education community. Various survey instruments and metricshave been used to gauge the effectiveness of individual programs and undergraduate researchprograms in general. The current paper is a summary of an examination of the effectiveness of athree year NSF-funded Research Experience for Undergraduates site focusing on Neuro-engineering.Since one of the goals of this REU site, and all undergraduate research programs at ourUniversity, is to encourage students to continue their education at the graduate level, theAttitudes Toward Graduate Studies Survey (AGSS) was developed to measure changes instudents’ opinions about graduate school and their plans to pursue or not pursue graduate studiesas a result of participating in an undergraduate research
required information connected with the projects’ planning,construction or operation, and decommissioning” [6]. It is a digital representation of physical andfunctional characteristics of a facility providing accurate 3D representations of a building and thecapability to affiliate attributes and data to the components and objects that form the model [7].Similarly, the National Institute of Building Sciences published the following definition: “Building information models, or BIMs (are) digital, easily managed and shared representations of physical and functional data that define buildings throughout their life cycles—are increasingly seen throughout the public and private real estate and construction sectors as a way to
thefirst and last Monday nights of the semester were planned for orientation and presentations,respectively. Throughout the semester, students spent three hours each week on SE. Then, forone hour they would meet with their advisor to present the work they had completed, askquestions, and receive feedback. If time remained, they would plan the following week’s work.Unlike in the past, this meeting could occur any time during the week when all participants couldattend. This allowed instructors to have more direct oversight over their SE teams. Faculty werealso limited to no more than two teams at a time. These changes were not without concern. Twoof the initial “pillars” of the SE program were eliminated—the idea of overlapping student teamsand the
employers. The online platform is freely available through Geoengineer.orgfor use by educators.Future workThe implementation of these projects and virtual professional engagement is planned to beexpanded to additional courses and universities with the assistance of other course instructors.Currently, online projects are planned to be implemented in another civil engineering course,Rock Mechanics, and expanded to subjects beyond geotechnical engineering. Feedback receivedfrom students through the survey is used to devise improved strategies for the studentexperience. Additional student feedback is being planned through formal interviews of onlineproject participants.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Kostis
the settlement plan for land that would be newly openedby the project. Retaining the original designs of this major project might have helped avert thesubsequent political deterioration that spiraled into warfare.A rural development project in Rwanda that started in 1974 is another example of a missedopportunity that turned out instead to exacerbate tensions. In this case, the benefits (includingstructures, roads, and land access) were largely captured by local Hutus, excluding Tutsis. Thefinal result was judged by one Africa scholar to be “a great increase in inequality betweenregions, social classes, groups and individuals.”In two examples from Thailand, irrigation projects were constructed (in the 1950s-1970s) to winpopulation loyalty in a
teachers.Introduction to PMSThe use of PMS, in the construction industry, as a tool for managing and organizing work hasgrown and continues to grow at a rapid pace in many other industries7,11. A recent study hasshown that since 2000, over 95% of construction companies use PMS for control and planning oftheir daily activities11. Multiple studies show that if present companies want to compete intoday’s market, they must become adaptive and use information technology systems such asPMS7-10. There are a few PMS available for use in the construction industry and of these thereexist two favored PMS packages; Primavera and Microsoft Project7-11. Primavera systems(http://www.oracle.com) became available in 1983 and is today’s leading provider to theconstruction
awarded in biology, chemistry, geosciences, mathematics and physics in the College of Arts & Sciences by 2016. 2. Increase by 25% the number of Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Engineering awarded in the J.B. Speed School of Engineering by 2016.The rationale underlying these two goals is real and compelling. The University of Louisville’s2020 Strategic Plan, a business and growth blueprint for the current decade, states that we will“Implement STEM initiatives leading to more graduates with science, technology andmathematics majors; more students majoring in engineering; and an increased cohort of scienceteachers for K-12.”. The 2020 Strategic Plan Scorecard sets year-by-year targets using 2008graduation statistics as
