. 10[22] Bloom B. S., 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I:The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.[23] Pohl, M., 2000. Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: Models and Strategies to Develop a Classroom Culture of Thinking. Cheltenham, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow.[24] Delgado, J. P. and Greer, R. D., 2009. “The Effects of Peer Monitoring Training on the Emergence of the Capability to Learn from Observing Instruction Received by Peers”. The Psychological Record. 59, 407–434.[25] Greer, R. D. 2002. Designing teaching strategies: An Applied Behavior Analysis Systems Approach. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.[26] Greer, R. D., Singer-Dudek, J., and Gautreaux, G. G., 2006. “Observational Learning
. 2012, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.652929.[18] G. Goldschmidt, “Linkographic Evidence for Concurrent Divergent and Convergent Thinking in Creative Design,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 115–122, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2016.1162497.[19] L. T. B. Tran, N. T. Ho, and R. J. Hurle, “Teaching for Creativity Development: Lessons Learned from a Preliminary Study of Vietnamese and International Upper (High) Secondary School Teachers’ Perceptions and Lesson Plans,” Creat. Educ., vol. 07, no. 07, pp. 1024–1043, 2016, doi: 10.4236/ce.2016.77107.[20] J. Teng, X. Wang, K. Lu, X. Qiao, and N. Hao, “Domain-specific and Domain-general Creativity Differences between Expert and Novice Designers,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 34, no
racial and ethnic groups: Indicator 24: STEM degrees. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/indicator_reg.asp[3] Adams, P., Delgado Solorzano, X., Lo, W., Gattis, C., & Popp, J. (2020, June). Closing the STEM Labor Gap through a Path to Graduation for Low Income, Rural Students. Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2—34291[4] Gattis, C., Delgado Solorzano, X., Nix, D., Popp, J., Cleary, M., Lo, W., Hill, B., & Adams, P. (2019, June). Work in Progress: A Path to Graduation: Helping First-Year Low Income, Rural STEM Students Succeed. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260
. Oman, C. E. Thoresen, T. G. Plante, and T. Flinders, “Cultivating mindfulness: Effects on well-being,” J. Clin. Psychol., vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 840–862, 2008.[5] T. Duncan, P. Pintrich, D. Smith, and W. J. Mckeachie, “Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire manual,” no. August. pp. 1–79, 2015.[6] T. Perez, J. G. Cromley, and A. Kaplan, “The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 315–329, 2014.[7] B. M. Gadzella, “Student-Life Stress Inventory: identification of and reactions to stressors,” Psychol. Rep., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 395–402, 1994.[8] Z. Ivcevic and M. Brackett, “Predicting school success: Comparing conscientiousness
, https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325[2] U. Bronfenbrenner, “The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments in Nature and Design,” Harvard University Press, 1979.[3] S. Liu, P. Hallinger, and D. Feng, “Supporting the Professional Learning of Teachers in China: Does Principal Leadership Make a Difference?, Teaching and Teach. Ed., vol. 59, pp. 79-91, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.023[4] G. B. Willis, “Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design,” SAGE Publications, 2004.[5] O. C. Robinson, “Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide, Qual. Res. in Psych., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 25-41, 2014.
measure changes in self-efficacy across both genders betweenpre- and post-surveys, and analyze gender-specific impacts of WebTA on programmingself-efficacy. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to understand student experiences andperceptions of WebTA feedback.Funding AcknowledgementThe work presented in this article was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)under Grant No. 2142309. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNSF.References 1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company. 2. Kinnunen, P., & Simon, B. (2012). My program is ok – am I? Computing
engineering. In Year 1, 56% of participants were from non-R1 universities, and 67%belonged to underrepresented minority groups (UMG) in STEM. In Year 2, 67% of participants werefrom non-R1 universities, and 44% were UMG. After the summer of 2024, REU Students were asked to rank the following six programcomponents: a) Integrated learning communities, b) Weekly Research, c) Field Trips, d) My WindResearch Video, e) Poster Presentation and f) Conference Attendance. Their top rankings were field trips,research projects, and integrated learning communities tend to be ranked higher because they provideopportunities for networking, hands-on learning, and collaboration. Weekly seminars were consistentlyranked lower due to their perceived lack of
Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 185–207, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01056.x.[11] T. L. Derting, D. Ebert-May, T. P. Henkel, J. M. Maher, B. Arnold, and H. A. Passmore, “Assessing faculty professional development in STEM higher education: Sustainability of outcomes,” Sci. Adv., vol. 2, no. 3, p. e1501422, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501422.
