information technology tools. Without a laboratory section for the course, the designresults are verified using simulations, for example using MATLAB, MATHCAD or otheravailable programs. It is very important that students first go through problems usingpaper/pencil, back of envelope calculations, with use of calculator before they attemptsimulations, obtaining graphical results from available computing information technology tools.4. CONCLUSIONS. In this paper we have shown how computer information technology (CIT)are used at the right time, right place in an example science and engineering course. Students areencouraged to use paper and pencil, calculator to solve a given problem and do simplecalculation (“back of envelope”) before using software
the supervision of Professor Neal Cason. In 1999 Mr. Tatar presented a paper on Groups and Representation Theory and was awarded a MS degree in Applied Mathematics. A year later, he completed a dissertation on Hadron Spectroscopy of Light Mesons and earned a PhD in Experimental Particle Physics. Dr. Tatar joined the faculty of Idaho State University in August 2001, where he remains until now. Dr. Tatar’s scientific interests are in experimental and phenomenological studies of strong and weak interactions and the possible extensions of the Standard Model. He was a member of the team that discovered the first mesons with exotic quantum numbers, after analyzing a large data set from Brookhaven National Laboratory. His
from Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, India, and M.Tech degree in Mechatronics Engineering from NITK, Surathkal, India. She is currently a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY. She is serving as a research assistant under an NSF-funded DR K-12 project.Dr. Vikram Kapila, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting
considers papers that relate to industrialtechnique, rather than analysis, and engineering education papers that focus on content, ratherthan methodology [2]. It is suggested too that the following subjects meet the aforementionedcriteria: accreditation, active learning, applied research, assessment, capstone projects, classroomactivities, curriculum design, distance learning, industry partners, innovative pedagogy,laboratories, non-technical skills, and other topics related to engineering technology practice andeducation.Using data contained in the Scopus database (Elsevier B.V.) and analyzed by SCImago (akaScimago), selected metrics were examined that characterize the Journal of EngineeringTechnology. A research group from the Consejo Superior de
, Columbus, OH, USA, June 24-28, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/ 27720,[Accessed March 12, 2019].[9] I. Fidan, A. Elliott, M. Cossette, T. Singer, E. Tackett, “The Development andImplementation of Instruction and Remote Access Components of Additive Manufacturing,” In:Auer M., Azad A., Edwards A., de Jong T. (eds) Cyber-Physical Laboratories in Engineeringand Science Education. Springer, Cham, 2018.[10] J. Fraley, A. Imeri, I. Fidan, and M. Chandramouli, “A Comparative Study on AffordablePhotogrammetry Tools,” Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE 2018, SaltLake City, UT, USA, June 23-27, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/29663,[Accessed March 12, 2019].[11] I. Fidan, G. Chitiyo, T. Singer, and J
Paper ID #26810Powering Internal Combustion Engines Using Cost Effective SYNGAS Drivenfrom BiomassDr. Hazem Tawfik P.E., State University of New York, Farmingdale Prof. Tawfik obtained his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, from University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. He has held a number of industrial & academic positions and affiliations with organizations that included Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Stony Brook University (SBU), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Atomic Energy of Canada Inc., Ontario Hydro, NASA Kennedy, NASA Marshall Space Flight Centers, and
which is a high-stake design-build-test whose themevaries from term to term. This paper describes three semesters of the course: Term 1 is Fall 2018, 1Term 2 is Spring 2019, and Term 3 is Fall 2019. The course currently underway is Spring 2020and referenced as Term 4.Students are tasked with a design-build-test of a mechanical device for the end-of-term“competition” to showcase their high-stake design project. This class employs a team of 20undergraduate teaching assistants (TAs) to help facilitate various aspects of the course and tostaff the laboratory around the clock during business hours. Two to three graduate TAs are alsoassigned to the course
