Conference Session

Computer-related Issues

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles McIntyre, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Sanjeev Adhikari, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Veto Matthew Ray, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; James W. White, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

from allthat is available is problematic. Similar to our counterparts in the industry, educators must selectsoftware which satisfies a number of often competing requirements. Our software acquisitionsmust compliment the curriculum, integrate with the technical capacity of the institution, andprovide sufficient challenge to students, all the while reflecting current industry standards. Weare thus presented with a shared dilemma: how do both educators and industry decide whichsoftware application(s) to acquire?Software acquisition and adaptation decisions often involve comparing alternatives of severalcriteria. However, the end users of the software systems may not necessarily be familiar with theoverall decision-making criteria. To address this

Conference Session

ET Projects

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ghassan T Ibrahim, Bloomsburg University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

and impede its performanceinclude:• Distance between RFID reader antenna location and the passive tag• Angular orientation of passive tag with respect to RFID reader antenna• RF noise interference• RF signal reflections from ground or walls• RF signal reflection of metal surfaces to which the RFID tags attachedTag Performance Evaluation The following RFID tags were tested by the students under guidance of the advisor todetermine the most suitable tag to be used: The Alien Technology Squiggle Tag, The AlienTechnology ALN-9540-WR 2x2, the Alien Technology ALM-9554-WR Inlay, Omni-ID, andOmni-ID Max Rigid, a metal tag coated in silicon, Key Fob Tag, and Mango Key Fob tag. Threetests were performed to validate the tags’ performance

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daria Gerasimova, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

profiles developed. In contrast to the study described in [6], wedifferentiated between two dimensions of engagement – behavioral and emotional – andseparately explored the levels of engagement in each dimension. We also used a differenttimeframe; rather than considering a single class period, we asked students to reflect on theirengagement across the entire semester. These differences allowed us to develop a comprehensivepicture of student engagement profiles, which we hope will be useful for electrical engineeringinstructors. Specifically, knowledge of students’ engagement profiles may help instructors tounderstand the various ways students engage in a course. This knowledge may also help informinstruction and course management

Conference Session

Construction Division Technical Session 2: K-12 through Adult Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

professions. Thesefeatures range from professional socialization to critical thinking. They require that studentsengage in in-depth analysis of problems and apply creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving,collaborative interaction, negotiation, and teamwork to achieve satisfactory outcomes. Studio-and project-based learning provides a way to increase the relevance of course content byrequiring that students not only synthesize information but apply it to actual projects. It alsorequires that they engage in an iterative process that necessitates reflection as well defense.Finally, in many cases, the studio replicates the collaborative environment in which students willenter as professionals.The Building Construction Science program at Mississippi

Conference Session

Middle School Students' Engineering Identity, Efficacy, Attitudes, and Perceptions

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexis Basantis, Rowan University ; Megan DiPietroantonio; Amy B. Geary, Rowan University; Melanie V. Ware, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

, active/reflective, and sequential/global.Complementary teaching styles can be matched to each of the learning styles, and the traditional“chalk and talk” style can in no way encompass all of them. Several institutions found that amixed-mode approach which balances active learning and passive learning is best for teachingstudents, especially in early stages of development [4]. Thus, in order to teach STEM topics toall students, supplementary teaching tools should be utilized.There are some assignable causes linked to the lack of engagement and success in STEMclassrooms. Many times teachers themselves do not have adequate training to teach STEMtopics. This problem was illustrated in a study done in 2007 that revealed the United Statesranked 41 out

Conference Session

Cognitive Engagement

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allyson Jo Barlow, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Benjamin David Lutz, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

?Preliminary findings suggest students’ interpretation of items points to a discrepancy betweenresearcher and student meaning of engagement. Though the survey was intended to target in-class engagement, students often conflated their in- and out-of-class engagement behaviors.Moreover, students did not distinguish between language we intended to reflect different levelsof cognitive activity. As we continue to develop surveys surrounding engagement, this studygives useful insight into how we can interpret student responses and provide meaningfulfeedback to faculty. This is accomplished by understanding the ways in which researchers,faculty, and students talk about engagement differently, and how that might lead us towardsshared

