Conference Session

Aerospace Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelia Greig, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Alex Powaser, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Douglas Howe, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Will Alan McGehee, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

theprinciples of electrostatic propulsion, a different device known as an electrospray thruster may beused instead. Electrospray thrusters are significantly simpler to make and, although the operationis somewhat different to gridded ion and Hall thrusters, the basic principles of electrostaticpropulsion can be accurately demonstrated with the electrospray system.Electrospray thrusters are not a new technology, being first developed in the 1960’s [1]. Initiallythey were not popular due to low thrust levels and high voltages required. The emergence ofmicro- and nano- satellite technologies has seen a resurgence in interest in electrospray systemsas there are more avenues for their use and improvements in technology have dropped therequired voltages [2,3

Conference Session

Creating Impactful Learning Experiences for Engineering Leaders

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Bayless, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

otherprograms. Students were assessed by the faculty and external mentors during the course of theprogram. Students also performed self-assessments of the development of their personalleadership qualities and the overall worth of the program.While actual execution of the project was done in a cross-functional team, each engineeringstudent was asked to identify how they were developing their leadership skills within theirproject. Specifically, they were asked to provide their personal narrative to • Explain his/her vision of the project and why it was appropriate to undertake • Describe what information he/she would be responsible for gathering and the communication strategy required • Describe which task(s) you he/she would lead in

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Siqing Wei, Purdue University; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University; Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

dimensionsubgroups at each peer rating event. Table 3 Self-rating and Peer-rating Across Dimension (Convergence) ANOVA Analysis Intervention Peer Difference P-value Effect Size Difference P-value Effect Size Review Mean (Cohen's d) Dispersion (Cohen' s d) Time CD = 0 1 -0.5175 = 22 1 -0.4292 = 22 2 -0.00952 0.9098 .0287 .005837 .8835 .0309CD >= 22 3 0.02424 0.7729 .0041

Conference Session

Technical Session 7: Online and Distributed Learning

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Otto Borchert, Missouri Southern State University; Abigail Byram, Virginia Commonwealth University; Debra Mardell Duke, Virginia Commonwealth University; Alex David Radermacher, North Dakota State University; Mourya Reddy Narasareddygari, North Dakota State University; Gursimran Singh Walia, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

. Gursimran Singh Walia, North Dakota State University Gursimran S. Walia is an associate professor of Computer Science at North Dakota State University. His main research interests include empirical software engineering, software engineering education, human factors in software engineering, and software quality. He is a member of the IEEE Computer Society. Contact him at gursimran.walia@ndsu.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Experiences Using a Cyber Learning Environment in CS1 ClassroomsAbstractThe Software Engineering and Programming Cyber Learning Environment (SEP-CyLE) is aweb-based platform to supplement standard course materials in CS1, CS2, software engineering,and

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joan V. Dannenhoffer P.E., Syracuse University; Sinead Mac Namara, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

given to thestudents at the beginning of the semester, skills that students are not familiar or comfortable withwhen they enter the program include making sketches, diagrams, graphs, etc. and using them astools to learn, to investigate, and to document. This paper will describe the results of that surveyand the introduction of four specific assignments into the first-year engineering design course thatare designed to both improve these skills and foster appreciation for these skills. The authors willevaluate the impact on the students’ perception of their abilities and their level of comfort in usingthese visualizations skills to solve engineering problems.Literature Review and BackgroundIn the 1950’s when the United States was focused on the

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sevile Mannickarottu, University of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

January 8, 2019]4 Google. G-Suite [Online]. Available from: https://gsuite.google.com/ [Accessed January 8,2019]5 Papert, S. & Harel, I. (1991). “Situating Constructionism.” Constructionism, 36, 1-11.6 Szymula, K.P.; Magaraci, M. S.; Patterson, M.; Clark, A.; Mannickarottu, S. G.; Chow, B. Y.,An Open-Source Plate Reader. ACS Biochemistry 2018; DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00952.7 Space.nss.org, “Enterprise In Space Program Announces Winners for Its Print The FutureCompetition to 3D Print on International Space Station” [Online]https://space.nss.org/enterprise-in-space-program-announces-winners-for-its-print-the-future-competition-to-3d-print-on-international-space-station/ [Accessed January 8, 2019]8 Group K Diagonostics, [Online] https