Paper ID #29982Designing a MATLAB-based Escape RoomMs. Lauren Nicole Heckelman, Duke University Lauren Heckelman is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Duke University. She previously received her B.S.E. and M.S. degrees in biomedical engineering from Duke in Spring 2016 and Fall 2017, respectively. Lauren is currently advised by Dr. Louis E. DeFrate, Sc.D. She works as a graduate research assistant in the DeFrate Musculoskeletal Bioengineering Laboratory, where she investigates hip and knee cartilage mechanics using magnetic resonance imaging, image processing, and 3D solid modeling.Dr
engineeringundergraduate programs. These can be offered as a part of a minor or a concentration: Mandatory Course (3 – 4 credits) Details Introduction to IoT and Cyber Physical An introductory course using Arduino- Systems (Junior) (3) based kits and simple laboratories, assuming that the students took a general programming course and some electrical/electronics content. Microcontrollers and Sensors for IoT Building on the first course, this course (Junior/Senior) (4) will focus on the hardware being utilized
Visiting Assistant Professor at Purdue University School of Aeronautics and Astronau- tics. His research interests are in model-based systems engineering, system-of-systems, and information fusion. He also holds a temporary faculty appointment with U.S. Navy Naval Surface Warfare Center in Crane, IN. He has worked with the John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory on fusion systems and prior to joining Purdue University, he was a flight controls and flight management systems engineer at Honeywell Aerospace. He is a Certified Systems Engineering Professional from the Interna- tional Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) where he is a co-chair of the Complex Systems Work- ing Group and the assistant director of
postdoctoral research associate at AT&T Bell Laboratories from 1988-1990. Cooper’s research interests include optical spectroscopic studies of novel magnetic and superconducting materials at high pressures, high magnetic fields, and low temperatures. Each spring since 2013, Cooper has co-taught (with Celia Elliott) a graduate- level technical writing course, ”Communicating Physics Research,” to physics and engineering graduate students.Celia Mathews Elliott, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Celia Mathews Elliott is a science writer and technical editor in the Department of Physics at the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She has been teaching technical communications to upper-level
instructional designers through retrospectiveinterviews. Kirschner and colleagues27 compared university and business instructional designersthrough a Delphi-like study (using Visscher-Voerman’s 16 principles) and a short team designtask. In another study, Perez and colleagues28 compared expert and novice instructional designprocesses using a think-aloud protocol in laboratory setting. Although these studies do not reporton their findings as heuristics, they all rely on data collected from expert practices anddemonstrate several similarities, including an emphasis on learner and context analysis, theapplication of proven techniques, and problem framing. However, these studies also showimportant differences between contexts (e.g., university and business
received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Tsinghua University, Bei- jing, China, in 1995 and 1997 respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2002. From 1997 to 2002, he was a research assistant at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. From 2002 to 2005, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the Electromagnetics Laboratory in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He was an assistant professor with the Department of Elec- trical Engineering, the University of Texas at Arlington from 2005 to 2012. He joined the Department of Electrical and
in an Engineering ClassroomIntroductionThis research paper describes a study that examines a testing effect intervention deployed in anengineering classroom setting. The testing effect is based on the premise that learning isimproved when students engage with newly acquired information by challenging themselves toanswer questions about the content instead of using other means of interacting with the content,such as rereading a text. The testing effect has been established in laboratory research studies[1]. To translate this finding into educational practice, classroom research studies [2]-[6] aim todefine the conditions for which the testing effect remains robust in authentic classroom settings.In the classroom domain, a testing effect
or studio setting thatintegrates both lecture and laboratory work in the same environment. The course interactivelydeveloped student's understanding of: the product design process, project management skills, andengineering practice principles while keeping track of the economic aspects of the design. Theteam based approach provided students with the opportunity to discuss alternative design ideasand work on their communication and interpersonal skills [6]. In addition, the setup of thiscourse also played an important role in meeting ABET general Criteria, Criterion 3 -Student Outcomes a -k. The course covers (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, k) [7].Essentially, recycling and re-manufacturing would allow production of new products with lowermaterial
MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY.Prof. Branislav M. Notaros, Colorado State University Branislav M. Notaros is Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University, where he also is Director of Electromagnetics Laboratory. He received a Ph.D. in elec- trical engineering from the University of Belgrade, Yugoslavia, in 1995. His research publications in computational and applied electromagnetics include more than 150 journal and conference papers. He is the author of textbooks Electromagnetics (2010) and MATLAB-Based Electromagnetics (2013), both with Pearson Prentice Hall. Prof. Notaros served as General Chair of FEM2012, Colorado, USA, and as Guest Editor of the Special Issue on Finite
valves. Dr. Amini has served as an assistant professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Akron since August 2013. The overall goal of his research laboratory is to improve human health by studying the multi-scale biomechanics and biotransport in cardiovascular, ocular, and digestive systems. Dr. Amini’s research has been funded by the National Science Foundation, Akron Children’s Hospital, Firestone Foundation, and American Heart Association.Dr. Marnie M SaundersMichael CoonMr. Robert Paul Thoerner, University of Akron Biomedical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: using video tutorials to assist biomedical
Have students reflect on how knowledge in their field has changed over time and discuss the process of creating new knowledge. o Plan and conduct open-ended laboratory experiences or solve problems for which students and instructors do not know the outcome. o Ask students to reflect on the knowledge they gained that is new to them versus new to their field.Future WorkThe outcome of the first two phases of this work will be the development of a theoretical modelthat captures epistemic cognition and identity development during UREs based on our data andusing a grounded theory approach. The final phase of the project will involve defining anddescribing the factors and experiences from UREs
engineer for Mote Marine Laboratory, and a contestant onthe television show MythBusters.2. Sponsor a girls technology summer camp where women engineering students help teach middle school girlsThrough outreach programs, women engineering students promote the engineering profession tomiddle school girls as they begin taking the math and science classes they will need as anengineering college major.5 Started in the summer of 2016 and continuing in the summer of2017, a week-long full day camp for middle school girls was held at the UF science andengineering library. Teaming with women engineering students to teach the middle school girlscreative technologies reinforced the women engineering students’ belief in their own abilities.3. Hold a human
spent six years with Boston Scientific Corporation. During this time, he progressed from a doctoral entry-level position to manage the day-to-day activities of five direct reports along with the operation of a corporate cell biology research laboratory staffed with ten scientists. He also worked with senior management to propose and develop a cross-Divisional collaboration network to improve communication and eliminate redundancies within the Company’s billion-dollar research and develop- ment (R&D) organization and drive the completion of cross-disciplinary medical device R&D projects critical to products’ commercialization. Prior to Boston Scientific, Garanich served as both Associate and Analyst with The
Devices laboratory at MIT before moving to Boston University’s Biomedical Engineer- ing department where she received a NIH NRSA postdoctoral fellowship to work with Dr. Catherine Klapperich developing molecular diagnostics for point-of-care pathogen detection. Dr. Linnes’s current research bridges innovations in basic science and translational diagnostic techniques in order to develop non-invasive, rapid detection technologies that efficiently diagnose and monitor diseases at the point of care. Her teaching focuses experiential learning and co-creation of devices and technologies via user- centered design.Prof. Chi Hwan Lee, Purdue University Chi Hwan Lee is an Assistant Professor at Purdue University, with
standardsand applications relevant to students. Each teacher developed a plan for her/his own school andcurriculum during this part of the RET. Formative feedback on these plans included weeklyfeedback from graduate student, research mentors, resource specialists from Engineering Projectsin Community Service (EPICS) at PU, and the other teachers in the RET program. Teachers were also embedded into the research groups of their mentors: they attendedgoup meetings, discussed research results, and conducted laboratory work, modeling exercises,or other utilized other methodologies to answer their research questions. Teachers also workedwith their research group to develop implemenation plans, and in particular, what type ofsupplies and equipment
