Product, Process and Business Practices The course centers around the idea of integration of product development, manufacturingsystems and business practices (see Figure 2). Therefore, it adopts a system-based approach,considering not only components (be it machines, processes, or knowledge) necessary inproduction of consumer goods, but also their interactions and impact on each other. While thisidea is perhaps not entirely new, it is also set in context of the current market paradigm of MassCustomization6,7,8. Page 24.912.4Table 1 Abridged Course Syllabus Week Subject 1
course syllabus change oraddition needed, making adoption extremely easy – the instructor can straightforwardly replace orsupplement some of the textbook examples and homework problems with the examples andproblems provided by the classroom module. Page 26.986.5 4(continued on next page) Page 26.986.6 5 Figure 1 A classroom module on Raoult’s law.3.2 Web modulesFor the web modules, we have been developing a glossary, collections of commonly usedequipments, different biofuel processes, animated video clips, and a reference
Building Construction Management since fall of 2002 and recently developed and taught the Introduction to Demolition and Reconstruction Management course. Page 11.456.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Development of a Construction Management Specialization in Demolition and ReconstructionAbstractThis paper details the development of a curriculum for a specialization in demolition andreconstruction within a construction management program in a college of technology. At present,an assistant professor faculty position has been funded, and an introductory three-credit coursehas been
active in many professional associations in the engineering and science education, teacher education, distance learning, program evaluation and special education fields. She has been the principal investigator on several federal grants through the US Department of Education, the National Institute of Health, and the National Science Foundation. Page 24.827.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 iPodia: “Classroom-without-Borders” Global Engineering Education1. IntroductionIn light of the recent development of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC)1-3, there aremultiple key
. Specifically, if a course offered by the commu-nity college has substantially similar learning outcomes to some course offered by the university,a student successfully completing the community college course can petition to have this courseaccepted as transfer credit by the university. The work involved in establishing these so-calledcourse equivalences typically involves a review of the community college course syllabus by afaculty member in the department that offers the potentially equivalent course at the university.This is often a time-consuming process that can take months to complete and is sometimes re-ferred to as credit recognition. Unfortunate bias can also be introduced at this stage. For instance,we have heard university faculty claim
syllabus statement on diversity, equity, and inclusion that has been adopted in severaldepartments, and is currently being discussed for college-wide adoption as a required part of allcourse syllabi.Feedback regarding these initiatives has, to this point, been anecdotal, but positive. We describethe aspects that have been particularly noted by students, faculty, and staff to have been helpful.We conclude the paper with a reflection on how we can improve our community building eventsand the online community and describe our future support services for underrepresentedstudents.1. IntroductionSeattle University is a small, private, religiously-affiliated and mission-driven institution locatedin Seattle. Our urban campus is home to eight colleges and
Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Trans Comput Educ, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 16:1-16:22, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1145/2534971.[9] A. J. Magana and R. E. Garcia, “FiPy and OOF: Computational simulations for modeling and simulation of computational materials,” in Proceedings of the 117th Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), Louisville, Kentucky, June, 2010, pp. 20–23.[10] R. Mansbach et al., “Reforming an undergraduate materials science curriculum with computational modules,” J Mater. Educ., vol. 38, no. 3–4, pp. 161–174, 2016.[11] J. Karaganis, “Open Syllabus: Explorer,” Open Syllabus. Accessed: Jan. 11, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://opensyllabus.org/[12] W. D. Callister and D. G. Rethwisch
development groups. Group members learn about evidence-basedstrategies and are asked to select a strategy to implement based on needs they have identified intheir courses. The content and structure of SIMPLE groups are largely open to determination bythe group itself to allow flexibility and to be responsive to the needs of participants.In what follows, we describe insights gained from studying the change process for six facultydevelopment groups over two years. Results are drawn from analysis of participant interviews atthe end of each year of group participation. Participants’ path toward adoption of interactiveteaching strategies is analyzed using the five stages of the adoption process in Rogers’ Diffusionof Innovations (DOI) as a framework [5
