understand it. I think that’s probably why I struggle with science, ‘cause it’s all like, I can’t connect a newton to a person.This student’s reflection underscores the importance of creating space for learners toconnect course content to real-life experiences. SIRI provided students with the leeway todesign projects that interested them. Estrada [3] encourages higher education institutions“to find ways to emphasize how classroom content relates to prosocial communaloutcomes” [3, p.4], and we could not agree more.Discussion and Conclusions In conclusion, difference was fundamental in shaping the students’ experience in SIRI.Students appreciated the racial and ethnic diversity that SIRI provided, which was an intentionalaspect of
and survey findings indicated that students were looking for a natural feel in thespace, with plants and more neutral tones. Students wanted to be able to have some privacy whenthey work but they also want to feel the comfort and energy of having other users around them.The ideal space would “feel more authentic” or, in design terms, reflect a use of natural lighting,more live plants, natural materials used in décor and lighting that can be managed by the studentin the space (dimmers, lamps, windows with blinds). This was a theme that prior research hadfound in the MSL, but our work further explored and revealed how important this element is.The results from this study were used in the MSL fourth and fifth floor renovations which beganin
Civil Civil HBCU PWI Shasha F 1st Mechanical Mechanical PWI-D PWI Tony M 3rd Aerospace Aerospace PWI-D PWI-D Val F 4th Nuclear Mechanical HBCU PWI X M 2nd Mathematics Industrial HBCU PWI We conduced semi-structured interviews with the participants to understand their uniqueexperiences in engineering as Black students. Since the participants held graduate status, theywere able to reflect on their undergraduate and graduate experiences in their narratives. Theinterviews
paper is to help address these questions. We present details of the process andresults of a multi-year international study that examined the topics of difficulty and importance inCS2. As is common in previous CI work, this study uses the Delphi method to identify thesetopics. The Delphi method is a systematic iterative process of arriving at a common opinion ordecision by a diverse group of subject experts 17 . At each iteration (round), the experts areprovided with a questionnaire and an aggregate anonymized group response at the precedinground that might affect the experts’ responses at a current round 18,17,19,20 . After several rounds, thegroup’s response closely reflects the consensus opinion of the group. By giving each expert’sopinion
,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses decrease failure rates and increase performanceon summative assessments [3]. In Fink’s taxonomy of significant learning experiences [4],course design should be learner-centered, so students are actively engaging not just withtechnical content in an engineering course but also reflecting on their own learning processes asthey strive to become lifelong learners.One strategy for promoting reflection and engagement is through opportunities for collaborativelearning. Collaborative learning represents a joint intellectual effort by students (and ofteninstructors) to mutually create or find meaning, solutions, or products [5]. Intentionally designedcollaborative learning strategies can be mapped to Fink’s taxonomy
designed for disassembly,among others. Some concept maps reflected the students’ conceptual understanding of the topicwith few or no misconceptions. Additionally, students also showed both simple and complexrelationships in the concept maps with a clear indication of relative importance. Overall, most ofthe participating students developed a more holistic concept map for addressing the constructionand demolition waste issues by considering design for disassembly and upcycling principles aswell as disaster management guidelines to improve sustainability in construction. Then, throughthe identification of different relationships and patterns among the concepts, students were able toclearly articulate the impact of these systems on the circular
to students.4.1.2 End of Semester SurveyWe then surveyed students from the Point-Restricted-Policy semester at the end of thesemester.We had the students compare the Poinr-Restricted-Policy course against Time-Restricted-Policycourse. We specifically asked in what ways did a student approach completing the programmingassignments differently between the two courses. Students were instructed to skip the question ifthey did not take the course recently with the time-restricted policy. We asked this question toanswer RQ1 from the perspective of students who have now experienced both policies and areable to reflect on both. These responses also help inform our answer to RQ2, supplementing ourobservations through the lab success measures as we
