. We also share a few surprisesfound in the data.Our main contributions are the analysis of the rich body of collected data, as well as distillinggroups of questions that have yielded particularly useful results, and categorizing those by targetoutcome: questions for evolving the course, for “reading” students’ moods, and for gettingstudents to reflect on their experiences. Many of these questions may be broadly applicable.The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 elaborates on relevant aspects ofthe course structure and describes our mechanism for collecting feedback data. Section 3discusses what we have learned from our data analysis – first about the course, and then aboutthe process of doing student surveys. We
structure. This property distinguishes it from other prior attempts atdeveloping sociotechnical-based assignments in the literature, which have primarily focused on asingle course-context.The process of writing and implementing the assignment followed by the authors’ reflection andanalysis required for this paper elucidated many findings that are relevant to other efforts tointegrate sociotechnical concepts into core engineering science and design courses. Specifically,we identified barriers to sociotechnical integration which include addressing the diverse needsand objectives of our courses, managing different instructor backgrounds and biases, usingappropriate terminology which avoids reinforcing the dualism we are trying to address
Paper ID #31581Determinants of initial training for engineering educatorsDr. Elizabeth Pluskwik, Minnesota State University, Mankato Elizabeth leads the Engineering Management and Statistics competencies at Iron Range Engineering, an ABET-accredited project-based engineering education program of Minnesota State University, Mankato. She enjoys helping student engineers develop entrepreneurial mindsets through project-based and expe- riential learning. Her research interests include improving engineering education through faculty devel- opment, game-based learning, and reflection. Elizabeth was a Certified Public
mental processing coupled with dialogicinteraction with other learners, where the learner reflects on novel insights and perspectives. Wehave integrated these considerations into our course design. In the next section, we describe thepurpose of this investigation, followed by the course structure.Research PurposeThis paper presents findings from a comparative analysis of the learning outcomes ofengineering students who participated either completely online mode or in a hybrid-mode, whichincluded both online and in-class components. For both learning groups, we utilized the samepedagogy designed to enhance ethical reasoning (the SIRA framework).20 We implemented thispedagogical framework at the graduate-level and assessed student learning and
through the lens of“teaching-as-research.” We define “teaching-as-research” as “a deliberate, systematic,and reflective use of research methods to develop and implement teaching practices thatadvance the learning experiences and learning outcomes of students as well as teachers.”The graduate course is designed to promote the development of those skills and habits-of-mind, along with the knowledge base associated with high-quality teaching, learning, andassessment. Within the graduate course, students participate in a micro-course, aninnovative adaptation of the traditional micro-teaching experience. The uniquecomponents to our approach are both the teaching-as-research model and the authenticachievement model
recognize theneed to advance certain abilities, take responsibility for personal development, engagepurposefully to achieve desired development, and reflectively assess and validate theeffectiveness of these achievements for meeting present and long-term needs.Learning Context and TheoriesLearning professional skills in the context of capstone design courses or similar team-basedproject experiences can be described by a mix of cognitive, constructivist, and motivationalmodels 25. In the semi-authentic professional communities of project teams with realstakeholders, social interactions will shape student learning 20, 23, 25. Interdependence andaccountability to teammates also produce learning through negotiation and by modeling ofbehaviors
withresponsible positions in business and industry; have had time to experience the effects of theirMaster’s degree and reflect on the outcomes. Because they have all graduated, they were deemedto be independent in that they were not beholden to the university in any way as might be thecase if the evaluation were conducted prior to the award of the degree. Page 22.1022.22.1 - Historical ContextOn June 11, 1998, the College of Technology initiated the process for University, andsubsequently Indiana Commission for Higher Education, approval of a non-traditional, fee-basedweekend alternative to Purdue’s traditional campus tuition-based Master’s of Science
