being designed andconstructed by ESET and MXET capstone team members, students in Education and Science aredeveloping curriculum modules that can be readily integrated into current math, science, andengineering courses at the secondary level. The IoT house is expected to be centrally located atTexas A&M or other accessible locations and used remotely via the Internet by multiple groupsof 8-12 grade students. The project is scheduled to be completed by December 2018 withcurriculum to be field tested in the Spring 2019 semester. This paper will provide introductoryand background information on the genesis of the project, the establishment of theinterdisciplinary team, an overview of the IoT house, a demonstration of its operation
, assess how they intend to integrate these tools into future curriculum, and identify theconcerns and challenges associated with AI usage. The survey comprised 105 students from threemajors: Mechanical Engineering (11.4%), Engineering Management (43.8%), and MechanicalEngineering Technology (44.8%). The participant group was evenly divided between undergraduate(49.5%) and graduate (50.5%) students.The survey featured a combination of multiple-choice and Likert-scale questions focused on four mainareas: first, the survey explored usage patterns and engagement with AI tools with questions focus onhow students interact with AI tools, the various applications of these tools in their studies, and theperceived engagement and efficiency benefits; second
students. Approximately 700 students take the second-semester course, Introductionto Computing and Problem-Solving, annually across fourteen sections. Course deliveries rangefrom face-to-face, online synchronous, hyflex, and hybrid. Students learn to problem-solveusing MATLAB©. Additionally, the successful implementation of auto-graded assignmentsthrough an integrated Zybooks© and MATLAB© Grader environment provides real-timefeedback for students and supports a mastery-based assessment approach to learning weeklycontent. Because of a significant support structure integrated into the course by undergraduateteaching assistants (UTA), additional student success workshops had not been needed. However,in response to a significant drop in student
Design and Development: Framing Engineering as Community Activism for Values-Driven Engineering”; Co-PI of NSF CISE ”EAGER: An Accessible Coding Curriculum for Engaging Underserved Students with Special Needs in Afterschool Programs”; co-PI of NSF INCLUDES: South East Alliance for Persons with Disabilities in STEM, Co-PI of NSF CE 21 Collaborative Research: Planning Grant: Computer Science for All (CS4ALL)). Dr. Marghitu was also PI of grants from Center for Woman in Information Technology, Daniel F. Breeden Endowment for Faculty Enhancement, AccessComputing Alliance, Computer Science Collaboration Project, Microsoft Fuse Research, Altova Co., and Pearson Education Publishing Co. Dr. Marghitu has mentored over one
development opportunities in the Engineering Education Coalitions,organizations such as ECSEL, FOUNDATION, GATEWAY, and SUCCEED. Often theseorganizations are competing for the same membership or attendees for training in the facultydevelopment.So we come back to the original question, “How does a consistently ranked undergraduateengineering and computer science program retain its excellence in undergraduate education, whilealso aspiring to become an outstanding research institution?” On Baylor University’s campusthere are a number resources that contribute to this goal. The Academy for Teaching andLearning (ATL) has a two-fold mission: globally, to support and inspire a flourishing communityof learning; locally, to promote the integration of teaching
Tech. Her dissertation explored faculty adoption of research-based instructional strategies in the statics classroom. Currently, Dr. Cutler works as an assessment and instructional support specialist with the Leonhard Center for the Enhance- ment of Engineering Education at Penn State. She aids in the educational assessment of faculty-led projects while also supporting instructors to improve their teaching in the classroom. Previously, Dr. Cutler worked as the research specialist with the Rothwell Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence Worldwide Campus (CTLE - W) for Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.Prof. Dawn McFadden, Pennsylvania State University Since 2015, Dawn McFadden has been an Assistant Teaching
modelling and also in design as aresearcher, manufacturer, developer or administrator.Teaching and learning with a design-centric curriculumEach participating institution has at least one representative for each course, a teaching academic, anassessor, and an overall program director. A steering committee consisting of engineering academicsand academic deans guides the project in WUST. An internal research review team evaluates the projectannually as part of an ongoing longitudinal study. The curriculum approach is based on design-basedlearning (DBL), a combination of problem-based learning and project-based learning. With differentlearning styles, students (figure 2) are able to express their skills and talents through working on projectsor by
