of ”yes” or ”no” to assess the students’ answers. Figure 5: Escape Room LayoutNumeric Metrics and Student FeedbackDuring each competency, students were asked to write 2-3 reflections on how useful thegamification tools were towards their learning. They also completed paper and pencil surveys,which included questions on enjoyment, engagement, and value of the games played. An end ofthe semester, students completed an anonymous course evaluation focused on the specifics ofgamification tools. Limited data was collected because our program has less than 50 students inupper division, so the sample size is automatically small. We plan to track the use of these gameslongitudinally in order to reach meaningful
Paper ID #18024Climbing to Cruising Altitude: Promoting an Academic Library’s 3D Print-ing ServiceMr. Daniel P Zuberbier, East Carolina University Dan Zuberbier is the Education & Instructional Technology Librarian at East Carolina University (ECU). He planned for, launched, and currently manages the J.Y. Joyner Library 3D printing service which makes 3D printing accessible to all students, faculty and staff at ECU, and teaches a course on 3D printing and design for the North Carolina Summer Ventures in Science & Mathematics Program. He previously worked as a high school Social Studies teacher in Arizona and
and Outcomes for Connectivity Series Evaluation Plan Objective Short-Term Intermediate Long-Term Evaluation Outcomes Outcomes Outcomes Data Source (s) / Each AY AY 2017 AY 2019 Cycle Strengthen Continual Assess Inform NSF Connectivity faculty core review of Connectivity ADVANCE Series competenci Series Series impact on national Evaluations es and build satisfaction participating community with (individual faculty
indicator of student success in transitioning from high school to college, with counselorsadvising less than 250 students more likely to speak to students about planning for college andtaking college entrance requirements [18]. Effective training of school counselors is necessary toeducate students about STEM majors and occupational choices [16]. Research has shown thatthis is particularly important for counselors serving low income populations, since thesecounselors often exhibit low expectations which may affect students’ science and mathematicscoursetaking and achievement [19], [20]. Counselors must be better positioned to assist studentsin aligning their career aspirations with the coursework necessary to achieve them [21]. This isessential for
% Caucasian 96% 100% African American 4% 0% Male 62% 79% Female 38% 21% GPA range 3.0-4.0 2.6-4.0 GPA mean 3.6 3.6 Recipients included all levels of undergraduate STEM majors, mostly engineering,with the majority including sophomores, juniors, and seniors, with only 15 percent freshmen(1 to 30 credits) (Table 2). Sixteen per cent of participants planned to attend graduate schoolin the first-year survey (with another 27 per cent indicating graduate school or employment).Thirty
(technical, formal presentations in front of an audience) Oral communication (communicating ideas to other engineers) Oral communication (communicating ideas to stakeholders or the public)Project Management Skills Planning a schedule to meet deadlines Prioritizing tasks Delegating tasks across team members Organizing resources and information Making decisions collectively and effectivelyInterpersonal and Teamwork Skills Dealing with difficulties effectively Listening and being open-minded and respectful when disagreeing Encouraging everyone to contribute ideas Showing concern for the feelings of other team members Making sure team members understand each other Adapting to new ideas Giving
allocated funding suggests a perceivedimportance of the program for increasing the number of students involved in research.One of the goals of many REU programs is to increase the likelihood that involved students willgo on to graduate school in the STEM disciplines. As compared to a matched sample ofundergraduates who did not participate in an REU program, Zydney and colleagues (2002) foundthat participating students had an increased likelihood of attending graduate school and felt thatthe program improved their career trajectories. Similarly, Seymour and colleagues found thatstudents felt that their research experience allowed them to have a clearer picture of their post-graduation plans and felt more prepared for their career or graduate school
educational virtual reality game, the Design Review Simulator (DRS) with the aim to helpstudents build design review skills. The game was designed to challenge the students in findingand evaluating various types of design mistakes. In this paper, we discuss the development of thegame and frame it in light of the existing literature to further understand the value of VR in thedesign process. In addition to the development experience, we offer a plan for the implementationand evaluation of the game with an assessment instrument designed for the game.2. LITERATURE REVIEW2.1. Design Review and Visualization With the growing adoption of building information modeling (BIM) approaches, severalinnovative technology applications for various use cases