in Heidegger’s philosophy – and certainly thetechnological critique he has comes at a much needed time in our own community. Heidegger divides thought into two camps: meditative and calculative. Calculativethinking involves the sort of specialized thinking that involves planning, research, andorganizational abilities – always in reference to some known quantities or conditions. Of keyimportance to calculative thinking is the inability to stop expanding outward without meditativethought. The aforementioned quagmire of thoughtlessness, rationalization of thoughtlessness,distractions, and all related issues, directly map to meditative thought. Meditative thought inHeidegger’s world comes in multiple forms, for instance: active
discharge, one section in the middle of the system, and one section towards the endof the lake system. The locations along the lake were chosen in order for students to see acontrast in water quality parameters along the flow of the system.The development of the field study question was adapted from previous site evaluations.Previous site evaluations had been completed prior by private engineering firms and the city’sengineers with full water quality analysis. Students were not privy to prior water quality resultsbut rather were promoted to develop a real world scenario objective to be completed throughoutthe semester. Students were given the role of “city engineer” in the project and worked as a classto develop an objective and sampling plan
plan production sequence of simultaneously the class into planning team of a video, activities carry out tasks two groups. project including script, by each of the to reach a Have one group timelines, roles, props, and roles armies leading common goal. read aloud while and assignments of the team in to the the other group and working producing the Battle of provides together to video. Identify Waterloo. humming complete
engaging in practices of the field, such asjustifying simplifications or estimating magnitude of an answer.One specific type of SAIL activity is small-group, in-class solving of a problem based on real-world applications. Students work in small groups to accomplish a common learning goal andare encouraged to use the problem solving process of experienced decision makers: define thesituation, state the goal, generate ideas, prepare a plan, take action and check to see if the goalwas achieved.4 This type of collaborative learning activity has been shown to positively engagestudents in the classroom and emphasize the process of solving a problem, not just the end-goalof obtaining a solution.2,5,6 Even though the work is done in groups, individual
completed at this point. Therefore, assessing the prototypes forcompleteness and extent of testing completed at this point has been found to be a good predictorof team effectiveness. The prototypes are assigned a score of 1-5 for completeness, where 5indicates a completed prototype and 1 indicates that no prototype is likely by the end of thecourse. Testing was also rated on a 1-5 scale, where 5 indicates that prototype verification testingis complete and 1 indicates that testing was not planned or discussed. This validated rubric ispresented in Table 2. In addition to scoring the executive summary, grades are determined basedon oral and written reports and whether the final projects met the specifications laid out by theteam and their advisor at
andlearning center. There are two ways to approach this overlap. The first is to make the ASEEprogramming unique. On large campuses, some Chapters have found success in providingSTEM-specific content as a supplement to the campus-level content for all majors. The secondapproach is to partner with other organization(s). This approach has extra benefits; it exposesASEE and its mission to the members of other organizations and it can provide extra assistancefor planning and execution. For research-specific programming, some campuses have foundsuccess with ASEE-hosted STEM education poster sessions. While almost 90% of therespondents reported having some campus-level teaching programming, at least 65% reportedthat they are interested in ASEE providing
of 2014. The number of students who enrolled as mechanical engineeringmajors was double the anticipated number and created some anxiety on resourcing the newprogram in subsequent years.As a new mechanical engineering program being offered for the first time in the fall of 2014, notall of the planned faculty has yet been hired to fulfill the needs of the program or the student’sinterests. It is critical that the current faculty communicate with the students about theconstraints facing a new program. For instance, the number of current faculty must match therequired teaching load based on the student population. Similarly, hiring faculty to oversee anddevelop one of the focus areas may not be necessary if there is little student interest or
helptheir employees embrace diversity and inclusion. Boeing’s diversity training covers a variety oftopics, including “awareness of cultural, gender and international sensitivities, avoidingstereotypes and micro-inequities, understanding generational differences, and how to positivelyimpact culture change”.18 The Department of Defense’s strategic plan for diversity and inclusionbuilds on the government’s plan and efforts to promote diversity and inclusion in the federalworkforce.19 In addition, the websites of many companies (NASA, Johnson Controls, Dow,General Motors and 3M) have testimonials and statements from executives demonstrating theirsupport of diversity. Raytheon and Xerox have established diversity councils to define policiesand programs
