, Northwestern University Trevor is an undergraduate psychology major with a minor in business institutions and a certificate in marketing. Over the course of his Northwestern career he has conducted research for and served as a coauthor on numerous psychology and other social science studies.Dr. Penny L. Hirsch, Northwestern University Penny L. Hirsch, Professor of Instruction and Associate Director of the Cook Family Writing Program at Northwestern University, teaches classes in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences and the Mc- Cormick School of Engineering and Applied Science. She was Northwestern’s first Charles Deering McCormick University Distinguished Lecturer and played a key role in developing Design Thinking and
emphasizes onacquiring soft skills besides the engineering concepts such as professional code of conduct,report writing, and team management. These skills are critical in todays emerging globaleconomies for a successful engineering career. With this in mind, the purpose of the course is toequip the students with technical and non-technical professional skills that could be implementedon engineering design problems, while working in a global team with different dynamics. For thestudents, to be successful in the course, they have to develop and sharpen skills in organization,time management, self-discipline, and technical writing, while working as a strong teammember.At the end of the school year, the capstone design course concludes with a one-day
public policy, assessing stakeholder needs and desires, resource analysis, and collective impact engagement. Currently, he is working closely with several local and national organizations to research and rally opposition against the transfer of federal public lands to state governance.Dr. Steven J. Burian P.E., University of Utah Dr. Steven J. Burian is an associate professor in the Urban Water Group in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Utah. Dr. Burian’s career spans more than a decade during which he has worked in design engineering, as a scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, as a profes- sor at the University of Arkansas and the University of Utah, and as a director of
this ratherunpleasant situation, how may young faculty members of the Arab Gulf Region,overcome these difficulties and survive in this maelstrom of indecisiveness anduncertainty? What is the role of the institution in assisting young faculty inovercoming the initial hurdles at the start of their journey?The paper addresses issues and concerns that beset the majority of young engineeringfaculty in the Arab Gulf Region at the start of their academic career, and argues thatthe introduction, early on, of “well thought out” professional development strategiesof engineering educators would raise their self-confidence as teachers and help inequipping them with the tools they need in disseminating knowledge in theclassroom. This does not mean that
interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Student Persistence Through Uncertainty Toward Successful Creative PracticeAbstract: To increase creative practice among students in engineering and other
Engineering from MIT and her M.S. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include engineering design education (especially in regards to the design of complex systems), student preparation for post-graduation careers, and innovations in research-to-practice.Mel Chua, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Mel is an engineering education researcher with a focus on hacker/maker culture and faculty development. She is also an electrical and computer engineer and an order-20 all-pole auditory low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 250Hz.Dr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University Stephanie Cutler has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her dissertation
experiencesthrough their virtual course platform. The purpose of UNED’s virtual course platform is toreduce the evaluation workload of NetServicesOS courses, especially for practical activities,using an automatic evaluation system 7. UNED has extended the e-learning platform (aLF) by Table 1: Contemporary approaches for hierarchical technology enabled STEM delivery whereby each {,- } indicates relative {strength, limitation}. Service Remediation via Career Content Exam Exam Grade Rigorous Project
classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her work focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning. Tamara Moore received an NSF Early CAREER award in 2010 and a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2012.Ms. Bunmi Babajide, Purdue University, West Lafayette Bunmi Babajide is a PhD student at Purdue University in the college of Engineering. She obtained her Undergraduate and Masters in Electrical Engineering and currently interested in research topics in cur- riculum design for K-12 and professional engineering environments.Mrs. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Purdue University, West
engineering practice, particularly by highlighting important gaps betweenwhat is portrayed by the codes and professional societies’ appetite for controversy arising fromactual ethical dilemmas.This paper examines the historical context around the establishment of IEEE’s first “Code ofEthics for Engineers,” focusing specifically on the early history of the IEEE Committee onSocial Implications of Technology (CSIT) and the advocacy activities of one of its co-founders,Stephen H. Unger. CSIT and Unger played a crucial role in the creation and adoption of the 1974IEEE “Code of Ethics for Engineers” and in urging IEEE to support engineers whose adherenceto the Code of Ethics exposed their careers to risk. Through revealing the historical contestationsover