Paper ID #16071Evaluation of Interactive and Inter-connected Software in UndergraduateRenewable Energy CoursesMr. Amjad Aman, University of Central Florida Amjad Aman is a PhD candidate at the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida. His research interests include fuel cells, fuel cell materials, perovskites and numerical modeling.Prof. Nina Orlovskaya, University of Central Florida Prof. Nina Orlovskaya is an Associate Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Uni- versity of Central Florida. Her research interests are in field of ceramics for energy
Page 24.1315.6Figure 2: Consolidated data from 3 focus group sessions5. Future WorkUser studies and the design of the IMODTM system is still ongoing, and will be further describedin future publications. The next steps will include more focus groups and further analysis of thedata collected. We will also conduct user interviews which will consist of: a) an ethnographic-style observation of an interviewee doing his or her own curriculum design activities while weobserve him or her; and b) follow-up with open and close-ended questions for further clarificationof the observations.AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support for this project under the National ScienceFoundation's Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science
Publishing, 2019.[7] C. B. Muller, S. Blake-Beard, S. J. Barsion, and C. M. Wotipka, “Learning from the experiences of women of color in MentorNet’s one-on-one program,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 315-335, 2012.[8] M. Ashtiani and C. Feliciano, “Access and mobilization: how social capital relates to low- income youth’s postsecondary educational (PSE) attainment,” Youth & Society, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 439-461, 2018.[9] M. Karp, S. Ackerson, and I. Cheng, “Effective advising for postsecondary students: a practice guide for educators,” What Works Clearinghouse [Online], 2021. Available: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/28.[10] G. Achenbach, L. J. Barker, and L. D
. Northwood. "Hands-on experiences in engineering classes: the need, the implementation and the results." World Trans. on Engng. and Technol. Educ 15, no. 1 (2017): 12-18.8. Goodwin, Graham C., Adrian M. Medioli, Willy Sher, Ljubo B. Vlacic, and James S. Welsh. "Emulation-based virtual laboratories: A low-cost alternative to physical experiments in control engineering education." IEEE Transactions on Education 54, no. 1 (2010): 48-55.9. Diana Restifo. 2021. “Best Free Virtual Labs.” TechLearningMagazine. July 21, 2021. https://www.techlearning.com/news/best-free-virtual-labs.10. Bongiovanni, Emily. n.d. “Library Guides: Open Educational Resources: Simulations and Virtual Labs.” Libguides.mines.edu. https://libguides.mines.edu/oer
best practices drawn from the literature of Human Resources andwill consider adoption of concepts of Agile Engineering practices to provide a more uniformlypositive and enriching student experience.AcknowledgmentThis research was supported with funding from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] National Science Foundation https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5257[2] Vernaza, K.M., Vitolo, T., Steinbrink, S. and Brinkman, B. “Building Excellence: ServiceLearning in the SEECS Program, an NSF S-STEM Sponsored Project,” Proceedings of the
. Pintrich P.R. (2000) Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology [Internet]. American Psychological Association. 92(3):544–55.4. Husman J. & Lens W. (1999) The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist. Taylor & Francis. 34(2):113–25.5. Markus H. & Nurius P. (1986) Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. doi:10.1037//0003- Page 24.261.7 066X.41.9.954 CAREER: Student Motivation and Learning in Engineering6. Kirn A., Morkos B. & Benson L. (2012) Work in Progress: How Differences
as non-white, more than 25%have an individualized education plan, and English language learners consist of 18%. Whileworking with the teachers, we appointed youth leaders who were representative of the studentbody and displayed patience, curiosity and camaraderie with others. Youth leaders will bere-elected each year and students in lower grades have already expressed interest in participating.Below is a breakdown of the youth leader demographics. School School A School B % not male 60% 80% % not White 80% 40% Languages spoken English and Spanish English, Albanian, Spanish, NepaliStarting