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Capstone Design Projects

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaela M. Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott; Richard T. Mangum, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Dina M. Battaglia, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

engineering instructor. Both good team cohesionand an embedded communication instructor create better capstone experiences, and we arelooking into how to help students understand the importance of both. In the future, we propose tolook more deeply at how the teams are performing and perhaps develop interventions thatpromote more collaboration between team members.References [1] A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen, “A review of literature onteaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, pp. 17-28, Jan. 1997.[2] D. R. Brodeur, P. W. Young, and K. B. Blair, “Problem-based learning in aerospace engineering education,” In Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, 2002, pp. 16-19.[3

Conference Session

Computational Thinking in Pre-College Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tony Andrew Lowe, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

- BMG3TdwsShAyH_0Z1xpFnpVcMvpYJceHGWex_c/editGrover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051Kelleher, C., & Pausch, R. (2007). Using storytelling to motivate programming. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1272516.1272540Lowe, T., & Brophy, S. (2017). An operationalized model for defining computational thinking. In Frontiers in Education. Indianapolis, IN.Pea, R. D., & Kurland, D. M. (1984). On the cognitive effects of learning computer programming. New Ideas in Psychology, 2(2), 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732- 118X(84)90018-7Selby, C. (2013). Computational Thinking : The Developing

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas C Williams, University of Louisiana; Aimee Barber, University of Louisiana at Lafayette; Peter Sheppard, University of Louisiana at Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 481-491.[8] Clapp, E. P., Ross, J., Ryan, J. O., Tishman, S. (2016). Maker-centered learning: Empowering young people to shape their worlds. John Wiley & Sons.[9] Cross, N. (2007). Designerly Ways of Knowing, Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland.[10] Cross, N. (2007). Creative thinking in design: an introduction. In ’07 Proceedings of the 2007 Symposium on Science of Design (pp. 2-3). Arcata, California: ACM.[11] Cross, D. (2011). Design thinking. New York: Berg.[12] Draw How To Make Toast (2019). Retrieved January 4, 2019, ​https://www.drawtoast.com/[13] Fraser, K., Fraser, L., Lum, B., & Fraser, M. (2009). The 175 Best Camp Games.[14] Fu, K., Moreno, D., Yang, M., & Wood, K. L

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Wood, University of Notre Dame; Alisa Zornig Gura; Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame; Aliah Rayna Carolan-Silva, Horizon Education Alliance; Sara Boukdad, University of Notre Dame; Juan Carlos Alarcon

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

initialyear. First, all agreed that program participation was a beneficial and positive experience and thatthe relationship developed with the City of Elkhart was an important part of the learningexperience. The cohort also agreed that including students in Elkhart Catalyst that came from thefocus neighborhood(s) was important to the success of the data project as well as to the learningoutcomes. Nonetheless, the degree of academic diversity, at least in a small cohort, was both achallenge and an attribute. An additional challenge was that interns had some frustration with thelack of tangible projects in the community in the first year.Although any particular improvements suggested were not necessarily mentioned by everyone inthe cohort, there were a

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Nidhal Carla Bouaynaya, Rowan University; Ravi P. Ramachandran, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

the general instructional objectives of thefreshman course.The project was titled “Introduction to Big Data Analytics: Analyzing Tweets with Matlab”. Theinstructor provided the students with a Matlab code that was designed to facilitate applyingSentiment Analysis to tweets. For example, the code can be used to (1) identify tweets thatcontain one or more specific keywords and (2) create a histogram of words used in these tweets,in order to identify recurring themes in tweets that mention the keyword(s). The final deliverablefor the project was a report in which students detailed how they used the Matlab code to answer anumber of open-ended questions, as well as an introductory section in which students discussedthe importance and applications

Conference Session

ETAC/ABET-Related Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sri R. Kolla, Bowling Green State University; David Border, Bowling Green State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

our students can seek and otherreasons. This paper presents the process adopted by the ECET program faculty to use the pastATMAE accreditation practices to present ABET accreditation. A hallmark of our program hasbeen the mandatory two-semester long co-op experiences and an optional third-semester co-opexperience, which has served as an important tool along with our in-class course instruction andlaboratory experience for the success of our students. Our program educational objectives reviewand student outcomes assessment of ABET’s Engineering Technology AccreditationCommission general ‘a to k’ criteria and Electrical/Electronic(s) Engineering Technology, andComputer Engineering Technology program specific criteria use four direct and

