velocity) (area of fan)b. kg/s = (m3/s) (density of air)c. Density of air ~ 1.2 kg/m3 (5) Calculate the heat rejected by the condenser as follows: a. Heat rejected = (kg/s) (specific heat of air [Cp]) * (Temperature difference of air) b. Heat rejected = kJ/s c. Specific heat of air [Cp] = 1.008 kJ/kg K Experiment 4 – Evaporator Heat Absorption Purpose: To calculate the heat (kJ/s) absorbed by the evaporator from the air. Definition: Heat is transferred from the hot refrigerant vapor to the condenser tubes and fins and finally exhausted to the air. Assuming
the function. Unfortunately for the two groups, the nature of thecombined-cycle optimization caused Mathcad to find local-maximums for specific power basedon the groups’ initial guesses that were less than the class maximum specific power. However,consideration was given to the groups for ingenuity and resolve.ME 321 Introduction to Fluid MechanicsAppendix B presents the project assigned during the Fall 2003 offering of ME 321 Introductionto Fluid Mechanics. The project required designing a thrust reverser to retrofit the Gulfstream IIbusiness jet owned by Virtucon Inc., the cover company for Dr. Evil’s empire. The thrustreversers were needed to safely land the Gulfstream II on the 0.5-mile landing strip on Dr. Evil’sIsland. The specifics of
) BT 3 0.029 d B C DB = (3) CDBT d t S C DF = 2 C f 1 + 2 F n (4) c SBTThe determination of payload – method #1:Error! Reference source not found., below, shows a typical mission profile for the flight ofmodel rocket. 3 v=0 sc = Σ∆s 100 ft
toward the paddlers.A large amount of tumblehome, or sides angled heavily inward as shown in Figure 3c, alloweasier access to the water for the paddlers but reduces stability. The opposite of tumblehome isflare, when the sides of the canoe angle out away from the paddlers. Excessive flare adds tothe stability of the canoe by increasing underwater volume. While flare adds to the stability ofthe canoe, it makes it harder for the paddlers to reach the water with their paddles. Page 12.665.9 Figure 3: (a) Cross-Section Shape, (b) Forms of Rocker, and (c) Tumblehome and FlareAlthough the hydrodynamic attributes are considered the most critical aspects
global market for renewable energy is already dramaticallyincreasing. In 2006 its turnover was US $38 B, 26% more than in the previous year and this trendis expected to continue3.A dual energy crisis strategy of conservation or maximizing efficiency and vigorousdevelopment of alternative energy sources is proposed. The role of the Arizona State Universityas a New American University in this regard is the one of a bold leadership and relentless pursuitto promote and establish new energy sources.The mandate of the newly established Alternative Energy program at Arizona State University atthe Polytechnic campus is to strategically develop electronics engineering cadre capable ofmeeting the demands of the new energy economy that will rely on energy
processes. Sridhar B. Seshadri isthe Vice President of Planning and Process Excellence for Stanford Hospital and Clinics and isrepresentative of this career opportunity. Although currently working in a management role,Seshadri started his career in healthcare as an engineer. In an interview, Seshadri states: “Our Page 12.1390.6focus is to improve those operational processes that ‘envelop the clinical event’.”16 As part of a marketing class at the University of Missouri-Rolla, a number of studentsinvestigated the demand within hospitals for engineers with not only a knowledge and educationin the biomedical discipline but also in business. Ten
; Vagge, S. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learningfrom multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 91(4), 638–643.4. McCombs, B. L. (2000). Assessing the role of educational technology in the teaching andlearning process: A learner centered perspective. The Secretary Conference on EducationalTechnology 2000.5. http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/reu/6. Way Kuo, Assessment for US Engineering Programs, IEEE Transaction on Reliability, vol 55,March 2006, pp 1-67. F. Frankel, “Translating Science into Pictures: A Powerful Learning Tool,” Invention andImpact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) Education, AAAS Press, 2005, pp. 155-158.8. L. Cochran et al
teaching experiments, In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.) Research in science and math education (pp. 197-230). Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.8 Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (2003) Design experiments in educational research, Educational Researcher, 31 (1), 9-13.9 Bannan-Ritland, B., Gorard, S., Middleton, J., & Taylor, C. (in Press). The “ design Experiment: From Soup to Nuts. E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Design research: Investigating and assessing complex systems in mathematics, science and technology education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10 Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of
