Conference Session

Instructional Innovations in Architectural Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald Miers, Western Carolina Univeristy; George Ford, Western Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

AC 2010-331: SCHOLARSHIP OF ENGAGEMENT AND PROJECT BASEDLEARNING: EXPERIENTIAL BASED LEARNING PROJECT FORCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT STUDENTS AT WESTERN CAROLINAUNIVERSITYRonald Miers, Western Carolina UniveristyGeorge Ford, Western Carolina University Page 15.1053.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Scholarship of Engagement and Project Based Learning: Experiential based learning project for construction management students at Western Carolina UniversityAbstract The Peggy Crosby Center located in Highlands, North Carolina is a multi-use complex that wasbuilt in the late 1800’s. Originally built as a private dwelling and after many

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barry Dupen, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

photocopy or scan the relevant page(s) from your notes, and mark in red the changes you would like to see. You can benefit from extra points, and next semester’s class will benefit from better handouts. Page 15.372.7One third of the students participated in the extra credit assignment, and most of thesesubmissions were thoughtful, detailed, and thorough. Some students submitted recommendationsin sentence form. Here are some examples: The only change I would make is on page 5 under valve actuation: separate the mechanical vs. pilot vs. solenoid better. They run together and look like they are of the same group. It would be easier

Conference Session

Capstone and Senior Design in Engineering Technology: Part I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Jones, State University of New York, Institute of Tech, U; Anglo Tadros, SUNYIT

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

-successful). The measure of satisfactory performance in eachcategory was the percentage of students scoring “1.” A benchmark of 70% was used to gage theoverall level of success. If 70% of the students were successful, then the presentations wereconsidered successful. Results from this rubric gave the instructor and students feedback, and theresults also provided a basis for monitoring improvements that occurred during the second halfof the semester.Table 5. Rubric for Mid-semester Oral Presentations Before the presentation, submit a typed page with: Your name(s), Descriptive title Outline of the presentation List of references, including URLs of websites used

Conference Session

Program Development and Pipelines for Recruitment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anoop Desai, Georgia Southern University; Jean-Claude Thomassian, State University of New York, Maritime College

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

needs, but is dynamic enough tokeep changing and evolving with the times. This principle has been amply demonstrated in thispaper.References1. Akao, Y(ed), Quality Function Deployment, Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press, 1990 Page 15.333.82. Shingo, S, Zero Quality Control: Source Control and the Pokayoke system, Cambridge, MA, Productivity Press,19863. Mizuno, S, Company wide Quality Control, Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization, 19884. Harry, M.J., and Schroeder, R, Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World’sTop Corporations, Doubleday Business, 2006.5. Pyzdek, T, Six Sigma handbook: A

Conference Session

Two-Year College Potpourri

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farzin Heidari, Texas A&M University, Kingsville

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

variety of angles. The generated 3D model can be saved as a file and imported into otherapplications such as prototyping or other CAM processes. Students taking design and 3Dmodeling will also be introduced to program features allowing them to create, edit, analyze andplot 3D models.Manual Machining: Manual machining is referenced as learning the operation of conventionalmachine tools. This technology has not been changed since the 1950’s. Students learn basicskills and machining techniques required to operate the following machines; horizontal andvertical mills, engine lathe, drill press, surface and pedestal grinders. Students’ skills areenhanced through hands-on machine tool practices including precision measurements, blueprintreading and the

Conference Session

Incorporating Innovative Technologies into the Curriculum

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University; Tony Lee Kerzmann, Robert Morris University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

studentsincluding the ones detailed below. Others are not within the reach of smaller schools such asDefense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA)’s Grand and Urban Challenge3. Someothers like SAE’s Formula Series4 may require greater resources compared to the ones below. The Institute of Navigation (ION)’s Robotic Lawn Mower Competition will be held June 2-4, 2011 in Beavercreek, Ohio5. The objective of the competition is to design and operate a robotic unmanned lawnmower using navigation to rapidly and accurately mow a field of grass. NASA’s 18th Annual Great Moonbuggy Race will be held April 1 - 2, 2011 in Huntsville, Alabama, at the U.S. Space & Rocket Center. Each Moonbuggy will be powered by two

