scheduled design review days.Although this approach was not expected to provide students with as personal of an experienceinteracting with their partner as seen with other successful service-learning approaches in theliterature [4,5], it intended to minimize logistical challenges and provide reflection opportunitieswhere students could consider themselves in the role of the kid for which they were designing.The course was divided into three phases: (1) individual phase where students used CADsoftware to mock up potential solutions, (2) group design phase where students were grouped inteams based on shared ideas and worked to flesh out a design for fabrication, (3) groupmanufacturing phase where each group member adapted a specific role towards
important to understand youraudience. Selecting the game-based activity that best accomplishes your learning goals shouldgo hand in hand with an activity that aligns with the interests of the participants. For instance,certain individuals do not engage well with competitive type games. In this case, use of acooperative game would be better suited for the class environment [9].Debriefing is a vital aspect of game-based learning strategies as it provides feedback to helplearners reflect on their experience and understand how games can improve overall instructionaleffectiveness [12]. Hays describes three phases of debriefing including self-reflection about thegame experience, guided reflection on their individual experiences and personal meanings
. • The result of a departmental initiative requiring staff to write Learning Objectives for each course highlighted the unfamiliarity and reluctance felt by many staff in engaging with the process of reframing their teaching in this way.It is suggested that a major contributing factor to each of these issues, is the lack ofunderstanding and acknowledgement by engineering academic staff of the usefulness ofeducational “tools” and theory linking, for example, Learning Objectives andAssessment.Nature of the problemIt is suggested that the over-arching problem that needs addressing is how to leadacademics in a research-led university to reflect on their teaching practice with the aid
these panels.Use of student journalsAn important element in teaching is the opportunity to reflect on the teaching experience.Participants are given an opportunity for reflection through required journals at various points inthe class. The five required journal assignments are: Journal 1 - Reflection on outstanding college professors - Name four adjectives that you feel define an outstanding college professor. Thinking back to outstanding college professors you've encountered in the past, cite at least one specific example of actions that exemplify each of the four adjectives. Journal 2 – Learning theories - Choose the learning theory/model (Felder Soloman, Myers
engineering). As the class progressed through the semester actionswere taken to minimize the influence of these factors on student success. However, inspite of the corrective actions the final grades of the two groups showed distinctdivergence. This prompted the authors to explore Kolb’s Learning Style Theory toinvestigate possible psychological variances among the two groups. The results of thisstudy shows that the Engineering students tend to have a penchant for ‘AbstractConceptualization’ over ‘Concreteness’, while Management students had a preference for‘Active Experimentation’ over ‘Reflection’. Relevant data supporting this finding alongwith a statistical interpretation are provided here. Introduction The
students and "More Knowledgeable Others" (e.g.teachers, parents, coaches, peers, experts, etc.)4. The classroom must become more active andengaging. When the students in the course becomes more involved and the professor puts morethought into the course the desired outcome is quite likely. Dee Fink in his workshops across thecountry states that there are two methods engaged teachers can utilize to add meaning to theexperience. “One is by helping students learn about additional things, e.g., about themselves,about others, about learning.2 Students survey responses reflect that they prefer to see onlinecourse-management systems, like WebCT and Blackboard, operate faster and be moreinteractive, presenting things in video or audio formats. The course
interaction. Learningis largely mediated by social interaction of students and "More Knowledgeable Others" (e.g.teachers, parents, coaches, peers, experts, etc.)4. The classroom must become more active andengaging. When the students in the course becomes more involved and the professor puts morethought into the course the desired outcome is quite likely. Dee Fink in his workshops across thecountry states that there are two methods engaged teachers can utilize to add meaning to theexperience. “One is by helping students learn about additional things, e.g., about themselves,about others, about learning.2 Students survey responses reflect that they prefer to see onlinecourse-management systems, like WebCT and Blackboard, operate faster and be
