. 256-273, 2008.[4] S.C. Davis, N. Cheon, E.C. Moise, and S. B. Nolen, “Investigating Student Perceptions of anEngineering Department’s Climate: The Role of Peer Relations,” in 2018 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[5] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, “Introduction,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering EducationResearch, A. Joyride and B.M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-2,2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139013451.002[6] C.A. Shapiro and L.J. Sax, “Major selection and persistence for women in STEM,” NewDirections for Institutional Research, vol. 2011(152), pp. 5-18, 2001.[7] Yang Yang and D. W. Carroll, “Gendered Microaggressions in Science, Technology, andMathematics,” Leadership and Research in
thathave to be mobilized at the start of PBL. At the start of learning in PBL is the selection of realproblem(s). This is, in fact, the major driving force for learning. Effort and time dedicated to theselection of problem(s) is time well-spent and will eventually pay off. The problem(s) should bewell crafted to engage and immerse students in learning new materials, as well as challengingexisting knowledge, skills, and attitude. It is important to note that PBL is not only about givingproblems and solving them in classroom, but it is also about creating opportunities for students toconstruct knowledge through interactions and collaborative inquiry (Allen et al 1996).In PBL, the instructor is primarily a facilitator, whose role is to make the
these conversations no development of critical consciousness will ever be achieved.References[1] J. A. Mejia, D. A. Chen, O. O. Dalrymple, and S. M. Lord, "Revealing the Invisible: Conversations about -Isms and Power Relations in Engineering Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/30937. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/30937[2] D. A. Chen, M. A. Chapman, and J. A. Mejia, "Balancing Complex Social and Technical Aspects of Design: Exposing Engineering Students to Homelessness Issues," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 15, p. 5917, 2020.[3] L. Winner, "Do artifacts have politics?," Daedalus, pp. 121-136, 1980.[4] J
criteria coding and table was done for all thearticles in this study [22]. Findability 0 no 1 = yes Provided via data archive Persistent identifier (DOI/URN) Findable through search engine On web page Accessibility 0 = no 1 = yes Can the article and data be accessed openly Data download option Interoperability 0=no 1 = yes Information on author(s) provided Information on funding provided Information on data methods/procedures provided Is study part of larger comparative survey Is the study part of a larger longitudinal study Reusability 0 =no 1 = yes
through learning activities” in International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 13 vol. 3, pp. 249-262. July 2012[6] M. L. Sattler, V. C. P. Chen, B. H. Dennis, S. P. Mattingly, K. Rogers, Y. Pearson Weatherton, M. Rani, and K. Kositkanawuth, “Integrating sustainability across the curriculum: Engineering sustainable engineers” in Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. June, 2012. Available: https://peer.asee.org/21566[7] M. Ashby, E. Brechbühl, T. Vakhitova, and A. Vallejo, “Social Life-Cycle Assessment and Social Impact Audit Tool: A white paper” in ANSYS Granta Design [Online], Available: https://grantadesign.com/teachingresources
overlooked by practitioners and researchers. Additionally, the platform has supportedworkshops organized across the country. Workshops are co-organized with organizations thatoperate large backbone networks connecting research centers and national laboratories, andcolleges and universities conducting teaching and research activities.1. IntroductionGeneral-purpose enterprise networks are capable of transporting basic data, e.g., emails,multimedia, and web content. However, these networks face many challenges when movingpetabytes (PBs) of scientific data, e.g., genomic, climate, imaging, and high-energy physics, [1].As a response, network architects have developed the concept of a Science Demilitarized Zone(Science DMZ or S-DMZ) [2] as parts of a
on the basis of gender and race/ethnicity.There have been fewer studies on peer ratings for international students. Wei et al. [19] found“significant differences in peer rating behavior among international vs. domestic students inthree CATME dimensions: contributing to team’s work, interacting with teammates, andexpecting quality.” (p. 3) However, treating international students as a monolith is likely overlysimplistic due to wide differences among cultures. Wei et al.’s [19] findings were situated withinHofstede’s cultural dimensions and focused on individualism vs collectivism, with theinternational students in their study seemingly predominated by students from China, India, andSouth Korea. The teams may also have been predominated by