Conference Session

MET and Mechatronics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wei Dai Vian, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nancy L. Denton P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

factors affect experimental results, thetensile testing experiment was expanded to incorporate thermoplastic specimens made bythree distinctly different processes. Student roles included manufacture of the specimens,measurement of necessary dimensions, conducting the tensile tests, generating stress-strain curves for each specimen, and determining the corresponding Young’s modulusand ultimate tensile strength values. Reflection on the effects of process and geometricvariation on their property results became a new report requirement. This article willpresent the complete laboratory experience, results, and initial student response to thisenhanced tensile testing experiment.Keywords: Tensile test, Tensile strength, Specimen preparation, Specimen

Conference Session

Connecting Theory and Practice in a Change Project - And What I Wish I Knew Before I Started

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Kerice Doten-Snitker, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

equivalent) to be the PIon the grant, the mechanism also requires that each RED team includes at least one educationresearcher and one social science or organizational change expert. When reflecting on thedifferent roles among team members, participants at the baseline often noted that thesedistinctions felt blurred. As one education researcher explained: I think we’re figuring out exactly what our roles are—of our evaluator, our social scientist, our education specialist. It’s not bad or problematic, but we realize that it needs to be done. Because those lines aren’t necessarily clear, and maybe they shouldn’t be all that clear, because the data collected, and the analysis, and the work of those three people is

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen, Technical University of Denmark; Jason Bazylak, University of Toronto; Steffen Foss Hansen, Technical University of Denmark; Redante Delizo Mendoza

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

classes pose.In order to address these research needs, we first reviewed the literature on what constitutesgood teaching and reflect upon identified criteria and their feasibility when it comes to largeclasses. Second, we identified Team-based learning (TBL) and active learning exercises(ALEx) as two teaching methods, which have been proposed in the literature as alternatives toconventional teaching [5],[6]. Furthermore, these innovative TMs may have potential forwidespread implementation in university teaching. Third, we analyzed and evaluated the twoidentified TMs against the identified criteria for good teaching of large classes and we discussthe limitations of our study and how the pros of both methods can, in theory, be used to

Conference Session

Energy & Technology in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meera N. K. Singh, University of Calgary; Krista Francis, University of Calgary; Julia Anna Patricia Sather, University of Calgary; Philip Egberts, University of Calgary

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

experiential learning [9], yet the learning was superficial and disconnected. Tobegin to deepen campers learning, the camp was revised in 2017 to reflect the aforementionedpedagogical objectives of the advisory committee.By transforming the week into an investigation into how to power a metropolis, campers wouldlearn to apply knowledge of different generators, and electrical circuits to build a model city.This design process would provide campers with what Scardamealia and Beretter [10] describeas knowledge building opportunities. The campers would collectively inquire into energyengineering to complete a common goal and synthesize ideas. This paper documents the changein camp structure, describes the programming associated with the modified 2017 camp

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Reddy, Colorado School of Mines; Leslie Light, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

instructors to talk about their students, focusing their attentionparticularly on challenges in short (10-20 minutes long) semi-structured and open endedinterviews. In these interviews, faculty responded to prompts such as “what parts of workingwith stakeholders do you think your students struggle with?” by describing their ways ofthinking about students and teaching. These responses were diverse, and reflected on their ownlearning experiences, and on the different capabilities of students who came through theirclassroom and their roles supporting students taking on challenges that might be more difficultfor some than for others. Faculty showed commitment to helping students, and did so with theunderstanding that some students experienced more

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis J. Everett, University of Texas, El Paso; Norman Love, University of Texas, El Paso; Md Moinuddin Shuvo, University of Texas at El Paso; Vishal Bhimrao Zade, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

attend college. The University’scommitment to providing both access and excellence is reflected in the unique demography of itsstudent body – a 21st Century demography that reflects its service area in terms of ethnicity andgender. Engineering has been at the heart of UTEP since its origin. The College ethnicity reflectsthe service area (majority Hispanic - 81%); increasing the participation of females in engineeringis a work in progress. It is notable that the College has been successful in attracting minoritywomen into engineering with the current female population (~20%) being primarily Hispanics.The intervention described in this paper uses an on-line communication software that can bethought of as a form of “social media”. According to

