students was rated very low in the area of “Impact of Solutions,which possibly indicates an area for further emphasis in course coverage. Faculty Evaluation of the EPSA ImplementationAfter reflecting upon the Fall 2013 EPSA sessions, the instructor expressed several concernsabout the implementation. Recommendations to address each concern were proposed: Concern #1: Do we need two practice sessions or is that overkill?Recommendation: Do only one practice session and two record sections. Allocate some general class time after the session to exchange general feedback on the process, the outcomes, and the lessons learned.Action: This was incorporated into the 2014
, unsuccessfully. Hazel then completes the task alone. After this, Page 26.1256.6Hazel does more checking in with Olive, asking her if ideas make sense. Hazel’s explanations toOlive are presented colloquially, reflecting Hazel’s awareness of Olive’s lack of experience. Foralmost all of the coding in the first two days, Hazel types the code while Olive looks onattentively, sometimes with Hazel narrating her actions. Olive’s contributions are mainlybrainstorming ideas for the final project and helping to Google questions.On the second day, they begin putting together the mechanical arm. Olive immediately takes thelead in constructing it, though Hazel
’ communication and teamwork skills4. It can also enhance students’ intrapersonal skills by promoting self-efficacy, character building, and resilience5. All of these traits are commonly cited desired attributes of a global engineer working in a multi-disciplinary world, and are reflected in engineering accreditation requirements today6-8. Project-based learning in particular can simulate an industry-like environment for students, to facilitate the development of the skills required for practicing professional engineers. In project-based learning, students are formally instructed to ensure they have the foundation of knowledge needed to work on and complete the project assigned9,10. Emphasis is
undergraduate students. The engineering professors delved even further intothe energy policy process by participating in the governing board of the largest electric utility inPuerto Rico and as advisors to the Governor. Policy actions from engineering professors andstudents played an important role in the passing of a comprehensive electric sector reform inMay 2014. The paper also presents university education efforts (supported by a DOE grant) thatprovide the electricity sector workforce and stakeholders with tools and knowledge needed toimplement the reform mandated by law. The paper concludes with assessment results from a newcourse created once the professors returned to UPRM, a reflection on the background requiredfor effective energy policymaking
experiential nature of our approach, the second half of the class meetingperiod is dedicated to a sequence of “mini-projects.” These mini-projects take the form ofadditional homework problems in which students are asked to perform a set of measurementsand address a set of questions related to the project. By way of example, typical "mini-projects"for transmission lines include measuring characteristic impedance, propagation delay, standingwaves, and the determination of unknown loads by observing reflections, and the design andconstruction of impedance matching circuits and power splitters. A sampling of our experimentalhardware is shown in Figure 21 : (a) shows an image of an “artificial transmission line”(consisting of series of surface mount
through experience and reflection, 39 throughencountering different ways of knowing. There is no room for critical thinking and reflectiveaction. 40 Most important, lifelong learning is foremost about a love of and passion for learningitself, rather than focusing exclusively on the discrete knowledge that is acquired. As Deweywrote “The most important attitude that can be formed is that of desire to go on learning. Ifimpetus in this direction is weakened instead of being intensified, something much more thanmere lack of preparation takes place” (48). 41 With these reductionist misconceptions aboutknowledge and learning, it is clear that a concept like lifelong learning didn’t stand a chance.Many of these omissions are in fact related—one needs
communitiescommunity?”Pragmatic “Concepts Transparency “Knowledge Present results to designValidation – “Do underlying research Empathy produced… educators andthe concepts and design… Open-ended and meaningful in the researchers and discussknowledge claims compatible with non-leading social context applications and utilitywithstand reality in the field” questions underexposure to the investigation”realityinvestigated?”Ethical Validation Interview conducted Relaxed and Study results reflect Potential
between product and process is deliberate and designed to roughly follow a generalized“V-model” for systems development [13], figure 1. Figure 1: Representation of the V-model on which the capstone class is loosely based.The V-model has two phases, validation on the left and verification on the right. The validationphase focuses on effectiveness, do the design decisions reflect the right thing to do, while theverification phase focuses on efficiency or whether the planned design is being executed the rightway. The top of the Vee represents broader more contextual elements of design while thebottom of the Vee represents detailed design. In this model as student teams move from left toright through the design course they first represent their
. Weconclude that the FLDoE framework may be used as a foundation, but not the sole source, forimportant AM knowledge areas, leaving opportunity for the development of an AM body ofknowledge that reflects employer expectations and geographic variations.1.0 IntroductionManufacturing has evolved from the time that Henry Ford operated the first assembly line in1913. The ability to make products in volume, allowed the US to dominate the world inmanufacturing output, and increase its gross domestic product. In 1951, units of operation inproduct assembly began to be infused with technological innovations, evolving into what is nowknown as advanced manufacturing. Advanced technologies, systems, and processes have notonly transformed the assembly line, but