Conference Session

Innovations in Power Engineering Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dale S.L. Dolan, California Polytechnic State University; Taufik Taufik, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

harmonics for continuous-conduction-mode boost power-factor correction,” Proc. IEE Electric Power Applications, Vol. 148, Issue 2, pp. 202 – 206, March 2001.3. B. Choi, S. Hong, and H. Park, ”Modeling and small-signal analysis of controlled on-time boost power-factor- correction circuit,” IEEE Trans. On Industrial Electronics, Vol. 48, Issue 1, pp. 136 – 142, Feb. 2001. Page 22.160.74. M. Orabi, T. Ninomiya, and J. Chunfeng, “Nonlinear dynamics and stability analyses of boost power-factor- correction circuit,” Proc

Conference Session

Hardware Applications

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald J. Hayne, The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

’ Figure 5. Instruction Fetch Sequence. Step RTN Control Signals T3 R(D) ← R(S) REGS_Read1 <= ‘1’ ALU_OP <= Pass_A Load_STATUS <= ‘1’ REGS_Write <= ‘1’ Clear <= ‘1’ Figure 6. Instruction Execute for MOVE Rs,Rd.VHDL ModelThe VHDL model for the instructional processor is developed in phases, with new capabilitiesadded in each phase. Phase 1 includes the components of the data path, which have beendeveloped throughout the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sydney Rogers, Alignment Nashville; Sandra Harris, Alignment Nashville and PENCIL Foundation; Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University; David McNeel, Education Consultant

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

the project in each middle andhigh school club are closely monitored and, any corrective action, if needed, is takenimmediately. Future goals of this initiative include developing a sustainability model for theongoing operation of its after-school clubs and summer camps and more tightly integrating itsprograms into middle to high school transition strategies and into 9th grade curriculum and Page 22.228.6activities preparing students for their choice of academies.AcknowledgementsThis project is being funded by National Science Foundation Award Number 0833643.Bibliography1. Rogers, S. Rapid Prototyping: A Strategy to Promote Interest in STEM

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sharon Johnson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Venkat Allada, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Susan Pariseau, Merrimack College

changes.Bibliography1. Krathwohl, D. R., “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview”, Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218, 20022. Nakamura, M.S., S. Sakakibara, R. Schroeder, “Adoption of Just-in-Time Manufacturing Methods at US- and Japanese-Owned Plants”, Transactions on Engineering Management, 45, 230-240, 1998.3. Moskal, B. M., “Scoring Rubrics: What, When and How?”, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3), 2000a.4. Moskal, B. M., “Scoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability”, Practical Assessment, Research & Page 15.766.5 Evaluation, 7(10), 2000b.5. National Research Council (NRC), How People

Conference Session

Graduate Student Experience

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barrett Caldwell, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

AC 2010-1950: CONSIDERING GRADUATE RESIDENCIES AND CO-OPS INHEALTHCARE ENGINEERINGBarrett Caldwell, Purdue University Barrett S. Caldwell, PhD Associate Professor, Industrial Engineering / Aeronautics & Astronautics Phone: (765) 494-5412 E-mail: bscaldwell@purdue.edu; URL:https://engineering.purdue.edu/GrouperLab Prof. Caldwell is a Professor in Industrial Engineering, and Aeronautics & Astronautics, at Purdue University. His background includes undergraduate degrees from MIT in 1985 (one in astronautics; one in humanities) and a PhD (1990) in social psychology from the University of California-Davis. He is a research leader and innovator in human factors engineering

Conference Session

DELOS Best Paper Nominations

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dawn Spencer, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Nebojsa Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

, 1991.2. Bonwell, C.C. “Active learning and learning styles,” Active Learning Workshops Conference, 1998. http://www.active-learning-site.com/work1.htm.3. Gehringer, E. F. and Miller, C. S., “Student-Generated Active-Learning Exercises,” Proceedings of the 40th Association for Computing Machinery technical symposium on Computer science education Chattanooga, TN, 2009, pp. 81-85.4. Rosario, R. A. M. and Widmeyer, G. R., “An Exploratory Review of Design Principles in Constructivist Gaming Learning Environments,” Journal of Information Systems Education, v. 20 no. 3, Fall 2009, pp. 289- 300.5. Prince M., “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, July 2004, pp. 223-231

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks - Session I

Collection

2015 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Takao Ichiko, Professional online

