nearly 60% of classes that include laboratory content. Theselaboratory exercises are constructed to simulate manufacturing process and product designproblems. While labs are critical to gaining technology experience, they are not engineeringprojects. The first comprehensive engineering project a student attempts is the program’scapstone course; the Senior Design. The under-served component of Engineering Technologyeducation is engineering projects.This paper describes a three-year NSF-funded summer program designed to improve studentretention in Engineering Technology by exposing students to an industrial setting to gainpractical engineering experience. Sophomore and Junior-level students were organized intoteams and assigned to small or medium
Paper ID #13220Supply Chain Management: Is It a Must Course for Manufacturing Engi-neering Technology?Dr. Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M UniversityPradip Kumar Krishnadevarajan, Karpagam University, INDIA Pradip is a research scholar at Karpagam University, INDIA pursuing his PhD in supply chain manage- ment. He is a also the cofounder and research lead at the Global Supply Chain Laboratory (GSCL) in the Industrial Distribution program at Texas A&M University. Pradip is also an educator at the Thomas and Joan Read Center for Distribution Research and Education. He conducts educational programs, busi- ness sessions
majority of the literature on behavioral and implementation intentions focuses on health-related behavior, specifically health-protective behaviors (e.g., condom use8) and its associatedtheories and models (e.g., prototype-willingness model9). While these theories and theresulting studies have established the role of intentions in the pursuit and attainment of healthgoals, the scope of this research has perhaps been limited. Those studies, with a fewexceptions, that are not focused on health-related behavior can be considered primarylaboratory research using paradigms that may not generalize outside of the laboratory (e.g., cuedetection in an illusion paradigm10). Gollwitzer and Sheeran4 conducted a meta-analysis of theeffect of implementation
Technology Mingyu Lu received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Tsinghua University, Bei- jing, China, in 1995 and 1997 respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2002. From 1997 to 2002, he was a research assistant at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. From 2002 to 2005, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the Electromagnetics Laboratory in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He was an assistant professor with the Department of Elec- trical Engineering, the University of Texas at Arlington from 2005 to 2012. He joined the Department
, including the America Invents Act and cases such asMayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. and Association for MolecularPathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., rendered the casebook out-of-date, and revised editions wereslow in coming. Accordingly, beginning with fall, 2013 semester, the course changed to a digitalcasebook1 prepared by law-school faculty at Lewis & Clark College and at the University ofGeorgia. The new text was completely up-to-date, featured helpful commentary and studyquestions, and cost about one-fourth of the hardbound book. In class, the students refer to eachday’s case materials on their laptop or tablet computers.The course’s pedagogy, while retaining the intellectual rigor and much of the flavor of a
committee for several years. He has invested over twenty-five years in the development and maintenance of a multimillion dollar manufacturing laboratory facility complete with a full scale, fully integrated manufacturing sys- tem. Professor Harriger has been a Co-PI on two NSF funded grants focused on aerospace manufacturing education and is currently a Co-PI on the NSF funded TECHFIT project, a middle school afterschool pro- gram that teaches students how to use programmable controllers and other technologies to design exercise games. Additionally, he co-organizes multiple regional automation competitions for an international con- trols company.Dr. Michael Gerald Flynn, College of CharlestonSusan Marie Flynn, College of
requirements.Another ineffective use of time is students’ tendency to use “free tools” because of costconsiderations. Industry is very concerned about labor cost (time) and cannot afford todeal with unsupported, and often non-robust, tools. The use of such problem-plaguedtools was a major impediment to obtaining an operational system. The sponsor’s CEOhas talked to the students and emphasized that “time is money” and “do not hesitate toask for help” – especially utilizing the supporting professionals – plus looking for otherways to successfully proceed when faced with a stalled task (think out of the box).Problem Handling: “The skill of diagnosis and subsequent corrective actions that isefficacious.” In college engineering labs effective student laboratory