Conference Session

Teaching & Learning Dynamics, Vibration, and Mechanics More Broadly

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jason W Morphew, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

corresponds to an air velocity of roughly 30 m/s. With the leaky connections, theerrant dynamic pressure and velocity measured about 6 mm of water and 10 m/s, respectively.Thus, their digital measurement device appeared in every way to be working properly, but if thestudents took the effort to convert their pressure measurement to a velocity measurement, theymay realize that the velocity they were measuring was too low, which admittedly may requiresome amount of intuition that the students probably do not yet have.Because the exercise involves questions of accuracy, the students were also asked to assess theuncertainty in their measurements. Because the fluid density is needed to convert the dynamicpressure measurement into a velocity measurement

Conference Session

Engineering Cultures and Identity

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexis Prybutok, The University of Texas, Austin; Anita D. Patrick, University of Texas, Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin; Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin; Mary Jo Kirisits, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

an Analytic Lens. Journal of Research in Science and Teaching 2007, 44, 1187-1218. 2. Meyers, K. L.; Ohland, M. W.; Pawley, A. L.; Silliman, S. E.; & Smith, K. A. Factors relating to engineering identity. Global Journal of Engineering Education 2012, 14 (1), 119-131. 3. Ohland, M. W.; Sheppard, S. D.; Lichtenstein, G.; Eris, O.; Chachra, D.; & Layton, R. A. Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs. Journal of Engineering Education 2008, 97 (3), 259- 278. 4. Meyer, M.; Marx, S. Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 2014, 103 (4), 525-548. 5. Godwin, A.; Potvin, G.; & Hazari, Z. The Development

Conference Session

Proven Strategies in Classroom Engagement Part II: Activities for Creative Pedagogy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Celio Biering P.E., Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, United States Military Academy; Joseph P Hanus, U.S. Military Academy; Rahul Verma P.E., United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

civilengineering faculty have sought to develop their program appropriately along a set of commonlyaccepted educational taxonomies; that is, Bloom’s Taxonomy. These widely known taxonomiesare based on the seminal work of the 1950’s educational committee chaired by Benjamin Bloom.The committee established a set of taxonomies in three domains of learning: cognitive, affectiveand psychomotor. The cognitive domain taxonomy is widely accepted in many fields and hasbeen identified as, “arguably one of the most influential education monographs of the past halfcentury.”3 The taxonomies are a language that describes the progressive development of anindividual in each domain and are defined as follows4:  Cognitive: of, relating to, being, or involving conscious

Conference Session

Graduate Programs, Development, and Research Fellowships

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University of Calgary; Milana Trifkovic, University of Calgary; Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Karen Andrea Canon-Rubio, University of Calgary; Stephanie Hladik, University of Calgary

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

styles, and academic integrity.To build an effective supervisory relationship, first a workshop on Life as a graduate student isoffered. Students hear from senior graduate students on the challenges, opportunities, andsupport throughout grad studies. Additional topics of discussion include: 1) how to keep a happyand healthy life style, 2) where to get help? and 3) what are the opportunities for leadership orscholarship? The discussions are conducted in round table groups to provide an open format.The second workshop focuses on the supervisory relationship. This workshop is designed toteach students on their responsibilities as graduate students, and to give them a toolkit to build asuccessful relationship with their supervisor(s)/academic

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Thomas Dick, Oregon State University; Susie J Brubaker-Cole, Oregon State University; Ann Sitomer, Oregon State University; Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Oregon State University; Christina Smith, Oregon State University; John David Ivanovitch, Oregon State university; Julie Risien, Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning; Lori J. Kayes, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University; Devon Quick, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

DUE1347817. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Koretsky, M., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Brown, S. A., Dick, T., Brubaker-Cole, S. J., Sitomer, A., Quardokus Fisher, K., Risien, J., Little, D. L., Smith, C., & Ivanovitch, J. D. (2015, June). Enhancing STEM Education at Oregon State University – Year 1 Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.240022. Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of

