educating them in the skills, competences, and toolsnecessary to cope with them, are necessary in the education of every engineer. This paperhighlights the integration of ethics into an existing, traditional industrial engineeringundergraduate course at the senior level. In particular, we show how traditional optimizationassignments can be reformulated to blend mathematics and ethics. Therefore, we do not followthe path of developing an independent, elective course that focuses on ethical issues.Furthermore, integration of ethics is not performed through case studies on which students canreflect on their own experiences. Instead, we embed ethical issues in traditional industrialengineering knowledge. In this way, ethical conflicts reveal themselves
Paper ID #13068Improving the Global Competency of Graduate Engineers Through PeaceCorps Partnership and Long-Term International ServiceMr. Nathan Daniel Manser, University of South Florida Nathan Manser is an Environmental Engineering PhD candidate at the University of South Florida con- ducting research on the fate of pathogens in biological waste to energy systems. His research interests include the application of household engineered systems to recover resources in a low impact environ- ment, developing globally competent engineering graduates and integrating active learning methods into engineering curriculums.Ms
platformoverwhelmed the novice students with the addition of the hardware element to the softwareelement. Scratch was much easier for the new programmers to pick up quickly, with theexception of the fifth lab (functions in BYOB), which proved to be overly complex.Both high schools, though, will continue to integrate more computing in to their classes. Theyintend to use Scratch in their computer applications classes and Arduino in their programmingclasses, after an introduction through Scratch. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2013, American Society for Engineering Education
assess the validity of the chosen approach. In the literature, such categories havealso been defined as crystallized intelligence and fluid intelligence. Procedural knowledge can beimparted via the standard instructional settings. Strategic competence cannot be “taught.”However, providing several illustrative examples, an environment can be created that promotesthe development of strategic competence. This paper discusses several instances of metacognitionand proposes an approach to assessing learning in the classroom. Examples will be given fromhigh school geometry and a few junior to senior level courses in electrical engineering.Recommendations for incorporating metacognitive processes into the curriculum and assessmentare made
required.JIT includes all components of educational practice: curriculum, instruction, assessment, andteaching. The curriculum is comprised of an integrated sequence of nodes and related topics thatincorporate competencies.Educational change occurs at the node (Just-in-Time where the mathematics, physics,technologies, and related competencies are presented to the student). The content of a node issimilar to the description of a topic within a course but at a more detailed level; it is presented inbehavioral terms. Nodes introduce relevant knowledge, skills, and attitudes via combinations oflecture, computer simulation, written documents or other traditional or modern methodology.Student participation in these related activities reinforces their
. The emphasis is on building the technical skills around understandingmaterial properties, and knowledge of how materials respond to various loads. At the same time,this subject offers an opportunity to introduce other practical project variables. This paper willdemonstrate an example of integrating concepts of environmental and economic sustainability inthe material selection process using Ashby diagrams (charts) [3]. Ashby charts are visual toolswhere variables are plotted against each other, such as strength versus density, to enable theengineer to weigh trade-offs between multiple variables. Further, when students use the Ashbycharts they practice the skills in making informed decisions based on data and projectrequirements.The activity
Session 3432 Improving Technical Writing through Published Standards: The University of Texas at Tyler Electrical Engineering Laboratory Style Guide David M. Beams Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Tyler Lucas P. Niiler Department of English and Writing Center Director, University of Texas at TylerAbstractThe writing of technical reports is an integral part of the duties of practicing engineers. Theaccreditation criteria of EC2000 recognize this by placing emphasis on "soft skills
evaluation data as dependent variable in their studies [28], [35], most other studies of theeffect of teamwork experience use other methods, so we decided to use peer evaluation resultsand quantitative methods to examine the relationship of experience in teams using a commonpeer evaluation system would improve their peer rating quality. Therefore, the research questionis: How does the teamwork tenure of students affect the quality of peer evaluation ratings?MethodologyThe data were collected from a senior civil engineering course in an Australian university thatused CATME peer evaluations at multiple points throughout the curriculum. Students in thissenior course were assigned to teams of five members and completed three rounds of peerevaluation. In
