learning, STEM integration, engineering education, curriculum development, and self-efficacy.Dyanne Baptiste Porter, Georgia Institute of Technology Dyanne Baptiste Porter is a postdoctoral research fellow at Georgia Tech Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). Prior to earning her Ph.D. in Mathematics Education, she taught high school mathematics for eight years. Her research interests include interdisciplinary mathematics teaching and learning, equitable teaching and learning practices in STEM, and increasing representation in advanced mathematical sciences.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is a Associate Director and Principal Research
bothlove to work directly with students through in-person instruction, but know that at an institutionof this size we need to provide quality instruction in other ways as well.Course-based Live InstructionEach of our departments offers a Senior Design class with 50-100 students each. The library iscurrently integrated into the Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering classes. Thosetwo departments are Jon's liaison assignments. Jon, working with the faculty and from the notesof his predecessors, has taught these classes solo this first year in a lecture-style format thatbriefly discusses the different types of information that can be found in the various forms ofengineering literature, as well as best practices in searching. Over the
starting stage. Whilevarious methods such as flyers, web pages, school visits have been tested, it is apparent that thedirect communication between faculty members and potential candidates is the most effective inrecruiting.3Community Support and ArticulationLocal community welcomes technical education programs. When we were setting-up an advisoryboard, 16 people representing the middle or upper management of local industries, technicalschool as well as the chamber of commerce enthusiastically attended the advisory meetings twicein a period of six months. Advisory members provided supportive comments and ideas torecruitment, curriculum, and placement. They played a positive role in publicizing the program.Some of the advisory board members advised
students, exploratory factor analyses identified an underlying factor structure of thescale with 38 items loaded onto one of five factors (Leadership Opportunity, Team Motivation,Engineering Practice, Innovative Changes, and Ethical Actions and Integrity), along with goodreliability evidence.I. Introduction “Our aspiration is to shape the engineering curriculum for 2020 so as to be responsive to the disparate learning styles of different student populations and attractive for all those seeking a full and well-rounded education that prepares a person for a creative and productive life and positions of leadership” (p. 52)1.As we face rapid changes in technology, society, and the world, the National Academy ofEngineering
team members. In anonymous evalua-tions, the students commented that “I liked the team thing as an idea. It didn’t work out for methough because I had a hard time with my partners. I do think in the future, team design is agood idea.” Or “Groups of peopled helped but caused many disagreements which slowed downprogress. Although the thought of putting people together was a good one.” The extended historyof the studio as a collaborative one aids in the development of teamwork because it generallyexcludes students who are determined to undermine the concept.ConclusionThe metaphor, changing the culture of the curriculum, may seem slightly pedantic; however,methods of teaching have been passed from generation to generation in the most
has been supported by theNanotechnology in Undergraduate Education (NUE) program at the National ScienceFoundation. The first NanoCORE program was successfully completed during January 2009through December 2010, and the NanoCORE II program extended the project efforts duringJanuary 2011 through December 2012.The FAMU-FSU College of Engineering is home to a diverse student body where 42% of theundergraduate student population belongs to traditionally under-represented groups. TheNanoCORE program introduces and integrates nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) aspermanent components of the core undergraduate engineering curricula, presents multipleopportunities for undergraduate learning of concepts in nanoscale science and engineering
Paper ID #24692How Songbirds Learn to Sing Provides Suggestions for Designing Team Projectsfor Computing CoursesDr. Ashwin Satyanarayana, New York City College of Technology Dr. Ashwin Satyanarayana is currently an Associate Professor with the Department of Computer Systems Technology, New York City College of Technology (CUNY). Prior to this, Dr. Satyanarayana was a Research Scientist at Microsoft in Seattle from 2006 to 2012, where he worked on several Big Data problems including Query Reformulation on Microsoft’s search engine Bing. He holds a PhD in Computer Science (Data Mining) from SUNY, with particular emphasis
