notes that the cost of maintenance and insurance arehigh and not easily recoverable from student fees. As an alternative approach, some institutionsutilize flight simulation as an education tool to enhance the aerospace engineering curriculum [5,6, 7], for training flight instructors [8], and enhance the learning experience [9]. In addition toflight simulation as a means to understand the dynamics of flight and human factors associatedwith it, some institutions also offer courses on aircraft flight test using these flight simulator tools.The Department of Aerospace Science and Technology at Politecnico di Milano (DSTA-PoliMi)has developed a unique graduate course on flight testing that focuses on hands-on experience [10].Students are required
, flexibility comes with a higher demand forstudent self-guidance abilities. Though the rapid switch to online instruction proved to bechallenging, early data shows that the integration of online labs has a likely chance to persistas part of the curriculum, perhaps in combination with hands-on labs. For example, one couldthink of using online labs as preparation for hands-on labs to better understand boththeoretical concepts and basic technical procedures and use face-to-face lab time for morecomplex activities.In online learning environments, user experience (UX) is the users’ perspective of andresponse to using the systems. Faculty and students are both users of the interfaces for onlinelabs and experiments. Faculty are responsible to design
Paper ID #7821A Conceptual Framework for Technology-Enhanced Problem-Based Learn-ing in Construction Engineering and Management EducationDr. Namhun Lee, East Carolina University Namhun Lee is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Construction Management at East Carolina University, where he has been teaching Construction Modeling and Information Technology, Construc- tion Planning and Scheduling, Construction Estimating, Equipment Management, and Advanced Cost Estimating and Cost Analysis. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include: 1) Information Visualization and Decision Support Systems, 2) Building Information Modeling
: A Multidisciplinary Course in Mechanical Engineering Electrical EngineeringAbstractThis paper presents pedagogy and experiences in teaching system modeling and analysis as wellas feedback control systems in the engineering curriculum. The course is a requiredmultidisciplinary course to be offered at the junior level for both electrical and mechanicalengineering students. In addition, electrical engineering (EE) students and mechanicalengineering (ME) students who pursue an electrical engineering (EE) minor are required toconcurrently complete a laboratory course. But regular ME students who do not pursue an EEminor are not required to take the laboratory course. The motivation for offering thismultidisciplinary
, wepropose that engineering can be taught to students in all Science, Technology, Entrepreneurship,Arts, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEAEM) courses through practical hands-on learningexperiences. Therefore, instead of resurrecting standalone shop classes in their original IndustrialArts manifestation, we recommend an alternative. Inexpensive and topically-relevant hands-onlearning activities should be developed competent for ubiquitous and seamless insertion intoSTEAEM courses. When offered to teachers as educational kits, these activities could beselected a la carte from a catalog to integrate with existing classes. This approach inducesminimal curriculum disruption, facilitates easy instructor adoption, and allows high schools tocontinue
of undergraduate researchaccording to the students. In addition, developing relationship with the faculty mentor and thegraduate student mentor is another positive outcome of the undergraduate research.Haddad and Kalaani [5] presented an undergraduate research model to integrate research into alecture- based curriculum through summer workshops, research-designated courses, andundergraduate research grants. The proposed model included establishing an Office ofUndergraduate Research, developing a research-integrated curriculum, and instituting arecognition system as an incentive to encourage participation. A set of minimum requirementswere set for undergraduate students participating in the research to achieve the status ofundergraduate
integrate theirlearning into their lives. There have been long-standing claims in the research literature thatstudents learn faster and retain more information the more they are involved in the learningprocess (Liu & Hsiao23, Royer & Royer24). Therefore, the more students interact, the more theywill learn. From a theoretical perspective, Hamilton25 saw the curriculum as a process thatshould not separate what is learned from how it is learned. This duality is the fundamentalidentity of multimedia.Since this class has continuous assignments for students, each week they must write about thecourse topics each week. Our surveys show that students enjoy the self-paced multimediamodules for Units 1 through 4 and their answers to the class