Publications, Inc, 2012.[17] E. Zerbe, G. M. Sallai, K. Shanachilubwa, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Engineering graduate students' critical events as catalysts of attrition,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 868– 888, 2022.[18] B. A. Burt, “Toward a theory of engineering professional intentions: The role of research group experiences,” American Education Research Journal, vol. 56, ed. 2, pp. 289-332, 2019.[19] B. N. Böke, D. J. Mills, J. Mettler, and N. L. Heath, “Stress and coping patterns of university students,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 60, ed. 1, pp. 85-103, 2019.[20] F. . D., Ampaw and A. J. Jaeger, “Completing the three stages of doctoral education: An event
academic environments, between minoritized and non-minoritized students [3,4].Minoritized students (MS), as defined in the work, identify as having African American orLatinx racial / ethnic backgrounds. Pervasive research continues to reveal that MS students aremore likely than their counterparts to attrit from STEM majors [5].Faculty play an important role in cultivating an inclusive academic culture both inside andoutside of the classroom [6]. To strengthen inclusive environments in STEM, faculty must beafforded the opportunity to participate in professional development that: a) contextualizes theexperiences of MS in STEM, b) provides them data (both qualitative and quantitative) aboutdegree completion disparities, c) shares resources, and
survey 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Knowledge Outcome Index (b) Figure 1. Pre and post survey results for knowledge outcomes: a) for CS470, Winter 2011; 2011 b) for EE440, Spring 2011. Similarly, the pre and post survey also measured the skill growth in CS470 and EE440. Table 3lists the specific skill outcomes (which are the same for both courses).Table 3. Skill sets evaluated via pre and post surveys in CS470 and EE440
AC 2012-3651: FROM THEORY TO IMPLEMENTATION: MEETING IN-DUSTRY NEEDS THROUGH UNIVERSITY AND COMMUNITY COL-LEGE COLLABORATION IN DIGITAL LOGIC DESIGNDr. Nasser Alaraje, Michigan Technological University Nasser Alaraje is currently the Electrical Engineering Technology Program Chair, as well as a fac- ulty member at Michigan Technological University. He taught and developed courses in the computer engineering technology area at the University of Cincinnati and Michigan Technological University. Alaraje’s research interests focus on processor architecture, System-on-Chip design methodology, Field- Programmable Logic Array (FPGA) architecture and design methodology, engineering technology ed- ucation, and hardware
laboratory,experimental results have to berecorded. Tables for data collectionwill be uploaded on the computers. Figure 3. Virtual cut-Repeated experiments will yield off machine: (a)subtly different values in order to Virtual machine, andmake the virtual results more realistic. (b) A real one.4. To make the virtual lab user-friendly, PowerPoint was developedthat can be used to easily navigatethrough the virtual lab environmentand link to resources.The PowerPoint files also include links to the theory behind
course they tutor with an A or B. Tutors are selected based on theiracademic history, previous tutoring experience, and faculty or instructor references. All tutorsare required to complete GEEKS training which includes instruction about effective ways totutor and how to differentiate the needs of students. Required weekly meetings provide tutors anopportunity to visit with advisors and other GEEKS tutors to discuss successful strategies andways to improve the tutoring provided. Tutors work closely with course instructors to ensure thatthey are prepared to tutor students in the areas being covered in classes. When possible,additional opportunities are provided for tutors to be well informed and prepared. For example,in fall 2011, tutors for
al., “A survey on deep learning hardware accelerators for heterogeneous hpc platforms,” ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv230615552, 2023.[2] Kapor Center, “The Culturally Responsive-Sustaining Computer Science Education Framework.,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaporcenter.org/equitableCS/[3] CAST, “Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2,” 2018, [Online]. Available: http://udlguidelines.cast.org[4] N. Ismail, “Inquiry based learning: A new approach to classroom learning”.[5] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press, 2014.[6] L. C. B. C. Ferreira, O. C. Branquinho, P. R. Chaves, P. Cardieri, F. Fruett, and M. D. Yacoub, “A PBL-Based Methodology for IoT