, aerospace, defense, pharmaceuticals,healthcare and consulting with an emphasis on industrial distribution and business to businesschannels.There is greater demand for students to enter the major than the major can currentlyaccommodate. One of the reasons that this is the case is the extent to which the program hasbeen able to integrate ideas of engaged scholarship into the curriculum by considering multiplestakeholders of the program.The depicted diagram in Figure 1. shows the relationship between the various services performedin the program as a cycle of engagement. The whole point is emphasizing how the variouscomponents of teaching and research are mutually reinforcing and enhance both the educationalexperience offered to students, and the skill
also an Assistant Professor in the General Engineering Department and Civil Engineer- ing Department where he teaches the First-Year Engineering Program course Introduction to Engineering and Design. He is the Director of Vertically Integrated Projects at NYU. His Vertically Integrated Projects course is on Smart Cities Technology with a focus on transportation. His primary focus is developing curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based cur- riculum, first-year engineering, and transportation. He is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and is the Webmaster for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engi- neering Experience
The extent to which a first-year engineering student ‘‘defines the self through a James, W. Identification role or performance in engineering” (p. 1342) (1892/1968)58Fleming (2013)28 Academic and “We focus on the cultural context in which the identity develops, namely the MSI Gee (2000)10, Social campus. Researchers have conducted studies on identity development of Carlone (2007)44 Integration engineering students, specifically. They found that three factors influence the development of an engineering identity, (1) how engineering is understood as a
Session 1566 Short-Term Course Assessment, Improvement, and Verification Feedback Loop Teodora Rutar and Greg Mason Seattle UniversityAbstractAn assessment-improvement feedback process is presented for improving the students’classroom learning experience. The new process uses multiple short surveys during the term toidentify strengths and weaknesses in a course curriculum and in an instructors teaching style.The surveys questions used in the process are derived directly from course educationalobjectives. The advantage of the new process is
[6], and the Working Model 2D and3D multibody code software from Knowledge Revolution [4]. A new course is being being developed aroundthese experiments, entitled “Experimental Model Based Control Design Using Multibody Codes”. Limitedversions of the experimental setups have, and will be used, in other senior electives at Cornell. To our knowledge, no other projects of this scope exist; there are several projects, however, which sharea similar philosophy. In [2], a laboratory is described where computer simulations are compared to actualmeasurements as integral parts of an undergraduate mechanics laboratory. It is argued quite convincingly inthis paper that simulations should not replace real experiments in the undergraduate curriculum
Module III aims to develop an entrepreneur view in theA. Module I: Inverted Classroom overall engineering economics curriculum. Specific plans Concept of inverted classroom is a key element in this include:proposed work. Research has shown that active learning breeds Link Risk Management topic with the Entrepreneurship.the best retention rates [1]. However, in order to do the type of Semester-long group project assignment focusing on a newactive learning proposed, the instructors must engage the product invention. Tasks will include but not limited to:principles of inverted classroom by recording lectures which o Market survey, feasibility analysis
programmes are regularly reviewed andevaluated in consultation with the industries and communities which it serves. The paper brieflyoutlines this review process with reference to various performance indicators and questionnairescompleted by freshmen, graduates, alumni and employer organisations and the assessment byquality assurance panels specially appointed for every programme offered. The paper focuses on the strategies followed to ensure continuous improvement of theteaching in the institution to promote student learning. These measures inter alia are the- selection of suitable faculty,- induction and development of faculty on an on-going basis,- proper curriculum design to reflect the specific and critical educational outcomes as required by
components from mask view 4. Function on 4.1 Designate team roles and assign and monitor specific tasks of team members. multidisciplinary teams 4.2 Function within an assigned role. 4.3 Resolve conflict within team. 5. Identify, formulate 5.1 Measure and document the effect of processes on device and component performance and solve engineering and physical characteristics. problems 5.2 Determine where uncertainties or problems occur in process flow and correct. Can perform analysis of process integration issues. 5.3 Identify relationships between unit processes and device characteristics. 6. Understanding of 6.1 Work