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 6: Technology-enhanced Instruction and Assessment

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brandon Xavier Karcher, Bucknell University; Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brittany Pierson, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #27043Engineering Education and Quantified Self: Utilizing a Student-CenteredLearning Analytics Tool to Improve Student SuccessBrandon Xavier Karcher, Bucknell University Brandon is a Digital Pedagogy & Scholarship Specialist at Bucknell University. His work centers around instructional design, educational technology, and pedagogy. Current interests are reflective learning, student-centered design, and learning analytics. He received his B.S. at Southeast Missouri State in Graphics and Multimedia and an M.S. in Computer Graphics Technology at Purdue University.Dr. Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Gregory Mason P.E., Seattle University; Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

reflecting on experience, how to help engineering educators make effective teach-ing decisions, and the application of ideas from complexity science to the challenges of engineeringeducation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Implicit Engineering Identity in the Mechanical Engineering MajorAbstractThe Mechanical Engineering Department at Seattle University was awarded a National ScienceFoundation RED (Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Departments) grant in2017 to study how student identities are affected when a department makes “revolutionizing”changes. These can result in graduates who not only are prepared technically and professionallywith a practical, realistic understanding of what

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Deciding on a Major

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; Victoria E. Goodrich, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

students. At the end of the module, students completed a reflective paperthat outlined their experiences in engineering thus far and their expected major choice moving forward. Figure 1. Model of Discernment ModuleThis program structure, with a requirement to initially see all departments followed by choice events, hasalso been implemented at another Midwestern university and yielded positive outcomes. Positiveoutcomes included: (1) a higher retention rate in engineering and the STEM College and (2) a decrease inthe engineering major switches after the first-year1-2. Comparing the prior study to the current study site,there are significant institutional differences: an urban public vs. a selective private. In both

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Deciding on a Major

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew B. James P.E., Virginia Tech; Kacie Hodges P.E.; Jenny L. Lo, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

help you get where you are now? 7. Any additional comments that would be useful to a first-year engineering studentAn in-class survey was administered for a completion grade at the end of the semester to solicitfeedback and reflection about the engineering job of the day profiles that were presented.Notable questions to be explored in this paper include the following: ● Q1: How did the engineer of the day profiles affect your perception of engineering? (Likert Scale and free response) ● Q2: Did the Engineer of the Day profiles help you decide to pursue (or not to pursue) a specific discipline? (Yes/No) ● Q3: A question asking whether the profiles helped students pursue other opportunities such as membership in

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics Decision-Making

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luis Fernando Cruz; Wilfrido A. Moreno P.E., University of South Florida; Joel Howell, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

human sciences, but that the student16]. recognizes ethics as something inherent to his/her education as an engineer. At this point the professorSubsequently, the concept of ethics being proposed plays a decisive role; on the one hand, he or shein this work transcends the philosophical reflection must be pedagogically trained to facilitate theof morality or the theoretical study of the formation process and on the other hand, as part ofimportance of the values of general ethics. It the system, he or she has the responsibility offocuses on ethics applied to engineering. That is to modeling ethical

Conference Session

Tales from the Flip Side

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J. Smith, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

“Discussion”portion of lectures. Students typically displayed a solid understanding of the topics and conceptscovered within the videos, as 87.8% of discussion questions were answered correctly. Further,there were only seven instances where a student Table 2. Participation Outcomesmissing from lecture with an unexcused absencewas randomly selected (with three such Participation Outcomes No. Perc.occurrences on the Friday prior to mid-semester Correct Responses 101 87.8%break). This was reflective of the attendance Incorrect Responses 7 6.1%throughout the semester, a byproduct of the Unexcused Absences 7

Conference Session

STEM Issues

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emel Cevik, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Jennifer Whitfield, Texas A&M University; Jay R. Porter, Texas A&M University; Joseph A. Morgan, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

