strategies. There are more than 32713 faculty members at diploma-level technicalinstitutions and 409412 faculty members at undergraduate technical institutions (AICTE2021). Out of which, around 20000 faculty members are getting trained in content andpedagogical training through various training programmes offered at the government traininginstitutions. Only 20% of the faculty members are only trained; however, the remaining needto be empowered periodically through various training modes. The need to increase thetraining programme is difficult due to the three main reasons: (a) Institutions are not willing to spare faculty members due to shortage. (b) The Importance of techno-pedagogical training and its implementation is difficult. (c) The
Services; and (b) conducted a survey to students, which helped recognize some ofthe main academic factors contributing to students’ stress and anxiety as well as identify currentand potential resources that the institution can offer to enhance their well-being. The datacollected from 456 students show that the main mental health issues are anxiety, depression,academic distress, and uncertainties about the future. The survey results showed that severalacademic factors, such as exams, not understanding assignments, financial issues, lack of timemanagement skills, poor school-work-life balance, and presenting in class, greatly impactstudents’ stress, anxiety, and overall well-being. In light of the results, the research proposesadditional resources
/s11948-005-0006-3Jimerson, B., Park, E., Lohani, V., & Culver, S. (2013). Enhancing Engineering Ethics Curriculum by Analyzing Students’ Perception. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 23.530.1-23.530.15. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--19544Orr, M. K., Ramirez, N. M., Lord, S. M., Layton, R. A., & Ohland, M. W. (2015). Student Choice and Persistence in Aerospace Engineering. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 12(4), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.I010343Palmer, E., & Tawney, J. (2022). A Model for Student-led Development and Implementation of a Required Graduate-level Course on History, Ethics, and Identity in Aerospace Engineering. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
, J., & Merrill, T., & Sood, S., & Greene Ryan, J., & Attaluri, A., & Hirsh, R. A. (2017,June), Clinical Immersion and Team-Based Design: Into a Third Year Paper presented at 2017 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28040[7] Muller-Borer, B. J., & George, S. M. (2018, June), Designing an Interprofessional EducationalUndergraduate Clinical Experience Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—30279[8] Zapanta, C. M., & Edington, H. D., & Empey, P. E., & Whitcomb, D. C., & Rosenbloom, A. J. (2017,June), Board # 18: Clinical Immersion in a Classroom Setting (Work in Progress) Paper presented at 2017ASEE Annual
sections at the same time throughout thesemester. At the end of each class, students are administered a brief quiz that can be in team orindividual format as decided by the individual instructor to check for comprehension andattendance. The physical structure of the team seating arrangements in-class divides teams of fourinto pairs seated across and facing each other. Three sections of the first-year engineering coursewere selected based on convenience sampling for the researchers. Section A had 40 students,Section B and C had about 50 students. Instructor’s enforcement of teaming activities varied bysection. Section A’s instructor consisted of more laissez-faire attitudes to enforcement of teamingactivities which allowed for reduced interactions
facilities used for this project include 3D printers, CAD software,and other fabrication facilities. These and other required facilities are available in the AERO(Aerospace Education and Research Organization) lab at the host institution. Nine undergraduatestudents work on this interdisciplinary project under the guidance of one faculty member. Studentsworking on the project are from Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Mechatronics andComputer Engineering programs. The research team is divided into three main groups: a) AvionicsGroup, b) Structures Group, and b) Systems Group. The avionics group includes students fromMechatronics and Computer Engineering. The systems groups include students from Mechanicaland Civil engineering. The structures
]. Thestudent essays will subsequently be evaluated by the course instructors together with theuniversity’s Center for the Advancement of Teaching to understand whether asset maps had anybearing on cognitive trust and thereby, team effectiveness.In future work, we also hope to explore these two other research questions:1. To what extent do students capitalize on their strengths and develop their growth areas as a result of the team asset mapping protocol?2. Are students who are provided with the opportunity to identify, share, and capitalize on their strengths in the context of a group project more likely to remain in an engineering program?References[1] National Science Board, “The State of US Science & Engineering,” 2022.[2] B. N