Paper ID #25316Using More Frequent and Formative Assessment When Replicating the WrightState Model for Engineering Mathematics EducationDr. Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Leroy L. Long III is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Fundamentals at Embry-Riddle Aeronau- tical University in Daytona Beach, FL. He earned his PhD in STEM Education with a focus on Engineer- ing Education within the Department of Teaching and Learning at The Ohio State University (OSU). He earned his Master’s in Mechanical Engineering at OSU and his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering at Wright State University. Dr
University PartnershipAbstractEspecially in rural locales like Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, students and employers alike canstruggle in their search to find STEM-based educational opportunities and the qualified graduatesthat result from them. Thanks to an innovative partnership between Bay de Noc CommunityCollege and Michigan Technological University, however, students are being provided with newopportunities to receive a quality education in the fields of mechatronics and robotics. By co-developing robotics curriculum and partnering on a number of grant applications to procureequipment, Bay de Noc Community College (commonly known as Bay College) and MichiganTech have created a replicable student pathway that can result in a certificate in
suggestedthat educational institutions should place more emphases on the fundamental courses to cultivatestudents with essential skills/knowledge and capabilities to cope independently with highlychangeable business environment.On the other side, some of the interviewed faculty members of the IT department signified thatuniversity-level IT education should emphasize more on an in-depth knowledge of howemerging EC technologies can be applied by business firms as well as an in-depth understandingof databases management systems, systems analysis and design, implementation, integration andmanagement issues. The comparison between the IT curriculum and the survey results showsthat many of the important topics were not extensively taught, for example
Paper ID #45273WIP: Factors Influencing Faculty Pedagogical Decisions around Diversity,Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in Engineering: A Comparative CaseStudyMr. Avis Carrero, Tufts University Avis Carrero is a civil and environmental engineering PhD candidate at Tufts University. He previously earned an M.S. in Civil Engineering from Tufts, focusing on geosystems engineering. Avis’ research focuses on advancing racial and educational equity in engineering education through exploring the experiences of students and faculty. His dissertation research examines factors that shape faculty pedagogical and curricular
world news. More specifically, if contemporary issues pertain to thediscipline of engineering, students will do little to maintain their knowledge apart from what isdiscussed in the classroom context. In reality, this topic must be more intentionally interjectedinto the curriculum to show application of engineering principles.Two categories of courses come to mind that should adequately support “soft” outcomes. Onesuch course would be a senior capstone design course. Berg and Nasr discuss such a course.1 Itis true that the capstone design course should be the pinnacle of an engineering program, wherestudents are able to integrate all aspects of their education into a challenging project. It is anatural place to discuss topics in the
create a powerful impacton STEM education and consolidate the achievements of DEI from the institutional level efforts.Prior research has shown that diverse faculty leadership plays an important role in fostering aDEI culture [11]. Faculty members’ curricular decisions and pedagogy, including theirinteractions with students, can help create more inclusive climates. Research also reveals that thereflection of students in the curriculum helps create a sense of belonging for them and fostersinclusion [11, 12]. Incorporating DEI in classroom teaching needs a good understanding ofstudents’ and instructors’ perceptions of inclusiveness, such as self-assurance, belonging,empathy, student's voice, trust towards student peers and instructors, as well as
students focus primarily on the technical aspects of the problem, asapparent in the type of data they seek to collect, many include considerations on the peopleimpacted, government interventions, and cultural values. This study sheds light on the ways thatstudents answer a real-world problem before learning technical problem-solving techniques. Theinsights from this study will be used to supplement the introductory engineering curriculum, sostudents are better positioned to integrate social, economic, and political insights with theirtechnical competencies in solving real-world problems.Introduction "An engineer and a sociologist were tasked with finding the height of a church steeple. The engineer measured the angle to the top of the
Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd is a TEES Research Professor in the Office of Engineering Academic and Student Affairs at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. He was an Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional
solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. Page 26.514.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Development and Implementation of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Threshold Concepts in Thermodynamics
been defined as a service model where an academic librarian participates in acourse or program on a continuing basis in order to understand the learning objectives anddetermine which library resources best support them [11, p.2]. Being an embedded librarian is apartnership between the faculty and librarian. As an embedded librarian, you are working withthe faculty on many aspects of their curriculum and your information literacy instruction learningoutcomes and assessments. An embedded librarian is a collaborator, as building a strongrelationship with the faculty is seen as one of the critical elements in successful incorporation ofinformation literacy instruction into a university curriculum [2]. Embedded librarianship goesbeyond being part
teaching the Integrated Civil Engineering Design class and with regards to engineering education, specializes in easing the school to work transition.Dr. Kira J. Carbonneau, Washington State University Dr. Kira J. Carbonneau, is an Assistant Professor in Educational Psychology, with five years of K-8 teaching experience. Dr. Carbonneau’s area of expertise is in the efficacy of instructional practices in mathematics and science as well as research methodology. She has experience consulting on statistical analyses, research design, measurement analysis, and assessment development in various areas including teacher education, math education, socio-emotional learning and motivational constructs. Her work has been published
Integrating and aligning teaching methodsTeaching Practice towards self-regulated learning Broader curriculum reform to support self-Curriculum Development and Assessment regulation and authentic assessment of lifelong learning skillsAs an exploratory investigation, this research is not seeking to measure students’ levels of self-reflection, self-regulation, or engagement in these processes. The workshop exercises do not takean instructional approach to teach students about lifelong learning or to target the development ofrelated competencies. Additionally, our research goal is not to
) architecture and design methodology, Engineer- ing Technology Education, and hardware description language modeling. Dr. Alaraje is a 2013-2014 Fulbright scholarship recipient at Qatar University, where he taught courses on Embedded Systems. Ad- ditionally, Dr. Alaraje is a recipient of an NSF award for a digital logic design curriculum revision in collaboration with the College of Lake County in Illinois, and a NSF award in collaboration with the University of New Mexico, Drake State Technical College, and Chandler-Gilbert Community College. The award focused on expanding outreach activities to increase the awareness of potential college stu- dents about career opportunities in electronics technologies. Dr. Alaraje is a
successful integration of personal attributes andprofessional training in the context of a professional community. PID is a dynamic and complexprocess that involves the continuous interpretation and re-interpretation of experiences whichfoster the strengthening and maturing of an individual through a series of educational andprofessional experiences [19-21]. A variety of factors associated with educational andprofessional environments influence the formation, evolution, and progression of PID in anindividual [9][18][22]. Professional identities in STEM students continue evolve as multipleidentities of students interact with academic and professional environments [22]. Fourperspectives of identity include: (1) nature identity; (2) institution
description language modeling. Alaraje is a Fulbright scholar. He is a member of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), a member of ASEE’s Electrical and Computer Engineering Division, a member of ASEE’s Engineering Technology Division, a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), and a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Department Heads Association (ECETDHA).Prof. Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University Aleksandr Sergeyev is currently an Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering Technology program in the School of Technology at Michigan Technological University. Sergeyev earned his bachelor degree in electrical engineering at Moscow
laboratories to promote workforce development. Furthermore, he has collaborated on an NSF grant project that explores integrating cybersecurity principles and virtual reality technology in additive manufacturing education. Dr. Ojajuni’s research has been recognized with numerous awards, and his findings have been disseminated through publications in respected peer-reviewed journals and presentations at academic conferences.brian Warren, Southern University and Agricultural & Mechanical CollegeFareed Dawan, Southern University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Dr. Fareed Dawan received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Louisiana State University (LSU) in 2014. In 2006, he earned his Masters of Engineering