AC 2007-1261: EMBEDDED SOFTWARE DESIGN METHODOLOGY TO HELPSTUDENTS SUCCEED IN THE REAL WORLDKeith Curtis, Microchip Technology Inc. Page 12.595.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Embedded Software Design Methodology to Help Students Succeed in the Real WorldIntroduction: A Tool for Entering the Workforce with ExperienceIn the good old days, new engineers could look forward to a long and rewarding career,working for a well-established engineering firm. They would typically spend their firstyear of employment “learning the ropes” from older, more-experienced engineers.During this apprenticeship, they would pick up the tips, tricks and
Knew About The World Bank, a World Bank publication,The World Bank, 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20433· USA, 2006. See also: http://info.worldbank.org/etools/reducingpoverty/about_b.html2. See http://www.usaid.gov/locations/asia_near_east/afghanistan/3. Smith, A. B., Banzaert, A., & Susnowitz, S. (2003). The MIT IDEAS Competition: Promoting Innovation for Public Service. Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE 2003 Frontiers in Education Conference, Session S1B. Retrieved February 14, 2005 from Frontiers in Engineering web site: http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2003/papers/1401.pdf4. Banzaert, A., Goss, J., Smith, A., & Susnowitz, S. (2003). MIT’s Public Service Design Seminars: Inspiring Applied Innovation. Proceedings of the NCIIA
the University’s profile in engineering education. PBLprovides the means to:-a) address more explicitly the essential attributes needed by engineering graduates in professional practice;b) enhance pedagogical effectiveness;c) tackle at the outset the learning difficulties faced by many commencing students.”In summary there were political, practical, social, industrial/employment related as well as thepedagogically sound reason that PBL would best suit our particularly diverse student cohort.Overall VU could cite 8 (namely 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11) of the 12 reasons for making thechange to PBL as identified by Moesby 2, and shown in Table 1. 1 To attract better and - if preferred - more students. 2 To improve the
AC 2007-2053: AN INTEGRATED UNDERGRADUATE DYNAMIC SYSTEMSTEACHING METHODOLOGY UTILIZING ANALYTICAL ANDEXPERIMENTAL APPROACHESPeter Avitabile, University of Massachusetts-Lowell Peter Avitabile is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department and the Director of the Modal Analysis and Controls Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. He is a Registered Professional Engineer with a BS, MS and Doctorate in Mechanical Engineering and a member of ASEE, ASME, IES and SEM. Page 12.222.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 AN INTEGRATED UNDERGRADUATE
AC 2007-485: UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCES THAT PROMOTERECRUITMENT INTO THE FIELD OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERINGCharles Bott, Virginia Military Institute Charles B. Bott, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington, Virginia Adjunct Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia Previously an Environmental Engineer with Parsons Corporation Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Virginia Tech M.S.E. in Environmental Engineering from Johns Hopkins University B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Military
underclass undergraduate engineeringstudents.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE-0536342.Bibliography1. Miller, R. L., Ely, J. F., Baldwin, R. M., and Olds, B. M., “Higher-order thinking in the unit operations Page 12.393.13 laboratory”, Chem. Eng. Ed., 32(2), 146-151, (1998).2. Welty, J. R., Wicks, C. E., Wilson, R. E., and Rorrer, G., Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer, 4th Ed., Wiley, New York (2001).3. Wilson, E. E., A basis for rational design of heat transfer apparatus., Trans. ASME, 37, 47-82 (1915).4. Fernandez-Seara, J
mapping of CDIO Syllabus to ABET EC2000 and TC2K SLOs. Page 12.663.5 Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineering Education 5Table 1. Mapping of CDIO Syllabus to ABET EC2000 and TC2K SLOs ABET EC 2000 and TC2K OUTCOMES CDIO Syllabus Condensed Form a b c d e f g h i j k1.1. KNOWLEDGE OF UNDERLYING SCIENCES
Assessment of Student Learning in Engineering and Engineering Science Topics,” Journal of Engineering Education, 87 (3), 305-311 (1998).9. Nirmalakhandan, N., D. Daniel, and K. White, “Use of Subject-Specific FE Exam Results in Outcomes Assessment,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93 (1), 73-77 (2004).10. http://www.rose-hulman.edu/REPS/ Page 12.548.1011. http://www.che.cemr.wvu.edu/ugrad/outcomes12. http://edweb.sdsu.edu/webquest/rubrics/weblessons.htm13. http://edweb.sdsu.edu/webquest/rubrics/rubrics.html14. Waalvord B. E. and V. J. Anderson, Effective Grading. A Tool for Learning and Assessment, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