stirring rods and in a developing for quantitatively measuring the reflectivity of thesurface. Arguably the most significant contribution in the paper was showing that trace gascompositions in the furnace air can lead to tarnishing of the glass surface. Faraday showed thattrace amounts of CO reduced the lead oxide at the surface of the glass. The method used byFaraday for measuring the reflectivity is shown in the figure below. The intensity of the shadowfrom a lights source at a distance D2 is matched with the intensity of the shadow from the lightsource reflected from the glass measured at distance D1. Faraday showed that 8.5 YO of the lightwas reflected for his optical glass consisting of silica, boric acid, and lead oxide compared to 3.8%for
communication systems • Calculate signal attenuation, dispersion, and optical reflection loss through a fiber span; • Carry out Fiber-Optic measurements; • Design fiber-optic communication systems.Course Contents The topics are grouped into three main sections: transmission medium (optical fiber), opticaldevices, and fiber optic communication systems. The outline of the course is listed below4. • Fundamentals of Fiber Optics • Optical Fibers • Optical Sources o Light-emitting diode o Semiconductor lasers • Transmitters • Receivers • Optical Amplifiers, Repeaters and Regenerators • Passive Optical Components • Fiber Optic Measurements: o power loss, OTDR, CD, PMD, BERT
learning theoryand apply to a course in civil engineering. In order to achieve a new paradigm of the computer-based learning in engineering education, the approach utilizes wireless technology along withPen-based Tablet PC used by the instructor and the students in the classroom. This enables a newlearning environment called “Paperless Classroom.”The ELT is a learning theory that describes learning as a four-step cycle based upon theorthogonal relationship of two continuums of cognitive growth and learning2, 3. Kolb describesexperiential learning proceeds through four modes: Concrete Experience (CE), AbstractConceptualization (AC), Reflective Observation (RO), and Active Experimentation (AE) basedon how people obtain knowledge and develop2. To
potentialresponses. Each potential response will influence four metrics that record participant behaviorwithin the environment. The first metric is time, represented by a clock that changes as decisionsare made. The other three metrics are safety, personal reputation, and output. Performance onthese metrics is shown by an icon that indicates relative performance (i.e, a smile indicates goodperformance, a frown indicates negative performance, etc.). Within the virtual environment,participants are also given reflection prompts that seek to better understand the conditions thatmight have influenced their decisions. Reflection prompts were designed in alignment withKohlberg’s moral development theory and include pre-conventional, conventional, and post
more broadly?We are answering these questions through a two-phase qualitative study. Phase I leverages bothcollaborative inquiry and collaborative autoethnography, guiding our exploration of our livedexperiences and respective academic cultures. Initially focusing on our own experiences, as earlycareer engineering education faculty, allows a deeper understanding of our experiences, bothgood and bad, that may not be revealed in a less intimate approach. The longitudinal nature ofour approach also makes it possible for us to document and reflect on our experiences and howwe navigate obstacles. Phase II will use constant comparative methods to expand and refinePhase I findings through a series of semi-structured interviews with 12-15 additional
to provide for rich classroom discussions and allow students to reflect onimportant topics they will likely face in their careers with the advent of new biomedicaltechnologies. Topics such as equal access to healthcare, ethical issues surrounding gene editing,and understanding how a user’s background or culture can affect their healthcare needs/desireswill all be discussed and considered throughout our curriculum directly alongside technicaltopics. This approach will allow us to more specifically address the new ABET outcomes(particularly Outcome 2) that call for more integration between social and technical elements.Our first students will not officially begin the BME track until the fall of 2020, but we arepiloting our biomechanics and
Online Learning Environments through Intelligent Fast Failure (IFF)AbstractIn this paper, we address the stimulation of creativity in online learning environments throughour examination of a simple hands-on task aimed at teaching the principles of Intelligent FastFailure (IFF) in the context of a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) focused on creativity,innovation, and change. A simple physical “prototyping” exercise involving common householdobjects was designed and presented to a global community of online learners using the CourseraMOOC platform. Data gathered from the task outcomes and student reflections were analyzedwith respect to gender and cultural differences, as well as correlations between the number ofattempts
learning styles and levels of motivation. Both modules begin with an instrument(learning style inventory or motivation questionnaire), then a tutorial that gives students a firsthand experience of the influence of learning style or motivation, then questions of understanding,then a tutorial about learning style or motivation strategies, then reflection questions, and finallyan evaluation of the module.Learning Styles Module The learning styles module begins with a Barsch learning styleinventory2. This module creates the “first hand experience” by asking students to learn materialthat is presented in different learning styles. It presents tutorials on mitosis and Punnett squares
