, an associate of the System Chip Design Center and teaches microelectronics and VLSICAD design. Dr. Delalic is the faculty advisor of the College IMAPS student chapter.JIM J-S CHEN received the PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University in 1985. He is a Professor,Chair of Mechanical Engineering, Director of the Thermal Processing Laboratory and teaches heat transfer andmaterials processing.RICHARD COHEN received the PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Princeton University in 1977. He is anAssociate Professor and teaches heat transfer, thermodynamics, and combustion. Dr. Cohen is the faculty advisor ofthe College SAE student chapter.DENNIS SILAGE received the PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania in 1975
Introduction to Engineering Design course (ENES 100) has evolved over the lastdecade at University of Maryland, College Park (UMCP) and integrates ideas, opinionsand experiences of many faculty members who have experimented with teaching designto freshman students. The course involves freshman students in a “hands on” productrealization process. The product development project is assigned in teams of four or five.The typical product chosen, like many engineering products is synthesized from Page 7.579.1components and engineering principles that cover a spectrum of topics.Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
resources system problem. In the intervening years, he continued work on large scale system based problems. He has expertise in model- ing architectures for complex engineering systems such as transportation, infrastructure, water resources, and energy distribution using computational intelligence techniques He is the Founder of the Missouri S&T’s system engineering graduate program. Dagli is the Director of the Smart Engineering Systems Laboratory and a Senior Investigator in the DoD Systems Engineering Research Center-URAC. He is an INCOSE Fellow 2008 and IIE Fellow 2009. He has been the PI, Co-PI, or Director of 46 research projects and grants totaling more than $29 million from federal, state, and industrial
AC 2012-4426: USE OF GAMES FOR LEARNING AUTOMATED SYS-TEM INTEGRATIONDr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano man- ufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control
education.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University Brian P. Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech and his Ph.D. in bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Self has taught in the Mechanical En- gineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year, he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering
AC 2012-3655: PROPOSED KEEN INITIATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR EN-TREPRENEURIAL MINDEDNESS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONDr. Owe G. Petersen, Milwaukee School of Engineering Owe Petersen is Department Chair and professor of electrical engineering and Computer Science at Mil- waukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He is a former member of the technical staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories and received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Pennsylvania in 1971. His technical work ranges over topics such as optical data links, integrated circuit technology, RF semiconductor com- ponents, and semiconductor component reliable. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and an ABET EAC Program Evaluator in electrical engineering.Dr. William M
engineeringopportunities in order to help excite and engage them in the math and physics courses that willdominate their first two years of school. The course at the senior level, however, grew out ofstudent demand to explore distributive intelligence. In both cases, students coming into thecourses had different backgrounds with regards to electronics/building experience andprogramming languages. Hence, a tool set was needed that all students could quickly and easilyuse regardless of their previous experience. Moreover, the course instructors wanted tools thatwould be easy to support and maintain and allow students to complete projects outside of theclassroom or laboratory if necessary.While many tools exist for teaching robotics, the need for text based
homework problems. The text integrates the interactive application so that the distance learning student will be able to use this module for self-paced education.2. Interactive Applications. One or more multimedia computer-based interactive applications are the core of each module. The applications aid the student in visualizing aspects of the modular content and meeting the other learning objectives. The interactive applications are made as intuitive as possible; however, a part of the course module is a user’s guide with examples for operating the application. This is particularly important to distance learners. The concept is to recognize that learning occurs with a number of sensory inputs (e.g., laboratory work with tactile
Session 2222 Development and Implementation of an ABET-Compliant Course Profile & Assessment Model Heidi A. Diefes, Kamyar Haghighi Purdue UniversityAbstractAs part of the ABET assessment process, each course in an accredited program must beevaluated for ABET compliance by the teaching faculty. By establishing an ABET compliantcourse profile and assessment model, program deficiencies between expected program outcomesand actual course level outcomes can be identified. The Department of Agricultural andBiological Engineering at Purdue University has developed a
activities, means that they (and the students) are well-prepared to undertake internships in a serious manner.• Research : Because teaching activities are closely associated with industry, both professors and industrialists have become more aware of their partners' preoccupations. More and more research is being undertaken in the laboratories of French colleges using equipment and funding from industry. This is a relatively recent phenomenon in the Grandes Ecoles but is proving to be a fertile breeding-ground for all those involved (industrialists, faculty, Ph.D. students and final-year students). Page 3.247.7
catalyst to teach engineering communication skills. Most of the DFMportion of that course was centered on the concepts of design for manual assembly and design forinjection molding. The other 13 students were either exchange students, transfer students orstudents who had taken a different version of the freshman course. The important point here isthat these twelve had never heard of injection molding and had never been exposed to design forinjection molding concepts. None of the students had ever been exposed to forging or theconcepts of design for forging.In both the case of the injection molding tutor as well as the forging tutor, the software wasinstalled on PCs in the College of Engineering PC laboratory. On three separate occasions 75minutes