student and faculty development around teaching, mentoring, leadership, communications, and teamwork. She has a particular professional expertise with program planning, management, and evaluation and an academic interest in leadership de- velopment in academic contexts. She holds a M.A. in Education from Michigan State University and an M.A. in English from The Ohio State University.Mrs. Astri Briliyanti, Michigan State University Astri is a graduate student in the Department of Community Sustainability, Michigan State University. She previously worked as a researcher and urban planner consultant in Indonesia, helping the government with the creation of spatial and development plan, as well as policy analysis and
Education, American Evaluation Association, International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, and Academy of Human Resource Development.Jordan Orion James, University of New Mexico Jordan O. James is a Native American Ph.D. student in the Organization, Information, and Learning Sci- ences (OILS) program as well as a lecturer at the University of New Mexico’s School of Architecture and Planning in the Community & Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research assis- tant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments, and has been recognized as a Graduate Studies student spotlight recipient and teaching scholar. Jordan studies learning in authentic, real-world conditions utilizing
development and project management. Ms. Koechner co-founded the Khoros Group/Khoral Research and was key in the design and implementation of the Khoros software system. She is the founder of eN- ova Solutions, LLC. Ms. Koechner has traveled extensively and has a broad perspective of cultures and insights into societies. She is proactive about the environment, conservation, sustainability and human rights. She was a member of the planning and organizing committees for the www.weef-gedc2018.og world conference where the theme was ”Peace Engineering”. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 How do we frame Peace Engineering education? A complex, but
, Computer Graphics, Materials Science and laboratory courses. Since 2015 she has been actively involved in the University of Miami College of Engineering’s ”Redefining Engineering Education” strategic plan on educational innovation. As part of this plan, Dr. Basalo worked with 2 other faculty members to organize inaugural Senior Design Expo in May 2017, an exposition where over 200 senior students showcased their Capstone projects to the University of Miami community, alumni and industry leaders. Starting in 2016 and through her work with the University of Miami’s Engaged Faculty Fellowship program, Dr. Basalo incorporated an academic service component into the final project for a sophomore-level Measurements Lab course
objectives and associatedlearning actions were chosen for student educational program development and assessment: Objective #1: Students will identify safety hazards in the wind turbine environment with these learning actions: o Students will examine and assess safety conditions in the virtual wind turbine. o Students will select appropriate personal protective equipment. Objective #2: Students will apply task-based hazard assessment with this learning action: o Students will examine a work plan and assess potential hazards for each task in virtual scenarios. Objective #3: Students will create and follow a safety plan and correct safety procedures with this learning
summaries, technical descriptions, reports) Professional writing (emails, memos) Oral communication (technical, formal presentations in front of an audience) Oral communication (communicating ideas to other engineers) Oral communication (communicating ideas to stakeholders or the public)Project Management Skills Planning a schedule to meet deadlines Prioritizing tasks Delegating tasks across team members Organizing resources and information Making decisions collectively and effectivelyInterpersonal and Teamwork Skills Dealing with difficulties effectively Listening and being open-minded and respectful when disagreeing Encouraging everyone to contribute ideas Showing concern for the feelings of
settings, American, Canadian, and British universities are themost committed to its implementation. Nevertheless, Saudi Arabian, African, and Asianuniversities are also adopting lean principles in their practice6.Both newly developed and established administrative processes are potential opportunities forimprovements7. Most projects focus on operations such as financial transactions, facilitiesmanagement, human resources and library services. Based on documented results by earlyadopters in higher education, clear continuous improvement is part and parcel of organizationalstrategic planning and applied within daily operations at forward-thinking institutions.2Improvements from lean in higher education include reduction of waiting time for
more approachable to the middle school or high school students. Thesepresentations were practiced for the group during weekly seminars. After receiving feedbackfrom peers and educators, the pairs updated their presentations and took them to classrooms toshare with students. Grad Student STEM Share program provided several leadershipdevelopment opportunities of specific and translatable skills including communication, teaching,coordination of meetings and events, follow-up, teamwork, planning, presentation skills, andnetworking, as well as optional leadership coaching. Detailed feedback from the graduatestudents and the teachers whose classrooms they visited was positive and will be presented inthis paper, as well as details on the pilot year