conducted to understand the student team dynamicexperience. The surveys administered were open-ended, with ten questions to be answered. Asample of open-ended survey question used to gain and analyze student feedback are provided inAppendix B.4.1 Course-End Survey AnalysisOpen-ended questions were used to understand nonbiased student experience throughout thesemester. When asked what the students would do differently if they had a chance to retake theclass, students identified that they would end up spending/allocating more time dedicated to thecourse. One student was notified that they would take this course in person rather than online.Students were provided PowerPoint slides, reading materials, and examples each week. Whenasked what resources
Paper ID #39664Self-learning Sandbox to Emulate Biological SystemsMr. Benjamin Lubina, Gannon University I am currently an undergrad in Cybersecurity at Gannon University, I run the school Cyber Defense Club, represented Gannon in challenges and competitions, and published a prior paper in the field of machine learning. I have 3 years of experience with software development, cyber risk assurance, and data analysis.Dr. Ramakrishnan Sundaram, Gannon University Dr. Sundaram is a Professor in the Electrical and Cyber Engineering Department at Gannon University. His areas of research include computational architectures for
students participated?d. What was the implementation process?e. To what extent was the program implemented?2. Stakeholder perceptionsa. What were the experiences of the participants? b. Would the participants recommend the program to others?c. What changes would the participants recommend?3. Program outcomesa. What outcomes are observed among participants?b. Were stated program outcomes met?c. What unintended outcomes emerged?A focus group meeting was also held with the participants with an additional survey. The focusmeeting with the participants allowed them to discuss the workshop and their experiences. TheFocus Group with WaterWorks modules participants consisted of the following questions:1. How did you hear about the program?2. In your own
, V. V. Kulkarni, S. Munoz-Najar Galvez, B. He, D. Jurafsky, and D. A. McFarland, “The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 117, no. 17, pp. 9284–9291, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915378117.[3] K. W. Phillips, D. Medin, C. D. Lee, M. Bang, S. Bishop, and . N. Lee, “How Diversity Works,” Sci. Am., vol. 311, no. 4, pp. 42–47, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1014-42.[4] T. T. Aldridge and D. Audretsch, “The Bayh-Dole Act and scientist entrepreneurship,” Res. Policy, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1058–1067, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.006.[5] A. Huang-Saad, J. Fay, and L. Sheridan, “Closing the divide: accelerating technology commercialization by catalyzing the university
software.Main RF systems/other topics are covered in a companion course.References1. M. B. Perotoni and M. S. Vieira, “Increasing the interest in antennas and microwave courses,” The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Figure 2. Coverage of RF related Education, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 193-207, 2019. topics in the PSH EET Program.2. M. L. Lumori and E. M. Kim, “Engaging students in applied electromagnetics at the University of San Diego,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 419-429, 2010.
. Kuratko, G. Fisher, and D. B. Audretsch, "Unraveling the entrepreneurial mindset," Small Business Economics, vol. 57, pp. 1681-1691, 2021.[3] R. J. Pidduck, D. R. Clark, and G. Lumpkin, "Entrepreneurial mindset: Dispositional beliefs, opportunity beliefs, and entrepreneurial behavior," Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 45-79, 2023.[4] R. D. Ireland, M. A. Hitt, and D. G. Sirmon, "A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions," Journal of management, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 963-989, 2003.[5] S. E. Zappe, "Avoiding Construct Confusion: An Attribute-Focused Approach to Assessing Entrepreneurial Mindset," Advances in Engineering Education, vol
, “Beginning an Engineer’s Journey: A Narrative Examination ofHow, When, and Why Students Choose the Engineering Major,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 4,pp. 556–582, 2018, doi: 10.1002/jee.20234.[5] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attritionfrom Engineering Majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 2013, Accessed: Feb. 07, 2023. [Online].Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Why-They-Leave%3A-Understanding-Student-Attrition-Geisinger-Raman/89d9fb50408b4d7cf18a573178134e4e28163b01[6] M. F. Bays-Muchmore and A. Chronopoulou, “First-Year Engineering StudentsPerceptions of Engineering,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun.2018. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https
gender. Most of all programs and gendersspecified ramps as the facilitation way used for entrances. Looking at the EnvE program that wasnot exposed to the presentation or the tour we can see that female students mentioned theuncommon facilitation ways while male students didn’t think of them. This includes adequatelightings, door handles and sliding doors.Table 5 Facilitation ways by program and gender shown in percentages. The following abbreviations are used: PAT = Preferanother term; PNS = prefer not to say; A P = Accessible parking; A L = Adequate lighting; A D = Automatic Doors; C C = Colorcoding; D H = Door Handles; E = Elevators; L D = Light Doors; R = Railings; Ra = Ramps; S = Signage; S D = Sliding Doors; U =unknown; U B= Use of Braille