contentclarifications. Lab periods are used for online laboratory exercises and analysis, project check-ins, and periodic reflection. The labs contain pre-lab assignments and in-lab exercises. Pre-labshelp students prepare for in-the-lab brainstorming. The in-the-lab work includes watching avideo of the lab components, brainstorming the solutions, watching the lab video conducted bythe faculty, and doing a group analysis of the results. The learning outcomes intended for theonline labs are the same as in-person labs. Occasionally, a few minutes are allocated forreflection during lab periods aimed at increasing inclusion and a sense of belonging for allstudents.The one offering of the online labs is compared to two offerings of in-person labs, one precedingand
at orientation and post surveys on the last day of the program. Thestudy was developed to understand student background, how the bridge program can impact theirgrowth, and the impact of the bridge program on their preparation for the academic year.Some significant findings from surveys: • There were no schools who had significantly different distributions of answers between pre and post. Growth Sector is working with SRI International to alter the tool for future studies. This could be in part due to the short nature of the Bridge program. Additionally, this could reflect the recruitment of many students who already are decided on a STEM field. • Overwhelmingly, students said their experience in the Summer Bridge
en r vo Le Kn Po Im gr. n of En K ow p. In Kn p. ImFigure 1: Pre (grey) and post (purple) survey results of student opinions on class topics.Midterm ExamFor their midterm exam, students were required to answer question 1 and either question 2 orquestion 3 from the following three questions. These questions were designed to assess theirability to discern and reflect upon the tensions surrounding the technical/technological, economicand ethical imperatives relating to several
Moments: First-year Student Perceptions of Mindfulness and Meditation in the classroomAbstractIn this evidence-based practice paper, we seek to investigate our students’ perceptions of theinclusion of mindfulness practices in the engineering classroom. Mindfulness and meditationinvolve the art and science of building an awareness of self and developing reflective techniquesto promote calmness and stability. There is evidence from literature that demonstrates positiveeffects of mindfulness and meditation for well-being.In engineering education in particular, the cognitive stress of engaging with the curriculum canbe high. Past research has found that engineering students do perceive benefits from engaging inmindfulness activities
). 3Figure 2. Knowledge ThreadsEach knowledge thread contains a variety of competency strands. For example, theprofessionalism thread encompasses teamwork, communications, social justice, and ethics(Figure 3).Figure 3. Professionalism Thread Competency StrandsThe disciplinary knowledge thread reflects multi-disciplinary competency strands, to includescience and engineering fundamentals, project management, public policy, and environmentalengineering specific topic areas, such as surface water resources and hydrology, air quality andcontrol, solid and hazardous waste, etc. Within each strand, competency domains were identified 4to provide additional detail as shown in Figure 4. For each domain, specific
delve into their own experienceswhen it comes to fostering inclusive climate. We ask the chairs share (1) their biggest challengeswhen it comes to department climate, (2) the strategies they’re already tried to improve climate,including what worked and what didn’t work, and (3) any resources they need to improve theclimate in their department. Again, this step generates lively discussion as participants reflect onwhether colleagues’ strategies might work in their own department or could be adapted to betterfit the culture or context of their unit.Module 3: ImplementationThe workshop ends with a call for all participants to take immediate steps to improve theirdepartment climate. The team shares four ideas for small steps that chairs can take
PowerPoints and light board writing videos resulting in 105 videos (2 to 13min each; M=6.75min.).For the AE 530 flip, videos were mostly PowerPoints due to the graphical complexity with a total of 115videos (2.5 to 13.25min each; M=6.75min.). Flipping each class freed up a total of 12hrs for AE 401 and16hrs for AE 530 across a 15 week duration. Examples were still done in class. It was debated early onwhether to flip examples but it was not done so that real-time engagement and reflective questioningopportunities remained. Having shifted 12 or 16hrs to pre-class time allowed for more interactive examples/ scenarios, as well as, time to work on assignments. Here, examples were increased by approximately 10%.Table 4 provides a larger perspective of the
teaching linear algebra that have shown success and promise [5]. Theemerging area of inquiry oriented linear algebra (IOLA) has undergone many iterations to itspedagogical practice by applying a design based research practice and provides an empiricallytested curriculum for linear algebra instructors [6].1.1 Inquiry Oriented Linear AlgebraThe IOLA curriculum draws on RME instructional design heuristics to guide students throughvarious levels of activity and reflection on that activity to leverage their informal, intuitiveknowledge into more general and formal mathematics. The first unit of the curriculum, referred toas the Magic Carpet Ride (MCR) sequence, serves as an example of RME instructional design.Specifically, the tasks reflect four