role of emotion in student learning, and synergistic learning. A recent research project uncovers the narratives of exemplar engineering faculty that have successfully transitioned to student-centered teaching strategies. She co-designed the environmental engineering synthesis and design studios and the design spine for the mechanical engineering program at UGA. She is engaged in mentoring early career faculty at her univer- sity and within the PEER National Collaborative. In 2013 she was selected to be a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Faculty Member.Karen Sweeney Gerow, University of Georgia Karen Sweeney Gerow is pursuing her PhD in the Lamar Dodd School of Art at the University
). In response to these meager results, and thepotential usefulness of STEM careers, the President and PCAST mandated that STEM educationmust be improved to increase our global competitiveness. National educational attention andmomentum is swung towards STEM learning in response. The National Research Council published A Framework for K-12 Science Education in20124. In response to the call to education action in STEM, the framework included a novel push Page 26.1529.3 3 to include engineering throughout
recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Natascha M Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natascha Trellinger is a second year Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Syracuse University where her interest in the
UniversityAbstract:Although there is evidence that most women with long-term careers in STEM will face someform of sexism, there is little research on how to handle such behaviors. Some situations requireintervention by those with authority, some can be confronted directly by individuals, and stillothers should be ignored. To better understand how students and faculty should respond to sexistcomments made by one student to another, we interviewed engineering students, professionals,and faculty, asking them to respond to two different real-life scenarios containing sexistcomments.We found that three-fourths of professionals and over one-third of students had experiencedinappropriate behaviors that could be labeled as sexist. Furthermore, we found major differencesin
Technology. Because Information Technology sits adjacent to many otherdisciplines, it is imperative that IT education includes pedagogy that sensitizes students to thepotential for misunderstanding because of semantic differences in commonly used terms.While some more isolated fields still operate under the mindset that “their” definition of a term iscanon, someone in IT will work with other fields their entire career and therefore they mustrecognize the semantic shades of gray. It must also be recognized that when semantic dissonanceis encountered frequently, it is not enough to “roll with the punches.” Would you tell anInformation Security analyst to ignore potential virus threats until one actually infects amachine? Of course not! Clear
engineering students not seeing the value of reflection, especially in relation to their engineering courses and future career. When students do not see the value of reflection, they may not take it seriously, which in turn makes it difficult for educators to incorporate reflection activities in classrooms. Some educators related this problem to the idea that reflection may be new to many engineering students and because students have not done it before [e.g. Arizona State University FG08, Bellevue College FG07, Bellevue College FG10, Clarkson University FG01]. Educators employed different techniques to help students see the value of reflection and below we present the more salient tips: Provide clear description. Many
interdisciplinary 7-pt, 1-7 1/3/5 knowledge for future career Concern for Others13 Analyze Belief in importance of stakeholders and non- 7-pt, 1-7 5 technical issues in engineering design Professional Sense of moral obligation to help others using 7-pt, 1-7 4 Connectedness one’s professional skills Global Work Interest Interest in working on projects outside the U.S. 7-pt, 1-7 1 during career* The lowest number of items in common (listed first) was used in this paper
over a 19-year teaching career and among the lowest courseratings in the department. The average departmental overall course rating is 4.8. A few studentsrated the course adequate; four students rated the course at a 4 or 5. Students’ expectations werelow; the “personal interest before enrolled” average rating was 2.1 / 6 (median 2.0); the lowestseen in the department. The average amount of time that students reported spending on thecourse (including class) was 7-9 hours per week; that is appropriate to an upper-divisionengineering course that meets 2 hours per week with an expectation of 2 to 3 hours of outsidework per week per credit hour (6 to 8 hours, by that estimate). The median was only 4-6 hours,and this may be why some students did
to a reason for pursuing (or not) engineering thatis related to the self-perceived identify of an engineer; Cost is the price of success (or failure) interms of effort, time, and/or psychological impacts in pursuing engineering in comparison toanother career; Interest is the enjoyment (or lack of) experienced in doing engineering activities;and Utility is the perceived usefulness (or lack of) of becoming an engineer and/or earning anengineering degree (Matusovich et al., 2010). The authors conducted longitudinal semi-structured interviews of 11 participants (5 boys and 6 girls) during their four years ofundergraduate engineering education. They found that all four Eccles’ value categories arepresent; that attainment value plays a prominent
societal challenges; and 4)perform data collection, analysis and presentation in order to answer research questions andshare research results with a professional audience. The course also emphasized critical thinking,multidisciplinary perspectives, leadership and team-based problem solving. To achieve thecourse learning objectives, the course focused on problems associated with an aging sewersystem, generally, and the lack of local sewer infrastructure data, specifically. This course wasexperimental in that it introduced design thinking through an experiential learning project earlyin engineering students’ academic careers. Traditionally, design capstone courses are offeredtoward the end of students’ course of study after core courses and textbook