Tagged Topics

International Forum

. Page 19.2.33.1 Detailed Schemes in the Research There are different and more numerous types of questions and answers betweenlearners and teaching staff in the distance learning environment. Fig.1 shows anexample of questions and answers (denoted Q/As) from learners (denoted S1 to S4) andteaching staff (denoted T), respectively. For instance, there may be a volley of answersfor Q3 if it is assumed to be of the highest priority at a certain time during the process oflectures/seminars. It is more effective to timely enhance dynamics between learners andteaching staff by making the usage of shared space mobile Q/A integration. It is alsopossible for any S to get an answer for each question uploaded if it can be found andmatched in the knowledge

Conference Session

Track 2 - Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Julia Ziyatdinova; Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Artem Bezrukov, Kazan National Research Technologcal University, Russia

Tagged Topics

Curriculum and Lab Development

] Sanger, P.A.; Ziyatdinova, J.N. Bridging the communication gap of a foreignspeaking instructor in Hands On Pedagogy // Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 2013International Conference on //Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/ICL.2013.6644617 //Publication Year: 2013 , Page(s): 433 - 435 [3] Sanger,Ph.A., Ziyatdinova, J.N. Writing in English for international conferences.// Higher Education in Russia, Issue 12-2013, P. 95-99 [4] Bezrukov, A. Flexible Learning Model for Computer-Aided TechnicalTranslation. // Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 2013 International Conference on //Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/ICL.2013.6644680 // Publication Year: 2013 , Page(s): 673 - 675

Conference Session

Modeling Student Data

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Ricco, Purdue University; Ida Ngambeki, Purdue University; Russell Long, Purdue University; Matthew Ohland, Purdue University; Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press; 1997. x, 429 p. p.4. Ohland MW, Sheppard SD, Lichtenstein G, Eris O, Chachra D, Layton RA. Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 2008;97(3).5. Astin AW. What matters in college? : Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass; 1993. xxi, 482 p. p.6. Lord S, Brawner CE, Camacho M, Layton RA, Long RA, Ohland MW, Wasburn M. Work in Progress: Effect of Climate and Pedagogy on Persistence of Women in Engineering Programs. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education, Saratoga Springs, NY 2008.7. Lord S, Camacho M, Layton RA, Long RA, Ohland MW, Wasburn M. Who's making it? Race

Conference Session

Web-Based Education

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Sivand Lakmazaheri

Page 10.507.4 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”AnalysisOnce the learner has completed the problem, the system analyzes the constructed shear andmoment diagrams to determine if they are correct. This is performed by comparing the shape andmagnitude(s) of the diagram constructed by the learner, in each segment, with the correct ones.Incorrectly constructed segments of a diagram are highlighted, allowing the learner to requestcorrective feedback (see Figure 4). Figure 4: Initial System Response to Learner-Constructed DiagramFeedbackIf the learner constructs any part of a diagram

Conference Session

Writing and Communication I

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Fry

Sky" (blue), "Wasabi" (green) and "Chutney" (orange).). The result: your dad's old Schwinn bike on steroids.” 2 [emphasis added]Without realizing it, the author(s) of the above passage make the connection between Rhetoricand successful Product Development. Designers, Engineers, and Marketers are engaged in theact of persuasion. Ultimately, their hard work must persuade a consumer to purchase or use theproduct that they developed. During the process, each partner in the team is trying to persuadehis or her superiors and/or peers that their solution is the correct one.The three overarching components of Rhetoric (Kairos, Audience, and Decorum) clearly apply tothe product development process. In fact restated, the above definition of the

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Turns Jennifer; Atman Cindy; Angela Linse; Karl Smith

. Planned and managed changes 3. Unplanned revolutionary changesProbably the most famous step model of change is Rogers’ (2003) Diffusion of Innovation thatdescribes diffusion as the process by which (a) an innovation (b) is communicated throughcertain channels (c) over time (d) among the members of a social system. Rogers conceptualizesfive steps in this process: 1) knowledge, 2) persuasion, 3) decision, 4) implementation, and 5)confirmation. Rogers is famous for the S-curve relationship between time and the number ofadopters. Rogers writes that “The dominant viewpoint is that social change is caused by bothinvention (the process by which a new idea is discovered or created) and diffusion, which usuallyoccur sequentially.”Clearly, defining or