accreditation visit and the accreditation process in general.ABET assigns a team chair and typically one program evaluator per program being evaluatedwith a minimum of two program evaluators assigned for an initial accreditation visit. The teamchair and institution negotiate a visit date which is typically scheduled between September andDecember.Self-study. The institution then has until July 1 to complete and submit its self-study to ABET, akey aspect of the accreditation process. The institution generates a self-study report that addressesthe accreditation criteria directly and is the primary document used by the ABET team to evaluatethe program prior to their arrival on campus. It is intended to be a self-reflective document inwhich programs have
participation in study abroad for STEM students is not due to lack of interest orintent. The literature indicates no statistically significant difference in intentions betweenstudents in arts and humanities majors and students in business, education, or science,technology, engineering, and math [8]. It appears that the question of most engineering andtechnology students is not whether or not they would like to study abroad, but rather whether ornot they feel able to study abroad with all the demands on their academic time.Engineering programs throughout the U.S. and the rest of the world follow very stringentcurriculum designs, with courses sequenced fairly inflexibly in most graduation plans. Theserequirements reflect accreditation standards (e.g
. We coded each section (reflection as a community member, as a farmer, as agovernment employee) with the same basic set of codes, adapted where notedCode Description -1 0 1First person Use of first person voice suggests They / passive You / one Iperspective student took up the perspective voice directlyEmotion Expressing emotions, including None One Multiple trust, was prompted by the question (How would you feel); not including specific emotions indicates lesser connection with the point of view.Water use Describes specific uses of
that led the educator to seek out professional assistance was the concern that thedesign of the Affable Bean Project (the web site that was developed by following the NetBeansE-Commerce Tutorial) may not reflect industry best practice. The tutorial is very well writtenand covers the major objectives of the course, but it is somewhat dated (it was written in 2009),and a portion of it emphasizes EJB (Enterprise JavaBean) technology, which is not as prevalentin industry as some other technologies. When the educator and professional were discussingways to modify the Affable Bean Project to bring it more in line with industry best practice, theprofessional suggested employing a version of the DAO (Direct Access Object) Pattern usingJava instead of
potential source of assistance.Previous researchers have focused on engineering undergraduate-based feedback and advice 11 .They asked students to reflect on their experience through interviews and suggest ways forstudents to find happiness throughout their college years, for example, joining professionalsocieties. That research did not focus on study habits, which is the crux of the present paper’sprocess.The study presented here is also unusual among help-seeking research because the resultsrepresent actual help-seeking behavior rather than an intention to seek help 12,13,14 . Help-seekingintentions, often used by researchers to control for varying needs for help, may differ significantlyfrom actual help-seeking behavior 15,16 . The results of
describing that theclassroom did not provide the same exposure, Byron stated, “In the lab, you have to do a lot of 13outside research to find out what you need to do. No one is telling you what to do step by step.It's a very creative [space]. Inside the classroom, the same creativity isn't necessarily used.”Shortly after, he reflected on the effect that the project process had on his ability to design andmake, stating, “Basically, it taught me how to break things down into parts in my head, and thatmakes it so much simpler.” Due to his ability to apply the concepts learned in class to the maker-projects he was simultaneously working on, Bryan considered
populations in other studies theproject evaluators have been involved with. To examine the reliability of the items for each keyconcept, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was computed. Cronbach’s alpha is a common metric forgauging reliability. Its calculation reflects the internal consistency, that is, how related a set ofitems are as a group. Higher values reflect a set of items that are more closely related (valuesrange from 0 to 1.0). For all concepts the calculated Cronbach alpha coefficient was acceptable(above .70), and a composite score was generated using the average response value acrossassociated items. The instrument continued to be refined year to year in keeping with thechanging nature of the project, and new constructs with new questions
digital simulations of theirunmodified rocket kits. Software-simulated unmodified rocket launches established an altitudebaseline, which was validated by experimental launches of a real rocket built to kit specificationsand instrumented with an accelerometer and altimeter. Students then brainstormed and exploreda variety of design modifications, using modeling software to evaluate the potential impact ofeach change on rocket altitude. Next, students modified their rocket kits to reflect changes theymade in the computer model to increase flight altitude. Modified rockets were then instrumentedwith accelerometer and altimeter sensors and flown. Students evaluated the resulting flight datato determine how well the rocket modifications they selected
engineering science courses and humanities and social science courses. So, while the technical engineering science courses focus and - and privilege the technical, the humanities and social science courses in many universities do just the opposite.The separation of technical and social within the curriculum reinforces the perceivedseparation in students’ minds, which is not reflective of engineering practice where the twohave to be considered simultaneously.Requirements vs. electiveSome interviewees also commented on the challenges associated with teaching ESI inrequired versus elective courses. Elective courses are conducive to high engagement andmotivation because student self-select into them based on prior interest. An interviewee whohas