itself as the main event; it was the primary focus for the students inrelation to the RSAP experience. Assessment practice suggests that findings from the study need to be utilized to makeadjustments in curriculum or common program practices in order to help close the loop orfacilitate the continuous improvement process. Based on the results from this particular study,revisions were made to the class structure and materials. The syllabus was revised to reflect thedesired goals and outcomes identified as part of the RSAP experience, including a greateremphasis on development of global competencies and related skills. Given the developmentallevel of the students enrolling in RSAP, the course was also revised to discuss leadership skills
Marvels CourseEngineering Marvels was designed to introduce students to engineering within historical andcultural contexts of various engineering marvels. The course description as it appeared in thecourse syllabus is provided below: Engineering has evolved over the years as technology and society has advanced. This course will investigate technical engineering concepts, the evolution of engineering, and the historical and cultural significance of engineering through the study of ancient and modern engineering marvels around the world. A framework of basic engineering analysis and historical context will be explored for the marvels before travel, and site visits and tours will take place abroad to explore these
focusgroup protocol. Furthermore, the elements in Bragg’s model are more within the locus ofinfluence for engineering programs and educators with a focus on the college experience. Futurework could employ a more contemporary and comprehensive model of socialization tounderstand ESI in engineering education.Project ContextThis study is part of a larger project exploring ESI education. The mixed methods project beganwith an online survey that was designed to understand educators’ practices and perspectivesrelated to ESI (for more information, see [23],[24]). Respondents (n=1448) were asked if theyintegrate ESI topics in the courses they teach or the co-curricular activities they mentor and wereprompted to indicate the characteristics of the setting
undergraduate mentors.traditionally been reserved for upper-level students, especially • Administration of online/in-class surveys with agraduate-level seniors. The following Project Achieve course sampling of participating students to collect feedbackobjectives are expected to engage early enrolled students in on their perception of the project's impact onthe 'engineering process' rather than traditional first-year understanding and engagement in research, potentialprimarily foundational lecture-type courses to encourage early changes in persistence through graduation, andengagement, interest, and future career thinking. possible career options. 1. To
.• Facilities: o On campus: standard classroom o In Rome: UW Rome Center• Cost: o Program fee: $4,800. Other administrative fees add another $300. o Recommended student budget: $7,000 to $7,500 is recommended for students to cover the program fee, airfare, food, and other living essentials.• Syllabus: o Course catalog description: Engineering-focused Exploration Seminar that covers Roman civil engineering over 3,000 years from Ancient Rome to the present day. Introduction to civil engineering topics reinforced by practical engineering calculations, local experts and site visits. Provides international and historical perspective on engineering and the
assumptions Ensuring classroom Build availability about current and is physically Pre-Semester for students into 100% former students and re- 83% accessible and 67% your schedule4 commit to increasing usable by all your awareness1 students1 List contact information Explicit course Promote empathy Syllabus 100% for University 100
-course memos written about technicalcommunication and through a post-summer questionnaire sent to all 11 REUs. On a 4-pointscale, with 4 meaning “a great deal” and 1 meaning “not at all,” eight students said that the TCcomponent of the REU program has influenced their current written and oral reports “somewhat”or “a great deal.” The average answer to that question was 3, with a few students saying that theyhaven’t been asked to write anything since their REU experience. Students who offeredcomments said they gained the most from improving their presentation and PowerPoint skills.Also mentioned were improvements in writing memos and emails, giving and getting feedbackon writing, communicating online via Prometheus, and being more willing to seek
