gain an understanding of what is necessary to become asuccessful engineering student and future professional22, 23.Section 3: MethodologyWhat is unique about the current collaboration is the unit in which ASC 1000 is housed.Typically, a department or group of departments within an institution’s academic affairs unit isresponsible for coordinating its first-year seminar program. Student affairs professionals maytake on instructor roles or serve on an instructional team that includes a faculty member as theprimary point of contact. Since the course’s inception, it has been housed under the studentaffairs umbrella. Faculty members teach a few sections of the course every year, however, thelevel of collaboration between academic affairs and
then evaluated at the spring Faculty Assessment meetings. At thesemeetings all full-time faculty members and those regular part-time faculty members wishing toparticipate, identify and propose strategies to improve ABET Student Outcomes and, hence, ourprogram educational objectives through course work. The department has determined that theminimum level of quality to produce graduates that will ultimately achieve its ProgramEducational Objectives is an EGMU score of 1.5 for each ABET student outcome.2 Whilemany courses may satisfy a particular ABET outcome, the assessment committee has selected asubset of these courses that it finds most appropriate to determine the minimum metric for eachoutcome.The recommendations of the assessment committee
. He is currently an Associate Professor with the Department of Physics & Engineering Science, Coastal Carolina University, USA.Ryan Kerns Ryan Kerns is a 4th-year Engineering Science student at Coastal Carolina University in South Carolina with a concentration in Physics. Kerns plans to graduate in August 2022. He has an interest in mechanical and aerospace engineering specifically in the field of innovative technologies. His long-term goal is to work with an industry company dedicated to technology innovation. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: Developing an Interactive, Immersive, 360-Degree
is to retain and graduate at least 95% of these scholars.To enhance the success of these scholars, a zero-credit six-week orientation course wasdeveloped in Fall 2017 focusing on four dimensions of student wellness: academic, financial,social, and personal. This paper describes the development of this course, its content, and themodifications that were made to the course for Fall 2018.The paper will also address the research conducted in order to generate knowledge about theprogram elements that will be essential for the success of vertical transfer programs at otheruniversities. Two research instruments are described: an online survey and a focus groupinterview that were developed, and administered to the transfer scholars in their first
, 2015 An Approach to Teaching People Skills in Senior Design Project Courses Introduction The premise of this paper is that most engineering students are ill-prepared for the demands their careers will place on them to interact with other people one-on-one, within teams, and within organizations—organizations that are often global in character. The senior design project provides an opportunity (literally a last chance) for graduating seniors to recognize and develop people skills needed for success. Because the project is intended to simulate real engineering practice, the faculty member can observe each student’s people skill level in project context and at a minimum provide insights and coaching to each student in order to improve those
trainees, 11 got a master’sdegree or doctoral degree in either Computer Science or Electrical and ComputerEngineering. Further, 3 out of 7 trainees who got Ph.D. degrees chose an academiccareer path in their trained research areas.Assessment Methods: REU trainees’ demographics, first-generation student or not,career achievement, and evaluations of the REU site were analyzed by anevaluation model associated with their final degree outcomes, academic GPA,number of publications during the REU training, and frequency of interactionsamong faculty members and the REU trainees during and post the REU training.Statement of Results: This is the first longitudinal study on an assessment of thebenefits of REU in Electrical and Computer Engineering. This
capital, and researchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, and a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research Association (AERA) and Tau Beta Pi. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002) in Bioengineering from Clemson University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Understanding Needs of Undergraduate Engineering Students Who View Degree Attainment as “Transactional”AbstractThis research paper explores the story of an undergraduate engineering student who
to include management issues in thecurricula, and 3) the ASCE vision for civil engineering in 2025 to include leadership, teamwork,public policy, and management as educational outcomes.Some advantages of the MS management option include (a) a structured mentoring experiencefor graduate students, (b) an effective means to acquire projects for the undergraduateculminating design class, and (c) a forum that allows practicing engineers to share professionalexpertise directly with students. In addition, students gain an understanding of how technicalproficiency must be meshed with business acumen to have a successful career in engineeringmanagement.IntroductionThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has become a strong advocate