interest in engineering; 86% reported moderate to greatgain in confidence that they understand the material; and 83% indicated moderate to great gain inunderstanding how engineering helps people address real world issues. Figure 2 provides asummary of responses to the questions related to student affect.Class impact on your attitudes 3. As a result of your work in this class, what GAINS DID no gains a little gain moderate gain good gain great gain not applicable YOU MAKE in the following? 3.1 Enthusiasm for the subject 3.2 Interest in discussing the subject area with friends or family 3.3 Interest in taking or planning to take additional classes in this subject 3.4 Confidence that you understand the material 3.5 Willingness to seek help from
), the process (the activities and work done to create the product), and softwareengineering management (“planning, coordinating, measuring, monitoring, controlling, and reportingactivities to ensure that software products and software engineering services are delivered efficiently,effectively, and to the benefit of stakeholders”, SWEBOKv3, 7-1). Performance assessment falls withinthe area of software engineering management (SWEBOKv3, 7-9). To relate the idea that softwareengineering includes assessment of the product, process, and performance to education, we consider thelearning objectives for a course to be the product, the teaching techniques employed as the process, andthe individual student’s learning to be performance.In both disciplines
train teachers on how to encourage students, especially girls and minorities incomputer science and engineering education has been noted9. In addition, financial support wasproven to play a large role at student success related with participation in robotic teams10.FIRST robotics is one of the most expensive competitions. Therefore, there is a need for studentsto develop computer skills for writing fundraising presentations, trip and team budgets, andbusiness plans as they search for sponsors to fund their team’s needs. Many Title I students areunable to accomplish these tasks without mentors that can provide the support and answertechnical questions as they arise.The objective of this study is to find how robotics and the participation in
3.67 5. I felt comfortable asking questions or getting help during the Math Review Sessions 4.28 6. I plan to continue using academic support services (such as SI, Math Lab or STEM Lab) for the Math Course I’m currently taking 4.41 7. My Math skills improved during this time due to the evening Math Review Sessions 3.64 8. My Math skills improved during this time
sophomore level. Our major renovation to this class is engaging students in asemester-long group project, which includes formal presentations, research, team work andmultiple active learning exercises. The semester-long group project consists of four phases:communication and planning, modeling, construction, and deployment. Through the four phases,students gradually gain communication, ethics, and teamwork professional skills. Comparisonamong data collected from the four phases show significant improvements of the students’professional skills, particularly presentation skills and teamwork skills.ABET student outcomes and performance indicators ABET student outcomes describe what students are expected to know and be able to do by thetime of
andcreeds. This paper reports on our progress to date and our plans for future studies.IntroductionA core principle of the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) holds that theknowledge and skills possessed by an engineer are to be used to the advancement and benefit ofhuman welfare 1 . The Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) has adopted themission of fostering “technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of humanity” 2 . Mostengineering programs concentrate on the development of knowledge and skills, with littleemphasis on how those skills will be applied to benefit humanity. Some critics of the codes and ∗ eljacobs@memphis..educreedal statements of engineering’s professional societies have even
the knowledge and tools necessary for being successful in this course. 5 Work effectively as a member of a team. Teamwork 6 Use written, oral, and graphical communication to convey methods, results, and Communication conclusions. 7 Demonstrate a capacity for self-directed, lifelong learning, including goal Lifelong Learning setting, decision-making, project planning, resource discovery and evaluation, personal development (autonomy, self-motivation, self-confidence, self- reflection). 8 Develop and apply attitudes and skills for creativity within the context of Creativity materials science and engineering. 9 Develop
procedures for quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis, as wellas some possible limitations to our approach. We additionally discuss the novel, ambitious, andcomparative nature of this project given that its collaborators and research subjects are drawnfrom four U.S. engineering schools, and we review our progress to date and plans for bringingthe project to completion over a five-year timeline. This paper will likely be of particular interestto scholars who teach and/or research engineering ethics, social responsibility, and allied topics.Social and Ethical ResponsibilityOur project is focused on social and ethical responsibility, broadly construed, and primarily inthe context of engineering education and professional practice. On
