depth across the range ofengineering topics implied by the title of the program.The curriculum must include probability and statistics, including applications appropriate to theprogram name; mathematics through differential and integral calculus; sciences (defined asbiological, chemical, or physical science); and engineering topics (including computing science)necessary to analyze and design complex electrical and electronic devices, software, and systemscontaining hardware and software components.The curriculum for programs containing the modifier “electrical,” “electronic(s),”“communication(s),” or “telecommunication(s)” in the title must include advanced mathematics,such as differential equations, linear algebra, complex variables, and
external motivation to keep their teams moving forward and makeprogress towards their STEM goals through the following forums and community activities: • Attend Cohort Monthly Meetings to share best practices and hear from guest speakers. • Participate in KickStarter’s NSF program-specific group meetings and related KickStarter communications including access to existing resources such as NSF proposal preparation workbooks (e.g., join the S-STEM working group to share ideas and discuss aspects of the S-STEM proposal). • Get the latest updates on NSF proposals and webinars with access to the STEM Network and KickStarter group. • Support and training provided for new and additional faculty and proposal teams
, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984.[2] J. N. Harb, S. O. Durrant, and R. E. Terry, ”Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, April 1993, pp. 70-77.[3] J. N. Harb, R. E. Terry, P. K. Hurt, and K. J. Williamson, Teaching Through The Cycle: Application of Learning Style Theory to Engineering Education at Brigham Young University, 2nd Edition, Brigham Young University Press, 1995.[4] J. Dewey, Experience and Education, Macmillan, N.Y., 1939.[5] C. M. Itin, “Reasserting the Philosophy of Experiential Education as a Vehicle for Change in the 21st Century,” The Journal of
in the project increasedtheir confidence to enter the workplace [16]. Likewise, students involved in the project discussedin this paper have stated that they are more comfortable and competent with working withacademic/industry professionals through this research experience.SE Student 1:SE Student 1 is the first author of this paper and considers this type of research disseminationactivity to be highly reflective of the unique opportunities that have been presented to him on thisproject. SE Student 1’s main motivations are to expand his professional network, contribute toresearch and writing of conference papers/presentations, and to collaborate with industryprofessionals on a project that has a humanitarian outcome. The research team is
appropriate to its solution; (2) design, implement, and evaluate a computer-basedsystem or program to meet desired needs; and (3) develop software system(s) within teams.4.3.2 EFFECT Learning Objectives and OutcomesIn the context of improving lane departure guidance systems, students will learn aboutrequirements for the sensing system on driverless vehicles (e.g., drones) and the embeddedvehicle control system (e.g., drone controller). Through hands-on experimentation, students willdevelop an understanding of the necessary specifications for the sensors and vehicle controlsystem to ensure that driverless vehicles can safely navigate complex topologies and physicalenvironments. Specifically, students were required to inquire and study the
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.Edington, S., Holmes Jr., A. L., & Reinke, P. (2015). A tale of two common reads: Models for developing a successful common reading program for first-year engineering students. In American Society for Engineering Education.Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312–340.Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717.Jordan, K. L
. Recognition was also central in Barton et al.’s [8]longitudinal study tracing the identity work of girls from nondominant backgrounds. They foundthat girls imagined for themselves possible futures in science when their identity work wasrecognized and scaffolded while they engaged with science in formal and informal learningsettings. These studies contribute to a growing realization of the complex work girls face inconstructing and sustaining a disciplinary identity in STEM. These researchers, along withothers, call for further studies to enrich our understanding of the aspects of identity construction,especially with regards to the interaction between gender, ethnicity, and STEM in the transitionto adulthood.One avenue that holds promise to transform