fororganizing experience and substantially strengthened the idea of using cross-curricularexpressive writing (in which the writer captures, investigates, and reflects upon his/her ideas) toenhance students’ learning (pp. 57-58).10 Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Emig’s and Britton’swork became the basis for recognizing writing as a primary learning method. (For a morecomplete discussion of WAC history, refer to Chapter 5, “Writing to Learn,” of Reference Guideto Writing Across the Curriculum, by Charles Bazerman, et al.10)Three major goals for incorporating VCUR’s WAC program into VCUQatar’s project-directedapproach became • to develop students’ metacognition about their learning and thinking processes, • to convince students that using knowledge
and other learning activities in engineeringcourses. In recruiting interview participants, we strategically oversampled for marginalizedracial/ethnic and gender identities to ensure diverse perspectives. During the interview process,we observed that student participants reflected on their strengths and connected them to theirwork in and beyond engineering courses, suggesting the potential of APPI to be used both as anasset-based pedagogical intervention and as a research method for collaborative sense-makingwith students about their experiences. We believe that students were able to better recognize andactivate their assets because of APPI’s roots in social constructivism, which enables participantsto engage in collective inquiry and dialogue
inevitable that dental institutioncurricula will need to be updated (Thurzo et al. 2023).Impact of AI tools on Pharmacy EducationThere is a well-known proverb that says “We do not learn from experience. we learn from reflecting onexperience” that depicts the foundational work on teaching and learning. Critical self-reflection has beenincreasingly identified as pivotal to the development of independent, self-regulated learning, as stated invarious educational research studies. Reflective writing is one of the most common approaches used forcritical self-reflection in education. However, teaching, learning, and grading reflective writing presentschallenges, as it is often an unfamiliar style for both students and teachers (Dewey, 1933).The evaluation
history of engineers. At present, 30 textbooks reflecting the concept of greenengineering education have been revised and newly edited, covering variousdisciplines such as engineering, science, management and law.2. Construction of Green Engineering Courses ECUST has offered a series of courses related to green engineering. First,"Fundamentals of Enterprise EHS Risk Management" has been offered to allengineering undergraduates as a compulsory course. This course built by over fortycorporate alumni and university faculty was listed as a national-level MOOC in 2017.Taken by about 2,300 people each year, it has been listed as a required or electivecourse by 106 universities nationwide. Second, eight "Green Engineering" electivecourses have been
. The interviewer asked open-endedfollow-up questions to prompt participants to reflect on these emotions, repeating this process forall eight contexts.We conducted and recorded hour-long interviews with 20 undergraduate students described inTable 1. We transcribed excerpts of interview recordings of four contexts: doing a problem setfor Mechanics 1 alone, doing a problem set for Mechanics 1 with friends, making something in amakerspace for yourself, and making something in a makerspace for Electronics 1. The firstauthor conducted line-by-line open coding [11] of three interview transcripts from a second-,third-, and fourth-year participant each, from which themes of emotional configurationsdeveloped organically. She shared the coded
on how students learnand included many practices useful for developing student learning; these included retrievalpractices, increasing sense of belonging & decreasing stereotype threat, metacognition & self-regulated learning, and transparency in teaching and learning. The workshop presentedresearch on these topics and provided time for faculty to brainstorm class changes based onthese ideas. The goal of this workshop was to communicate to all faculty teaching practicesbased on learning theories while also giving faculty time to reflect on their current practicesand propose course modifications.The course modifications focused on the first of a two-semester first-year engineeringsequence for honors designated students at The Ohio
children’s experiences in the makerspace to home. The app walks children through each step in the process, encouraging them to document their work by taking photos, drawing diagrams, and writing notes. Short animations, tips, and helpful prompts guide children to reflect on their work and promote discussions with caregivers about their ideas. The app is free and works on smartphones and tablets.4. Take-Home MaterialsThe toolkit includes take-home
, although we oftenassociate love with teachers of younger students. The project incorporates principles ofmindfulness, empathy, and social connection, and draw upon research in psychology andeducation to inspire participants to consciously bring love into their classrooms. The purpose ofthis paper is to reflect on the experiences of the first cohort of participants who completed theTeaching with Heart workshop. The researchers will explore what we have learned so far aboutthe impact of the workshop on participants' personal growth and teaching practices and point tothe next phases of the project.FOUNDATIONS FOR WORKSHOP DEVELOPMENTIn practice, the primary focus of STEM higher education is the acquisition of the academicknowledge and technical