career and manage a project which requires developing anumber of soft skills, such as interpersonal, marketing, and communications 14. In order to be atrue engineering leader, engineering students must possess technical and nontechnical soft skills,which would give them an edge in the workplace 13. They must possess skills such as written andoral communication, customer relations, personal initiative, teamwork abilities, organizationalknowledge, and decision making that will facilitate the development of solutions to businesschallenges, to be effective leaders 15.According to the NAE (2004), “engineers must understand the principles of leadership and beable to practice them in growing proportions as their careers advance”. Engineers need
slate of programs to address diversifying goals on multiple frontsgreatly vary. Decisions about which K-12 activities to offer range from whether to host small tolarge size events, the design of an activity with respect to the appeal for younger, high school,minority and/or women students and whether to host it on campus or at a local school. Creatingand executing retention initiatives to support students once on campus may involve determiningthe amount of scholarship support necessary, teaching strategies to help students build anacademic community and maintaining pathways to involve more diverse students in research.An institution’s diversity slate may include individual projects resulting from faculty grants thatcreate a one-time outreach or
the emergent nature of leadership in an engineering education contextEngineering as a profession is increasingly a team-based and multidisciplinary endeavor,requiring not only technical skills but also the ability to work well with diverse groups of people.In engineering education, students often participate in project teams in which the members mustmake and execute decisions, relying increasingly on their own reasoning and abilities whilelearning to depart from the strictly teacher-led notion of learning.It is important to understand how students perceive leadership, how they understand a leader’srole and importance, and how leadership impacts the work of the team. This study offers a viewinto how leaders
program staff to include this in future activities with the suggestion of schedulingit in fall when more students would take advantage.STEM female faculty role models shared life stories (personal and professional) and experienceson the path to success at the mentoring Networking events. In 2010-2011, three Networkingevents were held in both the Fall and Spring semesters. The purpose of these events was to givementors and mentees an opportunity to talk with professors outside the classroom atmosphere oncareer and major related topics and seek professional advice. Professors from chemistry,mathematics, biomedical sciences, and environmental engineering presented. One event eachterm was focused on advising or shared experiences by EXCEL graduate
industry. 2 hour Workshop Topic 1 – Writing an effective resume Topic 2 – Internships/co-ops/full-time employment opportunities Topic 3 – Effective utilization of the Career Fair Topic 4 – Job interviews—their purpose and how to prepare Topic 5 – Selecting a job from multiple offersCreate Your Unique Personal Development Plan: Explore Your Options (Sophomore)Students explore their options in building a unique set of educational experiences for themselves that fit with theirindividual goals and objectives. Panel members will address various options available to students and possiblesources of funding to engage in these activities and tips on how to get started. 1.5 hour Panel Discussion Topic 1 – Co-ops and internships Topic 2
the design team as if they are graduates employed by myfirm.” (R79)A similar number of respondents (n=47) addressed real-world projects, clients, and applications: “Iattempt to use the capstone design project to illustrate a microcosm of the real world, giving students asclose an experience to what they will encounter in design assignments.” (R53) Table 2 - Categories and Content Themes Regarding Teaching/Coordinating Strengths in Capstone Design Category # Resp. Content Themes (n=361) (in descending order of frequency) industry involvement; mentoring/advising/nurturing students; faculty
and adapted by other instructors, and integrated intotheir own courses and/or GCSP, to reach an even broader audience.The on-ground version of this course uses a lot of active learning techniques and is discussion-based, incorporating activities such as mind mapping, debates, role-play-based simulation,design challenges, and case studies, to help students explore and understand the interdisciplinarynature of the complex global challenges. Additional detail on the on-ground version of the coursecan be found in [2]. This high level of in-person, active learning posed the biggest challenge totranslate to the MOOC. Therefore, in addition to reaping the benefit of modularization forportability, there was also a strong focus and intent on making