complete in one academic year. It was understood by the companythat most of the students would be graduating and starting professional careers after thecompletion of their degrees. In the fall semester proposals were drafted and aggressive scheduleswere put together. By the winter break working prototypes of all three systems, mechanical,electrical and software, were demonstrated. It was the hope of the company to be ready tomanufacture at the conclusion of the spring semester. As with most student projects, issuesslowly started to materialize that would impede demonstrating a commercially ready solution inthe time frame desired by the company.By the end of the academic year, a fully functional software system was demonstrated. Theelectrical
management.Additionally, questions surrounding skills gaps (particularly soft skills and team problem solving),diversity, alternative education/career paths, and the future of work will demand moremeaningful attention and resources [5].The understanding in the industry, including software industry, is that new hires need to comewith the skills that industry needs as training them is expensive and cannot be justified. Toensure our graduates are competitive in the job market the academia needs to step up andprovide them the skills they need in addition to the degree they are awarded. Not doing so canhurt university reputation and affect incoming student pipeline. Such skills should provide reallife industry examples, and students should be able to retain them so
encourage their children to pursue manufacturing careers, and mostdon’t believe that manufacturing jobs today are interesting, rewarding, clean, safe, stable, andsecure (p. 1).” The limited entry of students into the pipeline leads not only to an unmet need fortechnicians in the AM industry, but also creates a shortage of experienced instructors that arehighly skilled and that have obtained the experience and credentials to instruct these importanttechnical programs.The need for skilled AM workers was described by Powers [10], who stated that “one of ourmost significant challenges facing virtually every manufacturer is trying to find a reliable sourceof factory-ready workers that can operate sophisticated machine tools and keep automated
currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Post- doctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico Jamie Gomez
internships.Teaching Style and Content in CapstonesSome capstones directly teach new technical knowledge, with this being common in mostengineering capstones within the U.S., while others are purely application of prior knowledge [33].In many instances, faculty members are responsive to teaching topics in a “just-in-time” format.Other capstones teach a minimal amount of new material to students, relying instead on theknowledge students have gained throughout their educational career to be used in the course. Thesurveyed indicated the amount of teaching conducted in capstones, as shown in Figure 5. Facultyhad the option to select from four categories that included: No formal teaching just advising on the application of prior knowledge Minimal
RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project and a CAREER project, FRAME. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, sci- entists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Chen Qiu M.Sc., University of New Mexico Chen
eachinstitution during this study.Key words: Sustainability, capstone design, mixed methods INTRODUCTION Engineers of the future must be prepared to address the complex, multidisciplinary problemsthat necessitate engineering solutions in sustainable and global contexts. Engineering educationcan provide students with the tools to approach these grand challenges of the 21st century whileconsidering aspects that are key for designing sustainable systems (David Allen et al. 2006, Davidsonet al. 2010). Furthermore, according to the National Academy of Science report, Changing theConversation, youth are seeking careers that make a difference (Sullivan 2011, National Academy ofSciences 2008). Sustainable engineering
being replaced as technology is introduced to theclassroom. There is a need to develop new ways of instruction to reform the overall educationmethods currently in use. The result for these innovative methods would be to help to ensure aseamless transition from obtaining knowledge and skills to being career ready and enjoyinglifelong learning (Patterson, 2011). Education disruptors, a term used to describe those who promote the use of technology ineducation and want fast and agile change implemented in P-20 (Robinson, 2013). Being adisruptor in education is not considered a bad approach. However, some education leaders andtechnologists think that education disruptors are not effective leaders because they are notmaintaining the expected
comes out or begins transitioning between the ages of 18 and 24[14]. This itself is a process with additional social and material support needs which canovershadow the demands of the classroom.Resiliency and social support Resiliency refers to the processes used to overcome challenging situations and adapt tothe demands of life, with particular attention on the unique strategies employed by marginalizedgroups [16, 17]. Transgender and gender nonconforming students are often written about throughdeficit framing which define their lives in terms of their trauma or perceived academic failure[13, 18]. In contrast, resilience is “reflected by achievement in career development, happiness,relationships, and physical well-being in the presence