, alumni network, team and leadership skills development, global awareness, sustainability, and diversity, equity and inclusion.Robert Enick ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 How We Incorporate the Impact of Engineering Solutions in Global, Economic, Environmental and Social ContextsIntroductionThe ABET student outcomes (2) “the ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions thatmeet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety and welfare, as well as global,cultural, social, environmental and economic factors” and (4) “ability to recognize ethical andprofessional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgements, which mustconsider
andconducting research from locations in time zones around the globe. The learning goals for thiscourse were developed such that students who participated in the course would: • Learn about research mentoring styles and build skills for communicating about goals and expectations with research mentors • Examine and apply time management skills for balancing academic, research and personal goals during college • Gain an understanding of the structure of research literature and develop skills for identifying and organizing appropriate references within their field of research • Explore methods for documenting and disseminating research results in engineering • Learn about ethical practices for research, and be able to articulate key
. Page 14.764.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Integrating Professional Topics and Engineering Constraints Across the CurriculumAbstractMost of us do not learn a skill the first time we try something. Same is true forengineering knowledge and attitudes. Therefore, developing engineering knowledge,skills, and attitudes cannot be relegated to single coverage within the curriculum. Topicsmust be introduced and wrestled with early in the curriculum, sustained throughadditional application during intermediate years, and engrained through integratedapplication during senior design. The concepts of globalization, public policy, andleadership and engineering constraints such as sustainability and ethics
. Page 11.880.3Assessment can become a motivator itself for supporting intentional learning, if the focus of theassessment is the entire learning process rather than knowledge outcomes alone. Liberativeassessment should fit into a larger picture related to the entire curriculum, in which courses arelinked to who students are as individual learners, and what motivates them to pursue engineering.In the first year, our institution’s introductory engineering design course engages studentidentities and introduces the ethics and social relevance of engineering. It is critical at this pointto hear students’ voices to learn what they bring into the program and how they think aboutengineering. Their questions can become a motivating force for the entire
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)fields, which this paper details. The next section provides more background on OSINT and itsuse by cyber criminals, governments, local law enforcement, and private corporations. Section 3details the OSINT course activity, such as the project description, objectives, classdemographics, logistics and scope, and student deliverables. The fourth section incorporatesstudent responses to the project, including general feelings about the project, how it relates tocybersecurity, strategies for completing the project, and how they managed challenges faced inthe process. Section 5 is an overview of lessons learned by the educator, including how todevelop an ethical project on this topic, create instructions
theseperceptions changed after STEP. Data were collected using open-ended entrance surveys andwritten responses on final exams. Research protocols were approved by the Institutional ReviewBoard (#13-577).Context and ParticipantsThe research setting was an introductory engineering course embedded within STEP. The courseis designed to introduce students to fundamental engineering concepts, and course objectivesincluded engagement with the engineering design process, exploration of engineering disciplines,engineering ethics, technical writing, and problem solving with software tools (Matlab). Thecourse curriculum integrated problem-based learning and product archaeology frameworks(Barrows, 1986; Kolmos, De Graaff, Johri, & Olds, 2014; Lewis et al., 2011
, Title, and Media Format for Each Unit in Tech 198 Unit Title of Unit Media Format 1 Nature of Science and Technology Multimedia CDs 2 History of Technology Web-based 3 Technology and Work Multimedia CDs 4 Technology and Gender Issues Multimedia CDs 5 Technology Transfer and Cultural Issues Lecture/Activity 6 Quality of Life Lecture/Activity 7 Ethics Lecture/ActivityAll the instructors teaching this course use the CD and web-based learning materials in
of Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engi- neering at the University of Colorado, Boulder, since 1996. She has taught first-year introductory courses, senior capstone design, and specialty senior-level/graduate courses in environmental engineering. Her research interests in engineering education have focused on service learning, sustainability, and ethics. Page 25.558.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Engineering Students’ Views of the Role of Engineering in SocietyAbstractA developed sense of social responsibility
Committee of the IEEE Education Society. He was the 20022006 President of Tau Beta Pi. Page 22.418.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Defining “Sustainable Engineering”: a comparative analysis of published sustainability principles and existing courses1. IntroductionAs a concept and a value in engineering and engineering education, sustainability has gainedwide acceptance and importance: engineering disciplinary society codes of ethics andresponsibilities1-4, accreditation criteria5, statements from engineering professional
to apply knowledge and student creative thinking from the different delivery systems , 2. CUES EKE Protocol for rating of activities, 3. CUES EKE for rating of course/instructional delivery, 4. models, matrices and subject/course-specific structures of knowledge for a discipline, 5. universal register of essential knowledge, and 6. ethics and life long learning.Goals and ObjectivesThe objectives of this paper are to: 1. demonstrate the viability of CUES Assessment Model (CUES-AM) as amedium for enhanced student learning, continuous improvement and assessment ofstudents achievement, 2. disseminate the