Conference Session

Integrating Taxes, Law, & Business

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

William Sullivan; Janis Terpenny

& Exposition Copyright  2004, American Society for Engineering Educationof income taxation that a specialist will bring to the table when s/he is needed to facilitatemanagement decision making.References1. Canada, J. R., W. G. Sullivan and J. A. White, Capital Investment Analysis for Engineering and Management, 2nd ed., (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1996).2. Collier, C. A. and C. R. Glagola, Engineering Economic and Cost Analysis, 3rd ed., (Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1998).3. DeGarmo, E. P., W. G. Sullivan and J. R. Canada, Engineering Economy, 7th ed., (New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1984).4. Grant, E. L., W. G. Ireson and R. S. Leavenworth, Principles of

Conference Session

Ethics & HSS in Engineering

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Lee Harper

system-level trade-offs among alternative approaches;” and specialization, in which the system is brokenout into its constituent parts, to be “designed and built by specialists … [to manage] their Page 9.1290.2interfaces and interactions.”22 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Central to the processes of systems design and systems management is the definition ofrequirements, from the points of view of the person(s) or entity(ies) requesting the work and theengineers performing it, and trade

Conference Session

Computers in Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Laura Lucas; Chul Kim

A DEVELOPMENT OF WIRELESS CLASSROOM FRAMEWORK FOR CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY COURSES Chul S. Kim, Laura Lucas Indiana University-Purdue University, IndianapolisIntroduction Many courses in the Construction Technology (CNT) Program in Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) are taught in traditional classrooms that are notequipped with computers. This is partially due to the lack of funding to provide enoughcomputer facilities; however, it is more because computers are not currently deemed integral inthe teaching and learning in these courses. Thanks to the rapid progress in informationtechnology

Conference Session

Professional Graduate Education & Industry

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Albert McHenry

Society for Engineering Education Copyright © 20033. National Academy of Engineering, Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology, 2002.4. National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform, Strategic Plan, 2004.5. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press6. Ullman, S. (1980) Against direct perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 373 - 415.7. Gibson, J. J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin8. Dewey, J. (1933/1998) How we think (Rev. ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.9. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston10. Piaget, J. (1972). The

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade for Teaching I

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Jerry Samples

preparation to beeffective. Professors must include plans to keep students active and involved. Finally,professors should attempt to make learning approach that experienced in smaller classes to befair to the students.REFERENCES1. Felder, R.M., “Beating the Numbers Game: Effective Teaching in Large Classes,” Proceedings of the 1997American Society for Engineering Education annual Conference and Exposition, Milwaukee, WI.2. Montgomery, S., “A Secret to Large Classes – Showing You Care,” Proceedings of the 1997 American Societyfor Engineering Education annual Conference and Exposition, Milwaukee, WI.3. Dail, P.R., “Techniques for Teaching Large Classes,” Proceedings of the 1997 American Society for EngineeringEducation annual Conference and Exposition

Conference Session

A Renaissance in NRE Programs

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

G. Maldonado; Christenson John; Eugene Rutz

, and highly motivated graduate students for the UCNRE GraduateProgram who will soon be in a position to become professionals in the nuclear industry.5. References[1] J. Christenson, G. I. Maldonado, E. Rutz, H. Spitz, “MNE-ACCEND,” Proc. of 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 20-23, 2004.[2] W. Wallack, et.al., “University of Cincinnati Launches Joint Mechanical/Nuclear Engineering Degree,” Nuclear Energy Institute’s Nuclear Energy Overview, p.5, Nov. 3, 2003.[3] S. Ali, J. Christenson, P.K. Ray, S. Usman, “Building an Effective Educational Bridge Between Tuskegee University and the University of Cincinnati Nuclear and

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Constance Kampf; Dave Kmiec

successful? 3. Who will be the reader(s) of this memo? What do they know about the problem? What will they gain from the problem being solved? 4. What action(s) do you expect your readers to take as a result of reading this memo? For the purposes of this class, understanding a problem differently can be considered an action. 5. What do your readers need to know in order to want to take those actions?Through lectures and feedback, the students are coached to appropriately collect and constructanswers to each of these questions. Then they are asked to use their answers to these questionsto their memos and proposals.5 The exercise is helpful to students who are not accustomed toconsidering, in depth, their