better.References1. “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century”, National Academies Press, 2004.2. Buchanan, R., Downey, G., Faste, R., Giard, J., Kuhn, S., “The Product Design And Innovation Program AtRensselaer Polytechnic Institute”, NSF External Review Committee Final Report, April 15, 2002.3. Newberry, B. And Farison, J., “A Look at the Past and Present of General Engineering and EngineeringScience Programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, July 2003.4. Steiner, M.W., “Using Real-World Multidisciplinary Design Experiences to Prepare Young Engineers to EnterToday’s Workforce,” International Engineering and Product Design Education Conference, Delft, Netherlands, 2-3
requires certain premisesof teaching and learning to be put into place.7Fortunately, by applying three fundamental principles, instructors can create theseconditions in the vast majority of learning groups. These principles, referred to as“KEYS” in his essay, are: a) promoting individual and group accountability; b) usingassignments that link and mutually reinforce individual work, group work, and total classdiscussions; and c) adopting practices that stimulate give-and-take interaction within andbetween groups.Application of the Theory:This type of interaction can be facilitated by dividing students into small groups of five orsix and assigning chapters within the text. These teams of students are then divided intoexpert groups one through five
ASEE PIC-III Award, 2003 Joseph J. Martin Award, 2004 Raymond W. Fahien Award and 2005 Corcoran Award for his contributions to engineering education.Roberta Harvey, Rowan University Roberta Harvey is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Writing Arts at Rowan University. She has been part of the faculty team that teaches Sophomore Clinic I since 1998 and played a key role in the development of the integrated design and communication pedagogy of the course. In addition to engineering communication, her areas of interest and expertise include interdisciplinary learning, collaborative learning and teamwork, meta-cognitive learning, information literacy, and student learning outcomes
of Technology Patrick Ferro is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Dr. Ferro received his Ph.D. in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines. His professional interests are in casting, joining, heat treating and alternative energy. Page 12.1061.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 33 Meteoritics and Materials in an ME Lab Course B. Hathaway, C. Edds, A. Bernal, N. Miller
problems. Furthermore, they found that students who stayed often received help (often bychance) at critical decision points contributing to their decisions to stay in the major—students Page 12.1162.4who left often did not receive help when it could have made a difference in their decision toleave.Seymour and Hewitt reviewed several early studies on S.M.E. students and found two majorreasons for attrition among S.M.E. majors: (a) students who left S.M.E. majors found othermajors more attractive and (b) students who left found the work too difficult.2 Additionalfindings included perceptions that incoming freshman were unprepared for the rigors of
situations: a) those where you arealready able to communicate with someone who is not physically nearby, but wish thatcommunication could be richer, and b) those where you wish to access or communicate to anarea that may or may not be nearby but is limited by situational or physical restraints. In thesesituations, communication is already occurring, but could be made more effective, or lessexpensive via videoconferencing.General Uses of Videoconferencing in Education For meetings that already regularly take place and require-face-to-face communication,videoconferencing can substitute for the actual physical presence of remote participants. Thisreduces travel costs as well as travel time and makes meeting attendance more convenient andlikely to
/Educating-Engineering-Students-in- Page 12.407.7 Entrepreneurship.pdf3. Ochs, John B., Watkins, Todd A., Boothe, Berrisford W., Creating a Truly Multidisciplinary Entrepreneurial Educational Environment, Journal of Engineering Education, October 2001, pp578- 83.4. Lewin David I., Teaching Techies to Become Entrepreneurs, Computing In Science & Engineering, May/June 2000, pp6-9.5. Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective for Evaluations During the 2006-2007 Accreditation Cycle, Engineering Accreditation Commission, ABET, Inc., www.abet.org6. Nunally, P. O., Saad, S. M., “Technical and