math, science, computer science, and engineering teach- ing to frame his research on STEM teaching and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological
, broadeningawareness of the roles technicians play in the global economy and expanding partnership inCenter activities. NJCATE has developed an innovative curriculum model that provides aprocess and the procedures for the development of integrated, interdisciplinary engineeringtechnology programs.The NJCATE curriculum model, as well as effective pedagogy, use of technology-basedinstructional materials, recruitment and retention strategies, and mechanisms for integration ofethics into instruction, have been widely disseminated via the NJCATE web site, intensivesummer institutes, and national and regional conferences. Over the years, more than 900secondary and postsecondary faculty and administrators have participated in NJCATE events.Through complementary NSF
ensure that students understand the impact of engineering projects on society aswell as the social contexts within which they operate, to develop confidence in the students’ability to solve problems, to help the students function successfully and comfortably in aprofessional engineering environment, and to understand and appreciate what it means to be aprofessional engineerService learning has been shown to do this while also providing an experience that is bothfulfilling and enlightening [1-2]. Many engineering students are overwhelmed by the workloadof the engineering curriculum, and are not stimulated by the course materials. Some studentslack the maturity or experience to understand how the engineering curriculum will be of value tothem in
affective qualities has been correlatedwith student achievement, the aim of affective efforts need not be on retaining students, butrather on student achievement and retention will naturally follow. 30The fact that student interest, belonging, motivation, and most of the NACE qualities areaffective in nature suggests that an organized approach to foster appropriate affective growthcould favorably impact student success in SMET disciplines. Standard levels of affective growthhave been defined in Krathwohl’s affective taxonomy: receiving, responding, valuing,organizing, and characterization. 13 This paper recommends the integration of discipline-basedaffective objectives into curricula to enliven, incorporate, and sustain the energy of students
engineering curriculum, as has been done at times with Formula SAE [8].Some of the skills the competitions promote are an entrepreneurial mindset, project management,leadership skills [9], and systems engineering knowledge [10]. AutoDrive is not only one of thelatest collegiate competitions, but perhaps it is the most challenging competition involvingautonomous vehicles at a high level of complexity, defined as SAE Level 4 autonomy, per SAEStandard J3016 [11]. One of the related issues to address is the education and training of studentsdirectly participating in the competition and more generally, of students interested in a futurecareer in the area of autonomous vehicles.Many approaches exist to design and deliver education and training programs
mentors grad- uate and undergraduate engineering Fellows who teach in local K-12 classrooms through the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program’s TEAMS initiative, is on the development team for the TeachEngineer- ing digital library, and is faculty advisor for CU-Boulder’s Society of Women Engineers (SWE). Her primary research interests include the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, path- ways and retention to and through K-12 and undergraduate engineering, teacher education and curriculum development.Maia Lisa Vadeen, University of Colorado - Boulder Maia Vadeen is a Discovery Learning Apprentice at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engi- neering and Applied Science. She
in Tyler, TX, with his wife Terra and their dog Ollie.Dr. Catherine Elizabeth Ross Ph.D., University of Texas - Tyler PhD. University of Texas at Austin, 1998 Associate Professor of English, University of Texas as Tyler 1998 to the present c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 SEEKING NEW PERSPECTIVES: ENGINEERS EXPERIENCING DESIGN THROUGH CREATIVE ARTSAbstractThe engineering curriculum of necessity focuses heavily on technical subjects—mathematics,chemistry, physics, and the large body of discipline-specific material. The arts are frequentlypresent only in vestigial form and are regarded as tangential at best to the real engineeringcurriculum. However, an
with many local community agencies.Dr. Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University Dr. Bimal Nepal is an Associate Professor in the Industrial Distribution Program at Texas A&M Univer- sity. His research interests include integration of supply chain management with new product development decisions, distributor service portfolio optimization, pricing optimization, supply chain risk analysis, lean and six sigma, and large scale optimization. He has authored 30 refereed articles in leading supply chain and operations management journals, and 40 peer reviewed conference proceedings articles in these areas. He has B.S. in ME, and both M.S. and Ph.D. in IE. He is a member of ASEE, INFORMS, and a senior member of IIE.Dr