95 R-Square 5.57% R-Square Adjusted 3.21% S (Pooled Standard Deviation) 1.454 Table 7. Analysis of Variance Results for Problem 1 ANOVA Source df SS MS F P Group 1 10.287 10.287 4.867 0.029* Grade on Exam 1 2 2.827 1.414 0.669 0.514 Error 120 253.64 2.114 Total 123 268.60 2.184 *5% significance level, ** 1
: If yes, what disadvantages did that introduce? o Free Response, only answered by students in multidisciplinary groups • Q9: Based on your experiences, what is the greatest challenge for effective communication between team members? o Free Response • Q10: I feel the collaboration within my team was successful when working together towards our learning objective(s). o 5-Point Likert Response (strongly agree to strongly disagree) • Q11: I feel that my groups learning objectives were achieved. o 5-Point Likert Response (strongly agree to strongly disagree) • Q12: I feel the deliverable(s) my team achieved are appropriate for our defined group learning objectives
/262274614_Simply_Python_for_CS0/links/54de78c40cf296663786a2a1/Simply-Python-for-CS0.pdfArora, S. A. S. (2018, September 5). Learn Python: Tutorials for Beginners, Intermediate, andAdvanced Programmers. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from https://stackify.com/learn-python-tutorials/.Ateeq, M., Habib, H., Umer, A., & Rehman, M. (2014). C++ or Python? Which One to Beginwith: A Learner's Perspective. In 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning inComputing and Engineering (pp. 64–69). (Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271425337_C_or_Python_Which_One_to_Begin_with_A_Learner's_Perspective)Bell, C. (2017). MicroPython for the Internet of Things: A Beginner’s Guide to Programmingwith Python on Microcontrollers. Apress. https://link.springer.com
preparedness and self-efficacy. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education, 2012. [4] S Marikunte, F Harackiewicz, J Nicklow, and L Chevalier. Benefits and challenges of training teaching assistants. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education, 2006. [5] RJ Gustafson. Determining impact of a course on teaching in engineering. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education, 2011. [6] S Montgomery. A hands-on course on teaching engineering. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering
, Cohort 2 has almost twice the number of students. This is one set ofdata points that suggest the approaches utilized in STRIDE are not only effective, but may evenbe improving in their execution. It should be noted that there could also be various reasons forthese changes, and continuous improvement and revisiting of new data is recommended. A boostin overall average of Cohort 2 over Cohort 1 could have been as a result of a stronger incomingfirst year class. It could have also been due to the recent implementation of university-wide firstyear advising. In the year that Cohort 1 was in their first year, the university did not have its newFirst Year advising model. In Cohort 2’s first year, the university did have it. Hence, this couldhave also
Department at Seattle University. Dr. Cook received her doctorate in Social and Personality Psychology from the University of Washington, with a minor in quantitative methods and emphases in cognitive and educational psychology. Her research has included classroom learning, person perception, health perceptions, and jury decision making.Dr. Gregory Mason P.E., Seattle University Gregory S. Mason was born and raised in Spokane Washington. He received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. degree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital controls, from the University of Washington in
] N. A. Tran and M. J. Nathan, “Pre-College Engineering Studies: An Investigation of theRelationship Between Pre-college Engineering Studies and Student Achievement in Science andMathematics,” J. Eng. Educ., 2010.[2] “Boston-Area Summer Programs for Middle & High School Students,” 2020. [Online].Available: https://oeop.mit.edu/resources/boston-area-summer-programs-middle-high-school-students.[3] R. Hammack, T. A. Ivey, J. Utley, and K. A. High, “Effect of an Engineering Camp onStudents ’ Perceptions of Engineering and Technology and Technology,” J. Pre-College Eng.Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, 2015.[4] J. Rodriguez, S. Butt, and T. Fredericks, “Pre-College Activities to Promote PositivePerception of Engineering and Engineering
Paper ID #29625Faculty Experience in Team Teaching in Construction Management HigherEducationDr. Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Manage- ment Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus. Her previous degrees include a MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development companies in Brazil