Conference Session

College-Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session I: Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Glenda D Young, Virginia Tech; David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Lee Michael Warburton, AKKA Technologies; Christopher David Ciechon

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

major in college. Findings identifieddifferences in male and female students career fit confidence offering another reason whywomen were more likely to leave engineering after graduation [25]. Cech et al.’s findingssuggest it is important to consider the impact of professional socialization when examininginteractions engineering students have with industry. The authors illustrate how the frameworkcan be used to explain gender representation differences in engineering.Our intent for this paper is to use professional socialization as a lens to examine the value that anAIDP brings to a students’ engineering identity formation, not to provide a full review on thistopic. We focus on three outcomes of professional socialization to guide our

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arden Moore, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Paper ID #15214Experiential Learning in the Thermal Sciences: Introducing and ReinforcingFundamental Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer Principles to K-12 andEngineering Undergraduate StudentsDr. Arden Moore, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Moore graduated with his B. S. in mechanical engineering from Louisiana Tech University in 2001, followed by his Master’s and Ph. D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2007 and 2010, respectively. During his time in graduate school he worked in the fields of thermoelectric nanostructures, nanoscale energy transport physics, and advanced thermal

Conference Session

Teaching Methods in Mechancial Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Bernadine Catton, Colorado State University; Abril Galang, Colorado State University; Alexander T Bulk, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

downside to active learning using clickers in large classes.Institutions may need to reconsider large class sizes with clickers to take advantage ofimprovements in exam performance and benefits in terms of cognitive and non-cognitiveoutcomes.References [1] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012) Fact Sheet: Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.[2] U.S. Department of Education: National Center of Education Statistics (2013) Digest of Education Statistics[3] Freeman, S., S.L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, M.P. Wenderoth (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science

Conference Session

Trends in Accreditation and Assessment

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

—a specific critique offered by the ABET Engineering AccreditationCommission’s (EAC’s) Criterion 3 Task Force (TF-3). The obdurate habit of over-specification cansimply manifest itself in different ways—although we ought to consider in the same light TF-3’s ownrecommendation to include within Criterion 3 only those outcomes that can be reliably achieved.11As already alluded to above, what stymies effective solutions in engineering education is hardly limited tothe disciplinary habits and boundaries of engineering; the reasons go back to the structure of U.S.educational institutions and the engineering profession itself. With regards to the latter, engineers shouldstop worrying that theirs is somehow an incomplete profession. Sociologists

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

ideation? Why can person A in agiven situation generate a potential innovation while person B, perhaps even with a substantiallysimilar background, cannot? Consideration of the concepts/principles presented in Figure 4provides engineering and technology education researchers a framework for raising questionsthat might lead to fruitful investigations. The ten speculations listed below are initial examples ofsuch research questions. Perhaps the innovator(’s):1. knowledge representation is more holistic, i.e., established as a system as contrasted to hundreds/thousands of discrete individual facts/ideas?2. has a better memory and a larger/wider store of information to work with , or perhaps the innovator just has a better/quicker way of

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Karlin, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Dan Ewert, North Dakota State University; Ronald R Ulseth P.E., Itasca Community College

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

National Academies, Washington, DC. 2. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207. 3. Prince, M., Borrego, M., Henderson, C., Cutler, S., & Froyd, J. (2013). Use of research- based instructional strategies in core chemical engineering courses. Chemical Engineering Education, 47(1), 27-37. 4. Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), 1344- 1360. 5. Jesiek, B. K., Borrego, M., and Beddoes, K. (2010

Conference Session

Professional Skills development in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Matthew Cromwell, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Andreas Febrian, Utah State University - Engineering Education

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

develop andrecognize one’s own self-regulation in learning and teaching.ACKNOWLEDGMENT This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1148806. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography[1] ABET - Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2015-2016 Accreditation Cycle. November, 2014[2] Zimmerman, B. J., “Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 64-70, 2002.[3] Zimmerman, B. J. Attaining self