engineers,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 1367–1370, Aug. 2000.[3] P. K. Imbrie, S. J. Mailer, and J. C. Immekus, “Assessing team effectiveness,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2005, pp. 831–837.[4] H. J. Passow, “Which ABET Competencies Do Engineering Graduates Find Most Important in their Work?,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 95–118, Jan. 2012.[5] ABET, “Engineering Programs,” 2019.[6] R. Guimerà, B. Uzzi, J. Spiro, and L. A. N. Amaral, “Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance,” Science (80-. )., vol. 308, no. 5722, pp. 697 LP – 702, Apr. 2005.[7] S. Wuchty, B. F. Jones, and B. Uzzi, “The Increasing Dominance of
. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004.[2] K. S. Athreya and M. T. Kalkhoff, “The Engineering Leadership Program: A co-cirriculur learning enviornment by and for students,” J. STEM Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 70–75, 2010.[3] Bernard M.Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program, “Capabilities of Effective Engineering Leaders,” 2011.[4] L. Compton-Young et al., “Engineering leadership development programs a look at what is needed and what is being done,” J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 10–21, 2010.[5] R. J. Schuhmann, “Engineering Leadership Education--The Search for Definition and a Curricular Approach,” J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 61–69, 2010.[6] ABET
organization before the semesterbegins. This requires a well-organized schedule and insight to the material rather than buildingthe course as one teaches it during the semester.Bibliography[1] S. M. Reynolds and R. N. Tackie, "A Novel Approach to Skeleton-Note Instruction in Large Engineering Courses: Unified and Concise Handouts that are Fun and Colorful," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[2] S. T. Peverly, J. K. Garner and P. C. Vekaria, "Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking," Reading and Writing, vol. 27, pp. 1-30, 2014.[3] S. L. Robinson, H. E. Sterling, C. H. Skinner and D. H. Robinson, "Effects of Lecture Rate on Students' Comprehension and
, no. 5, pp. 2-3, 1998.[7] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T. Mcglamery, T. M. Nathans-Kelly, and C. G. Nicometo, “Understanding engineering work and identity: a cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–174, 2010.[8] R. F. Korte, “How newcomers learn the social norms of an organization: A case study of the socialization of newly hired engineers,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 285–306, 2009.[9] A. Buch, “Engineering by other means: transformations in engineering work practices,” Engineering Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 91–92, Mar. 2016.[10] Lutz, B. D. (2017). Into the Workplace: Exploring the Learning Experiences of Recent
AwardNo. EEC-1733636. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] E. Spingola, “Literature Review on Disability Participation in the Engineering Field Literature Review on Disability Participation in the Engineering Field,” in Proceedings of the 125th Annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 2018, p. 9.[2] Y. Pearson Weatherton, R. D. Mayes, and C. Villanueva-Perez, “Barriers to Persistence of Engineering Students with Disabilities: A Review of Literature,” in Proceedings of the 124th Annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference
bring up a topic, and he'dspeak about the topic and how knowledgeable he is about the topic, but then he wouldn'tteach us the material that was going to be on the test. We'd just go in there, and he'll showhow cool he is, and then the material that was on the exam wasn't that stuff that he was talkingabout. It was other stuff. So that's what sucked about that. […] So that's what made me hatechemistry.”Alfonso also described pedagogical practices that impacted his trajectory in the program. “Thisis his teaching style and this is how I’m going to learn from this class and then I, like, with[Professor S] I just kept on trying and trying and trying and nothing gave results. Like the firstclass I just kept on getting F’s and F’s and F’s and I just
://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness.shtml (accessed Dec. 03, 2018).[3] “Center for Collegiate Mental Health (CCMH) 2017 Annual Report,” Penn State, STA 18-166, Jan. 2018.[4] Suicide Prevention Resource Center, “Suicide among college and university students in the United States.,”Education Development Center, Inc., Waltham, MA, May 2014.[5] P. R. Albert, “Why is depression more prevalent in women?,” J Psychiatry Neurosci, vol. 40, no. 4, pp.219–221, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1503/jpn.150205.[6] N. C. Borgogna, R. C. McDermott, S. L. Aita, and M. M. Kridel, “Anxiety and depression across genderand sexual minorities: Implications for transgender, gender nonconforming, pansexual, demisexual, asexual, queer,and questioning
needingsignificant and more specialized support, their departments frequently encourage them to seekassistance to increase their teaching skills. For various reasons (research, too many classes, highservice load, etc.), there is a large population of teachers between the groups described abovewho could use help increasing their teaching and communication skills as shown in the middlelevels of the teaching skills hierarchy in Figure 1. This population of teachers may not attendMTEI programming, but will frequently respond well to information tied to their specificcourse(s) that is timely and time efficient to implement. Reaching all faculty, including in thislast group, has guided the design and implementation of the mid-semester course feedbackprogram.MTEI