of professional registration.Another level of accountability in engineering are codes and standards which provide accountabilityfor a given task, especially for engineers not professionally registered. If engineers do not followthese guidelines or topics and the result is a failure that causes loss of property and/or life, the legalsystem is always ready to hold engineers accountable. In addition to the external accountability thatexists for engineers, there is also an internal, personal accountability that exists. Internalizing theprofessional code of ethics is a start. Many people have other systems by which they live as well.Religion plays a big part in this role, whether it be Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Confucianism,Christianity, Taoism
Making in American Politics; Phase II—Decision Making in Engineering and Science;Phase III—Ethical Issues in Engineering and Policy. Interspersed throughout these three phaseswould be the laboratory component whereby students would meet with legislators and heads ofstate government agencies, such as transportation, environment and water, at the StateLegislative Building and government offices in surrounding areas.Phase IStudents were introduced to some of the fundamentals of the policy process from the socialscience perspective through an exploration of various decision-making models. We drew uponBrower and Abolafia’s “Bureaucratic Politics: The View from Below,” [1] which builds upon thesocial science gold standard—Graham Allison’s Conceptual
-specified outcomes and provides consistency for the general education of undergraduateprograms at Purdue university. Furthermore, the course aligns with the requirements of commonconstruction-related accreditation bodies, such as the American Council for ConstructionEducation (ACCE) [6] and the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)[7], by providing discussions related to ethics and risk management.The course is a lecture-based, 3-credit hour course. Two one-hour and fifteen-minute lectures perweek were scheduled for the course for the Fall 2022 semester. Through over 29 biweeklyclasses and book discussions, the instructors utilized: (i) architectural history as a background todiscuss the relationship between the changes in
, gain a minimum of four years ofworking experience, and pass two intensive competency exams to earn a P.E. license from theirrespective state's licensure board. One of the main goals of enforcing a P.E. license is to ensureengineering graduates follow ethical responsibility to protect public health, safety, and welfare.Currently, every state regulates the practice of engineering to ensure public safety by grantingonly Professional Engineers (PEs) the authority to sign and seal engineering plans and offer theirservices to the public [10].Historical data to regulate engineering practices in the United States dates back to the early1900s when the state of Wyoming established licensing requirements in 1907 [10]. The country'swestward expansion
toreally grapple with the material effects that environmental contamination can have forcommunities who live in environmental sacrifice zones. Using these concepts in the classroomcan pull students into deep conversations about ethics and responsibility and emphasize the needfor more far-reaching visions of technical communication and community engagement, likethose explored in recent work on Socially Responsible Engineering [5].In this paper, we focus particularly on what we call systems theories and material vibrancy andenchantment theories. For each of these, we offer a synopsis of several key insights, texts, andimplications. Then, we show the utility of the approach in question to advance importantpedagogical goals related to ethics and
student may be appropriate. All students wishingto take this course must also submit an Ethics Agreement to reinforce the ethics expected of acybersecurity professional. An example of a cybersecurity course Ethics Agreement can befound in Appendix A.Learning OutcomesThe Social Engineering course learning outcomes include the following: 1. Explain the various techniques that can be used to complete Social Engineering exploits. 2. Develop an understanding of the psychology of human interaction and how it can be exploited for gain. 3. Learn what technical controls, trainings, and processes can be used to help defend and establish security in-depth to protect against Social Engineering. 4. Overcome uncomfortable feelings such as
as well asemerging engineering fields suited to student interest. Likewise, it is essential to provide asocial, economic and ethical context to application of nanotechnology in manufacturing,medicine, and other contextual areas driving research and development. This provides a uniquechallenge and requires an approach which successfully integrates nanotechnology into currentacademic programs. Such an approach has the added benefit of enhancing student engagementand motivation. The result will be a better educated population of engineers, with anappreciation for the critical importance of nanoscale approaches to solving societal problems. b. Value of active/problem-based approachThere are many references regarding the value of problem
engineeringstudents who were not Calculus-ready and placed into Pre-Calculus. An engineering course wasdeveloped to parallel the material in Pre-Calculus. For example, students applied the conceptslearned regarding linear, power, and exponential equations in Pre-Calculus to applications in theengineering course. A second engineering course to follow this first one was eventuallydeveloped (another paper8 detailed the development of this engineering course sequence). Thefirst engineering course covered engineering design, engineering ethics, and sustainability inengineering. The second engineering course covered spatial visualization skills, engineeringachievements, computer programming basics, and had an engineering design project. Uponcompletion of the
]The civil engineering profession historically has had the highest percentage of licensedengineers. [12] Many job functions require a licensed engineer to seal documents and maintainresponsible charge of projects. This trend continues today as over forty percent of civilengineers are registered. [13] Licensure has continually been associated with the protection ofpublic health, safety, and welfare which aligns very closely with many of the functions of civilengineers. The ASCE and National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) codes of ethicssupport licensure and the concept that the civil engineering profession is tied to ethical practicethrough licensure. [14] [15]Is State Licensure Necessary?In recent years there has been a proliferation
Paper ID #22414From ’Empathic Design’ to ’Empathic Engineering’: Toward a Genealogy ofEmpathy in Engineering EducationDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 From “Empathic Design” to “Empathic Engineering”: Toward a Genealogy of