] L. J. Virguez Barroso, “A Quantitative Analysis of First Year Engineering Students’ Courses Perceptions and Motivational Beliefs in Two Introductory Engineering Courses,” Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2017.[3] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of direct matriculation, first-year engineering, and post-general education models,” in 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, 2012, pp. 1–5.[4] V. Tinto and A. Goodsell, “Freshman interest groups and the first-year experience: Constructing student communities in a large university,” Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–28, 1994
UndergraduateEngineering Programs Emphasize? A Systematic Review. J. Eng. Educ., 106: 475-526.doi:10.1002/jee.20171[3] Woods, D.R.,Problem-Based Learning: Helping Your Students Gainthe Most fromPBL,Woods, Waterdown ON ISBN 0-9698725-1-8, 1996,Chapter 3, distributed on the WWWthrough http://chemeng.mcmas-ter.ca/problem based learning/.[4] Engineering Criteria 2000, 2nd Ed., Engineering Accreditation Commission of theAccreditation Board for Engineering Technology (ABET), Baltimore, MD, 1996.[5] Sternberg, R.J., “Criteria for Intellectual Skills Training,”Educa-tional Researcher, Feb., 1983,pp. 6-12.[6] Robin S Adams, Jennifer Turns, Cynthia J Atman, Educating effective engineering designers:the role of reflective practice, Design Studies, Volume 24, Issue 3, 2003
oftraditional textbooks, although the latter were allowed to be used. Through short tasks thatwere designed to be initiated and terminated during in-classroom sessions, mostly to beworked in peers, we cover three general moments in the designed learning experience: ashort introduction, a discussion and a closure argument with general feedback by the end ofeach assignment.Each guide has different learning objectives: 1. Guide one: a. To distinguish sets that may or may not be subspaces of 𝑅𝑅 2 or 𝑅𝑅 3 , using GeoGebra for visualization. b. To construct linear combinations in 𝑅𝑅 2 and 𝑅𝑅 3 and identify the geometrical locus they define. c. To determine which vectors belong to the span of S for
to evaluatethe impact of retention factors on larger private and public institutions. Machine Learning and datamining can be very rewarding as researchers can apply many different methods to institutions of all sizesand types as needed. The suggestion of establishing a centralized center supporting different kinds ofresearch to solve retention problems could impact the university’s marketing and recruitment activities aswell. Improved management of new, innovative, and existing resources could improve retention andallow for greater financial stability at Jonson C. Smith University.References[1] L. A. Spakman, W. S. Maulding and j. G. Roberts, "Non-cognitive predictors of student success in college.," College Student Journa, p. 46, Fall
listen to me: Anticipated power and women’s disinterestin male-dominated domains,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 116-128, Jan. 2015.[4] V. VanDoren, “Road to engineer's license is both difficult and worthwhile,” ControlEngineering, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 21, Jan. 1998.[5] J. Keen and A. Salvatorelli, “Principles and Practice of Engineering Exam Pass Rate byGender,” Engineering Studies, vol. 10, no. 2-3, pp. 158-168, Sept. 2015.[6] E. Hamm, “Have you considered certification?” Cost Engineering, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 6, Feb.1995.[7] J. Naveda and S. Seidman, “Professional certification of software engineers: The CSDPprogram,” IEEE Software, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 73-77, Sept. 2005.[8] D. S. Sink and J. L. Higle, “Fusion
, SensePublishers, Rotterdam, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-980-7_2[2] (Available Online) https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/globalhighered/global-citizenship-%E2%80%93-what-are-we-talking-about-and-why-does-it-matter[3] Warrington, R.O., Kulacki, F.A., and Warrington, A. (2011), “Vision 2030 : A Time for Engineering Leadership”, Proceedings, 2011 INEER Conference, Belfast.[4] Urbina, J., Oliden, J. F., Tunno, P., Lakhtakia, A., Rodriguez, J., Estrada, M. L., Obonyo, E., Zappe, S. E., Masters, C. B., and Fonseca Pacheco, F. (2019, June), “Experience-Based Learning: Global Engineering Culture and Society”, Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32789[5] (Available Online
Graduate School: A Realistic Expectation or a Dangerous Dilemma,” New Dir. Student Serv., vol. 115, pp. 31–45, 2006, doi: 10.1002/ss.[10] S. K. Gardner, “Fitting the Mold of Graduate School: A Qualitative Study of Socialization in Doctoral Education,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 125–138, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x.[11] C. M. Golde, “Should i stay or should i go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 199–227, 2000, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2000.0004.[12] S. K. Gardner and S. K. Gardner, “Contrasting the Socialization Experiences of Doctoral Students in High- and Low-Completing Departments : A Qualitative Analysis of