review at that stage. Thetext in the lower half of each box indicates the topics they should discuss at that stage. Forexample, Figure 3 depicts that the building’s primary materials (e.g., steel, concrete, masonry orwood) should be discussed during the concept design because some materials have higher risksthan others.9 It is also important that opportunities for prefabrication be discussed during theconcept and 30% design phases because prefabrication typically reduces site injuries28 but ismore difficult to achieve if not enabled by the detailed drawings and technical specifications.Figure 3 therefore provides educators with an example of how effective collaboration duringdesign often requires an intentional and planned process that is goal
was illustrated through in-class entrepreneurship simulation. The complexityinvolved in entrepreneurial activities in academic setting requires an equally complex set ofactivities to facilitate the acquisition and understanding of the requisite entrepreneurial abilities(Robinson and Malach, 2004). In his work, Drummond (2012), linked team-based learning and 9critical thinking skills to effective entrepreneurship education while Gibbs (2002) categorizedvarious forms of experiential education as case analysis and writing in-class and out of classexercises and simulation, projects, interviews, business plan writing, consulting, among
of mechatronics and computer aided engi- neering. Her research Interests are: mechatronics,digital manufacturing, product lifecycle management, manufacturing systems, and engineering education.Megan Mize, Old Dominion University Megan Mize is currently a Doctoral Candidate in English Studies at Old Dominion University, pursu- ing the Literary/Cultural Studies and Rhetoric concentrations. Her dissertation, Constructing an Early Modern Queen: Gender, Authority, and the Rhetoric of Identity, explores the intersection of the history of female educational models and mimicry as a rhetorical strategy for Elizabeth I. As a Special Projects Graduate Research Assistant, she has served on the Quality Enhancement Planning
act as a bootloader and memory controller,loading old proprietary software onto the Zilog. The group did not anticipate how much effortwould be required for this project, and ultimately failed budget enough time. In the future, I planto take two steps to rectify the problem. First, I will work with students interested in reverseengineering a system to ensure that they understand how difficult such tasks can be. I also plan toinstantiate weekly in-class chats with each group to track progress and ensure that groups aresticking to a realistic project schedule.The other problem came up is that while several groups chose projects involving image andvideo processing, the process to read in video through the Zybo’s HDMI port proved moredifficult
the role of engineer starters’ early academic experiences,including participation in project-based courses, on retention. Future work will broaden bothpredictors and outcomes. In particular, we plan to assess engineer starters’ attitude toward STEM(e.g., interest, self-concept, self-efficacy) and academic performance and retention. Future workwill include pre-tests and post-tests to control for pre-existing differences in attitude and interestby course enrollment. We will also examine the impact of other early academic experiences onretention, including research experiences and participation in other courses with hands-onlearning components.IntroductionIn order to remain competitive in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM
. Many of the university’s STEMdegree programs, including seven engineering programs, computer science, and chemistry, arehoused within the College of Engineering, Mathematics and Science (EMS), which has anenrollment of approximately 2,700 students.In 2013, with a desire to improve retention and persistence of students in the college, aninterdisciplinary team of faculty and staff obtained a National Science Foundation STEM TalentExpansion Program grant. The primary purpose of the grant is to increase undergraduate studentengagement and to plan, market, and advance programs that support recruitment and retentionefforts in STEM with special efforts toward women and underrepresented student populations.As part of achieving this purpose, a study
use a software interface that wouldsolve the problem in real time as the instructor speaks and not just highlight the content while thevideo progresses. Equations needed little more attention and explanation. Overall, the short videoshelped students in this pilot study not only to prepare for the final exam but also to learn at theirown pace and understand key concepts of Statics. We plan to address these challenges in the futureresearch.Student Evaluations for Fall 2015Figure 6 shows student evaluations (scale 1 to 5; rescaled to compare different averages) for theinstructor of ENGR 2110 for the Fall 2015 semester. Generally, the instructor is evaluated bystudents based on following categories: (i) Presentation Ability, (ii) Organization and