reflect on this paper as awhole.2. Background2.1 Software engineering curriculum guidelineIn order to evaluate the engineering aspects of digital skills programs, we first need to look at theproposed skills an engineering graduate would be expected to achieve. The SoftwareEngineering 2014 Curriculum Guidelines (SE2014) [12] propose the knowledge areas thatsoftware engineers should master in post-secondary education. SE2014 define the corecurriculum skills needed in software engineering education as: - Computing essentials - Mathematical and engineering fundamentals - Professional practice - Software modeling and analysis - Requirements analysis and specifications - Software design - Software verification & validation
learning to design teaching and learning, program content and structure, student assessment, and continuous course improvement techniques. She managed and was a key contributor to a two-year pilot project to introduce blended learning into the chemical engineering capstone design courses, and is the author of a number of recent journal, book, and conference contribu- tions on engineering education. Her research focusses on how to teach innovation and sustainable design practices to engineers and develop a curriculum reflective of engineering practice requirements. Recently she has taught a short course on how to design and teach process engineering courses to professors in Peru and workshops on Metacognition and
Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Prof. Marnie V Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., P.Eng. is an Industrial Professor in Chemical Process Design in the Depart- ment of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds an M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education. She is currently the William Magee Chair in Chemical Process Design, leads the
) through activelearning than passive learning. Throughout our evolution, technology has been passed down bypupils imitating their mentors. This natural preference for learning is reflected in the genericlearning pyramid that was first proposed by National Teaching Laboratory Institute at theirBethel, Maine campus in the early 1960’s and the related work have been proposed by severalother researchers [31-34]. Though rightly criticized, the pyramid provides a measure of contentretention from lectures (5%), laboratory experiments (70%), and design projects (90%). Thisdisparity in content retention was recognized by the 5th century B.C Chinese proverb, “What Ihear, I forget. What I see, I remember. What I do, I understand.” ENDEAVOR harnesses
for Engineering Education, 2020 Spatial Visualization Skills Training at Texas State University to Enhance STEM Students Academic SuccessAbstractA diagnostic of thirty questions administered to incoming STEM students in Fall 2013 and Fall2015 - Fall 2018 reflects that their spatial visualization skills (SVS) need to be improved.Previous studies in the SVS subject [1], [2], [3] report that well-developed SVS skills lead tostudents’ success in Engineering and Technology, Computer Science, Chemistry, ComputerAided Design and Mathematics. Authors [4], [5] mention that aptitude in spatial skills isgradually becoming a standard assessment of an individual’s likelihood to succeed as anengineer.This research reports the
reflect on your understanding of the NSF-funded Engineering ResearchCenter (ERC). Rate your present level of understanding, as well as your level of understandingprior to participating in the ERC for each of the items below.” No items in this section wereshown to be highly correlated with one another (see Appendix A).A two-factor structure emerged through EFA (Table 1): 1) present understanding, and 2) priorunderstanding. Both factors achieved good reliability levels; Cronbach’s alpha of 0.909 forpresent understanding and 0.907 for prior understanding.Table 1. Factor structure and factor loadings for understanding the ERC Item Present Prior
segments and todevelop themes. These themes are presented in the Findings and Discussion.LimitationsThe focus groups were limited to the perspectives of those present. Since participation wasvoluntary, it cannot be assumed that the voices were reflective of the rest of the students in thecourses. Recruitment in qualitative research has been linked to interest in the subject matter [31]so the focus group participants might have been more interested in ESI. The 4DDD was chosenas the theoretical framework as a way to interpret the potential of a micro-insertion to contributeto ethical development through its conceptualization of instructional design for holisticdevelopment. However, there are a number of models and theories related to effective
’ ratings fromone moment in time to another. Each survey included 13 questions intended to capture a student’soverall sense of community, derived from the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction andFrustration Scale [22]: Thinking about your experiences in your undergraduate studies so far, please indicate how true each statement is for you on a scale of 1 (Not at all true) to 5 (Extremely true). Each question also included a ”Not Applicable” option. 1. I feel a sense of choice and freedom in what I undertake 2. I feel capable at what I do 3. I really like the people I interact with 4. I feel confident that I can do things well 5. I feel that my decisions reflect what I really want
research with biomedical companies;one student felt the experience helped him gain entry into medical school. Participants performedwell on the quiz and reported favorably regarding the experience.Conclusion: Training effectiveness was reflected in the exit survey results, job offers andgraduate school opportunities for students, and student conduct. Student motivation is reflectedin the self reported gain in interest and confidence in clinical research, in the low attrition rate,and in the increased activity levels of all groups. Page 12.7.2BackgroundExperiential education has been demonstrated to be effective in medical and nursing
theamount of information available can be overwhelming to any young instructor, the path forwardis traversable with the advice and assistance of experienced academics and colleagues, availableto help with the journey.I. Emulate a Role Model: At their very start, young engineering faculty begin to remember the Page 12.1119.6teachers they have had throughout their journey as students; and if their memories do not failthem, they sketch out the dominant positive characteristics of those they wish to emulate, andattempt to follow their way of teaching as they recall from their students days. Following thefootsteps of their role model is often reflected