Session 3538 Developing the EDG Curriculum for the 21st Century: A Team Effort Ronald E. Barr The University of Texas at AustinABSTRACTA Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Instruction (CCLI) proposal was submitted to the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) in November 1998. The title of the proposal was “Engineering Design Graphics Summer School1999: Planning the Engineering Design Graphics Curriculum for the 21st Century.” The project proposes toestablish a team of highly-motivated Engineering Design Graphics faculty who
Page 4.246.1the majority of students that select and stay in engineering are those who fit the culture.Table 1. Changes in the Characteristics of the IME curriculum during the 90’sCharacteristics at the Start of the 90’s Characteristics at the End of the 90’s1. Exclusively lecture format Active learning exercises, collaborative learning2. Structured laboratory exercises Guided design laboratories3. Design primarily confined to senior design Design projects integrated at all levels project4. Isolated courses focused on specific topics Topical material integrated into advanced courses5. Single
strengthen mental powers. --Donald Norman, Things that Make Us Smart 1Nearly everyone would agree that students come to the university to improve how they think andsolve problems. Yet beyond insisting that students think, faculty often fail to teach studentsmuch about developing effective tools for thinking. Hence, our goals—as a business managerand a university professor--have included developing tools for reflection and analysis andintroducing these tools to engineering students so they can use them throughout their educationand career.One of the best tools that humans can use to enhance thinking is a notebook. Since elementaryschool, students have probably kept some sort of notebook, using it to record what the teacherwrites
microwave measurement techniques and instrumentation. Historically, thecourse consisted of a series of labs, each requiring the student to use and characterize a specificpiece of equipment. One lab might consist of cable-loss measurements, the next, directional-coupler characterization, antenna-gain/pattern measurements, etc. The spirit of the course was tointegrate theory with hands-on knowledge of microwave measurement techniques. However,like many such labs, each lab session seemed unnecessarily disjoint from the other. Dissatisfiedwith the outcome of teaching pieces of knowledge and hoping that some unifying purpose wouldemerge at the end of the semester, the individual lab objectives were replaced with an overallsemester project that required
to use story as a way to allow students to develop their engineering identity, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands, and has a project to improve undergraduate student training for and exposure to research opportunities. Michelle is a current NSF ASCEND Fellow, a current KEEN Fellow, was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Dr. Kenneth W. Lamb P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Kenneth is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona and a licensed
Parson, PhD is an Associate Professor of Educational and Organizational Leadership. Her Ph.D. is in Teaching & Learning, Higher Education from the University of North Dakota. Laura’s research seeks to identify where and how institutional disjunctures occur in higher education for women and members of minoritized groups. She is a qualitative methodologist, with a focus on ethnographic and discourse methods of inquiry.Dr. Sushil Adhikari, Auburn University Dr. Sushil Adhikari is a Professor in the Biosystems Engineering Department and the Center for Bioenergy and Bioproducts Director at Auburn University. He is the Co-Principal Investigator of the NSF REU site: Research experience through collaborative teams in
edge in these fields but also for adapting to the evolvingneeds and interests of a new generation of students. Hence, there is a growing recognition of theneed for more engaging teaching strategies and learning environments to inspire and engage abroader range of students in engineering disciplines. Innovative learning technologies, such asdigital game-based learning environments, are integral to addressing this need by inspiring interestthrough intellectual engagement among the young generation of students. Moreover, engineeringundergraduate students must graduate from their programs with technical knowledge, criticalthinking, and problem-solving skills to succeed in today’s rapidly advancing and highlycompetitive STEM fields. Traditional
onTechnology for Education (T4E), Warangal, India: IEEE, Dec. 2015, pp. 53–60. doi:10.1109/T4E.2015.2.[4] A. Collins, J. S. Brown, and S. E. Newman, “Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching theCrafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics,” in Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays inHonor of Robert Glaser, L. Erlbaum Associates, 1989, pp. 453–494.[5] E. Etkina, A. Karelina, M. Ruibal-Villasenor, D. Rosengrant, R. Jordan, and C. E.Hmelo-Silver, “Design and Reflection Help Students Develop Scientific Abilities: Learning inIntroductory Physics Laboratories,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 54–98, Jan. 2010, doi:10.1080/10508400903452876.[6] S. Sheppard and Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Eds., Educatingengineers
, university students are prepared to mentor K-12projects. Projects are conducted during the spring semester and supported by universitylaboratories in the iterative design and integration of laboratory environmental monitoring Pods.High school students engage local community members by monitoring environmental conditionsin local schools, businesses, agricultural settings, homes, and government sites. Communitymembers assist with access to experimental sites, materials, and project promotion. Communitymembers are invited to the symposium. Two mentors will travel monthly to each school in thespring semester and support projects remotely via an on-line curriculum (See Component 2). TheSCENIC projects culminate in a local symposium where students
