11Formal Education and Computing Professionals’ Needs and do it. And if you go to industry, they find very hard. . . but that’s what they are looking for.Degree of Coverage in the Curriculum and Their Individual Courses When we asked about the degree of emphasis of the skills described above in the CScurriculum, all participants explained that these skills are not stated explicitly in the curriculumbecause of a number of reasons: (a) faculty are not trained this way, (b) faculty do notsufficiently value them, and finally, (c) faculty have a heavy curriculum load and not enoughtime to address or even incorporate these skills. As one participant explained, This is part of team leadership, program management. It is hard to
Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies. Retrieved January 4, 2017, from http://ftp.iza.org/dp8145.pdf 2. Annual installed global capacity 2000-2015 [Digital image]. (n.d.). Retrieved January 4, 2017, from http://www.gwec.net/global-figures/graphs 3. Bavel, J. V. (2013). The world population explosion: causes, backgrounds and projections for the future. FVV in OBGyn,5(4), 281-291. 4. Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., . . . Naeem, S. (2012). Corrigendum: Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature,489(7415), 326-326. doi:10.1038/nature11373 5. Dahl, T. (n.d.). Wind Power Systems. Retrieved January 4, 2017, from
, no. 4, 2000, pp. 63-85.did this, for example in asking the mentors to come to class [6] Pejcinovic, B., et al. “Assessing Student Preparedness forand talk about their work experience, expectations were met. Introductory Engineering and Programming Courses,” accepted forWhen we were less clear, for example regarding continuing FIE 2017.contact after the class meeting, results were less successful. [7] Ringenberg, J., et al., “The Programming Performance Prophecies: Predicting Student Achievement in a First-Year IntroductoryIn addition to making
topics that we covered in the that robotics is one of the best tools to introduce engineering and codingthrough educational robotics challenges. Pre-service teachers’ NOE views examine changes in PSTs’ NOE views after experiencing the engineering course: (a) technology applications in elementary science-engineering to STEM-savvy generations of the digital age.were assessed at the beginning and at the end of the methods course to unit. We specifically examined to what extent the 3-week engineering unit teaching, (b) NOE, and (c) NGSS.determine whether they improved their NOE views. NGSS aligned organized around educational robotics improved PSTs’ NOE views.challenges with the
design solutions twice to emphasizethe importance of iteration.We found that an immersive design-build-iterate experience in the 2nd year is associated withnarrowly focused improvements in 4th year capstone design outcomes. Specifically, the builtquality of the final prototype was improved in projects that focused on mechanical design, butthese improvements did not extend to other types of projects or to other late steps in theengineering design process. We discuss our findings in terms of the spacing effect, and othermeans by which engineering design behavior might be reinforced.Control yearThe control year of this design course was based around (a) a semester-long project thatculminated in an alpha prototype, and (b) a series of 1 to 3-week
the STEM Workforce, A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2014, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB- 2015-10).[3] Wendler, C., B. Bridgeman, F. Cline, C. Millet, J. Rock, N. Bell & P. McAllister. 2010. The Path Forward: The Future of Graduate Education in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.[4] Hancock, S. & Walsh, E. 2016. Beyond knowledge and skills: Rethinking the development of professional identity during the STEM doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 37-50.[5] Litalien, D. & F. Guay. 2015. Dropout intention in Ph.D. studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources
teaching partnershipswith faculty in select junior and senior level courses. We proposed designing a two-to-five yearmixed methods educational research project to assess the results. (See Appendix B for a diagramof that research project.) And finally, as a critical component of that proposal, we operationalizedthe ability to communicate as communicative self-efficacy. To date, we have completed the firstpilot and are beginning the second. We have begun meeting and coordinating with MAE facultyteaching designated junior and senior MAE courses. And, we have completed the first year ofour multi-year research project.Results of the Early Term Survey for communicative self-efficacyHerein, we will be presenting the results of early term survey