discussion on a breadth of topics relating to graduate education,acquiring a job, and the transition therein. The course component of PPIT aims to improve theteaching qualities of each student by providing theoretical and practical instruction on teachingin the classroom. In class, students are introduced to learning theories, literature in the field,learning styles, syllabus development, and others. The emphasis in this environment is on thedelivery and not particularly the technical content of an engineering professor’s instruction. Thiscomponent scaffolds the development of personal teaching philosophies and learning objectives,and gives each student a video-recorded microteaching sample for feedback purposes. Thesuccessful completion of both
“effectively” published throughout the course Course syllabus Example problemsConfidential data provides the one area of concern with the usage of a cloud computing platform.The concerns purely rest with the manner in which the cloud contract is structured. In the eventthat an institution routinely uses contracted services and discloses this in their FERPA filing,then the usage of a cloud based service is acceptable.However, the lack of contracted services by a university does not completely preclude the usageof a cloud based system for data storage. For example, a grade book is only a concern if itcontains personally identifiable information. If a professor uses an
safety critical settings, using tools such as Monte Carlo Tree Search.Dr. Morgan Louise Hooper, California Institute of Technology After completing her PhD at the Graduate Aerospace Laboratories of the California Institute of Tech- nology (GALCIT), Morgan Hooper is now an Assistant Professor (Teaching Stream) at the University of Toronto. There, her teaching focuses on building community within hands-on Engineering Design courses and beyond. She encourages students to engage with multi-faceted, trans-disciplinary engineer- ing projects to learn the complex ways in which engineering, design, and community interact.Yazmin Gonzalez, California Institute of Technology Yazmin Gonzalez brings over a decade of experience
theworkshop, participants will have developed a ready-to-implement syllabus and preliminary lecturematerials for their Fall courses.To evaluate the impact of these pedagogical interventions on undergraduate student ethicaldevelopment, this phase will incorporate a methodological approach similar to phases 1 and 2,utilizing a quasi-experimental design with pre and post-test surveys. These surveys will employestablished tools for assessing ethical agency, complemented by at least one course assignmentdesigned around the reflexive principlism rubric. This multifaceted assessment strategy will notonly allow for a comprehensive evaluation of student ethical growth but also serve as a criticalcheck on the research's integrity by examining the pedagogical
the “big picture”data pipeline and “what was under the hood” of the platform. This feedback was given to the PIand instructors. Mid-course corrections were made for the Spring CSPII Practica to provide morebasic instruction and in-class mentoring by instructors to allow for a more satisfactory learningexperience, particularly for students with less informatics backgrounds. In addition, a “broadpicture” overview of where bioinformatics fits into research design and the data pipeline as well as provision of a syllabus with detailed learning objectives and timeline beginning Spring 2017 resulted in more positive ratings of the Spring course. Other revisions from the 1st two years are described below. Additional revisions to address challenges
or two full-time masters students who attend the course each time it is taught. The 2required textbook for the graduate course was Pavement Design and Analysis by Huang, ThirdEdition. Table 3 presents the course outline for the graduate level pavement design course. Table 1 Course Outline at Rowan University Week Chapter Topic Reading Flexible Pavement Design 1 1 and 9 Syllabus/Introduction/ Types of pavements distresses 2 1 and 9 Mechanical responses and
, seniority, position, type of department) of the survey waswell matched with the data from the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada(AUCC), providing a good snapshot of the faculty attitudes and practices vis-à-visimplementation of educational technology.The respondents overwhelmingly taught face-to-face courses (95%), as compared to onlinedistance learning (11%). Of on-campus courses, 18% are hybrid, or blended courses, combiningface-to-face contact with online support. Of those that used technology in teaching (n=631), 82%used it to distribute information (syllabus, lecture notes, etc.). Of those that created coursematerials (n=465), 47% described them as lecture notes, 41% as assignments and projects and21% as course outlines and
level. For twosemesters, the Microprocessors course at East Carolina University (ECU) has been taught in aflipped classroom format allowing students to watch online lectures before attending each lectureperiod and to allow students more opportunities to ask questions and complete learning activitiesin class. During the scheduled lecture period students are encouraged to work with each other tocomplete hands-on in-class exercises allowing them to evaluate their understanding of thematerial presented in the online lecture and the assigned reading. Such in-class exercises mayinvolve answering conceptual questions, writing code, or building circuits. It was observed bythe instructor in previous semesters that some students who had a good grasp of