writing. They can either (a) select a few paragraphs and detectall four linguistic concepts or (b) select one linguistic concept and apply it to the entire draft.It offers an opportunity to practice their declarative knowledge of the four linguistic concepts,which will demonstrate their usefulness in disciplinary writing. This session was recorded viaZoom for the purpose of keeping all the details that may be useful later in the data analysis.Semi-structured interviewsA semi-structured one-on-one interview was conducted virtually via Zoom to two consentingparticipants (Vando and Laoshi)2 at the end of the tutoring. A set of questions aboutinterviewees’ learning experience in and perception of the tutoring design and subordinateclause use in their
. 89–100, 2007.[6] C. S. E. Woodcock, J. Callewaert, and J. Millunchick, "Synthesizing definitions of professional competencies linked to experiential learning in engineering education: A literature review," J. High. Educ. Theory Pract., vol. 21, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.33423/jhetp.v21i4.4214.[7] J. Donnell, B. Aller, M. Alley, and A. Kedrowicz, "Why industry says that engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says," in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Vancouver, BC: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2011, p. 22.1687.1-22.1687.13. doi: 10.18260/1-2--18809.[8] B. Lucas and J. Hanson, "Thinking like an engineer: Using engineering habits of mind and signature
perceived struggles could help instructors betterunderstand student circumstances during remote learning and other times of struggle, improvingsupport both inside and outside of the classroom.References [1] C ARETHERS , J. Insights into disparities observed with COVID-19. Journal of Internal Medicine 289, 4 (2021). [2] D E S ANTOS -B ERBEL , C., H ERNANDO G ARC´I A , J. I., AND D E S ANTOS B ERBEL , L. Undergraduate Student Performance in a Structural Analysis Course: Continuous Assessment before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak. Education Sciences 12, 8 (2022). [3] D OEBLING , A., AND K AZEROUNI , A. M. Patterns of Academic Help-Seeking in Undergraduate Computing Students. Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education
, Appearance and Accuracy, and Reason) as well as CRAAP (Currency, Relevance, Authority,Accuracy, and Purpose) are two such frameworks.7 My university employs a librarian whospecializes in information literacy. She was instrumental in helping me to find content that wouldbe beneficial for engineering students. Other universities may have similar library resources. 1(b) Be able to identify and explain key environmental issues at global, national, and locallevels. This objective is met by three assignments designed to give students the ability to put to usewhat they learned in the previous objective with respect to locating legitimate sources of facts anddata about environmental issues. For the global level assignment, students were asked to
acknowledge that we were not able to capture a more in-depth understanding ofstudents' perspectives on DEI through the survey data alone. Nevertheless, we are activelyworking on analyzing the focus group interview transcripts, and we plan to publish the results infuture studies to provide more nuanced insights into the role of DEI in remote labs.References1. Lindsay, E. A., & Good, J. (2005). Effects of access mode on students’ perceptions of aboratory objectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87-101. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00839.x2. Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (Eds.). (2014). Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Madhavan, K., & Lindsay, E. A. (2014
responsible for delivering a cohesive and comprehensive curriculum,composed of suitable courses, such as ME 220, to gain proficiencies in said outcomes. The whitepapers [6] that outline the institutional outcomes for the Application of Engineering Problem-Solving Methods and Critical Thinking outcomes and their respective proficiencies are includedfor reference in Appendices A-B. Table 1 summarizes the Application of Engineering Problem-Solving Methods outcome and its associated proficiencies. Table 1: Application of Engineering Problem-Solving Methods Outcome Proficiencies Fundamental Domain Knowledge Describe and apply the principles governing the performance and capabilities Proficiency 1
sense to assemble the build) can be engaged.Figure 2. (A) Student sewing string through silicone finger with a plastic needle. (B) Studentattaching actuators to PVC pipes with zip ties. (C) Students use a gripper to pick a prize.The activity starts with students carefully sewing a plastic needle through holes on the SDMfinger (Figure 2A). Next students moved on to attaching the fingers to a PVC pipe securing theassembly with a zip tie (Figure 2B). After the students finished assembling the gripper, they wereoffered a prize in a box of snacks and toys to pick up with their new gripper (Figure 2C). Thisserved as another opportunity to observe the use of the gripper assembly because differentgripping styles can be used for object picking.The