solved, and propose solutions to unresolved issues fromparticipants in the network.The creation of the initial pool of failure modes occurred over approximately a one hour roundtable discussion amongst the lead authors. The members of the round table discussion wereattendees of the EMERGE in person meeting and chose to participate in discussing this topicfrom 5 topics offered. The members of the initial table, the authors, were from DePaulUniversity, Earlham College, University of Ottawa, University of San Francisco, and StevensonUniversity. Characteristics of the authors’ institutions are provided in Table 1. Reflecting onpersonal experiences in program development and sharing stories, the activity generated about40 of the initial failure mode
. Research Questions The MUSIC model inventory was designed for use by instructors to examine student motivation, to encourage instructor reflection regarding classroom improvements to improve motivation, and to make data-informed decisions about curricular changes. Research using the inventory has been very applied in nature, as its use was intended. Our work has two purposes - to test for differences between early-term and late-term responses on the paired factors; and to take a step back to understand the underlying causal model of the factors together, as the various forms of motivation do not occur in isolation. Based upon the wealth of research touting the impacts of a caring instructor, we sought to understand a model
needs for their 9courses. Many students were also working jobs and wanted to plan course load around theiremployment commitments.The jump in performance inquiries were related to the students deciding on how their grades willbe reflected under the new grading policy of ‘pass and no credit’. Students were very concernedas to how a Pass grade would be interpreted by graduate schools or future employers. Studentshad the option to select the Pass/Fail grading system and many needed assistance with thisdecision. Some were concerned that their GPA would be adversely effected by the Pass option,which was incorrect. This new alternative to grading increased student’s stress over grades inmany cases with
been provento impact student learning and student engagement [14-19]. In summary, there are many researchfindings and proven methods of teaching that are effective in achieving deeper learning andcompetency development. However, many chemical engineering faculty members are not trainedin pedagogy and are not aware of these educational methods and tools and their implementationin today’s engineering education.In summary, with the broadening of the chemical engineering discipline, the gap betweenindustry and academia has grown. Faculty with limited experience in the industry struggle toupdate themselves and design their courses to reflect current industry practices. The developmentof interpersonal and intrapersonal skills is not systematically
of Current Strengths of the CPI Platform STEM+C Online Content - Often costly - Free and openly available - Barriers to accessing - Aggregates content for multiple providers high-quality free content - Multiple log-ins - One log-in for multiple accounts - Content often lacks diverse - Vetted content reflects characters and settings showcasing representation diverse STEM+C talent - Lack of personalization - Recommender algorithm suggests personalized and developmentally appropriate content - No pathway or clear - Structures an individualized pathway for progress progression spanning Plus
entrepreneurship.” EM attributes were listed asbusiness skills, character traits, communication, creativity, innovation, problem-solving, andresponsibility [8, 9]. Through their study, Jackson et al. [9] concluded that providing multipleopportunities for students to develop EM is essential since students in this study cited multipleexperiences when reflecting on their EM development.This paper introduces a new scale to assess students’ EM development and the preliminaryresults for its statistical reliability. Similar to the current scales, such as Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy Scale [10], EM Attitude Orientation (EAO) Scale [11], and the Entrepreneurial AttitudeOrientation Scale [12], the EM Scale relies on student’s self-reported, subjective responses
were used without beingverbalized, the interview protocol was designed to solicit what each participant’s main strategieswere. Utilizing the live think-aloud protocol enabled the research team to obtain the closestpossible record of what strategies were being used. Results of this study should be viewed withcaution due to the limited amount of data obtained.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1712887. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] D. F. Lohman, “Spatial Ability and G.” 1993.[2] T. Fincannon, A