fortheir 2nd year students’ technology requirements.Their syllabi created a vision for the basic technological understanding needed by the designstudents. Their course descriptions are available in Appendix A. These two technological literacyclasses started a new “life” in the college of design. Teamwork and learning, reflection-basedpedagogical methods coupled with investigations into nature and connections to technology,engineering, and design augmented and enriched these courses. Consquently they enhanced thedesign majors. The two classes enrolled 35 students and later, as the program grew, 65 studentssat in at peak enrollment.However, the two classes exited the Design program in 2020, based on administrativediscussions that students needed
their structures Students will complete the testing and Check focus question structures using the infrared camera outside. outcomes and observations Day 4: Improve Students will complete a gallery After looking at the results and reflecting Science journal claim design, gallery walk to see their peers’ designs. on their own designs, students will improve entry (see next page) walk They will then improve their their structures by changing material designs. attributes. Day 5: Test Students will test their improved After making design structure revisions
. APOS theory is initiated with Piaget’stheory of reflective abstraction [17] and got expanded to K16 mathematics education and RUME in recent years. Itwas applied in 1997 to mathematical topics for analyzing combined math knowledge of a student in a specificsubject [1]. Action, process, object, and schema are the mental structures proposed as a part of the APOS theory tofollow developmental stages of the learners. The main goal of this theory is to observe and categorize mentalstructures through observations of learners’ mental mechanisms; it is important to understand the totality ofknowledge and its’ reflection in applications.In the relevant APOS literature, learners’ conceptual view of the function was studied in [3] by relying on
empiricalstudy of art classrooms as a way to describe “the kinds of thinking developed by the arts [thatare] important in and of themselves, as important as the thinking developed in more traditionallyacademic subjects.” According to Hetland et al. [4], the eight Studio Habits of Mind include:Developing Craft, Engaging and Persisting, Envisioning, Expressing, Observing, Reflecting,Stretching and Exploring, and Understanding Art Worlds.Hetland et al. [4] define the eight Studio Habits of Mind in the following ways: Develop Craft- Technique: Learning to use tools (e.g. viewfinders, brushes), materials (e.g. charcoal, paint); learning artistic conventions (e.g. perspective, color mixing) Studio practice: Learning to care for tools
the manufacturingmetrics that had previously been defined for them. In this second video the assembly line runs andimportant metrics, like throughput and cycle time are demonstrated. Both videos are publiclyavailable on YouTube and are linked in this reference. [12]Finally, students were asked to reflect on this online lesson once they completed it. The reflectionquestions are presented in Table 1. Question # Question Text 1 How much did the videos help to improve your understanding of factory flows in general, and Little’s law specifically? In particular: 1a Which aspects of the videos were most helpful in improving your understanding? Please explain in detail. 1b Which aspects
K12 soft robotics activities werepresented as practitioner-delivered outreach. This paper details development and pilot of ateacher facilitated Soft Robotics Toolkit program for K12 schools that includes a design thinkingcurriculum and a physical toolkit, specifically designed to complete in school or at home. Forteachers to confidently deliver the emerging curriculum, we describe a teacher professionaldevelopment to facilitate adoption of soft robotics topics into middle and high school classrooms.We provide reflections on the experience of the classroom teacher delivering the curriculum inthe remote environment and results from a 9th grade student in the course. This pilot will informfuture work in assessing teacher confidence in teaching
exit interviews(blue shaded cells). Table 2- Artifacts reflecting sustainability mindset categorized by present or future orientation. Location of Artifacts Artifacts Household Present Future Two Entry Household 2 1 0 4 Interviews Household 4 0 1 Four Interim 2 Household 2 0 2 Interviews or Focus Groups 10 Household 4 7 3 Household 2 0 0 Two Exit Interviews 5
”transference to “remotely doing a lab” would not be easy to assess during lockdown, when face-to-face practical final exams are impracticable to schedule. Assessment would certainly includegrading but grading alone would not provide an adequate holistic assessment. The constructionof an assessment rubric for the online experiential learning, based on the McGill University face-to-face experiential learning assessment principle concerning content-process mixture, bigpicture perspective and reflection is presented here. The advances in artificial intelligencesoftware as it pertains to online experiential learning are discussed.KeywordsAsynchronous online delivery, experiential learning, tacit and explicit knowledgeIntroductionThe online delivery of