voicetheir support of quasi interactive videos as a valuable supplementary learning aid, particularlyin first year.In terms of student grades, there are many variables which make it hard to actually quantifybut overall performance in Electronics 1 has improved over the last three course offerings,with over 50% of students achieving a grade of A or B in 2004 as compared to 35% - 40%achieving the same grades prior to the introduction of the videos.It is difficult to determine the extent to which this practice influences exam results but it is fairto say that the majority of students have a positive perception of the class, have a soundpractical understanding of the material being taught and move on to the next phase of theirprogram well prepared and
AC 2007-3028: ENGINEERING DESIGN AND COMMUNICATIONS: SUCCESSESAND FAILURES OF AN EVOLVING FIRST-YEAR COURSEJanice Miller-Young, Mount Royal College JANICE MILLER-YOUNG is a P.Eng. with a background in mechanical engineering and a PhD in biomechanics. She has worked in the oil industry, has consulted for sports equipment companies and academics on biomechanics research, and has been teaching engineering design for three years. She also incorporates writing-across-the curriculum and inquiry-based learning concepts in more traditional courses such as statics and dynamics.Sean Maw, Mount Royal College Sean Maw has a PhD in Neuroscience (University of Alberta) and a BASc/MASc in Systems
AC 2007-2199: THE ROLE OF SMALL SCALE INTERNATIONAL SERVICEPROJECTS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION: THE STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVESarah Freeman, Tufts University Ms. Freeman is a current MS graduate student in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts University. She received her BS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Tufts and served as the 2005 President and co-founder of the Tufts Engineers-Without-Borders student chapter. Her teaching and research interests lie in the areas of water resources, sustainable development and appropriate technologies.Jonathan Crocker, Tufts University Mr. Crocker is a current senior in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts
other issues, program objectives (evaluation/ review), curriculum/laboratory update, and any program-related issue that may arise. • Odd Years, College of Engineering administers the Alumni Survey, the results of which are distributed to departments. PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENTBased on ABET statement [1], our working definition of the program educationalobjectives (PEOs) is that these are statements that describe the expected accomplishmentsof graduates in the first few years after graduation. Program objectives can be of twotypes: (a) what all graduates will do, and (b) what some graduates will do. Programobjectives are written to be used as descriptors of the program and are such
, competition teams, industrially sponsored teams, thecourse coordinator, and undergraduate program director for Mechanical Engineering participatedin the development of this new policy for our senior design course sequence. The followingsections describe the new policy, course format and procedures, and support provided to studentsand faculty. Page 12.1328.2Course Policy for ME 4015 – 4016 SequenceThe course policies for ME 4015 and ME 4016 are presented below in four policy subsections: A. Major Measurable Learning Objectives B. Course Format and Procedures C. Course Deliverables D. Grading PolicyA. Major Measurable
. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Available: http://www.asee.org/conferences/search/01067_2001.PDF22 Hall, T. M. (2000). Using software for electronics engineering technology laboratory instruction. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Available: http://www.asee.org/conferences/search/20674.pdf23 Flores, B. C., & Fabela, R. J. (2002). A concept inventory to probe student understanding of basic electronics. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Available: http://www.asee.org/conferences/caps/document/2002-1889_Paper.pdf24 Seymour, E., Wiese, D. J., Hunter, A., & Daffinrud, S. (2000). Creating a Better Mousetrap: On-line Student Assessment of their Learning Gains. Paper originally presented to the National
knowledge: Crowded engineering curricula may neglect some fundamental tools that should be a part of undergraduate learning. Students can learn simultaneously if the learning process is carefully planned. Though use of failure case Page 12.276.5 studies, students will learn Obj. a. the process of failure analysis, Obj. b. engineering ethics, Obj. c. engineers’ role in and value to society 2. Greater depth of knowledge: Mastery of engineering tools requires depth. Deepening knowledge demands a “supercharged” learning process, driving students more quickly to use higher level learning