. b. Cooperate in group activities. c. Reflect on both personal and team's problem solving/design approach and process for the purpose of continuous improvement4. Program and annotate simple equations and algorithms in a spreadsheet tool (Excel) a. Visually represent data and derive meaningful information from data 5. Model simple objects in 3 dimensions (Solidworks) – meets ENGR1110 objectives a. Read and interpret engineering drawings b. Define: orthographic projections, pictorial views, sectional views, auxiliary views, dimensioning, limits and tolerance values, working drawings, schematics, and standard practices c. Document engineering design using
maintained many years beyond thecompetition of the funded project supported by the National Science Foundation.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank contributions from Alex Edgcomb and numerous teaching assistants. Thismaterial is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1712186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. This work was completed within the framework of University of ToledoIRB protocols 2011808 and 202214.DisclaimerOne of the authors may receive royalties from sales of the zyBook detailed in this paper.References[1] A. Edgcomb, F. Vahid, R. Lysecky, A
• Develop a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) campaign • Provide more flexible schedule optionsFigure 3. Focus Group Findings SummaryAcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation, under GrantNo. 1932662 & 1953431. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Information Technology and the US Workforce: Where Are We and Where Do We Go From Here? National Academies Press, 2017.[2] U.S. Bureau of Labor
educationalcommunity. Some faculty members do not offer it, while many others do. The methods indetermining partial credits include reviewing exam papers manually [13], asking and reviewingpost-exam reflections from the students [14], and conducting in-person interviews [15]. Somefaculty members went the other direction of eliminating partial credit and supplementing it withextra credit problems [16].After reviewing student requests, we decided to offer partial credits in future exams. Thestudents will upload their detailed hand calculations to Blackboard for partial credit within tenminutes after completing the exam. The teaching faculty will review their hand calculations anddecide on the partial credits. The students will be informed before the exam that
during Spring 2020 compared to priorsemesters. In Spring 2020, most, if not all, universities transitioned to a fully remote teachingmode in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses are shown in Figure 11. As might beexpected, faculty members’ use of student involvement strategies decreased. Group problemsolving, field trips, student reflections, and student-led demonstrations all were used lessfrequently, as were instructor-led demonstrations. Use of visuals, written or projected text,sequential instructions, and traditional lecture increased. In Spring 2020, faculty had to quicklyadapt to different video conferencing platforms. Some platforms lacked the interactivity andgroup meeting capabilities added later and some faculty were
simulation program CLO 3D (CLO Virtual Fashion)that allows for the production of realistic full garments including physical properties andtextural/colour information. Students can explore and rotate the 3D model and click onhighlighted Points of Interest (POI) in the 2D interface to see where that pattern piece is in the3D model and view embedded media of video and stills from the product inspection andcomponent analysis stages. The portal has four different views: Garment, Seam, Decal, andElectronics. For each view the POI and media collections change to reflect the selection. Figure5 shows screenshots from the Virtual Product Portal where Figure 5a is the Garment View of theUnder Armour shirt highlighting the side mesh panel, Figure 5b is the
the next generation of construction managers and engineers. Theyoccasionally work in the industry as an intern, or sometimes in other positions reflecting theirexperience in the industry. There is little research related to this matter in the literature.An anonymous survey is followed to check the students' perception of the effects of the drug andcompare it to the construction industry employees.The survey clarifies the lack of associated knowledge and awareness in the job and university.Related safety training needs to be added for the students and other employees in the constructionindustry to avoid vulnerability. It is crucial in different levels and more critical in the lower agesand the student level to illuminate confusion. On the
. Thus, whereas 100% of CAPS scholars have demonstratedfinancial hardship, the same cannot be said of their otherwise matched peers. As reflected inTable 3, the GPA of CAPS scholars began slightly below their matched peers after one year inthe CAPS program, but by the second year of the CAPS program, CAPS scholars had surpassedtheir peers in GPA. This trend continued in the third year of the program, with CAPS scholarshaving a higher GPA than their peers. Further, CAPS scholars reported a higher commitment tocareers associated with their academic major relative to their matched peers at the end of theirthird year in the scholarship (i.e. the end of senior year), despite a lower intention to attendgraduate school (Table 4). Table 3. The GPA of