes. Nor are Jamersonstudents in the gadget, robot, widget, and/or thing-a-majig creation
in the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership at the University of Texas at El Paso. As an NSF Graduate Research Fellow, she received her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, with a concentration in Biomechanics, from The University of Texas at Austin. An engineering education researcher, her work focuses on enhancing engineering students' motivation, exploring engineering identity formation, engineering faculty development, developing integrated course sequences, and methods for involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction. Dr. Kendall's scholarship emphasizes the professional formation of engineers, specifically through the development and application
may involve unlearning or “deconstructing” some beliefs or understandings towardthe individual based on their cultural or societal identity5,14. To train engineers in use of the metaphor, an effective teaching method has beendeveloped. Cage Painting Simulation5 (CPS) was developed to integrate the four steps of cagepainting into an interactive tool that challenges the learner to examine interculturalcommunication preconceptions and misconceptions, with a culturally unidentified syntheticindividual named Simea. The CPS uses interactive scenarios with scaffolded feedback for three levels of learner’schoices: good, mediocre, and bad5. The character Simia has scaffolded feedback for the samechoice level. The scenarios are based on a
, facilities, institutional and external support andassessment [6]. Where applicable, each program must satisfy program criteria that amplify thesecriteria. Under the students and graduates subheadings the proposed criteria specify a set ofattributes a graduate of an engineering technology program expected to possess. Some of theseattributes are mastery of the knowledge, ability to apply current knowledge and adapt toemerging applications in mathematics, science, engineering and technology, ability to functioneffectively in teams and communicate effectively. Under the program characteristic subheading,there are subsections on educational objectives, curriculum, communications, mathematics,physical natural sciences, social sciences/humanities and
content was covered in isolation from the engineeringprojects with one week of equitable and inclusive STEM environment content followed by aweek of technical experiences with the project-based engineering curriculum. In each subsequentyear, the leadership team adjusted the content planning to better reflect the need for equity workto be embedded in STEM pedagogy, and not as something separate. The most consistentcomponent of the CISTEME365 professional development model was the Action Research forEquity Project (AREP). Participants designed, implemented, and then presented their findingsfrom an action research project where they investigated the impact of implementing one or moretargeted equity and inclusion strategies in their STEM Clubs or