terms of providing career development support forstudents in STEM, the way the departments are combined (e.g., professional versus non-professional) could dictate the values of top-level administrators and influence how theyconstruct possible solutions/interventions and how final decisions are implemented. Theprofessional nature of the engineering field may have a sizable impact on the extent to whichcollege administrators decide to create an engineering-specific career fair to provide access tointernship opportunities in the same way a college of science may prioritize undergraduateresearch to prepare its students for graduate studies or other professional schooling.Exo (Institutional) LevelAt the exo (or institutional) level, the type of
paper describes an effort to replicate best practices at Sam Houston State University in theimplementation of a cross-disciplinary course designed to provide students from diversedemographics with a more effective ramp into undergraduate research. The specific aim of thecourse was to provide students from diverse backgrounds with a curriculum designed to buildcommunity, introduce students to research faculty, and to counteract a perceived lack of researchreadiness. The student learning goals for the course included providing opportunities for studentsto: study key historical examples of excellent research; interact with faculty researchers whoperform projects across the STEM disciplines; and to explore the similarities and differencesbetween
engineering majors of interest to the larger project (namely, biomedical,chemical, mechanical, and electrical and computer engineering). Potential participants weregiven a link to an online survey, asking them to help the university prepare the next generation ofengineering students [27].Survey InstrumentThe survey instrument was divided into three sections: (1) characterizing the participants' post-baccalaureate pathways; (2) describing their experiences with and beliefs about engineering; and(3) collecting personal information about participants, including their demographics. First, tocharacterize career pathways, we asked participants to identify the number of career positionsthat they have experienced, including educational opportunities and
is the assessment chair and study abroad advisor for her department, the freshman director of the Civil Engineering Division for ASEE, and is the chair of the Continuing Education Committee for the Geo-Institute.Mrs. Kathleen Louise NazarPaul Bonfanti, Villanova University Paul Bonfanti is the Director of Planning and Policy Analysis for Villanova University. In that capacity, he performs quantitative and qualitative research and analysis for the University to inform policy and support strategic decision making. He also serves as an adjunct faculty member in the University’s Department of Public Administration, teaching Non Profit Management and Research and Analysis
provides financial support,research experience, and faculty and/or peer-to-peer mentorship to participating students.Mentorship (faculty and/or peer-to-peer) was cited as contributing positively to URMundergraduates’ “self-efficacy, identity, and values.” Specifically, science identity and valuesuniquely predicted persistence in STEM careers “up to four years after graduation [10].”Furthermore, there is a precedent of successful STEM intervention programs demonstrating anincrease in persistence in STEM for URM and low-income students. These programs [9], [11],[12], [13] showed that students who have participated in STEM intervention programs had ahigher probability of completing STEM programs than non-participants.Program Overview and
? RQ1b: What are the professional and educational contexts in which participants experience mentorship?MethodParticipantsA total of 25 male undergraduate and graduate engineering students from a large, midwesternuniversity participated in the study. From an initial pool of personal contacts, researchers utilizedsnowball-sampling methods to create “chains of referral”.25 We attempted to diversify ourinterview pool to reflect the various disciplines of engineering by utilizing additional recruitmentmethods because sampling through “chains of referral” can lead to a bias toward selectinginterviewees who share homogenous attributes such as backgrounds or preferences,25 Thesemethods included posting recruitment flyers in campus buildings (See
theirundergraduate research experiences with faculty, students, graduate school recruiters andcommunity members. The co-author also has experience in mentoring students’ research29 andhas co-published several studies related to undergraduate research experiences.30–34With experience, mentors often develop tricks and techniques for streamlining their efforts whenworking with undergraduate research assistants.35 The three-step methodology described herefor working with undergraduates in Engineering research developed over time, and was formallyimplemented in the last two years. During this time, the lead author mentored 20 undergraduatesfrom 8 different institutions, all of whom spent time at MSU working on research related to theanalysis of image data. Many