0.23 .465** 0.251 1* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).ConclusionsThis study’s results suggest that parents found the summer camp interesting and worthattending. In addition, participating in STEM Competition Night helped them tounderstand some innovative technologies and engineering concepts better. When parentsincrease their engineering knowledge and generate more positive behaviors and attitudestowards the engineering topics and concepts, this will reflect on their children. Becauseparents have a powerful impact on their children’s future career choices [1], helping theparents’ improve their engineering knowledge, behavior, and attitude

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 9: Persistence and Retention

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Johnny C. Woods, Jr., Virginia Tech; Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Tech; Homero Murzi, Virginia Tech; Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech, Ateneo de Davao University; David B. Knight, Virginia Tech; Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech; Scott W. Case, Virginia Tech; Natasha Smith, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Ms. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech, Ateneo de Davao University Michelle Soledad is a PhD candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include faculty development and data-informed reflective practice. Ms. Soledad has degrees in Electrical Engineering (BS, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, where she continues to be a faculty member of the Electrical Engineering Department. She also served as Department Chair and was a member of the University Research Council before pursuing doctoral studies. Prior to joining ADDU in 2008, Ms. Soledad was a Senior Team Lead for Accenture

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sevile Mannickarottu, University of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

effect of thislimitation is that the department has only one instructional lab. In addition, being an old program,the lab was originally designed for some of the more traditional Bioengineering fields, such asbiomechanics and instrumentation. About 15 years ago, in 2006, a new Bioengineering building was constructed reflecting thechange in the field to areas related to molecular biology and tissue engineering, among others.The instructional lab was moved to a new home in a lab which contained chemical hoods andcell culture hoods, but was still nevertheless setup with stations designed for physiological andinstrumentation studies (Figure 1). Figure 1: Main lab area with 16 stations each with data acquisition devices (Biopac & NI myDAQ) for

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Capstone Design Projects

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaela M. Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott; Richard T. Mangum, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Dina M. Battaglia, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

the88 respondents was 21.7 with 88% of the students younger than 23 and a maximum age of 32.The primary reported ethnicity was white or Caucasian (n = 73) followed by Hispanic (n = 14)and Asian (n = 8). Unsurprisingly, most of the respondents, 64, identified as male, and 19identified as female. These demographics reflect the overall campus demographics where 25% ofthe students are female and 67% are white.Results also showed that over half of the participants are working while in school with eightstudents working over 20 hours per week. Two of the students identified as veterans, nine asROTC students, and one as active duty. Around 77% of the students indicated that theireducation was funded by student loans.Of the 88 students who completed the

Conference Session

Teaching and Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University; Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Laura P. Ford, University of Tulsa; Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky; Christy Wheeler West, University of South Alabama

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Dr. Laura P. Ford, University of Tulsa LAURA P. FORD is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Tulsa. She teaches engineering science thermodynamics, mass transfer/separations, and chemical engineering senior labs. She is a co-advisor for TU’s student chapter of Engineers Without Borders USA. Her email address is laura-ford@utulsa.edu.Dr. Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University Dr. Lucas Landherr is an

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Romy Beigel, Montana State University; Emma Annand, Montana State University; Monika Kwapisz, Montana State University; William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University; Brett Tallman P.E., Montana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

identity. Results from the earlier quantitative phase canbe found in our earlier work [2].Conceptual Framework for the Development of an Engineering Leadership IdentityThe qualitative protocol was built from two existing identity development models, theLeadership Identity (LID) model [3] and the Communities of Practice (CoP) model [4]. The LIDmodel identifies four environmental conditions that influence the development of leadershipidentity. These conditions include contact with influential individuals, experiences with peersand perceived views of peers, meaningful involvement in curricular and co-curricular activities,and reflection on leadership experiences [3]. Within the Communities of Practice model identitydevelopment relies heavily on