to investigate whether Panopto adds value in enhancing thelearning experience for students enrolled in an Engineering Technology curriculum. Panopto is asoftware-based application that captures lecture sessions as rich media recordings includingvideo, audio, and screen capture components. Through an internal research grant, this studycoincided with the initiative by the Department of Engineering Technology at a largesoutheastern university in performing a trial test of Panopto lecture capturing to validate how itcan augment the effective delivery of course lectures. The particular engineering course selectedfor the study provided an excellent research context as it included both traditional, on-campusstudents as well as non-traditional
.* Correspondence: Miguel Andrés Guerra, MAGuerra@usfq.edu.ecAbstractCivil engineering education plays a critical role in shaping the next generation of professionalscapable of addressing the complex challenges of modern infrastructure development. To promotehands-on learning experiences and bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practicalapplication this research project has adopted a novel approach by integrating real material scalemodels into its curriculum. This abstract provides an overview of the implementation, benefits,and student outcomes resulting from this innovative educational initiative. The incorporation ofreal material scaled models into civil engineering courses enriched the learning experience ofundergraduate students. By
Paper ID #29709A Study of the Effectiveness of Using Hands-On Active Learning Exercisesin a Production Operations Management CourseMajor Steven Hoak, United States Military Academy Major Steven Hoak currently serves as an instructor at the United States Military Academy in the Depart- ment of Systems Engineering, focusing on engineering management. He is a career Army Aviation and Acquisition Officer. He holds a Master degree in Nuclear Engineering (Air Force Institute of Technol- ogy), a Master of Business Management (Mississippi State University) as well as a Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from the United
. Kristen Parrish, Arizona State University Kristen Parrish is an Assistant Professor in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environ- ment at Arizona State University (ASU). Kristen’s work focuses on integrating energy efficiency measures into building design, construction, and operations processes. Specifically, she is interested in novel design processes that financially and technically facilitate energy-efficient buildings. Her work also explores how principles of lean manufacturing facilitate energy-efficiency in the commercial building industry. Another research interest of Kristen’s is engineering education, where she explores how project- and c American Society for
activities would provide an initialgood analysis of the data. Projects completed in individual classes may be term papers, designprojects, debates, and more in-depth capstone projects. Oftentimes in the engineering curriculum,these in-class projects do not really focus on the social and environmental aspects of technologyor engineering design, however, this brief exposure may be enough to change students’perception of what engineering really is. Comparing the 3rd and 4th year students’ responses, thenumbers are not very surprising. Most of the 4th year students mentioned that their capstone hadat least a small focus on social and environmental impact, and this explains the higher percentageof students answering in that way.Projects that are
University. Olga is a national thought leader in higher education and engineering education. She is a biomedical and mechanical engineer as well as an STEM education researcher. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Inclusive and Bias-Minimizing Hiring Practices to Build a Diverse Team at Wake Forest Engineering: Transforming Engineering Education through Faculty Diversity and Broadening ParticipationThis paper presents a comprehensive case study of Wake Forest Engineering's successful launchand transformation to build a diverse faculty team to support innovation across curriculum,pedagogy, research, and community impact. By implementing research-grounded hiringpractices focused on
more inclusive and welcomingclassroom; and ultimately increase retention, particularly of underrepresented minoritiesincluding women. Herein, we discuss the development and implementation of a new hands-onfreshman engineering design course, Design Practicum, with an emphasis on improvements incurriculum and teaching strategies, and creating a more inclusive environment.Development of Design PracticumWe began by looking through student survey responses to determine areas needing improvement,and which features of past courses were the most effective at engaging students, retainingstudents, and creating a more inclusive environment. From there, participating faculty and ourteaching intern developed curriculum and strategies to implement in our