. Table 4. Online Quizzes Likert Scale Survey Question Results (AS) Agree Strongly(A) (A) Agree(B) (N) Neither Agree or Disagree(C) (D) Disagree (DS) Disagree Strongly Spring 2014 Solid-State Electronics (survey submission rate: 6/7: 85.71%) Spring 2014 EM Fields (survey submission rate: 14/33: 42.42%) Spring 2016 EM Fields (survey submission rate: 22/50: 44.0%) Fall 2016 Analog Electronics (survey submission rate: 20/48: 41.67%) Fall 2016 Engineering Computation (survey submission rate: 18/29: 62.07%) Statement (AS) (A) (N) (D) (DS) The ungraded online quizzes with individual 33.33% 50.00% 16.67% 0% 0
inexperienced and maydisregard safety procedures or considerations out of haste, ignorance, or distraction. Students arestill trying to master technical detail and have limited exposure to what can go wrong, what canbreak, and how to assess the reliability of a design. Industry addresses the issue of new engineersby assigning senior engineer mentors, having careful design reviews, and developing anunambiguous culture of safety where all stakeholders are on the lookout for unsafe practices.Before we delve into a specific senior design case study, we want to outline a general frameworkfor incorporating safety into such a project: a. Define specific safety-related technical requirements for the project definition presented to the students; b
Education I: A Vision for a New Century. Chemical Engineering Education 34 (1), 16- 25.[5] Sparkes, JJ. (1989) Quality in Engineering Education. Engineering Professor’s Conference, Occasional Paper #1.[6] Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., Stice, J.E., Rugarcia, A. (2000). The Future of Engineering Education II: Teaching Methods that Work. Chemical Engineering Education 34 (1), 26- 39.[7] Rangel, B., Guimaraes, A., Vazsa, A., Alves, F. (2016). Integrated Design Concept in Civil Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education 32 (3(A)), 1279– 1288. [8] Mills, J. and Treagust, D.F. (2003). Engineering Education-Is Problem-Based or Project- Based Learning the Answer?, Australasian Journal of
Poly State University in 1999 where he is currently a tenured Professor. He is a Senior Member of IEEE and has done consulting work and has been em- ployed by several companies including Capstone Microturbine, Rockwell Automation (Allen-Bradley), Picker International, Rantec, San Diego Gas & Electric, APD Semiconductor, Diodes Inc., Partoe Inc., and Enerpro. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Teaching the Hands-on Magnetic Design Laboratory Course: Experience and Lessons Learned Taufik Taufik California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoAbstractOne important concept in
community. Introduced in thispaper as an umbrella concept, Additive Innovation is a mode of collaboration where participantsin a community are: a) inspired by shared artifacts/ideas, b) openly share (and learn about) technology and processes used to create these, artifacts/ideas, c) design and prototype own modified version of the shared artifact/idea, and d) share their modified artifact/idea back with the community.Learning Attributes of MakingMaking is rooted in constructionism, learning by doing or Making and constructing knowledgethrough that doing 5. Aspects of Making that could appear in the engineering classroom aredescribed in the following sections. Attributes of Making come directly from themes emergingfrom our ongoing
Paper ID #17914Work in Progress: Engineering Design in Secondary BiologyDr. Kathy Lea Malone, The Ohio State University Kathy L. Malone is a Assistant Professor in Science Education. Her research interests include the incor- poration of model-based reasoning, and engineering design in K12 classrooms.Anita M. Schuchardt, University of MinnesotaMs. Courtney R. Irwin, The Ohio State University Doctoral student in Teaching and Learning, STEM EducationDr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She
. C., Hansford, B., & Tennent, L. (2004). Formal mentoring programs in educationand other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 518-540.4. Fassinger, R. E. (2008). Workplace diversity and public policy: Challenges and opportunitiesfor psychology. American Psychologist, 63(4), 252.5. Hayes, T., Kalen, S., Hult, H., Dahlgren, L., Hindbeck, H., & Ponzer, S. (2010). Being amentor for undergraduate medical students enhances personal and professional development.Medical Teacher, 32, 148-153.6. Horowitz, J., & Christopher, K. (2013). The research mentoring program: serving the needsof graduate and undergraduate researchers. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 105-116.7. Young, L
Outcomes. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Rocky Mountain Section Conference. March 29-30, Pueblo, CO.21. Davidson, C. I., Matthews, H. S., Hendrickson, C. T., Bridges, M. W., Allenby, B. R., Crittenden, J. C., ... Austin, S. (2007).Adding sustainability to the engineer's toolbox: A challenge for engineering educators. Environmental Science and Technology,41(14), 4847-4850.22. Gómez, F.U., Sáez-Navarrete, C., Lioi, S.R. and Marzuca, V.I., 2014. Adaptable model for assessing sustainability in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production23. Watson, M., Noyes, C., and Rodgers, M. 2013. "Student Perceptions of Sustainability Education in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Georgia Institute of
