, factualconsistency, and comprehensiveness. Coherence means the capability to summarize qualitativedata input into a coherent piece of information with cohesion. Factual consistency evaluateswhether each meaning unit in the summary is backed up by the qualitative data. Importantly, wealso added whether information found in the source qualitative data is represented in thesummary. Comprehensiveness evaluates the extent to which the summary reached thecomprehensiveness of the source qualitative data [6]. We dropped “harmfulness” from Tang et al.’s evaluation scheme since the data in this project does not have the clear physiological harms inthe biomedical studies. We adopted a 5-point Likert scale with 1 being “the least satisfied” and 5being “the most
] J. Walther, S. E. Miller, and N. W. Sochacka, "A Model of Empathy in Engineering as a Core Skill, Practice Orientation, and Professional Way of Being," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 123-148, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20159.[9] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, and A. O. Brightman, "The Development of Empathic Perspective- Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 534-563, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20175.[10] J. O. James, V. Svihla, C. Qui, and C. Riley, "Using Design Challenges to Develop Empathy in First-year Courses," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018: ASEE. [Online
. Lebdaoui, “How fashion influencers contribute to consumers’ purchase intention,” J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 361–380, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/JFMM-08-2019-0157.[11] P. D. Dobbs, P. Branscum, A. M. Cohn, A. P. Tackett, and A. L. Comiford, “Pregnant smokers’ intention to switch from cigarettes to e-cigarettes: A Reasoned Action Approach,” Womens Health Issues, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 540–549, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.07.005.[12] M. S. Hagger, J. Polet, and T. Lintunen, “The reasoned action approach applied to health behavior: Role of past behavior and tests of some key moderators using meta-analytic structural equation modeling,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 213, pp. 85–94, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016
excluded). Remove duplicates Figure 3. Review protocol for the study. In stage two, similarly as done previously, there were five phases. The identification ofresearch was made considering the search phrase used from the review protocol. This phrase wastaken from the previous study and is the one that provides the most results to search for studiesrelating to OR in HEIs contexts. The phrase considers two options for Organizational concept(with z and with s), as well as three options for HEIs (Higher Education, University, andCollege). The phrase was used searching in the “all fields” option for each database. Theselection of studies was made by checking the first
. Eng.Educ., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 51–60, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2019.1693123. [5] S. Niles, S. Contreras, S. Roudbari, J. Kaminsky, and J. Harrison, “Bringing in ‘The Social’ : Resisting and Assisting Social Engagement in Engineering Education,” in2018 World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), Nov. 2018, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/WEEF-GEDC.2018.8629756. [6] J. Smith, A. L. H. Tran, and P. Compston, “Review of humanitarian action and development engineering education programmes,”Eur. J. Eng. Educ.,vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 249
express the program pthat runs in M and produces s as an output. The smallest possible L(p) for a given s over allprograms and all machines that outputs s is the Kolmogorov measure of information in Xrelative in complexity to M represented as: KM(s) = min(L(p))+CM where CM is the number of bitsthat it takes to describe the machine M, a quantity that is independent of s. Since a Turingmachine may simulate any other machine, it may be used to estimate CM except that we cannot Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Arlington, March 21 – 23, 2013. Copyright 2013, American Society for Engineering Educationbe sure of a
author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Page 22.208.2This paper has materials that will appear in: Ganesh, T. G. (in press). Children-produced drawings: aninterpretive and analytic tool for researchers. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels, (Eds.). The Sage Handbook ofVisual Research Methods. London, UK: Sage. The author thanks Sage for the use of these materials.Review of the LiteratureThe use of children-produced drawings in research is not new. Margaret Mead used subject-produced drawings as contemporary responses by the public to events that represented rapidtechnological change after
Decision Short-Term Decision MakingNote. Adapted from Where to Go from Here? Toward a Model of 2-Year College Students’Postsecondary Pathway Selection,” by K.R. Wickersham, 2020, Community College Review,48(2), 107-132. MethodsThe current study forms part of a broader investigation into an S-STEM program designed toenhance the academic success of engineering transfer students transitioning from communitycolleges to bachelor's degree programs. This initiative aimed to establish stronger connectionsbetween two community colleges and a partnering 4-year institution. We employed a qualitativeresearch approach to examine the influence of the pre-transfer program, referred to as VirginiaTechs Network for
this differs from their understandingof education research through their next sentence: ”But education research is not that way, where there is always a correct answer.” - Participant 4Participant 4’s statement indicates how many graduate students in the ESED department use their linguistic capital fromtheir specific disciplines within education research. Similar to other graduate students within ESED, participant 4 brings theirdisciplinary expertise into the L&L space; which melds with the language from other STEM disciplines, resulting in a richmethod of communicating research to people in and outside of the space. In another statement, participant 4 also explains howthey value the linguistic capital others bring. ”It’s important