Models in Engineering Design: A Review,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 144, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053859[4] H. A. Simon, “The structure of ill structured problems,” Artificial Intelligence, 4(3-4), 181- 201, 1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8[5] M. L. Maher, and J. Poon, “Modeling design exploration as co‐evolution,” Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(3), 195-209, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.1996.tb00323.x[6] B. Lawson, How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Architectural Press, 1997.[7] J. S. Gero and J. Milovanovic, “A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains
their first year instead of transferring in theirsecond year or later. The success mentioned here is measured as receiving a grade of A or B or Cin a mathematics course in the semester the research was conducted. On the other hand, it isdesirable for a community college to have a student transfer to a four-year institution only afterreceiving an associate degree, and this normally happens if the student spends two years in thecommunity college. A transfer student from a community college without an associate degreefrom that community college does not bring much credit or recognition for the efforts made bythat community college. As a result, the community colleges are reluctant to let their studentsmove to a four-year college only after one
experience or familiarity with this program component, or your school does not have it, please circle “0.” a. Summer Bridge Program 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Very ineffective Very effective b. Freshman Orientation “Success Course” for Engineering Students 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Very ineffective Very effective c. Tutoring 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Very ineffective Very effective d. Project-Based (or Problem-Based
hands. However,different groups of teams were provided with different levels of scaffolding based on a 2x2factorial design of two independent variables: the scaffolding for social interaction processes andthe scaffolding for cognitive processes. As a result, four different interventions were provided tostudent teams in four different groups. While the assignment, requirement, and grading criterionfor the team collaborative learning were also developed and provided to all groups of studentteams, Group A was taken as the control group without providing any scaffolding, Group B wasprovided with the social scaffolding only, Group C was offered with the cognitive scaffolding,and Group D was given with both social and cognitive scaffolding. Those
this project).All in all, we have made much progress towards the aforementioned goals. Specifically, A. Creation, paper-writing, as well as publication efforts have focused on stochastic optimal control problems for electric power generation and transmission projects, engineering design projects, supply chain procurement projects. B. The elementary teaching module was revised to become more compact and self-contained in IE 305 for Spring 2017 and Fall 2017, leading to a more effective and efficient introduction of decision making for CEP’s to many students. C. The advanced engineering economy course, IE 405, was taught in Spring 2017. This course is no longer experimental (that is, it was IE 405X in
Paper ID #16104Efficacy of Macroethics Education in EngineeringDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also
. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368.2. Johri, A. and Olds, B. M. (2011), Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100: 151–185. doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2011.tb00007.x3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. National Academy Press Washington, DC.4. Engle, R (2012). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts, and continuing developments. Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning. London: Taylor & Francis, 2012.5. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding
research programs and I have always seen this frustration happen but then it turns into understanding and then it turns into productivity. I just want to make sure we don’t “throw the baby out with the bathwater.” I want my voice be heard as a proponent of the research part of the program.By acknowledging the challenge of narrowing the gap between subject matters and research, oneteacher suggested a better “match” between teachers and faculty mentors in terms of their subjectand research areas. b. Overall Program Satisfaction by Teacher Participants To see the effectiveness and its impact of the RET program, we have conductedassessment through surveys and interviews to understand whether and what they have