were then placed into one of two main themes/classifications inorder to answer the research questions. The first classification represented articles whose aimwas to identify the essential competencies that should be developed through an engineeringeducation, and the second theme of articles tended to define approaches for implementing thesecompetencies into education based curriculum or programming.ResultsThe following paragraphs elaborate upon the literature and each article’s relative positioning inthe themes focused on responding to the research questions in this paper.Theme 1: What are engineering Competencies?Five of the 23 articles were appropriate for the first theme, looking to identify essentialengineering competencies. Among the five
for a greater diversity oftraining setups to be utilized in a smaller area.IntroductionIn order to effectively teach instrumentation, mechatronic and robotic courses in an Engineeringor Engineering Technology curriculum, a variety of electromechanical laboratory setups aredesirable. [1] Exposing students to an assortment of technologies is also desirable, to give themas broad an experience as is reasonable. Thus, setups containing different sensors, effectors andactuators and indicators are needed. Quite often, the cost of such laboratory setups (or trainers) ishigh, thereby challenging the desire to have numerous full setups.To broaden the students’ programming capabilities, many programs teach such courses acrossboth microcontroller and
of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 13.3, pp. 144-152, 1999.[4] R. Luna, R. Hall, M. Hilgers, and L. Ge, “GIS Learning Tool for Civil Engineers,” Int. J.Engng Ed., vol. 26(1), pp. 52-58, 2010.[5] N. Bearman, N. Jones, I. Andre, H.A. Cachinho, and M. DeMers, “The Future Role of GISeducation in creating critical spatial thinkers,” Journal of Geography in Higher Education, vol.40(3), pp. 394-408, 2016.[6] W.H. Sprinsky, “Integrating Instruction in Geographic Information Systems with a CivilEngineering Technology Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 2002.[7] J. Komlos, S.L. Walkup, and K.A. Waters, “Modernizing an Introductory Civil EngineeringCourse with Project-Based
for their students.Questions regarding classroom implementation and viability for integration were also posed to theparticipants. For instance, 60 percent of the participating teachers indicated that they felt the levelof technical support was sufficient, meaning assistance with integration of the ‘COSMOSEducational Toolkit’ to the curriculum being developed. This was an important metric to capture,as the objective was centered on learning about different technical components of the toolkit andhow to leverage the kit for curricular content. However, a couple of teachers also indicated theywould prefer a greater amount of help during this phase, and another indicated a preference forworking more on their own, indicating some variation in
). This paper introduces one approach for integrating educational model currently being Page 5.277.1implemented in the Construction Management program at Zagazig University. In this approach,an integrated course has been developed at the undergraduate level that vertically integratesbasic construction management needs. Also, it presents openings to strengthen and exploitcommunication skills to prepare engineers for interdisciplinary projects and industry integratedneeds. This paper describes the primary constituents of this approach including the integrationof course, the cooperation required to support the communication emphasis, and
required collaboration with the Assistant Dean of Freshman Experience in theengineering college and the freshman engineering professors to define content, identify logisticproblems and solutions to those issues, and address the inherent challenges of teaching bothfreshmen and engineering students. Because of these different filters, the class was developed inconsideration of the ABET and ALA/ACRL/STS standards1. Additionally, ENGR 101 hasevolved over time through continued collaboration with the ENGR 101 professors.In spring 2011, an Information Literacy grant was given to the Assistant Dean of Engineering.This grant enabled the two engineering librarians to develop curriculum to be included in allENGR 101 classes to address library information
anddevelopment, and international initiatives dealing with nation building through educationand training. In spite of this historical leaning toward a "defacto" importance attributed to outreachactivities, the Pennsylvania State University has not previously integrated outreach as acritical element in matters concerning promotion and tenure. That is not the caseuniversally in other academic institutions. More formal definitions at Universities acrossthe country could and often do provide additional guidance for faculty striving to embracean insightful vision for outreach. In fact, some Universities have moved directly towardmaking the connection between outreach and promotion and tenure, documentingexpectations of outreach as an absolute pre
seen that both the quality of instruction and the quality of the course have improved.Since the instructor is not changed from one semester to another, these improvements areexplained with the embedment of engineering management topics to the original engineeringdesign curriculum. Nevertheless, compiled unsolicited student comments show an increase inthe number of positive teamwork relevant comments and in the number of positive design projectrelevant comments. Page 7.469.7 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society