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eun-Young Kang, California State University, Los Angeles; Jianyu Jane Dong, California State University, Los Angeles; Matthew C. Jackson Ph.D., California State University, Los Angeles; Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles; Gerardo Lopez, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

seminars tohelp students to build their portfolio, review students’ resume, and enhance required skills suchas research, presentation, and interview skills.During the Fall 2018, while encouraging scholars to attend as many professional events as theycan afford, the program required each scholar to attend at least one event (a seminar,presentation, industry visit, or workshop) and submit a reflection essay on their experiencewith memorable take-away points. In addition, the program encouraged scholars’ participationin professional workshops, conferences, internship opportunities and research opportunities atother institutions (e.g., REU programs) to foster their educational and career goals. Severalscholars participated in the 2018 HENAAC

Conference Session

ECE Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology; James R. McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

that received a 25 on the quiz, but then got all answerscorrect during the retake would receive a 70 to reflect both their initial low score and their newunderstanding. Figure 1 illustrates the original and post-retake averages and the number ofeligible retakes.After revisiting the quiz, students were asked of their sources for studying the quiz (after theinitial grading cycle). These sources were gathered qualitatively, and then coded and converted toquantitative data. The sources are listed in Figure 2. The sources themselves were not factoredinto the grading of the retake. However, if the student cited a source that was deemedinappropriate or less trustworthy, the instructor would discuss other possible sources.Additionally, good sources

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division - WIP Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Indiana-Purdue University; Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany; Thomas De Pree, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

vital role in the wider ecosystem of engineering profession(for example legal protections and obligations of a PE) reflects concretely in conversations as arationale to promote education of professional ethics.3.2.2 Ethical Development of New TechnologyOne of the most essential and characteristic tasks of engineering is the design of new technologies.As the integration of increasingly complex technologies with numerous aspects of our social andprivate life expands and intensifies, importance of ethical decision-making in production of noveltechnologies becomes evermore crucial. We observed arguments of this kind in our data as arationale for attending to engineering ethics education that enables the engineering students toaddress social and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan; Jessica E. S. Swenson, University of Michigan; Max William Blackburn, University of Michigan; Candace Rose Wiwel, University of Michigan; Jessica P. Hernandez; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

particular class meeting (RQ1).Second, we administered Instructor Survey 2 at the beginning of the post-semester interview. Inthis survey, instructors are asked to reflect on their teaching over the past semester through a 30-question survey. The questions, based on the Student Responses to Instructional Practices(StRIP) Survey [25], ask instructors about the pedagogy they used in the course. The surveyresponses are used to further understand the instructor’s pedagogical choices (RQ1) and theinfluence of the professional development (RQ3). In our data collection, all instructors whoparticiped in a post-semester interview also filled out Instructor Survey 2.Student SurveyFor all of the courses we observed, we administered a concurrent student survey

Conference Session

Faculty Development Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy B Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

). Observationprotocols typically are intended for reflective teaching and measuring changes in teachingpractices rather than for summative evaluation. With the growing focus on incorporating theassessment of student learning into teaching evaluation, engineering education is well-situated,in which faculty members can draw from ABET student outcomes assessment data and research-based student evaluation tools such as CATME for teamwork skills (Ohland et al., 2012).The SET Revision ExampleBackground. The University of Southern Indiana (a public, comprehensive institution) initiatedthe review of its existing SET instrument during Fall 2016. The SET was previously reviewedapproximately ten years prior. The goal was to recommend revised SET questions that couldapply

Conference Session

A Technology Potpourri I

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge Crichigno, University of South Carolina; Sadia Ahmed, Northern New Mexico College; John H. Gerdes, University of South Carolina; Robert G. Brookshire, University of South Carolina

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

. Results indicate a very strong interest in the adoptionof vLabs, as reflected by the attendance to the workshops (an aggregate of over 100 instructorsfrom more than 70 institutions, 25 states). Future work includes expanding the number of vLabs,increasing the number of internship opportunities, disseminating vLabs, and numericallyquantifying the impact of the enhanced cybersecurity model.Acknowledgement and DisclaimerSupport for this project has been received from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant1822567. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.References1. N. Klingbeil, K. Rattan, M. Raymer, D. Reynolds, R. Mercer