two years. Since her appointment in 2014 she has been exploring active learning, peer instruction, team-based, hands-on, application-based techniques in her classes to fully engage her students. She was selected as a UIC Teaching Scholar for Spring 2017, named as an American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) ”35 under 35” winner in the education category for 2017 and named as American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) ”20 under 40” awardee for 2018. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Reporting the Progress and Latest Status of an Ongoing S-STEM Project: An Integrated Program for Recruitment, Retention, and Graduation of
. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of Page 23.557.1 engineering education assessment tools. She is a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career (CA- REER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). c American Society
spending a lot of time in the outdoors, a lot of time doing physical activity.” maleMT students recognize that there are whole-life issues and career factors associated withachieving personal and professional balance: “I always think about my aunt because she is a real people person, and she’s just an awesome lady. She graduated with science or computer-programming, something….But she got hired so much quicker, and she was at the top of a chain by her first year out of college because she can explain and talk to people. And she can solve these things that she actually understands and that she has made, but she can talk to the people not in this
rehabilitation of historic agricultural structures. Her research interests include energy, the en- vironment, and engineering education. For one academic year, she served as interim associate dean for undergraduate education and student services in the College of Engineering. She was involved in OSU’s quarter-to-semester conversion effort at multiple levels over 3+ years: as point person and undergraduate studies chair for her department, as a member of the college-level committees in both the College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences and the College of Engineering, and as a Faculty Fellow in the university’s Office of Academic Affairs. She is a second-generation woman engineer; her mother worked as an
provided by a team of fourgraduate student TAs. With the guidance of an experienced faculty member, TAs recorded video lectures,prepared and led in-class and lab-based sessions, and created online homework assessments that could beautomatically graded by the online course management system.Successful implementation of a flipped classroom model was achieved and although challenges wereencountered, the success of the course was based on course evaluations, student and teaching assistantfeedback, and improvements in biomechanics related knowledge as assessed by concept inventory assessments.Knowledge acquisition over the course of the semester was demonstrated by a 38% gain score demonstratingincreased knowledge using the Biomechanics Concept
enrolled their first semester was apredictor of graduation.7 These communications, from engineering to mathematics, were largelyunsuccessful, and instilled an unproductive sense of “we” versus “them” rather than a teamapproach. As efforts were made to bridge this divide, it faded slowly, over time; and facultygradually transcended disciplinary boundaries. An example of the proactive work undertakenwas the invitation of mathematics faculty members to participate in teaching the introduction toengineering course in 2005 (with a small monetary incentive and a math course buyout). Onefaculty member signed up; shortly after this, that faculty member became the mathematicsdepartment chair. Over the next six years, he collaboratively guided his
contains 26 graduate courses, with new additions addedwhen appropriate. Of the 26 courses, three are cross-listed with engineering courses, offeringstudents a broad selection from which to choose. In an effort to keep courses current, recordedlectures and course material are updated every three years, at a minimum.The OM program is directed by a senior tenured faculty member and administered by a team offaculty and educational professionals who manage curriculum changes, textbook selection andthe program’s admission process, while hiring faculty and overseeing the educational quality andacademic rigor of the courses.Developing an Online ClassOne of the core courses in the OM program, and the one usually taken first by students enteringthe program
, adaptability). 3. Function well on a team. 4. Develop time and project management skills. 5. Apply knowledge to problem solving. 6. Gain hands-on experience with modern engineering tools and practices. 7. Practice effective business and technical communication skills. 8. Start networking and develop professional references. 9. Explore various career paths and refine personal career goals. 10. Exceed the company’s expectations through personal initiative and self-direction.This list of professional skills is not comprehensive, and is subject to modification, both in termsof the number and types of skills. We periodically revisit the needs of our students andemployers of our coops, interns and graduates as part of our process of continuous