all grading wasdone by the faculty instructor. Course sizes are typically 20-30 students, with a three-coursefaculty load each semester. If one were to implement this in large courses with multiple graders,consistency in feedback would need to be a focus.If one were to implement this in their own courses, they must make sure the final grade policy iscompatible with the school’s overall policy. In the courses discussed here, the syllabus had adirect mapping of the competency-based grading outcomes to a final university-wide gradingscheme.Note regarding 2020 courses: This work was completed during the 2020 COVID-19pandemic. The original versions were taught using in-person lectures and labs, supplemented inmost cases with on-line recorded
Laboratory is to develop the students’ writing ability. Historically, this has beenaccomplished by requiring bi-weekly technical memos. The course syllabus described the memorequirement this way: Your memo will most often pertain to your lab experience and lecture experience, although homing in on a particularly interesting aspect of lab or radio design is also fair game. Occasionally there will be specific topics you are to write about. Your one-page typed memo (space and a half, 12 point times font) is due at the beginning of the Monday lecture session, and is to be placed in the folder appropriate for your lab section. The memo will be graded based on spelling, grammar and content.In 2012 Auburn
Paper ID #8446EDGE 2013 Program – A Redesign Work in ProgressDr. Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College DAN G. DIMITRIU is a licensed Professional Engineer that holds a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Engineering and an M.B.A. in International Economic Relations. He has been practicing engineering internationally since 1970 in various industries and taught engineering courses concurrently for more than 20 years at various institutions. In 2001, he joined San Antonio College full-time as the Coordinator of its Engineering Program. He has been involved with several engineering societies and became a member of the Two-year College
restructuring thetraditional courses in design and manufacturing is an emphasis on life cycle assessment simulationexperience for enhancing student learning on green manufacturing. To provide online simulationexperience with network protocols, experiments with an industry-standard modeling tool GABI isused. Hence the teaching of green and sustainable manufacturing is an excellent opportunity toteach about research and innovations in industrial settings4-10.With increased societal and industrial interest in reducing the environmental impact of humanactivity, the need for environmentally conscious manufacturing has become more pronounced.While there have been considerable national and international efforts in recent years, includingISO 14000
- sign course, he has taught courses in mechatronics, controls, vibrations, dynamics and robotics as well as senior design. Page 24.150.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Analysis of First Year Students’ Changing Perceptions of Engineering Design and PracticeIntroductionA vast body of literature is available to guide freshman engineering introductory courses. Thispaper builds on three key pillars within the literature that focus on 1) project-oriented learning, 2)team-based learning, and 3) freshman design experiences. Design experiences at
, no. 6, pp. 422–427, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.6.1401.[18] M. F. Dahlstrom, “Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. supplement_4, pp. 13614–13620, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320645111.[19] M. A. Fuentes, D. G. Zelaya, and J. W. Madsen, “Rethinking the course syllabus: Considerations for promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion,” Teaching of Psychology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 69–79, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0098628320959979.[20] K. N. Silvestri, M. E. Jordan, P. Paugh, M. B. McVee, and D. L. Schallert, “Intersecting Engineering and
occurredoutside of the scheduled Friday classroom sessions. These activities included recorded lecturesand instructional videos that could be viewed at a time of the student’s choosing. They alsoincluded participation in specific campus events that were integral to success in the course.Students were generally expected to complete the distributed learning activities before the nextFriday class session.A syllabus for the course that details learning outcomes, and lists all learning activities andassignments, is provided in the Appendix to this paper. A style of problem-based learningpedagogy was utilized consistently throughout the course, in that content and pacing were drivenby the twenty-one (21) assignments listed on the syllabus. These consisted