in the state of Louisiana.Bill Elmore, Mississippi State University BILL ELMORE, Ph.D., P.E., is Associate Professor and Hunter Henry Chair, Mississippi State University. His teaching areas include the integrated freshman engineering and courses throughout the chemical engineering curriculum including unit operations laboratories and reactor design. His current research activities include engineering educational reform, enzyme-based catalytic reactions in micro-scale reactor systems, and bioengineering applied to renewable fuels and chemicals.Walter Bradley, Baylor University WALTER BRADLEY is a Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University. He has a B.S
retainstudents across wide cross section of the population. While the diverse population of fiveboroughs of New York City provides a large pool of potential candidates, QCC attracts studentsfrom all five boroughs with a majority of student originating from Queens County. The collegealso attracts students from Nassau and Suffolk counties as well. This paper will present ourefforts to maintain and improve the diversity of our student body. The efforts are focused on ourhigh school recruitment effort, the Summer Robotics program, the Women in TechnologySummer Workshop, and the changes we initiated in our curriculum in an effort to maintain andhave our student achieve a successful academic outcome. Research shows that a first-generationcollege student needs
this study demonstrate that there is significant value in getting students toconsider both technical and professional competencies concurrently as they work through project-based experiences in academic settings. Importantly, this study shows that a little reflection can goa long way in improving student outcomes and supports an argument that professional competencyreflection as a regular feature in the engineering curriculum.1.0 IntroductionThe motivation for this work stems from a need to help engineering undergraduates in therecognition and development of professional competencies. An important challenge forundergraduate programs is to provide students with experiences, inside and outside of theclassroom, that give insight on what it means
Paper ID #7052High School Students Modeling Behaviors During Engineering DesignMr. Tanner J Huffman, Purdue University Tanner Huffman is a research assistant and Ph.D. candidate in the Technology, Leadership and Innovation department at Purdue University. Additionally, he is an engineering and technology instructor at Richland Senior High School (7-12) in Johnstown, Pa. Tanner has experience writing integrated STEM curriculum and delivering professional development workshops on ITEEA’s Engineering by Design program. His research interests include modeling and design in STEM education, as well as STEM teacher professional
funded by the National Science Foundation (DUE-0737277).References1. http://www.nsf.gov2. http://www.engineeringk12.org/Engineering_in_the_K-12_Classroom.pdf3. Jahan, K., Hesketh, R. P., Schmalzel, J. L. and Marchese, A. J. (2001). Design and Research Across the Curriculum: The Rowan Engineering Clinics. International Conference on Engineering Education. August, 6 – 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway4. Harvey, R., Johnson, F., Marchese, A. J., Newell, J. A., Ramachandran, R. P., and Sukumaran, B. (1999). Improving the Engineering and Writing Interface: An Assessment of a Team-Taught Integrated Course. ASEE Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO.5. R.P. Hesketh, S. Farrell, and C.S. Slater, An Inductive Approach to Teaching Courses in
funded by the National Science Foundation (DUE-0737277).References1. http://www.nsf.gov2. http://www.engineeringk12.org/Engineering_in_the_K-12_Classroom.pdf3. Jahan, K., Hesketh, R. P., Schmalzel, J. L. and Marchese, A. J. (2001). Design and Research Across the Curriculum: The Rowan Engineering Clinics. International Conference on Engineering Education. August, 6 – 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway4. Harvey, R., Johnson, F., Marchese, A. J., Newell, J. A., Ramachandran, R. P., and Sukumaran, B. (1999). Improving the Engineering and Writing Interface: An Assessment of a Team-Taught Integrated Course. ASEE Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO.5. R.P. Hesketh, S. Farrell, and C.S. Slater, An Inductive Approach to Teaching Courses in
increasingly required to use the Internet to work together from remote locations.For this reason, it is important for students to begin developing their communication skills in thisrelatively new medium early in an engineering curriculum. To meet this need, the courseincludes a cooperative learning group project called the “People Balance Project” in which thestudents work together in interdependent groups of five, with each group member assuming adifferent role essential to the success of the project. Since the project is delivered andimplemented on the Internet, a group may include members from different sections of thecourse, different universities, or even different countries. In the project each group of studentscollects data on the people