students in aninterdisciplinary course with students in various departments to design and consult with a ruralHonduran community in need of a safe drinking water supply. During the course students workclosely with the community, a Honduran non-government organization, and professionaladvisors from various disciplines including civil engineering, water system operations, technicalcommunications, and political governance. The course focuses on wrestling with the challengesof defining a need, evaluating alternative solutions, and devising a plan for system construction,operation, and financing. Results of the first two efforts are discussed from the perspectives ofthe student participants, the community recipient, the NGO, and professional partners
differencesemerging from the traditional and alternative course student populations. An example of the fullstudent post-survey protocol can be found in the Appendix, however the survey protocol alsoshifted slightly from term to term.In each term that the course was offered (Spring 2014, Fall 2014, and Fall 2015), weadministered these surveys to compare student responses in the alternative and traditionalcourses. In most terms, students were surveyed at the beginning of the semester, at the end ofthe semester, and in the subsequent semester after students took the class. (In Spring 2014, only apost-semester survey was conducted, and for the most recent cohort a subsequent-semestersurvey is planned for May 2016).In Fall 2014 and Fall 2015 semesters, interviews
instructors and likely designed and maintained by an instructional team1–4. In many ofthese cases, it could be argued that the most significant factors influencing student performancein, and perception of, a large format class come not from the students, nor the instructors, butfrom the curricular decisions of the cross-disciplinary course planning team charged with thedesign of the content, assessment and pedagogy employed within the classroom. Literature concerning methods for high-quality engineering course design is wellestablished, and should form the foundation of any initial course design, or major redesign, in anengineering curriculum. Experts advise that this practice begin with a thorough review of thelearning objectives
, the team members introduced other faculty members toEPSA, who then independently implemented the EPSA method in their courses.Implementation of the EPSA MethodThe faculty members responsible for the “Professional Issues” course at Norwich Universityhave been using the EPSA scenarios for the past four years. The detailed facilitation plan forimplementing the EPSA method in a course was presented in a previous ASEE paper.1The students in each class were divided into teams. Some members of the team were assignedthe role of discussant and others assigned the role of observer. The discussants were responsiblefor conducting the discussion. The observers were each assigned one or two dimensions of theEPSA rubric to use to assess the discussions. All
links. 3. Testing reveals problems and changes propagate to other components. This learning objective emphasizes the iterative process sometimes required in systems design to resolve communication interdependencies between designers. It highlights how incorrect or incomplete requirements can cause problems in systems design, testing as a part of a larger verification and validation plan can uncover problems, and how design changes have a tendency to propagate between subsystems.These topics expose fundamental parts of the SE process26 but also align with broader objectivesin engineering education27 to view design as a multidisciplinary activity where designers musteffectively work in teams to meet conflicting
merely for individual students. This establishes whether the project isclear to move forward, needs intervention by organizational staff, or should end soon. Onecritical criterion for continuation is an ongoing relationship with an identified client. Policiesregarding implications of the green, yellow, red status are made known to the students.Project Course Grade Component BreakdownIn our revised and simplified approach, engineering project students are graded in three maincategories: progress against plans (30%), reporting & documentation (40%) and contribution toproject progress (30%). Progress against plans represents the same score of 0-30 assigned to allmembers of a project team by the responsible faculty member based upon MVP panel
, & Golding, 2010) and take many forms including cross-campus programswhich leverage multidisciplinary collaboration, to efforts specifically targeting engineering andSTEM students and social or non-profit ventures.At the graduate level, entrepreneurship courses open to non business students typicallyemphasize technology transfer and pair scientific teams with MBA students to developcommercialization plans for specific technologies. A long-established example is Georgia Tech’sTechnological Innovation: Generating Economic Results (TI:GER) Program, which createsteams of two MBA students and two law students who focus on the commercialization of a PhDstudent’s research (Thursby, Fuller, & Thursby, 2009). Another example is Ohio