mobile learning," Journal of E-Learning & Knowledge Society, Article vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 166-177, 2022, doi: 10.20368/1971-8829/1135622.[11] B. Marks and J. Thomas, "Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory," Education and information technologies, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1287-1305, 2022 2022, doi: doi:10.1007/s10639- 021-10653-6.[12] N. N. Kuzmina, E. G. Korotkova, and S. M. Kolova, "Implementing E-Learning in the System of Engineering Students Training," ed: IEEE, 2021, pp. 818-823.[13] K. Cook-Chennault and I. Villanueva, Exploring perspectives and experiences of diverse learners' acceptance of online
Paper ID #43454The Use of Animated Visual Aids in the Education of Undergraduate EngineeringStudentsMr. Mohaned Samer Ahmed, Texas A&M Univeristy at QatarOsama Desouky, Texas A&M University at Qatar Osama Desouky is a Technical Laboratory coordinator at Texas A&M University in Qatar. Osama is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in interdisciplinary engineering from Texas A&M University at College Station. He is responsible for assisting with experimental method courses, 3D printing, mechanics of materials, material science, senior design projects, and advanced materials classes. Osama’s professional interests
experiment” 6 to encourage studentparticipation and promote the use of new technology is now a common practice inuniversities and colleges around the world. As early as the 1990s, teaching and learningwith the internet has: increased student enthusiasm; provided an avenue for efficient data Page 22.642.2exchange; encouraged collaborative, student-led learning; promoted the discussion ofcourse topics before, during, and after class; and offered a variety of learningenvironments5, 6. In its initial stages, internet-based learning was offered through e-maillists, bulletin boards, and basic web sites 6. In some instances, those students receivingweb instruction
consisted of onedesign course in each of the two semesters, with an emphasis on laboratory experiences.Through these courses, the students were given 245 minutes of lab time each week (divided intotwo weekly lab periods of 170 minutes and 75 minutes, respectively) to work on various open-ended design challenges, as well as 50 minutes each week for lectures, which taught primarilywritten and graphical communication skills. The initial design course utilized the projects toexperientially develop important skillsets, such as the design process, project management,verbal communication, teamwork, social considerations, and the application of scientific andmathematic principles. These skills were expected to be developed by the students, with
of engineering or scienceprinciples in the classroom and subsequently practice the theory in the laboratory. Importantly,our scheme also includes mechanisms to measure how successful the classroom experienceshave translated into the immersed environment.Classroom Training for LeadershipWe have observed that leadership is not easy to teach but rather that students can be moldedthrough leadership experiences. Leadership, in other words, can be developed. To that end, wehad experts on leadership/management lecture in class. We assigned the students scholarlyreadings on leadership. We implemented leadership development activities. The activities wedesigned were meant to help them to identify their personal strengths and weaknesses as well
programs stronger,students more motivated, and future employers more satisfied with their new employees.IntroductionEach of us is an individual—we teach with a particular style, interact with students in particularways, and have our own interests and abilities. Our students are no different. They have uniquehistories, goals, stories, and learning styles. As we become more knowledgeable about the waysin which our students hear, understand, interpret, and integrate ideas we can design better classesand better assessment tools. As faculty we need assessment tools which are rigorous, fair, easyto tailor to a particular course or outcome objective, and which can be evaluated or graded.Ideally, we would choose a tool which evaluates higher order or
struggles seen at universities teaching computer engineering centers on the"depth vs. breadth" debate. In the depth camp reside faculty who believe students shouldacquire well-focused expertise in a given discipline, enabling them to confront challenging Page 4.111.3problems within the area. They believe technological leaps are the products of specialists.They also believe that this approach positions students to better meet the requirements of jobopportunities that are advertised along specialty lines. Those universities sharing thisphilosophy offer a select list of computer engineering areas from which the student selects oneto specialize
of programs and reduction of operating costs. The SCS program was first accreditedby Computer Science Accreditation Board (CSAB) in 1988, and it has maintained its accreditationto date.Institutions of higher learning teach computer courses in one or more of four general areas: (1)computer engineering programs are typically offered by computer engineering or electricalengineering departments and are accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology, Incorporated (ABET); (2) computer science programs are offered by computer Page 2.382.1science, electrical engineering, mathematics or general science departments, and these
, and that is to provide students on-the-jobtraining. “Adults learn by doing. You can teach concepts in a classroom, but if you wantemployees to be able to do the physical tasks of running machines and keeping production goingin your plant, at some point you’re going to have to let them onto the shop floor.”1 The exposureof students to real tasks while they are still going through school in a co-op or an intern’s role,provides several benefits, such as reinforcement of theoretical principles already learned, andapplication of engineering fundamentals to solution of challenging problems encountered inindustry.“It is important to recognize that internships have as their major purpose the development ofoccupational (professional) competence
, students enter the design courses in their junior yearhaving taken two core classes – Introduction to Mineral Processing and Properties of Materials.Both of these are three hour lecture and one hour laboratory courses. During their junior year,MME students primarily take discipline specific classes, usually 7-11 credit hours per semester.The courses and hours taken are variable as the MME department is relatively small, ~20students per year, and the upper division classes are offered on an every other year basis toensure that the number of students in each course is of sufficient size to meet minimum sizerequirements1.Design StreamBeginning in the 2008-09 academic year, the Department of Materials and MetallurgicalEngineering (MME) at the South