century is described asthe “era of sustainability”. Engineering education needs to foster this concept and impartknowledge about dealing with it to future engineers by conducting innovative teachingapproaches like the EWB Challenge, for instance.AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research withinthe project ELLI (Excellent Teaching and Learning in Engineering Sciences). The authorswould also like to thank Mr. Steffen Rolke of Engineers Without Borders, Germany(Ingenieure ohne Grenzen e.V.).ReferencesAllen, Deborah E., Richard S. Donham, and Stephen A. Bernhardt. 2011. “Problem-Based Learning.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning (128): 21–29.Belu, R., R. Chiou, Ciocal L., and B. Tseng. 2016
Paper ID #17622Modernizing the Current Afghan Engineering Education System: Challengesand OpportunitiesMr. Khalilullah Mayar, Kabul Polytechnic University, Kabul -Afghanistan Khalilullah Mayar is a faculty of civil engineering at Kabul Polytechnic University where he teaches, introduction to engineering, construction materials and methods, construction contracts, and engineering mechanics courses to the undergrad students. He also leads the Polytechnic University International Relation and Partnership Office and has been actively involved in the university academic programs- quality assurance efforts as well. Mr. Mayar was a
2017 ASEE International Forum:Columbus , Ohio Jun 28 Paper ID #20791Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Programs at International Institutions:Multidisciplinary Projects with Homes in Any DisciplineDr. Randal T Abler, Georgia Institute of TechnologyProf. Edward J. Coyle, Georgia Institute of Technology Edward J. Coyle is the John B. Peatman Distinguished Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing, directs the Arbutus Center for the Integration of Research and Education, and is the founder of the Vertically-Integrated Projects (VIP) Program. He is a Georgia Research
Engineering Education Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, 2007. 8. Danielson, S., B. Rogers, “A Methodology For Direct Assessment Of Student Attainment Of Program Outcomes,” Proceedings of the 114th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, 2007. 9. Ohland, M.W., Loughry, M.L., Woehr, D.J., Finelli, C.J., Bullard, L.G., Felder, R.M., Layton, R.A., Pomeranz, H.R., & Schmucker, D.G. (2012). The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11 (4), 609-630. 10. Smith, Karl A., “Managing Conflict in Multidisciplinary Teams,” Proceedings of the 106th
. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 7 (Mar. 1987), 3–7. Nicholas Voorhees, Graduate Research Assistant,[2] Pistilli, M. D., Willis, III, J. E., and Campbell, J. P. 2014. Department of Educational Psychology and Higher Analytics through an institutional lens: Definition, Education, University of Nevada Las Vegas, theory, design, and impact. In Learning analytics, from voorhn1@unlv.nevada.edu research to practice, J. A. Larusson and B. White Eds. Springer, New York, NY, 79-102.[3] Verbert, K., Drachsler, H., Manouselis, N., Wolpers, M., Vuorikari, R., and Duval, E. 2011. Dataset-driven research for improving recommender systems for learning. In Proceedings of the 1st International
Economic Benefits ofGovernment Investments in Engineering Richard B. Brown Engineering Initiative Background Olene Walker JonGov. Michael Leavitt Huntsman Gary John Warnock Herbert 2001 Utah Senate Bill 61• Increase the number of engineering and computer science graduates to advance the “well being of the State and its citizens.”• Improve the quality of instructional programs – Faculty – Programs – Capital facilities – Equipment• Broad
file:///Users/Isabel/Downloads/Fast-Facts-2016 (2).pdf (accessed Jan 27, 2017).(2) Institute of International Education. Open Doors Report 2013 http://www.iie.org/Who- We-Are/News-and-Events/Press-Center/Press-releases/2013/2013-11-11-Open-Doors- Data (accessed Jun 15, 2015).(3) Xia, S. Issues Appl. Linguist. 2009, 17 (2), 137.(4) Hinds, P. J.; Neeley, T. B.; Cramton, C. D. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2013, 45 (5), 1.(5) Matveev, A. V.; Milter, R. G. Team Perform. Manag. 2004, 10 (5/6), 104.(6) Ochieng, E. G.; Price, A. D. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2009, 16 (6), 527.(7) Mohammed, U.; Prabhakar, G.; White, G. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2008, 3 (5), 3.(8) Wang, K. T.; Heppner, P. P.; Fu, C.-C.; Zhao, R.; Li, F.; Chuang, C.-C
autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 1064-1071.9. Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220-232. doi: 10.1037/h004885010. Ma, W. Y, & Chen, K. J. (2003). Introduction to CKIP Chinese Word Segmentation System for the First International Chinese Word Segmentation Bakeoff. In Proceedings of ACL, Second SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, 168-171.11. Henle, M. (1962). The birth and death of ideas. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 31-62). New York, NY, US: Atherton Press.12. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E
Paper ID #18551Learning to Anticipate the User in Professional Engineering WorkDr. Alexandra Vinson, Northwestern University Alexandra H. Vinson is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwest- ern University. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology & Science Studies from the University of California, San Diego. Her research interests include professional education in medicine and STEM fields.Dr. Pryce Davis, University of Nottingham Pryce Davis is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Nottingham. He received his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences from Northwestern
the systematic literature review Exclusion Criteria a Papers that do not detail the number of participants and/or teams b Papers that do not discuss participant details c Papers that do not discuss team sizes d Papers that do not outline variables observed/accounted for e Papers that do not outline their methods for data collection f Papers that do not outline methods of data analysisArticles were not excluded on the basis of quality nor the country of focus. Detailed informationabout each study was recorded in a data exaction sheet. The following variables were included inthe data extraction sheet: author, publication date
; Froyd, J. E. (2013). Fidelity of Implementation of Research‐Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) in Engineering Science Courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(3), 394-425.Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (2004). What we have learned about student engagement in the past twenty years. Big theories revisited, 4, 299-328.Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., Mauney, M., Hamrin, C. E., & Dietz, E. J. (1995). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 151-164.Fredricks, J. A
- Workforce/Education Subcommittee, (2004). 2. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., (2007). 3. Mizelle, N. B., Irvin, J. L. Transition from middle school into high school. Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association, (www.nmsa.org). 4. DoD Research and Education Program for HBCU/MI Equipment/Instrumentation Grant, Proposal No. 64685-EG-REP from January 2014 to January 2015. 5. State Higher Education Coordinator Board Engineering Summer Program grant for “miniGEMS 2015: Roaches and Robots!” for Summer 2015. 6
strategies in particular. It is a follow up to previous work by the author,on viable strategies to improve the classroom environment of engineering colleges in theArab Gulf Region. At the start, the paper provides an overview of relevant benchmarks ofengineering education in the Region. Then, relates author’s preliminary findings onteaching/learning practices in engineering colleges of the Region, sheds light on the pros andcons of the lecture format, and examines the literature on meanings and substance ofdifferent active learning protocols, focusing on cooperative engagement strategies. Thepaper, also, sheds light on: theoretical roots, research support, current practices, andsuggestions for redesigning classes, if need be, to stimulate
andsuccess is commonly measured using exams scores or letter grades at the end of the semester.In an undergraduate engineering curriculum, the many different types of classes pose challengesand difficulties for students. To achieve a letter grade B or better, some courses are moredemanding and require more effort than the other courses. For instance, Fluid Mechanics isconsidered one of the conceptually challenging classes at the California State University, LongBeach (CSULB). Students are challenged to integrate knowledge from their prerequisite classes(math and statics) to understand the Fluid mechanics concepts and principals. Specific topicscovered in the course include Fluid Statics, Fluid Kinematics, Pressure Variation in MovingFluids
with. The purpose here is to offer a new way tothink about the development of the professional engineering educator. In this respect,the paper focuses on:(i) the cognitive processes that faculty would follow as theygrow and learn more about teaching and learning,(ii) the discipline-basedindustrial/practical experience they need to acquire in their locale to add to theirrepertoire as “practitioners” of engineering, and (iii) the institutional initiatives,including administrative support, encouragement, and resources. What is needed is tocreate a change in culture within the institution, the department or college, to generatea comprehensive and integrated set of components: clearly articulated expectations, areward system for good teaching