ofconstraints.”2 In essence, to design is to solve a problem. It is an inherently creative process thatis carried out every day, whether it’s for building a rocket ship or planning a date for Fridaynight. With the rise of technology and globalization, the engineering design environment has avariety of challenges including: increased complexity, shorter lifecycles, constrained budgets, anincreased demand for partnerships, in addition to other considerations such as environmentalimpacts, performance, regulations, and legal ramifications.The ways in which to approach the design process are varied. For instance, gate-based design(sometimes referred to as algorithmic design) is used on well-defined design processes like thoseseen in the pharmaceutical
) enablingof transfer credits and experiential credits; b) taking a community-based approach withcomprehensive programs and services for student veterans and their families which includehousing, health care, employment during the college; c) enabling veterans’ voice to be heardthrough roundtables, veteran associations, etc; d) have strong web presence easily accessible to theveterans; e) establish a specific point of contact; e) expand housing options; and f) implementtuition deferment plan to accommodate the GI Bill (Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944)payment schedules; g) provide veteran focused orientations; h) provide faculty training related toveterans (ACE, 2008; Heineman, 2016; Olin Earl & Committee on Veterans' Affairs, 1949).Veterans
notstatistically significant to success in the quality control course. However, the student’s priorsemester GPA, incoming cumulative GPA, and performance in the prerequisite course aresignificant to success in the quality control course.Background and MotivationThe quality control course at East Carolina University is a graduation requirement for allstudents majoring in engineering. For the majority of these students it is a terminating course inthe area of statistics within their curriculum plan since it is not a prerequisite for any othercourse. For a small minority, an elective course in lean six sigma is taken that requires qualitycontrol as a prerequisite. The quality control course prerequisite is a calculus-based probabilityand statistics course in
area of study. The responsibilities ofthe student and faculty member were clearly communicated each semester at the first workshop.Awardees signed a Mentoring Agreement at the beginning of each semester and submittedmentoring logs at the end of the semester. T4 STEM scholars and mentors committed to meetingat least every other week for the first six weeks of the semester to make sure the student got offto a good start, and on a monthly basis thereafter. Mentors worked with the students to developand manage an Individual Academic Learning Plan (IALP) which helped the student gauge theamount of time and coursework necessary to complete his/her studies by taking the courses inthe proper sequence.To maintain their scholarship, students were
negative impact onstudent interest in the course. This was seen in the fall of 2014, when in spite of marketing thecourse broadly, most students had already planned their fall class line-up and the course failed tofill to the course minimum and was cancelled for that term.Upon investigation and interviews with students who were thought to be viable coursecustomers, it was revealed that after the course’s one year hiatus in 2013, the group ofprospective students planning to take the course had advanced in their programs and were nolonger able to fit the course into their schedule which now included a healthy dose of researchcredits. Additionally, the perceived unreliable availability of the course led students whoseinterests were in industrial
1AbstractAs society addresses the major challenges associated with food, water, energy and climatechange there is an increasing need for engineers that are interdisciplinary and globallycompetent. The Master’s International Program (MIP) at the University of South Florida is agraduate partnership with the U.S. Peace Corps that provides over two years of supervisedprofessional service and international research experiences that include specialized training inlanguage, culture, participatory planning, and sustainable development. The students gain aglobal perspective while performing research in an international context of economic, social, andenvironmental limitations. Using a survey tool with quantitative and qualitative metrics, thisstudy assessed
and encouragement.C. Sustaining the Projects and Partners10. Reuse your STEM lessons with different audiences of middle school students. Developing new curriculum can be time-consuming and when working with middle school students, the activities and lessons really need to be tested. So even if it means that it limits how much design and creativity your university students will have, reusing your STEM lessons in several service-learning projects can save a lot of time and problems. One example is having a few lessons pre-planned, and having the engineering students be helper teachers. This shows the engineering students what is contextually appropriate for middle and high school students and what to expect in a classroom