of word choices in missionstatements compared across public and private engineering colleges in the United States. Theresearch questions driving this study are: 1. Which words are most frequently used in missionstatements for private and public engineering colleges in the U.S.? 2. For six pre-determinedcategories of interest that each word may represent (eg. related to global, service, pedagogy,research, ethics, and diversity), what similarities and differences are noted in occurrences of eachof the six categories across the two settings of public and private colleges?BackgroundTo help situate this research study, in this section, a discussion drawing from two bodies ofliterature is presented. The first part of this discussion focusses on
solution manuals available whencompleting the homework9. Further, Passow et al. have shown that the decision to cheat or notcan vary depending on the type of assessment11 (homework vs. exam). In general terms, studentsare more likely to cheat on a homework assignment than on an exam. Passow et al. have alsosuggested that students who cheat on homework in their first years of college withoutconsequence may develop skills to allow them to continue to cheat, and on higher-riskassessments such as tests, as they progress through school.Certainly the issue of academic misconduct extends beyond a single course, but due to itsprevalence on homework, impact on learning, and ethical implications it deserves attention inoverall course design. Simply
business and engineering failures, when it is acceptable to take risks, how to recognize signs of impending failure and avoid it, how to examine past personal and corporate failures, learn from them and persist. 15. Resolving Ethical Issues – Defines ethics as a process and argues that the principal reason to behave ethically is to engenders trust. Uses case studies to illustrate how ethical dilemmas arise in engineering, how most engineers respond responsibly, and how a small minority of engineers act irresponsibly. Describes three very different and practical methods for resolving ethical issues. 16. Role of Product in Value Creation – Describes the total product concept, one that introduces a
, where he is also Director of the Minor in Environmental Studies. He received his Ph.D. from U.C. Berkeley and has also been a faculty member at Ohio State University.Thomas Ruehr, California Polytechnic State University Tom Ruehr is a professor in the Earth and Soil Science Department at Cal Poly State University in San Luis Obispo. He has a Ph. D. from Colorado State University. He has received the University Distinguished Teacher award, served the U.S. Department of Agriculture as national co-chairman of the committee for Agricultural Ethics and Public Policy Curriculum Development, and helped lead the U. S. Agency for International Development world conference on Agricultural Systems
of program outcomes (criterion 3) aredifferent for engineering (EAC) and engineering technology (TAC), both lists include topics thatdirectly relate to developing technological literacy in students. Issues such as design withinconstraints, social and ethical issues, and globalization are included on both lists and relate totechnological literacy.This paper will examine both the TAC of ABET and EAC of ABET lists and will highlight areasrelated directly to technological literacy. The paper will explore the concept of technologicalliteracy as a framework for addressing these topics throughout the curriculum and in a specificschool’s or department’s lists of program learning outcomes. This framework has the potentialto be very useful as faculty
water filterand a child’s crutch) using hand tools and scavenged objects. Students experience in a very realway how technical, economic and social considerations are inextricably linked in design.We are working to establish meaningful two-way relationships with communities both locallyand abroad in hopes of creating a community-based project connected to the course. We discusssome of the concerns that have arisen to date and the ethical guidelines we believe are necessary Page 9.643.1for appropriate community collaborations. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education
and its potential contributions to design excellence areexamined. The concepts of “favorite”, “best in class”, “quintessential” and “designexcellence” are compared and defined. Questions about whether we live in a “claptrap”world are considered.Topics such as “S-Curve” analysis, closed versus open systems and technology pushversus market pull are blended with critiques of DFM/A and QFD to attempt methods ofunderstanding product development methodologies. Ethics in design forms an essentialfinal point of discussion.This paper outlines the course and illustrates its unique nature. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Engineering Education, 2012 Educational Materials Development and Assessment for Engineering History and HeritageAbstractThis paper summarizes the development and the first offering of a new course at Cleveland StateUniversity, ESC 200 Engineering History and Heritage. The student response to the first courseoffering was highly encouraging. Student survey results indicated that the course seemed to beeffective at addressing a number of important ABET student outcomes. Rather than teachingengineering history per se, the course teaches engineering through historical case studies. Thecourse provides an opportunity to integrate professional and ethical responsibility, impacts ofengineering solutions, sustainability
directly, but there appeared to be a natural relationship between the two,a new category was formed. If no relationship was found between the categories and theassociated cards, the literature-based survey coding was consulted to determine how the category(and corresponding cards) may be assigned. If no consistencies could be found between theaffinity diagrams and the survey coding, a new category was formed. Three such categories wereformed: discipline specific knowledge, creative thinking and engineering ethics. These final,synthesized categories became the outcome variables used in the larger research effort, as shownin Table 1. Definitions for the outcomes were based on the responses written on the individualcards that comprised each group
and signal Data collection and signal Hardware processing processing13 Machine learning for EEG-based Machine learning for EEG-based Data Analysis BCI BCI14 Machine learning for EEG-based Machine learning for EEG-based Data Analysis BCI BCI15 Ethics in BCI Ethics in BCI Summary Sessions16 Student’s project presentation Student’s project presentation Presentation2.3.1 Neuroscience Concept The first portion of the course focuses on an introduction to BCI and the