development programs and active learning in higher education.AcknowledgmentsThe authors of this paper gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundationfor this project under Grant No. JTFDXXX. References [1] Felder, R. M., & Brent. R. (2016). Teaching & learning STEM: A practical guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [2] Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College teaching, 44(2), 43-47. [3] Jungst, S., Likclider, L. L., & Wiersema, J. (2003). Providing Support for Faculty Who Wish to Shift to a Learning-Centered Paradigm in Their Higher Education Classrooms. The Journal of Scholarship
class or not.The majority of students are sympathetic to a student who may arrive late to class, and considerthis a “minor thing” as highlighted in the following comment: Professor absolutely disliked students walking in late in class and would ask them to leave if they walked a minute past the class start time. I think this was not only unwelcoming and embarrassing for the student(s) arriving late, but being forced to miss the lecture, despite paying for college tuition was unfair. This act of negative reinforcement also caused the student(s) to be behind and had to catch up on the material on their own time. While I understand that walking late into class can be distracting for the students and the
] Johnson, M.J., & Sheppard, S. D. (2004). Relationships between engineering students and faculty demographicsand stakeholders working to affect change. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 139-151.[2] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi-year singleinstitution study. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 225-246.[3] Besterfield-Sacre, M., Moreno, M., Shuman, L. J., & Atman, C. J. (2001). Gender and ethnicity differences infreshmen engineering student attitudes: A cross-institutional study. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 477-489.[4] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: Amulti-year, multi-institution
. D. Graaff, "The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education," Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5– 16, 2017.[2] P. Shekhar, M. Demonbrun, M. Borrego, C. J. Finelli, M. Prince, C. Henderson, and C. Waters, "Development of an observation protocol to study undergraduate engineering student resistance to active learning," Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 597–609, 2015.[3] A. Kirn and L. Benson, "Engineering Students Perceptions of Problem Solving and Their Future," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 87–112, 2018.[4] S. Tharayil, M. Borrego, M. Prince, K. A. Nguyen, P. Shekhar, C. J. Finelli, and C. Waters, "Strategies to mitigate student
working in Kansas rather than exporting themajority out-of-state. The results from Table 3 show that WSU does a better job of producingEngineering graduates who stay in Kansas, proportionally speaking. The second observation is that there was a change in the percentage of the graduates staying andworking in Kansas after about 2015. For WSU, more than 60% of their graduates stayed in Kansasbefore 2015 while they were in the mid- to lower 50%’s after 2015. Somewhat similar trends can beseen for K-State (typically above the 42% average value vs. below average), KU (upper 30%’s vs.lower 30%’s), and the overall results for the three universities (upper 40%’s vs. lower 40%’s). Such atrend suggests that something was happening overall in the Kansas
S. Africa S. Africa USA USA Source of funding Public Public Public Public Campus type College town Suburban College town Suburban Other details Historically Historically Space- Land-grant Afrikaans English grant research research research research university
-Engineering curriculum. Dr. High is involved with the development of an undergraduate entrepreneurship program at Oklahoma State University.Paul Rossler, Oklahoma State University PAUL E. ROSSLER directs the Engineering and Technology Management Program and co-directs the Legal Studies in Engineering Program at Oklahoma State University and is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering and Management. He is a licensed professional engineer and holds a M.S. and Ph.D. in industrial engineering from Virginia Tech.Martin High, Oklahoma State University MARTIN S. HIGH founded and co-directs the Legal Studies in Engineering Program at Oklahoma State University and is an Associate Professor of