architecture. Forthe architecture students it was a first experience in having to request, manage andappropriately integrate outside technical knowledge into their design process, for theengineering students it was their first exposure to the design process and the multifacetedway their highly specific skills are deployed in a real world process. The teaching,evaluation and assessment of the courses represent an opportunity for educators to thinkabout the role of service learning in architecture and engineering education. The Bergcompelled students to integrate technology and structure in the design process, requiredstructural engineers to and as such can be seen as experiments in advancing designpedagogy.BackgroundDesign build, community service and
, and mathematics (STEM) faculty at institutions of highereducation is a requirement of all MSP grants. The PISA program presents a novel approach toaccomplishing MSP goals by integrating the use of exemplary, research-based elementaryengineering curricula, engineering explorations and problem-based activities to strengthenteachers’ science learning. An intensive summer institute, followed by in-class mentoring andcoaching support, and online help, represent key program components.Partnership GoalsThe overarching aim of the three-year PISA program is to: (a) demonstrate and institutionalizewithin participating schools a methodology, supporting curriculum materials, and otherinstructional resources and strategies to increase student interest
, including theestablishment of personal relationships with students, the effective organization of course contentand class activities, strategies for motivating students, and the integration of course content withreal-world applications. During the lightning talk, we will share a comprehensive overview ofthe study's research findings as well as the importance of student-centered teaching practices inengineering education.Background and MotivationThe contemporary education of engineers remains a challenging domain, and a key area needingmore focus on identifying effective teaching practices, particularly in middle and upper-levelengineering classes. This lessons-learned paper, which emerged from an NSF-funded project(masked for review), explores
Page 14.341.2explain fundamental concepts. The importance of a mathematical framework cannot be denied,and yet mathematics alone often does not foster an intuitive understanding of these fundamentalconcepts.Hands-on laboratory projects help students to make connections between theory and practice.Hardware-based projects often require a substantial amount of setup time and debugging effort,and therefore can only explore a relatively small subset of the course topics. Computer-basedsimulation and visualization of communication systems, on the other hand, allow students toexperience a wider variety of fundamental concepts in the same amount of time, provided thatthe computer tools offer a sufficiently high level of abstraction. Since modern
education for students in the U.S. isparamount26. Students need to be taught the principles of engineering and be given positiveexperiences that may encourage them to pursue an engineering career5. Engineering educationneeds to begin in elementary school while student interest in mathematics and science is stillhigh. About 80% of fourth graders report positive attitudes toward mathematics and sciencecompared to an estimated 33% of eighth graders who report positive attitudes towardmathematics and science21. Integrating engineering concepts, practicing related skills, andexploring associated careers in the elementary and middle school classrooms may increase thenumber of students who pursue engineering.Influences in the Pursuit of EngineeringBesides
their catastrophicconsequences. For this reason, building professionals play a crucial role in the design andconstruction of our existing built environment in seismic zones. The Pacific Ring of Fire is themost seismic zone of the planet. Therefore, the countries that are in this zone are more prone toearthquakes. In this sense, it is recommended that architecture students learn about seismology[14]. It is paramount that the architecture curriculum includes an appropriate design and correctspatial-dynamic analysis [15]. Considerations in the configuration of buildings such as, form,size, height, and materials used have a meaningful impact on how the structure performs duringan earthquake. All of these aspects are directly or indirectly related
small 7" monitor to dis-play the results in real time to the user. An Arduino board is used for data acquisition from theencoder and load cell, and this is connected to a Raspberry Pi computer, which is in turn con-nected to the monitor. A wireless keyboard with an integrated track pad was used to interfacewith the machine, whose output is shown on the small 7" monitor.1 Pedagogical ContextThe field of materials science is focused on connecting the concepts of structure, processing,and properties of materials. Materials science textbooks [4] often begin with the topic of struc-ture, then move on to properties and processing. Many students have difficulty seeing the im-portance of studying structure, even though the structure of materials
, Charlottesville, VA 2 Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 3 University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 4 University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 5 University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HIABSTRACT – In Fall 2007, a coalition of four universities was awarded an NSF CCLI grant tosupport the development of a curriculum with the goal of cultivating systems thinking in students.Systems thinking, as defined in this project, is the ability to envision architectures of complex-engineered systems and the principles that underlie them. The