course for BC’s newDepartment of Engineering which will enroll its first class in fall 2021. Seventy students enrolledin MMW, representing all the BC undergraduate schools and a number of different STEM andnon-STEM majors.As a designated “Complex Problems” course, MMW includes three pedagogical components:lectures, labs, and reflection sessions [1]. Lectures examine topics from major branches ofengineering (civil, mechanical, and electrical) and the history of science and technology since1800, with a focus on sociotechnical systems and their relationship to gender, race, disability,immigration, and nationality. Labs involve hands-on engineering modeling tasks as well as amulti-week human-centered design challenge focused on issues of access and
Engineering Technology,and Telecommunications Systems Management programs at Murray State University reflect ontheir study abroad program successes and practices. The study abroad programs were 16-week (3credit hour) courses with instructional period throughout the semester, with travel occurring duringspring or summer breaks. All five study abroad programs concluded with students traveling to theinternational partner’s location and providing a unit of work or deliverable. Topics discussed inthis paper are student recruitment, project identification, finding international partnerships,program expenses, equipment logistics, knowledge transfer, and project sustainability.Keywords — Project-based learning, Engineering Technology, Study Abroad
sameexperiments as demonstrations. Both treatments were accompanied with the same pre-labprediction questions and post-lab assessment and reflection questions, which kept student timedevoted to each activity similar. Students performing the experiment in small groups scoredhigher on the concept inventory than did students who watched a demonstration (24.7-percentagepoint increase relative to 16.9-percentage point increase) although both groups improvedsignificantly relative to their pre-test scores. Analysis of the student reflection questions mirroredthis trend, with students performing experiments answering the reflection questions more fullyand more correctly than students who watched the demonstration.Introduction and BackgroundIn the past five years
summative surveys were distributed with each summative assessment(exams). The formative survey was distributed prior to the summative assessment and thesummative survey was distributed after the summative assessment. See Appendix A for the twosurveys. Questions are included in the figure captions, for convenient reference. Ample time wasgiven to complete the formative survey and the both surveys were generally returned with theexam. Students are informed to answer the formative survey questions reflecting on theformative assignments leading up to a summative assessment. For example, when filling outtheir second formative assessment students are asked to reflect on all homework leading up toExam 2 from the previous exam. Formative scores include the
, Michael, Pamela Turner and William Oakes, “Teaching Engineering In High School Using Service-Learning: The EpicsModel”, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2008Zoltowski, C., Oakes, W., and Cardella, M., “Students’ Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design”, Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol. 101, No. 1, January 2012, pp. 1-32Zoltowski, C. B., and Oakes, W.C., “Learning by Doing: Reflections of the EPICS Program”, Special Issue: University EngineeringPrograms That Impact Communities: Critical Analyses and Reflection, International Journal for Service-Learning in Engineering, 2014,pp. 1-32
efforts specifically for residents Cape Town, South Africa.Students were instructed that their solution should extend the residents’ current water supply aslong as possible. Researchers in engineering design emphasize the need for empathic educationalexperiences [19] and incorporating global perspectives into engineering curricula [20]. As suchthe design challenge focused on designing a product with social impact for a real-life crisis.Students were also instructed to use the design processes, methods, and tools taught in class todevelop a solution. At the conclusion of the in-class activity students were told they had 48 hoursto submit an individual reflection about the design challenge. The reflection asked students toconsider the design
the 2 semester engineering courses, faculty have little time to talk abouthow students are adjusting to life in college, what their plans are for engineering, and how thesemester is going. Each class has 72 students and each course is 2 credit hrs. Two faculty startedimplementing discussion boards on the Learning Management System (LMS) in their courses tointroduce new topics and require a reflective post each week. While the students use the LMS forturning in class assignments and viewing information, most of the class is delivered in-person,therefore, the discussion board assignment is one of the only pure online/virtual assignments.The two instructors used different approaches to the discussion boards. Instructor A posted thetopics on the