, civic organization or environmental authority. The practitioner(s) proposesa specific project with relevant work efforts that will complement their real-world assignmentsand can be completed by undergraduate environmental science and engineering capstonestudents. Faculty members work with the practitioner to refine the proposed capstone project tomeet the educational objectives of the capstone course. These mutually beneficial relationshipsresult in positive “community engagement” which is an increasingly important factor touted byuniversities. The positive community engagement aspect of capstone projects is especiallyimportant to state-funded universities for student recruiting, promoting programs to non-localalumni and for interacting with
. [17] E.J. Coyle, J.V. Krogmeier, R.T. Abler, A. Johnson, S. Marshall and[5] Susan Freeman, Richard Whalen, Courtney Pfluger, Bala B.E. Gilchrist, “The Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program – Maheswaran, Mark Sivak, Josh Hertz. (2016), The Cornerstone Leveraging Faculty Research Interests to Transform Undergraduate Course: Projects and Progress, FYEE Annual Conference The Ohio STEM Education,” Proceedings of the Transforming Institutions: 21st State University Columbus, Ohio
various working pressuresthe initial loading of Working Net N2 N2 t*(s) W0 Wsat Pressure (psig) Purity Recovery (g O2/kg CMS) (g O2/kg CMS)oxygen on the columnpacking is determined 25 98.3% 8.4% 285 2.2 4.2using a material bal- 50 98.3% 16.9% 353 3.9 6.4ance for the air intro
. 2, pp. 172– 209, 2011.[12] E. Litzler, P. N. Mody-Pan, and S. G. Brainard, “Intersections of gender and race in engineering education,” 118th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. June 26, 2011 - June 29, 2011, 2011.[13] M. J. Bruning, J. Bystydzienski, and M. Eisenhart, “Intersectionality as a Framework for Understanding Diverse Young Women’s Commitment to Engineering,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2015.[14] D. J. Mitchell, C. Y. Simmons, and L. A. Greyerbiehl, Eds., Intersectionality & Higher Education. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2014.[15] M. A. Armstrong and J. Jovanovic, “Starting at the Crossroads: Intersectional Approaches to Institutionally Supporting Underrepresented Minority Women STEM
AnalysisThe objective of the second assignment was to apply basic engineering principles of problemdefinition to their system of choice. The assignment goals were to define a system process andrelated variables and identify gaps in the knowledge through a Degrees of Freedom analysis.Students were required to: 1. Sketch your Chesapeake Bay system. 2. Define processes (splitting, mixing, reactions, etc.) and show the streams entering and exiting your process(es). 3. Define and show the variables associated with your processes. 4. Set up a Degrees Of Freedom (DOF) analysis of your system. Determine the variable(s) you will need to calculate (solve for). 5. Determine how many variables will you need to define through research in order
: Microethics, macroethics and the role ofprofessional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7(3). 403–414.9. Bocong, L. (2012) From a Micro-Macro Framework to a Micro-Meso-Macro Framework. In Christensen,S., Mitcham, C., Li B., & An, Y. (Eds.). Engineering, Development, and Philosophy: American, Chinese, andEuropean Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.10. Van De Poel, I., Fahlquist, J., Doorn, N., Zwart, S., Royakkers, L. (2012). The Problem of Many Hands:Climate Change as an Example. Science and Engineering Ethics 18. 49-67.11. Van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L., and Zwart, S. (2015). Moral Responsibility and the Problem of ManyHands. New York: Routledge.12. Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and
] Krauss, G. Gordon. Neeley, Lawrence (2015). Peer Review Feedback in an Introductory Design Course:Increasing Student Comments and Questions through the use of Written Feedback. Harvey Mudd College.[2] Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). On-line assessment and the role of peer feedback: A study of high schoolcomputer course. Computers and Education, v. 49 , 1161-1174.[3] Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., Chiou, S.-K., & Hou, H.-T. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self-and peer-assessment system. Computers and Education, 45, 187-202.[4] Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving effectiveness of peer feedbackfor learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 304-315.[5] Topping, K. (1998). Peer
importantto understand what this unbundling, that has impacted other areas such as industry, would do tothe academic environment. By understanding what binds students to the college experience,perhaps the 21st century higher education approach may be improved through more intentionalefforts that are poorly understood today.Bibliography[1] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201319030.[2] Slavich, G. & Zimbardo, P. (2012). Transformational Teaching: Theoretical Underpinnings, Basic Principles, and Core Methods. [Article