Paper ID #19806Demo or Hands-on? A Crossover Study on the Most Effective Implementa-tion Strategy for Inquir–Based Learning ActivitiesDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a
Innovations in Engineering Education and Research,2007.[9] Feisel, L.D. and Rosa, A.J., "The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education”, Journal ofengineering education, pp. 121-130, January 2005.[10] Thomas, J.W., "A review of research on project-based learning", California: The Autodesk Foundation. URL:http://www.bie.org/images/uploads/general/9d06758fd346969cb63653d00dca55c0.pdf, March, 2000. AccessedMarch 13, 2018.[11] Waks, S. and N. Sabag, N., "Technology Project Learning Versus Lab Experimentation", Journal of ScienceEducation and Technology, Volume 13, issue 3, pp. 333-342, September 2004.[12] Song, J. and Ma, G., "Different Lab Formats in Introduction to Engineering Course", Proceedings of the 2017American Society for
successfully introduced students to DNAsequencing technologies and genomic analysis. Students were able to identify appropriatetechnologies for different types of experiments. They were able to perform basic analysis andidentify the challenges associated with these analyses.To improve student mastery of the learning objectives that were not well met, I will be addingmore discussion of the history and developmentof genetics as well as genomic technologies.We will spend more time discussing libraryproduction, and spend some time reviewing theearly concepts again later in the course.For those wishing to implement a similarcourse, I have posted my materials on githubfor public use (http://bit.ly/GenAnal). Thecomputational laboratory component has beenmost
exit the discipline [1]. Important factors in student attrition from STEM disciplinesinclude: 1) instructional experiences such as first-year Mathematics courses and facultyexpectations [1][2] and 2) individual self-efficacy, epistemologies, and goal orientations [2][3].In order to enhance student cognitive and affective outcomes and retain students in STEMdisciplines, undergraduates have been used as Learning Assistants (LAs), course UTAs, and labUTAs with positive results [4][5][6]. For example, UTAs used in an inquiry-based generalchemistry laboratory context have similar student content knowledge gains as GTAs in the sameposition [5]. As another example, in a large-enrollment introductory physics course, studentshave significantly higher
), includes hands-onlaboratories and activities that are essential for all Mechanical Engineering Technology, ElectricalEngineering Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Technology students to work on. In orderto allow students to work with PLC training units individually or in small groups without requiringa large lab space, portable PLC trainers have been utilized in order to support the laboratory portionof this course for two semesters in 2017. Therefore, portable PLC trainers have been designed andbuilt to replace the out-of-date, rack-mounted PLC trainers. The final design, schematic drawings,sample lab handouts, and results from a survey given to students will be presented in this paper.Finalized designThis section includes figures
of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition, 2005[7] Robnett, R., "The Role of Peer Support for Girls and Women in STEM: Implications for Identity and AnticipatedRetention", International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 232-253, 2013.[8] Akl, R. G., Keathly, D., and Garlick, R., "Strategies for Retention and Recruitment of Women and Minorities inComputer Science and Engineering", Innovations 2007: World Innovations in Engineering Education and Research,2007.[9] Feisel, L.D. and Rosa, A.J., "The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education”, Journal ofengineering education, pp. 121-130, January 2005.[10] Thomas, J.W., "A review of research on project-based learning
perceived and I think very real discouragement that young engineering faculty receive from… traditional administrators that engineering research is in a laboratory and is traditional in the sense that it involves scientific equipment and established research protocol and again, laboratory based. And there is a kind of a discouragement to not allow this distraction, or it's even viewed as a distraction, engineering education research, as a young faculty member… I was told specifically not to allow, my teaching not to distract from my research nor my interest in the scholarship of teaching and learning to distract from my research.The interviewee’s reflection on his pre- and post-tenure experience illuminate several layers