Figard is a graduate student in Engineering Education and Systems Design and Universal Experi- ence (UX) Design at Arizona State University.Dr. Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis Kenneth Reid is the Associate Dean and Director of Engineering at the R. B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. He and his coauthors were awarded the Wickenden award (Journal of Engineering Education, 2014) and Best Paper award, Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE, 2014). He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award (2013) for designing the B.S. degree in Engineering Education. He is a co-PI on the ”Engineering for Us All” (e4usa) project to develop a high school engineering course
image of the web browser outputare shown in Figures 16 and 17. Figure 15(a). Web Server Initialization Code. Figure 15(b). Web Server Functions Code.Figure 15(c). Web Server WiFi Module Configuration Code.Figure 15(d). Web Server Data Code. Figure 16. Web Server Console Output. Figure 17. Web Browser Image.Internet of Things (IoT) ProjectsTechnology used in IoT projects can include devices for: • Wireless applications (ZigBee, Bluetooth, WiFi, etc.) • Sensing applications (temperature, pressure, moisture) • Control applications (motor) • Displays (LCD, LED OLED)There are many possible examples of student IoT projects for a 2-3 week lab
. (2013). Testing the flipped classroom with model-eliciting activities and video lectures in a mid-level undergraduate engineering course. In 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 161-163). October 2013. IEEE.[3] Kerr, B. (2015). The flipped classroom in engineering education: A survey of the research. In 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 815-818). September 2015. IEEE.[4] Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334-345.[5] Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of college science teaching, 42(5), 62-66.[6] Cabı, E
Pursue a Research Career (a) Research career in academia. (b) Research career in industry. Figure 2: Survey response on consideration of research career by genders.54% of students considered a research career in academia, and 69% of students considered acareer in industry. As shown in Figure 2, 60% of HUG students, including cisgender women andnonbinary/trans people, considered becoming faculty members after graduation. 67% of HUGstudents were interested in working in a research position in the industry. On the other hand, only50% of cisgender men students would like to pursue a research career in academia, and 70% ofthem were interested in industry. This gender
processing challenges. Even though the team picked a very complex design, thestudents successfully slip casted a very detailed Grubby, see Figure 1a. The AIR upon seeing theproduct at the end of the term expressed her appreciation that the team was able to successfullyexecute such a challenging mold that seasoned artists may struggle to execute. Additionally, shestated that this product was a wonderful merger of art and engineering into a creative product. a b Figure 1: Spring 2022 MET 352 scientific and creative competition winners. (a) Slip casted Grubby, the South Dakota Mines school mascot, (b) slip casted mug of the department head (Dr. Michael West).The mug shown in
across classrooms, schools,and OEs, we reduced the interview set to 50 interviews. We selected 10 girls from each timepoint using the following criteria: (a) each girl had completed a survey during the respective timeperiod; (b) there was no overlap in girls selected across time points; and (c) the girls were spreadacross all the participating classes as much as possible. This permitted us to include a widerrange of voices across the classrooms and time periods. Interview questions included: “Do youhave role models?”, “Could/would your OE be a role model for you?”, “Are your OEs rolemodels for you?”, and “Which of these (kinds of people) are your OEs most like?” In Year 1, weprefaced questions about role models by stating, “A role model is a
teaching and learning in the fields of engineering” Academic Journal ofBusiness, Administration, Law and Social Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 3. 2015.[8] R. Chantoem and S. Rattanavich, “Just-in-Time Teaching Techniques through WebTechnologies for Vocational Students' Reading and Writing Abilities”, English LanguageTeaching, 9(1), 65-76. 2015.[9] B. Hardin and D. Mccool, BIM and Construction Management. 2nd Edition. Wiley.[10] F. Gould and N. Joyce, Construction Project Management. 3rd Edition.[11] R. Sacks, C. Eastman, G. Lee and P. Teicholz, BIM Handbook. 3rd Edition. Wiley.[12] J. Held LLC, The Value of Computer Modeling & LIMS™ in Insurance Claims. 2022.[13] Y. Gamil and I. A. R. Rahman, “Awareness and challenges of building informationmodelling
rhetoric, composition, and technical communication in engineering.Prof. Robert Gerrick, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 1 From the Start: A Case for Introducing a Design, Build, Test Classroom Earlier in the CurriculumFollowing a recommendation of the College of Engineering Industrial Advisory Board, faculty atEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical University integrated almost all upper-level engineering capstoneswith courses in advanced technical writing starting in 2003 and finalized the completion of thiseffort in 2013. The courses are co-taught by a