from the other by uniformly scaling (enlarging or shrinking), possibly withadditional translation, rotation and reflection. This means that either object can be rescaled,repositioned, and reflected, so as to coincide precisely with the other object. Figure 1. Similarity TransformationAffine Transformation - A mapping from one vector space to another, consisting of a linear part,expressed as a matrix multiplication, and an additive part, an offset or translation. Figure 2. Affine TransformationProjective Transformation - A transformation of space that sends points into points, lines intolines, planes into planes, and any two incident elements into two incident elements
practice and reflection [11].Pilot StudyThe first year of this study we conducted initial interviews with teachers who had previouslyparticipated in a summer camp with primarily Latinx middle school students. The summer campinvolved 3 in-service teachers, 5 graduate students, and 8 undergraduate students working asSTEM summer camp facilitators for 77 middle school students. The pilot study focused on the 3in-service teachers as they navigated working with students in both formal and informal spaces.The goal of the pilot study was to generate some information of in-service teachers’ perceptionsof funds of knowledge and the strategies that teachers used in understanding and elicitingstudents' funds of knowledge. This pilot study served as the
last twoyears. It will also present and discuss the impact of having multiple teams all working on theirown team project as opposed to having the whole class work together on the same large project.The paper will discuss scheduling and implementation problems, evaluation procedures, peercollaboration in problem solving and conflict resolution, students’ attitude toward using projectsas an instructional tool, and instructor reflections on the process. Suggestions for improvementfrom both an instructor and a student perspective will be included.IntroductionThe benefits of employing collaboration in the classroom are well known1. In addition, advisoryboard members, prospective employers, and industrial partners have been expressing the desireto
relevant to their interests.13 Each of these successes enhances learners’perceptions of self-competence, content self-efficacy, and motivation to learn more.Educational research has expanded the concept of scaffolding to encompass “surface” and“deep” learning as part of instructional design and development.14, 15 A consistent finding amongthe research studies is that higher quantity and quality of learning outcomes are related to thepresence of deeper supports for learning and instruction.16 When the instructional methodincludes self-directed learning, group discussion and reflection to promote and/or challenge idea,students were more likely to adopt a deep approach to learning, to take responsibility fordetermining their learning goals, and to
designers use to generate multiple, diverse design concepts? What heuristics are evident in their concepts? ≠ How did the heuristics impact design outcomes? ≠ What level of conscious reflection do designers have about the use of these heuristics within their own cognitive processes?Research MethodsThe methodology for the study included think-aloud protocol during the design task, followed byretrospective interviews. Data from engineers of various levels of experience were collected toilluminate decisions made in generating and developing concepts. Atman and Bursic19 noted thatresearchers have effectively used verbal protocol studies to identify how designers introduce
the beginning of the course and at the end that focuses on theirconfidence in teaching the subject. The quantitative data from the survey will be enhanced bythe second part of the assessment, that of written reflective journaling. Teachers will be askedto reflect on their perception of their confidence in teaching and how participation in the courseenhanced (or did not enhance) their confidence. Teachers will also be asked to reflect onlearning in their classroom that resulted from implementation of content and pedagogicalstrategies gained through their participation in the course. These reflections will be posted on thecourse management system for review by all participants and will be included in the materialsdeveloped as a result of the
Criteria now requires that program constituentsare involved in the strategic planning process. In the Self-Study Questionnaire, the ABETdefinition of well-defined processes necessary to administer engineering programs is: “Processes for all elements of criteria are quantitatively understood and controlled; clearly tied to mission, program objectives, and constituent needs; seen as benchmarks by other institutions.”Using the current ABET Criteria, a program emphasis should now reflect participation byprogram constituents. Typical differences in constituents include, but are not limited to: • Number and interests of the faculty. • Amount and type of research. • Number and academic preparation of students