). Hence human-centered contexts for design activities allow for richproblem scoping and also result in more authentic learning experiences.Making following an Interest-Based FrameworkAll claims made in this paper converge to the need for an interest-based framework forengineering design in the K-12 classroom. We propose using classroom Makerspaces as a meansto implement this framework. Our proposition in addition to the aforementioned need is alsoparticularly meritorious on several other grounds that we will discuss in this section.(1) The idea of making and digital fabrication labs has strong historical and theoretical roots.Stager 33 writes about the implications of the Constructionist Learning Laboratory (CLL) thatemerged a decade before the
materials engineering classes with therefinements discussed above.Finally, the research group has begun evaluating long term retention. A small group of upperyear students volunteered to complete the Concept Inventory. Students currently in their fourthyear of engineering would not have completed this particular laboratory experiment; rather theywould have learned the concept of crystal structures with 2D materials from lecture slides andtextbooks, etc. Those in third and second year engineering would have completed thisexperiment. The research group plans to continue delivering the MCI to these students annuallyto gather whether completing this lab in first year engineering leads to increased conceptretention. As of now, the sample size is too
to work until 4:30PM. Prior to starting each module campersparticipated in interactive discussions on the topic. As campers completed activities, specialemphasis was placed upon the importance of teamwork, collaboration, and “thinking outside thebox”. As in an actual research laboratory, campers would arrive at the lab and continue studies oractivities from the previous day, it should be noted that the complexity and difficulty of themodules increases as the week progresses. Other activities included informal mentoring with thecounselors to discuss preparing for post-secondary education. On the last day of the camp,content and satisfaction post-assessment, as well as a focus group with the undergraduatecounselors were held. Lastly, campers
-management.aspx[2] Djassemi, M., & Singh, J. (2005). The use of RFID in manufacturing and packagingtechnology laboratories. In Proceedings of the 3rd SME International Conference onManufacturing Education.[3] Montgomery, D. C. (2009). Design and Analysis of Experiments (Eighth edition). Arizona:Arizona State University. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.[4] Mapa, L., Aryal, G., & Chanda, K. (2010, May). Effect of nanofluids on the readabilitya ofRFID tags. In Electro/Information Technology (EIT), 2010 IEEE International Conferenceon (pp. 1-6). IEEE.[5] FMC Technologies(2009). Syntron Vibrators. Retrieved fromhttp://www.tristateelectricmc.com/pdf/FMC%20Technologies%20Syntron%20Vibrators.pdf[6] Porcino, D., & Hirt, W. (2003). Ultra-wideband radio
, the secondresearch question helped to understand the effect of leadership support on selecting and adoptinga prescribed process model.Data Collection: The survey method is “The method in which field workers or interviewersobtain quantitative data in a study of people outside of the experimental laboratory” [12]. Forthe purpose for this study, a survey was a simple, easy, and clear method for respondents tosupply the data. The questionnaire administration took place electronically using an onlinewebsite. Brehob [6] defined a questionnaire as “A form that people fill out, used to obtaindemographic information and views and interests of those questioned” (p. 1, para. 1).Kirakowski [13] defined a questionnaire structurally as “A method for
FlowGo.FlowGo will also be disseminated through existing workshops at Tufts Center for Engineering Educationand Outreach and the CEEO’s online course program (okee.tufts.edu).The second expansion goal for FlowGo is to make the toolkit into a cost-effective laboratory tool for under-graduate fluid mechanics and heat transfer classes. It is difficult for most tertiary educational institutions tooffer hands-on labs in fluid mechanics and heat transfer because the majority of experiments in these fieldsare expensive to manufacture, difficult to calibrate, and large and heavy enough that they require permanentlab space. We hope to add quantitative flow measurement components to FlowGo such that undergradu-ates could use the toolkit to learn fluid mechanics
conference proceedings. He has been either PI or Co-PI for numerous grants and contracts, totaling more than $10 million in the past 15 years. NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Science Foundation, Office of Naval Research, Department of Defense, Department of Education, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, Texas Instruments and Lucent Technologies have funded his research projects. He is the recipient of the excellence in engineering research award at the College of Engineering at UTSA in 2010; the best teacher award in the College of Engineering at UTEP in 1994 and NASA monetary award for contribution to the space exploration. He has been the General Chair, Session Chair, TPC Chair, and Panelist in several
Louisiana Art and Science Museum in Baton Rouge. Adrienne has a Master of Science degree in zoology from LSU, where she studied in the Museum of Natural Science, and an Education Specialist Certification in science education.Mr. James Blake Gegenheimer James Gegenheimer is an MSME Candidate in Mechanical Engineering at LSU. When graduated, James will commission as a Second Lieutenant in the United States Air Force. He will be stationed at Hill Air Force Base in Salt Lake City, Utah. He plans to pursue a Ph.D. through the Air Force and work with the Air Force Weapons Research Laboratory. James is currently a Supplemental Instructor at LSU for Thermodynamics where he has served since 2013. He has worked to improve how