curve fittedthe plot, generated experimentally39, by an exponential function given by the following expressionas follows: 𝐹(𝑠) = 100(1 − exp (−0.0145𝑠1.165 ) (5)Where s is the size of the particle in m. F(s) is the percent proportion of the particle of a specificsize contained in the coal flay ash. To determine the amount of coal fly ash settled we used thecoal-fired power plant capacity. The power capacity of the coal-fired power plant is used todetermine the amount (in short tons) of coal that is necessary to maintain the electrical capacity ofthe plant. We determine the total yearly coal by the following expression as follows. Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE
; Exposition, Annual Conference, 2004.4 Flemming, L., Engerman, K., and Williams, D. ―Why Students Leave Engineering: the Unexpected Bond,‖Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Conference& Exposition, Annual Conference,2006.5 Fortenberry, N., Sullivan, J., Jordan, P., and Knight, D., ―Engineering Education Research Aids Instruction,‖Science, Vol. 317, 2007.6 Ohland, M., Sheppard, S., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., and Layton, R., ―Persistence, Engagement, andMigration in Engineering Programs,‖ Journal of Engineering Education, July 2008.7 Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N., Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview Press,Boulder, CO, 20008 Zhang, G., Min,YK., Ohland, M., and
collegemajor, including engineering. However, research has also shown that interest is not necessarilythe primary reason for career choice within underrepresented groups. The purpose of this paperis to present how interest relates to engineering as a career choice for a group historicallyunderrepresented in engineering. Using the Social Cognitive Career Theory as a frame work,high school and college engineering students from Appalachia were interviewed concerningcareer choices to answer the research questions: What role(s) does interest play in engineeringcareer choices of Appalachian students? How do such roles differ for high school and collegestudents? To answer the research questions, qualitative data from a total of 36 junior and seniorhigh
topicabout internal combustion engine dynamics, the system can take the student to prerequisite topicsfrom courses in algebra and physics. In this case the curriculum is not delivered as successivecourses; rather topics from different courses can be seamlessly woven together during curriculumdelivery. This ensures the shortest time span between the time at which the student takes a giventopic and the time at which he/she covers its prerequisite topic(s). Figure 5. Knowledge object from an online centrifugal pump maintenance course. Thehierarchical list on the left has the headings of other knowledge objects that constitute the course.3) Setting Learning GoalsA common problem with traditional learning is that it tends to teach all students the
; ReflectionThe results in this section are drawn from ten UCSD EMPOWER scholar responses to the surveyquestionnaire. Summarized responses are categorized into the corresponding survey sections“Transition to a 4-year University”, “Participating in the Program”, “Future Participation in theProgram”, and “Sense of Belonging”. The full, deidentified responses are found in Appendix A.Survey respondents’ demographic information:Figure 3: a) Identified Gender, b) Identified Race or Ethnicity, and c) Highest EducationalDegree Completed by Parent(s)/Guardian(s) for survey respondentsA. Transition to a 4-year UniversityThe first five questions asked to students are intended to gauge their experience transitioning intoa 4-year university. In general, the
students without requiring significantadditional workload. These findings point toward the key role of instructor mindset in buildingmore neuroinclusive environments. Future efforts may explore the role of AI technology inproviding personalized learning tools and supporting neuroinclusive practices more efficiently sothat educators can maintain these practices without burnout. Longitudinal studies are needed toassess their long-term impact on student success and retention in engineering programs.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1920761. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
Technology and Science (CloudCom), Dec. 2016, pp. 633–638. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2016.0109 [6] N. Nellore and M. Zimmer, “Towards a Systematic Review of Data Science Programs: Themes, Courses, and Ethics,” in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2, ser. SIGCSE 2023. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Mar. 2023, p. 1413. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3545947.3576356 [7] A. Badir, S. Tsegaye, and L. D. Nguyen, “Data Science in the Civil Engineering Curriculum,” Jun. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--42870 [8] D. Asamoah, D. Doran, and S. Schiller, “Teaching the Foundations of Data Science: An
(n=60) 7The GAI tools’ compatibility with human assessor assessment results depends on rubric structureand language. We used MECH 309’s Fall 2022 samples to investigate discrepancies betweenhuman assessor scores and GAI-generated scores within the lab using one rubric. The lab’srubric, shown in Table A.2, had four criteria: 1) technical background, 2) tables and figures, 3)data analysis and comparisons, and 4) structure and conventions. Table 2 presents average scoresand % difference for each rubric criterion. The smallest % difference was observed in Criterion1) technical background, as this criterion requires evaluating consistent
as academic performance and retention. ethodsMThis particular study is part of a larger project investigating “chosen family” in engineering education [9],[22]. Authors [22] describechosenfamilyas“person[s]outsideofthe[student’s] traditional family with individual or institutional power who genuinely and empathetically support and uplift [students] disrupting the [student’s] place amongst the structure- agency dialectic,andinturn,instillingastrongsenseofbelonging”(p.2-3).Inshort,chosenfamiliesare families students choose, who help the student enact agency in light of
ECE. Data was aggregated fromthe HSI’s Office of Institutional Analysis for the 2021-2022 academic year.increase their influence in the learning process and their success [10, 11]. However, research hasfound that a lack of sense of belonging is a determinant factor in a student’s decision to leaveengineering [12]. The relationships a student develops with their peers, teachers, and faculty canaffect that sense, influencing student performance, well-being, and the decision to stay/leave theirengineering program [13, 12]. The students who appear to have greater difficulty with their senseof belonging are those who are often underrepresented in the STEM/Engineering field(s), such aswomen or students with minoritized racial/ethnic identities [10