integrate knowledge gained from the required core courses offered in afour-year period. According to CC2001 1, this course is supposed to cover software systemdesign, software processes, key activities in software development lifecycle, and software projectmanagement. The traditional approach to teaching a Software Engineering course, as reflected inclassical textbooks 11, 10, usually starts with an introduction to software process models, which isthen followed with discussions on highlevel activities in various phases of a generic softwarelifecycle template that can accommodate all possible programming paradigms. Although updatedmany times since their original editions, those texts are not well adapted to the latest paradigmchanges (such as object
Paper ID #45304Syllabus Review Assessment: Technical Contract ReviewDr. Tracey Carbonetto, Pennsylvania State University, Allentown Professional skills continue to be found lacking in early career engineers despite efforts to improve suggested and implemented by faculty, administration, and ABET. Utilizing the early career engineering population as a source of information and specifically, feedback on the ability to meet the professional skills expectations, engineering faculty can include suggested recommendations for improve professional skills development within the undergraduate engineering curriculum
increases student engagement but alsoimproves learning outcomes by focusing on areas where students may require additional support.Moreover, the integration of AI in engineering education can bridge the gap between academiaand industry demands. AI-powered tools and technologies are becoming increasingly prevalent inthe engineering field, and it is crucial that students are well-prepared to leverage theseadvancements. By incorporating AI into the curriculum, educational institutions can ensure thatstudents graduate with the necessary skills to excel in a technology-driven workplace. This caninclude knowledge of AI algorithms, data analysis, machine learning, and automation, amongothers.MethodologyThis paper explores the student’s point of view
Knowledge with Essential Business Skills 4. Building Effective Leaders and CommunicatorsThe second pillar, nurturing global engineering competence, is of particular relevance to our courseand field experience. Through required international engineering field experiences like the onedescribed in our manuscript, students gain firsthand exposure to diverse cultures, engineeringpractices, and global challenges. This experience is integral to their development as well-roundedengineers capable of addressing complex, real-world problems in an increasingly interconnectedworld. Our course has been designed to align closely with the goals of the School of Engineering,ensuring that students not only receive a rigorous technical education but also develop
suggested by a noted entrepreneur and author.6By 2010/11, developments by engineering students in the engineering project curriculum had ledto WERCware 2.0. This version consisted of an audio headset on which a stabilized camera wasalso mounted, both connected to a portable, pocket-sized FitPC. Previously separate client-sideelements were now integrated, allowing the use of Wi-Fi from the FitPC as the wireless link, tosupport a Skype connection in both directions between client and coach. During these years, thefaculty team was expanded to include a business faculty and another engineering faculty withprior experience managing larger budgets. Two attempts were made by the expanded team tosecure a Federal grant through the Institute of Educational
; Exposition Copyright 2004 American Society for Engineering Education • Continuing team component with one engineering faculty and one science, math, or technology faculty member for inter-disciplinary benefits. • Continuing research-based approach both for learning what others have done in similar situations and for investigating specific teaching and learning situations.ConclusionsThe Ways of Knowing: Ways of Practice on-line experience offered an alternative tobetter integrate these types of activities into the more regular part of the life of faculty.The many positive comments from both participants and the teaching team suggest thatthe on-line experience produced significant value for the participants. The
issues, and new technologies in the distribu- tion and logistics sector. She was one of three professors in the United States recognized in an Inbound Logistics Article featuring leading professors in today’s supply chain curriculum. She has worked with a team of colleagues throughout other colleges at East Carolina University to plan a STEM initiative for 8th grade girls. This initiative helps bring more than 100 Pitt County girls to campus to engage them in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. She has also worked with ECU’s Global Academic Initiatives to collaborate with other institutions throughout the world. In addition, Dr. Pagliari collaborates with many external organizations. She is past president of