].Fundamental Cognitive Capacities According to Bandura human cognitive capacities that can predict individual’sperformance include ability to use symbols, learning through observation, planning, self-regulation, and self-reflection [1]. A brief description of each of these human cognitivecapacities follows. Ability to Use Symbols. By the use of symbols, humans transform immediate visualexperiences into internal cognitive models that in turn serve as guides for their actions. Throughsymbolizing, people also ascribe meaning, form and duration to their past experiences. Learning Through Observations. Learning can also occur indirectly by observing otherpeople’s behavior and its outcomes. Individuals’ capacity to learn by observation
movements and light (vision) data collection. Studentshaving trouble with NXT programming would generally not be able to progress toLabVIEW programming. NASA uses graphical programming (LabView) for control anddata collection in critical missions. A special exercise has been implemented to mimicthe NASA Mars Pathfinder operating principles. The exercise aims to teach theprinciples of robotic vision and data communication. The goal is to illustrate thegraphical programming control of vision via reflectivity measurement and datacommunication to third party computing environment such as Excel.Lego NXT block programming is used to measure reflectivity changes as a function ofelapsed time. Vision requires reflectivity measurements. The program reads
and cracks a low power (2mW) Helium-Neon(HeNe) laser source has been used. Due to relatively high wavelength of the red photons irradiated from the HeNelaser source, the incident laser beam possesses a very high level of reflectivity and negligible penetration.The experiments listed in this paper explore unique optical methods using a line laser. The advantage for using thistype of laser is that it generates low energy red photons having about two to three electron-volt energy andpossessing perfect reflectivity. The low energy photons have negligible low penetration. The paper explains amethodology for non-contact measurement of radius of curvature on the finished surface of manufactured parts. Inaddition, a hybrid approach consisting of
systematic fashion?"(p.82) The concept of theory as the foundation for practice suggests that theory should be applied topractice of teaching and learning. This theory is the body of knowledge that has been generated by aprocedural scientific research. Thus, scientific knowledge is the basis of practice. Aldus Huxley hassaid that pursuit of theoretical knowledge may lead us to practice, but practicing without theory maynot reverse generate a relevant theory. Similarly Darkenwald and Merriam (1982) profess, "Theorywithout practice leads to empty idealism, and action without philosophical reflection is mindlessactivism". [2] Theory in practice is a view slightly different from the others in regard to the relationship oftheory to
Session 2247 Evolution of a Journal Carole E. Goodson, Susan L. Miertschin College of Technology, University of HoustonSince the inaugural issue of the Journal of Engineering Technology in 1984, the publication hascontinued to evolve, reflecting the culture of the various Engineering Technology (ET)disciplines. The Journal (JET) was conceived at the 1981 Engineering Technology LeadershipInstitute (ETLI) at Arizona State University in Tempe, AZ by a focus group that consisted ofLarry Wolf, Durward Huffman, Mike O’Hair, Ron Scott and Ken
, and the Department secretary will be responsible for reminding faculty tocollect the material and will organize and file the materials.Each portfolio is divided into sections. These sections are: • a table of contents • an introductory statement of purpose for the portfolio and an overview of material included • a reflection on or evaluation of portfolio contents and outcome(s) measured by faculty members • student materials.A typical table of contents contains the following sections: introduction and statement ofpurpose, reflection on and evaluation of content, and student materials and summaries ofevaluation forms. Following is a typical introduction and statement of purpose; this example isfrom the
included in Graph #1. This is a study of current median salary of all RIT ET graduates (or of the national engineering graduate salaries) vs. years since graduation. The data is based on salaries reported as of early 1997, reflecting 1996 salaries. Graph #1, Salary of Graduates in Thousands of Dollars Comparison of RIT ET Graduates and National Engineering Salaries Page 3.311.3 3 Salary Median Years $80,000.00 $70,000.00 RIT ET
modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts; the design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners.Kyungki Kim, University of Nebraska, LincolnProf. Catherine Armwood-Gordon, Tennessee State University Dr. Catherine Armwood is Interim Chair and Associate Professor of Civil and Architectural Engineering at Tennessee State University. She is passionate in Engineering Education and Workforce Development of Underrepresented Minorities. She also conducts research in cementitious materials and structural resilience under extreme loading. ©American Society for