Conference Session

Experiential Learning

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Thompson; George Bodner; William Oakes

. 5.Noddings, N. (1992). Gender and Curriculum, from the Handbook of Research on Curriculum, edited by P. W.Jackson, New York: Macmillan.6. Rosser, S. V. (1990). Female-Friendly Science. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY.7. Rosser, S. V. (1995). Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, andEngineering. Teachers College Press, New York, NY.8. Matyas, M. L. & Malcolm, S. (1991). Investing in Human Potential: Science and Engineering at the Crossroads.AAAS, Washington, D.C.9. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. N. (1992). Curriculum Differentiation: Opportunities, Outcomes, andMeanings, from the Handbook of Research on Curriculum, edited by P. W. Jackson, New York: Macmillan.10. Astin, A. W. (1993). Engineering

Conference Session

Sustainability Issues

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Patricia Mosto; Gina Tang; Courtney Richmond; Joseph Orlins; Catherine Yang; Demond Miller; Beena Sukumaran; Kauser Jahan; Anthony Marchese; Mariano Savelski; Paris von Lockette; Stephanie Farrell; Yusuf Mehta; William Riddell

esteem, teamwork and leadership skills.AcknowledgementThis project is being funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF EEC#0353744) and Rowan University.References[1] Jahan, K., J. Everett, R. P. Hesketh , P. Jannson and K. Hollar (2004) “Environmental Education forAll Engineers”, Water Science and Technology, 49(8).[2] Jahan, K., J. Everett, R. P. Hesketh , P. Jannson and K. Hollar (2003) “Environmental Education forAll Engineers”, Proceedings of the IWA Environmental Engineering Education Conference, Zurich,Switzerland, Sept. 23-27.[3] Jahan, K., G. Tang, S. Gatling and K. Freeman (2003) “Undergaduate Research Experiences inPollution Prevention” Proceedings of the Mid-Atlantic ASEE Fall Conference, Baltimore, MD.[4] K. Jahan

Conference Session

A Renaissance in NRE Programs

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Sukesh Aghara; Irvin Osborn-Lee

Development of a Nuclear Engineering Program at Prairie View A&M University, a Historically Black University (HBCU) S. Aghara,a* I. Osborne-Lee a and Mehran Visehb , Richard Wilkinsc a Department of Chemical Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX/ b Department of Computer Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX c Department of Electrical Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TXAbstract Prairie View A&M University (PVAMU), one of the nation’s leading HistoricallyBlack Universities (HBCUs), in 2002

Conference Session

Distance & Service Learning, K-12, Web & Work-Based Projects

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Leijun Li; John Pan; Ismail Fidan

, Texas A&M University/Kingsville, and University of Kansas.Bibliographical Information1. J. A. Lee, D. M. Castella, and S. G. Middleton, “Faculty Perceptions of Academe’s Evaluation System,” Journal of Engineering Education, 263-267 (July 1997).2. K. A. Higley and C. M. Marianno, “Making Engineering Education Fun,” Journal of Engineering Education, 90 (1), 105-107 (January 2001).3. B. G. Davis, Tools for Teaching, Jossey-Bass Publishers, p.100, 1993.4. M. O. Haggler and W. M. Marcy, “Strategies for Designing Engineering Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, 88 (1) 1, 11-13 (1999).5. J. A. Lynn, “Distance Education Options for Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Mary Stephen; Jerry Weinberg

Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco, CA.6. Huges, J., King, V., Rodden, T., and Anderson, H. (1995) “the Role of Ethnography in Interactive Systems Design,” Interactions, 2(2) 56-65.7. Rose, A., Shneiderman, B., and Plaisant, C. (1995) “An Applied Ethnographic Method for Redesigning User Interfaces,” Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques (DIS ’95), G. Olson & S. Schuaon, eds., ACM Press, 115-122.8. Simonsen, J., and Kensing, F. 919970 “Using Ethnography in Contextual Design”, Communications of the ACM, 40(7), 82-87.9. Mueller, J., and Kuhn, S. (1993) “Participatory Design”, Communications of the ACM, 36(6) 24-28.10. Rettig, M. (1994) “Prototyping for Tiny Fingers”, Communications