2018 [15]. These smart technologies includetopics such as; additive manufacturing, robotics, production monitoring, data analysis andsystems integration, and understanding how to collect the right data, assure its integrity,and apply appropriate analytics to inform decisions. These and similar topics are notdepicted in the present Four Pillars of Manufacturing Knowledge.Data Collection MethodsThe SME manufacturing education and research community and the SME Center forEducation, were combined into one entity in approximately 2010. The combined group ofmanufacturing educators and industry representatives are known as the SMEManufacturing Education and Accreditation Committee (MEAC). This committee has an
education; and mathematical thinking.Marisa Wolsky, WGBH Educational Foundation Marisa Wolsky is an Executive Producer at WGBH Educational Foundation with over 20 years of expe- rience turning STEM content into entertaining and educational media. Ms. Wolsky is the Principal In- vestigator for the NSF-funded series Design Squad, for which she oversees all aspects of the production, translating its engineering content into entertaining across many platforms. She is also Senior Producer for the NSF-funded preschool science series Peep and the Big Wide World, responsible for managing its production and working closely with the series’ advisors to oversee the implementation of Peep’s educa- tionally rich science curriculum
six-week field test in West Africa thefollowing summer. In Fall 2003, development of the projector moved to the University ofCambridge in England, where students in the Sustainable Development program researchedopportunities for local production of content, and Worcester Polytechnic Institute, whereelectrical engineering students are tackling the redesign of a robust battery-charger circuit and amore efficient LED driver circuit8. In 2004, DtM will work with students at MIT and theUniversity of Cambridge to tackle problems related to systems integration and design-for-manufacture.DtM is now working with World Education to organize an extended pilot study of the device thisfall, as a prelude to large-scale deployment among World Ed’s literacy
skills to teach by emphasizing the contextual nature of leadership behavior. Theresults suggest that successful Capstone leaders would more frequently call on behaviorsassociated with the innovative Create quadrant than those associated with entry level engineeringwork with its emphasis on learning the tasks of a new job through coordination and control. Thissuggests the need to balance the curriculum in Capstone design to encourage the creativeleadership associated with a major undergraduate design experience that integrates all previouscurriculum while nurturing the coordination and monitoring tasks new graduates will encounterwhen starting out as an engineering professional.References[1] N. A. of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020
are beginningto create undergraduate programs in biomedical engineering and developing new curriculums tosupport such programs. Medical Robotics is a Level 4 compulsory course in McMasterUniversity’s new established Electrical and Biomedical Engineering program. This paperprovides an overview of a laboratory component which has been co-developed by McMasterUniversity and Quanser Consulting Inc. for this course. First, the motivations for introducing aMedical Robotics course into the Biomedical Engineering curriculum and the desired learningoutcomes pursued by the proposed laboratory experiments are discussed. These are followed bya brief introduction of the hardware/software system used in the lab as well as detaileddescriptions of four
Paper ID #38249Solar PV Installation and Troubleshooting CourseDevelopmentMohsen Azizi MOHSEN AZIZI is an assistant professor in the School of Applied Engineering and Technology at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT). He received the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from Concordia University, Montreal, Canada, in 2005 and 2010, respectively. From 2010 to 2013, he was an R&D engineer at Aviya Tech Inc. and Pratt & Whitney Canada Inc., Longueuil, Canada, where he designed and developed control and fault diagnosis systems for jet engines. His research has been focused on
, theinfrastructure and efficacy of the Engineering Research portion is detailed. Concepts, coursedescriptions, and assessment tools presented here were designed to be modular so that otherinstitutes interested in integrating research into secondary school curriculum could adapt thesecomponents to fit individual constraints.MethodsProgram OverviewBaylor Research (BR) is a pre-collegiate research program that includes Engineering,Biomedical, and Environmental topics. The program resides within the Science Department withfour faculty (the principal scientist in Environmental Research, the principal scientist inBiomedical Research, and two principal engineers in Engineering Research) who hold higherdegrees in their respective field. The mission of Baylor