of Written Communication into Engineering Classes and CurriculaAbstractThe inclusion of writing-based exercises in technical courses has multiple learning benefits tostudents. Writing exercises not only serve to improve students’ written communication skills(i.e., “learn to write”), but can also be leveraged to develop critical thinking skills and promotedeeper understanding of technical concepts (i.e., “write to learn”). Nevertheless, while writing-intensive assignments are relatively common in upper-level technical courses, especially in theform of laboratory and project reports, writing is often absent in the larger, required core coursesthat are taken by large numbers of engineering students. This is a
of refining our interview protocoland planning to recruit students who registered for MCB80x but did not receive the at-home lab-kit. We will then perform a comparative analysis of the findings from the two groups in order tounderstand the similarities and differences in the range of student experiences between them.Additionally, we will also focus on understanding the effectiveness of the use of the at-home lab-kits and provide recommendations to instructional designers for developing effective labexperiences for engineering and other STEM courses.References 1. Atiq, S. Z., Chen, X., Cox, D. D., & DeBoer, J. (2015). International STEM Classrooms: The Experiences of Students Around the World Using Physical Remote Laboratory
pencil and more recently using the online systemConcept Warehouse available through Oregon State University or through Blackboard.The Muddiest and Most Interesting Points (MIP) exercise was implemented in three required,junior level classes of varying structure in biomedical engineering at a large public university:Introduction to Biomaterials (BM), Introduction to Statistics for Biomedical Engineers (ST), andTransport Phenomena for Biomedical Engineers (TP). Here, the students were asked whichconcepts were most unclear and most interesting. Biomaterials is a 4 credit, lecture-style class that has been shifting towards a student- centered class. A 2.5-hour guided inquiry laboratory accompanies the two 75-minute lecture
control. His research interest includes sensor based condition monitoring of CNC machining, machine tool accuracy characterization and enhancement, non-invasive surgical tool design, reverse engineering and bio materials.Dr. Warren Rosen, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Dr. Warren Rosen received his Ph.D. in physics from Temple University. He has served as Assistant Professor of Physics at Colby and Vassar Colleges where he carried out research in solar physics, medical physics, and instrumentation. Following this experience he was a research scientist at the Naval Air Warfare Center in Warminster, PA where he established a laboratory for research in high-performance computer networks and architectures for
. Camaratta, Jr.lends itself as the background for questioning the process and application of creating solids.Students are asked to reflect on the process of creating an object’s profile, and what kinds offunctions are well-suited for that purpose. Students are also asked to explain the changes orcomplications that arise when using a vertical rather than horizontal axis.Instruction on calculating volumes using disks (washers) and shells can then proceed in the usualfashion, using a variety of problem solving examples that showcase both methods, presentrotation about either axis, and use either x or y as the variable of integration. The capstoneexperience for these sections is a laboratory-type experience where students analyze a collectionof actual
. Demonstrate an experiential understanding of engineering design impacts relevant to the various engineering disciplines. 9. Apply basic calculation procedures and computational tools used in engineering. 10. Apply the engineering design process and employ it to solve real-world issues. Textbox 1: Stated educational objectives of the Impacts of Engineering course.the roles and responsibilities of an engineer in society. More in depth coverage of the writingaspects of the course will be presented in a later work. The second component of the course isorganized around a laboratory setting in which students explore the course curriculum through thecompletion of a comprehensive engineering design project. The intent behind the
rates of students at 2-year institutions to 4-year institutions.4,5These programs provide exposure to meaningful applications of basic scientific principles andreinforce knowledge presented in the classroom.This paper describes a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent ExpansionProgram (STEP) program at a2-year college whereby “outside” classroom instruction via STEMindustry visits and undergraduate research opportunities were provided to program participantsin an effort to increase graduation and transfer rates. During STEM industry visits, programparticipants interacted with STEM professionals, toured STEM industrial research laboratories,learned about cutting-edge technology, and gained information regarding skills that are