Martin Rheault (Researcher)Amy Wu (Undergraduate Student)Christina Gardner-McCune (Researcher) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Analysis of Effect of Answering Reflection Prompts in a Computer Organization ClassAbstractThis research paper explores whether requiring students to answer reflection promptsimmediately before an exam affects their exam performance. Reflective practice encouragescritical thinking and answering reflection prompts can aid students in integrating ideas anddeveloping a holistic view of the material they are studying. In our study, 365 students in aComputer Organization course
' fathers graduated from college. Additional program detailscan be found in [8].End-of-Program Assessment The NSTI at CCSU program incorporates two surveys to assess program success and toimprove curriculum design: an opening survey and an end-of-program survey. Most questions inthe two surveys remain the same over time, ensuring consistence in program assessments. Theopening survey is conducted in the Monday morning before the program starts, and the end-of-program survey is right before a graduation ceremony in the State Department of Transportationheadquarters. Program director from the host university distributes and collects the surveyquestionnaires, ensuring each student has enough time to complete all questions. Six studentswere
. However, for meaningful engineering activities to beincluded in these courses, professional development for science teachers must be offered. Theliterature describes a variety of teacher workshops that employ several different approaches andfoci. The strategy most similar to the one focused on here is one by Custer et al., a recent effortto assist teachers in infusing engineering activities into physical and life science courses. Theypoint out that this particular approach to integration between science and engineering is “largelya new undertaking” with currently a small research base.3The current paper describes the initial offering of an engineering infusion workshop aimed at aparticular population of high school physical science teachers
previously participated, acted as peer-mentors for‘Juniors’. Findings from Year 3 saw an initial rise in ‘asked help’ and ‘intervened help’ instancesduring the earlier stages of the school year but later saw a decrease school year progressed asJunior students master M2 practices through guidance by Seniors. Our work, through thisEAGER, demonstrates an approach to providing a situated and scalable curriculum that modelspractices in real world industries and those that are yet to come.2 IntroductionMaking has the potential to expand students’ understanding of STEM topics [1], this throughdirect interaction with physical materials for personalized designs [2]. More-so, Making has thepotential to inspire the Maker Mindset in Makers, meaning that they
Paper ID #36814Work In Progress: Intersections between mentoringattributes and outcomes among Learning AssistantsAngela R Bielefeldt (Professor) Angela Bielefeldt, Ph.D., P.E., is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She is also the Director for the Engineering Plus program, which is in the process of being renamed to Integrated Design Engineering. Bielefeldt also serves as the co-director for the Engineering Education and AI-Augmented Learning Integrated Research Theme (IRT) at CU. She has been a faculty member at
Paper ID #38321Board 203: A Research Study on Assessing Empathic Formation inEngineering DesignDr. Justin L. Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Justin L Hess is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Hess’s research focuses on empathic and ethical formation in engineering education. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the editorial board chair for the Online Ethics Center, deputy director for research for the
, designing solutions with communities rather than for communities.We propose that the HCD could facilitate a platform to buy-in for engineering educators withrespect to educational reform, and open up a broader space for thinking, dialogue, reflectivepractice, and innovation in teaching engineering.We plan to address the topic of engineering educational reform in India in partnership with NITRaipur, through an integrated, participatory, and iterative manner while: 1. understanding the culture, pedagogy, and students in engineering programs at NIT Raipur, 2. identifying significant barriers to adopting effective and / or innovative educational practices, as experienced by the engineering faculty of NIT Raipur, 3. understanding how these
materials, we are also currently developing webcasts that present the mostimportant ideas from each unit in a more engaging format.4.2 Use of the MaterialsThe project materials are designed for flexibility in several ways. They can be integrated at anylevel of the curriculum, matching units to students' level of engineering knowledge. Currentimplementations have begun as early as a first-semester Introduction to Engineering course andas late as the final term in senior capstone courses. One university is using the materials as thebasis for a curriculum-wide writing-in-the-disciplines program. We believe that adoption in eachyear of the curriculum will enhance effectiveness because students will be continuously exposedto writing principles