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey Kiassat, PhD, MBA, PE P.E., Quinnipiac University; Xiaoyue Jiang, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

theindividual students’ roles. CATME is a short, web-based survey that collects and analyzes self-and peer-evaluation feedback. A behaviorally-anchored rating scale is utilized to assesscontributions of each team member in five areas based on the team effectiveness literature (Ohlandet al., (2012)23. The grade for each team-based component is multiplied by the CATME factor foreach student and that is the score entered for the student. As such, if a student does not pull his/herweight, s/he is penalized by the rest of the team and gets a lower grade than the rest of the teammembers. Conversely, if a student goes above and beyond the norm, s/he is recognized by theteammates and gets a higher grade than the original team score.It should be noted that

Conference Session

Student Recruitment and Retention in ET Programs and Labs in ET Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Turner, Purdue University (Statewide Technology); Rustin Webster, Purdue University, New Albany; Danielle Reynolds; Timothy Cooley, Purdue University New Albany; Andrew McCart , Purdue Polytechnic; Joseph F Dues Jr., Purdue Polytechnic New Albany

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

to navigate asimulated Mars surface. Assessment results indicate that by engaging students in project and team basedlearning in the context of real world applications, interest in STEM majors can be increased in highschool students.References [1]. Jeffers, A., Safferman, A., and Safferman, S. (2004). Understanding K–12 Engineering Outreach Programs. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 30:2(95), 95-108.[2]. Anderson-Rowland, M.R. (1996). A first year engineering student survey to assist recruitment and retention," Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996. FIE '96. 26th Annual Conference., Proceedings of, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 372-376 vol.1.[3]. Cantrell, P. and Ewing-Taylor, J. (2009), Exploring STEM career options through

Conference Session

Evaluation: Technology and Tools for K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John L. Irwin, Michigan Technological University; Douglas E. Oppliger P.E., Michigan Technological University; Joshua M Pearce, Department of Materials Science & Engineering and Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University; Gerald Anzalone, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

% • Over 50 times (more than twice 18, 51% per week) • Not at all 8, 23% • 11-50 (up to twice per week) Figure 11. Survey Question 2Question 3: Select any obstacle(s) that may exist to integrate the 3D printer intoacademic lessons (select all that apply).For this question respondents were asked to select all that apply and to suggest others thatalso exist. The top rated obstacle (13, 20%) was insufficient experience/training totroubleshoot issues and the least rated obstacle was insufficient studentinterest/enthusiasm (0, 0%). The category of “other” obstacles

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shweta Chopra, Iowa State University; Prashant Rajan, Iowa State University; Chad M Laux, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

is more value in gaining such information by exploring these researchvenues. Research which is conducted by visiting the site is known as field research2. It consist ofparticipant observation, interviews and document analysis as seen in figure 17. Field research canbe very exciting and rewarding and at the same time extremely overwhelming. It is important toknow what kind of information needs to be collected at the time of such research. Since the fieldis full of stories and actions, one can easily become lost in the scenario, hence having a biggerpicture and focusing on the specific research question(s) is a very important component of thefield study2. However, one cannot neglect important relevant incidents and make an informedapproach

Conference Session

Pipeline and Performance in BME Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Davide Piovesan, Gannon University; Karinna M. Vernaza, Gannon University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM and ADVANCE-PAID grants. Page 26.790.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Formative vs Summative ABET Assessment: A Comprehensive Graphic Representation for A New BME ProgramAbstractThis paper presents an innovative methodology for the assessment of a new BiomedicalEngineering (BME) program. Biomedical engineering programs are quite new in the engineeringeducational system. To date, in the state of Pennsylvania there are only six programs that havebeen accredited by ABET out of the 91 programs accredited nationwide1. While the guidelines ofABET

Conference Session

Delivering Value in Publishing and Scholarship

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David E Hubbard, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

engineering faculty attitudes and practices. Journal of Library Administration, 51(5-6), 432-454.4. Laakso, M., & Bjork, B.-C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 124. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741- 7015/10/1245. Bhat, M. H. (2009). Open access publishing in Indian premier research institutions. Information Research, 14(3). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/14-3/paper409.html6. Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Goerner, B., Darby, R., Hyppoelae, J., Igo-Kemenes, P., Kahn, D., Lambert, S., Lengenfelder, A., Leonard, C., Mele, S., Polydoratou, P., Ross, D., Ruiz-Perez, S., Schimmer, R., Swaisland, M