diagram best represents the system.Distractors include components out of order and incomplete or extra component interactions.Initial ResultsThe initial pilot of the test was conducted in a general-education engineering course at HopeCollege. The course satisfies a general education laboratory course for non-STEM majors. Atotal of 42 students took the test. Of these students 48 percent were male and 52 percent female.All of these students are majoring in a discipline that is not a field of science, engineering,technology, or mathematics. The material on the test was not covered in the course at the timethe test was given. The students had no opportunity to study or prepare, the test was given“cold.”Figure 1 shows the distribution of results for
control with research contributions in the areas of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), Networks and Computing Systems, and Mobile Cloud Computing. His research work has been published in over forty refereed papers, posters and journals, and one book chapter. Guirguis’ research and educational activities are funded with over $2.9M in grants from the NSF, DoD, AFOSR, IEEE, Cisco and Texas State. Guirguis received the NSF CAREER award in 2012. Guirguis has been a visiting faculty researcher at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) in the sum- mers of 2012 and 2013. During the academic year 2014/2015 he joined the Mobile and Pervasive Com- puting Group in the ECE Dept. at UT Austin. Guirguis has a wide range of
projects related to engineering and engineering education: value-added manufacturing (Dr. Katie Whitefoot), taxonomy of engineering education (Dr. Cynthia Finelli), pioneers in engineering education (Dr.Cynthia Atman) and inquiry-based learning in mechanics (Dr. Brian Self).Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011
the Robotics laboratory at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. He worked as a post-doc at University of Pennsylvania in the area of Haptics and Virtual Reality. His research interests are in the areas of unmanned vehicles particularly flapping flight, mechatronics, robotics, MEMS, virtual reality and haptics, and teaching with technology. He has ongoing research in flapping flight, Frisbee flight dynamics, lift in porous material and brain injury He is an active member of ASEE and ASME and reviewer for several ASME, IEEE and ASEE, FIE conferences and journals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Integrated Development of Programming Skills using MATLAB
, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #16374 NASA, NSF, FAA, DOE, and private companies. Currently, he and his students at the Advanced Tech- nology Systems Laboratory are pursuing cutting-edge research on the role of visualization and virtual reality in aviation maintenance, hybrid inspection and job-aiding, technology to support STEM education and, more practically, to address information technology and process design issues related to delivering quality health care. As the Department Chair, he has been involved in the initiation of programmatic initiatives that have resulted in significant
Professor in Mechanical Engineering and director of the Human Dynamics Laboratory at the University of Denver and Clinical Assistant Professor at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. He holds a BS in civil engineering from Tennessee Tech, an MS in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in biomedical engineering from the Virginia Tech–Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences. His research focuses on understand- ing and characterizing human movement across healthy and pathologic populations through in vivo exper- imental measurement and musculoskeletal modeling. Applications focus on fall prevention, spine stabil- ity, rehabilitation after total joint surgery, and muscle
Engineering, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall.6. Yang, Horng-Jyh, (2015), Online resources utilization in geotechnical engineering laboratory for undergraduate civil engineering students, Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE North Central Section Conference, American Society for Engineering Education.7. Puchner, Richard, (2011), “Using Google Earth in geotechnical investigations”, Magazine of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, Volume 19, issue 3.8. Kumar, Saneev, (2014), “Teaching Geotechnical Engineering using Professional Practice”, International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainesville, Florida.9. Boruff B. J., Emrich C., and Cutter S. L., (2005), Erosion Hazard Vulnerability of US Coastal Counties
5. A corresponding ThingWorxMashup can be designed to display the collected information as shown in Figure 6, and to sendout an email alert when the temperature or humidity exceeds a pre-set threshold. As part of our future work, IoT-based activities will be embedded in the curriculum, as aresult of which undergraduate students will be exposed to applications of IoT in the context ofcore electrical and computer engineering courses and laboratories. The author hopes to conduct astudy using qualitative and quantitative methods to determine impact of this curriculumenhancement in recruitment and retention efforts. In addition to the curriculum impact, IoTserves as an effective platform to motivate undergraduate research. The author and