., capstone design) of an engineering curriculum.10 Due to increasingrecognition of their benefits, professional development opportunities such as internships,undergraduate research, and co-op opportunities are becoming more common amongstengineering students. When compared to other majors, however, engineering students are lesslikely to participate in out-of-class activities.11 Out-of-class activities are defined as any activitythat occurs outside of the formal classroom, including curricular activities, co-curricularactivities, and extracurricular activities. Research in engineering education has shown that out-of-class activities are linked to numerous positive outcomes including students’ professional,intellectual, and leadership development, as
from a local company. The frameworkof mathematical thinking that guided this study as we investigated how these students engagedin mathematical thinking while they designed. We found that two aspects of mathematicalthinking were most often used when the students were dealing with uncertainty in their design:problem solving strategies and the use of social resources. These findings have the potential toinfluence how engineering educators integrate engineering science and real-world designtasks.IntroductionThere have been debates among the engineering education community on how and how muchmathematics should be taught to engineering students. The debates arise because studies likethe one done by Underwood show that mathematics used in people’s
educational research studies, student applications of the design process, curriculum development, and fulfilling the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first-year engineering educational environment through the use of active and collabo- rative learning, problem-based and project-based learning, classroom interaction, and multiple represen- tations of concepts.Ms. Lisa K Davids, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Page 26.597.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Enacting Video-Annotated Peer Review (VAPR) of Faculty in a First-Year
Mastersprogrammes that had at their heart: • Promotion of subject-specific advanced engineering topics • A parallel approach to teach management practice to an engineering audience • The creation of a management role for industrial representatives in academic programmesThese Integrated Graduate Development Schemes (IGDS) cover a wide range of industriesaerospace, chemical, material science and manufacturing engineering being some of the manyrepresented in the programme. They all endeavour to meet the need for employment-based part-time learning within the context of continuing professional development, providing core andadvanced engineering knowledge & skills and encouraging a multi-disciplinary approach to thelearning
deliver and assess the ethics anddecision-making components of the curriculum, which includes lecture modules,homework/exam questions, an interactive decision-making game, and multiple case studies. Thecase study presented in this paper is one of the components we utilized in the last decade.SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONSEthics, social responsibility, and trust are critical issues for designers, architects, engineers, andcontractors. Today's fast-paced and competitive business environment experiences a wide rangeof social and economic pressures, making ethical identification and behavior ever more critical.Professional degree programs carry the responsibility of shaping tomorrow's professionals andindustry leaders through the higher education system
complement the firstcourse. In this endeavor, we collaborated with Keysight Technologies who has developed arobust IoT-specific educational platform. We evaluated the board as the main tool for the secondcourse in our curriculum. The evaluation was performed by a team of students under thesupervision of a faculty member. A number of experiments were conducted and the resultsindicated that the platform, when supervised properly, is a valuable tool to teach the conceptsand functionalities of the IoT technologies.Keywords: IoT, educational tools, curriculum upgradeIntroductionIoT being one of the technological ecosystems with an estimated market size of up to $11.1Trillion per year in 2025 (McKinsey Global Institute) [1] is becoming a prominent source
. Creating new courses and adding modules toexisting ones can be extremely valuable interventions. However, making socio-technical thinkingan integral part of existing technical courses is also a necessary approach to reduce theperception that “social” issues are not equally valued in the engineering 1,2. The efficacy of suchefforts has not been widely tested. This paper builds on our analysis of an effort to incorporate socio-technical systemsthinking into a required civil and environmental engineering sophomore level course to testwhether such interventions effectively bridge the socio-technical divide in engineeringcurriculum 3. Our previous study found that class activities spurred more reflection on socialfactors that influence