occurred early in the control semester, the hurricane might negatively affect the studentperception of the instruction. We will continue the experiment in the next offerings that have onecontrol section and one subject section in a single semester.References1 Felder, R. M., and Brent, R. “Active learning: An introduction.” ASQ Higher Education Brief,vol. 2, no. 4, pp.1-5, 2009.2 Bakrania, S. “Getting students involved in a classroom with an iPhone app.” The ASEEComputers in Education (CoED) Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp.11-20, 2013.3 Prince, M. “Does active learning work? A review of the research.” Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 93, no. 3, pp.223-231, 2004.4 Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H
. 13References[1] M. Poe, N. Learner, and J. Craig. Learning to Communicate in Science and Engineering:Case Studies from MIT. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2010.[2] K.B. Yancey, L. Robertson, and K. Taczak. Writing across Contexts: Transfer, Composition,and Sites of Writing. Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press, 2014.[3] C. Kalman, M.W. Aulls, S. Rohar, and J. Godley, “Students’ Perceptions of ReflectiveWriting as a Tool for Exploring an Introductory Textbook.” Journal of College ScienceTeaching, pp. 74-81, March/April 2008[4] C.S. Kalman, and S. Rohar, “Toolbox of Activities to Support Students in a Physics GatewayCourse.” Physics Education Research, vol. 6, no. 020111, pp. 1-15, 2010.[5] V.A. Burrows, B. McNeill, N.F. Hubele, and L. Bellamy
a system.References[1] R. Mayer. Learning and Instruction. Thousand Oaks: Pearson. 2011. 26–107.[2] G. Ragusa, S. Levonisova, and S. Huang. “The Influence of Formal and Informal Pedagogical Practices on Non-traditional College Students’ Achievement and Persistence in STEM Education.” Association for the Study of Higher Education. St. Louis, MO. 2013.[3] D. Gioia, D. Brass. “Teaching the TV Generation: The case for observational learning,” Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, vol.10(2), pp. 11–18. 1985.[4] L. Proserpio, and D. Gioia, "Teaching the Virtual Generation" Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 6(1), pp. 69-80, 2007.[5] L. Rosen, "Teaching the iGeneration," Educational leadership vol. 68, no. 5
. His team deployed a bomb finding robot named the LynchBot to Iraq late in 2004 and then again in 2006 deployed about a dozen more improved LynchBots to Iraq. His team also assisted in the deployment of 84 TACMAV systems in 2005. Around that time he volunteered as a science advisor and worked at the Rapid Equipping Force during the summer of 2005 where he was exposed to a number of unmanned systems technologies. His initial group composed of about 6 S&T grew to nearly 30 between 2003 and 2010 as he transitioned from a Branch head to an acting Division Chief. In 2010-2012 he again was selected to teach Mathematics at the United States Military Academy West Point. Upon returning to ARL’s Vehicle Technology
theirresolution would certainly be a welcome addition to the literature.AcknowledgementThe authors gratefully acknowledge the kind support of colleagues from partner institutions whohelped advise and shape this research. This material is based in part upon work supported bythe National Science Foundation under Grant Number DUE-0717820. Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) anddo not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. T. H. Chi, M. Bassok, M. W. Lewis, P. Reimann, and R. Glaser, “How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 13, pp. 145–182, 1989.[2] R. Schwonke, A. Renkl, C. Krieg, J
26.1753.9determine similarities and differences among several design solutions” (MS-ETS1-3) than theywere able to address having students “define the criteria and constraints of a design problem”(MS-ETS1-1). An example of a lesson that integrated all three key MS-ETS1-3 elements was thesuggestion for students to “test several different bridge designs to figure out which one is able tosupport the most weight . . . [and] from these tests they could assemble a new design using themost effective shape, material(s), and method of construction.” Alternatively, a lesson that didnot address any of these three elements was the simple suggestion of having students constructscale models of playground equipment.Table 4. MS-ETS-3, Alignment of Lesson Suggestions with
Fuzzy Decision-Making, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995.4. T. J. Ross, Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications, 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 2005.5. K. Kurata and N. Eguchi, “Machine learning of fuzzy rules for crop management in protected cultivation,” Transactions of the ASAE 33(4), pp. 1360-1368, 1990.6. K. Chao, R. S. Gates, and R. G. Anderson, “Knowledge-based control systems for commercial single stem rose production,” ASAE Paper No. 97-4032, St. Joseph, MI, 1997.7. P. J. Salgado, B. Cunha, and C. Couto, “A fuzzy identification and controller for the agricultural greenhouse,” 7th International Conference on Computers in Agriculture, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St