the students. These case studieswill be improved to create complex scenarios for ethical education and training of students incivil and environmental engineering curricula. 105. References[1] Martin, M.W. & Schinzinger, R. Ethics in Engineering. New York: McGraw Hill (1996).[2] Houston, B. (2006, June), Ethics A Tough Choice Paper presented at 2006 AnnualConference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. https://peer.asee.org/793[3] Poor, C. J., & Chase, A., & Inan, M. (2019, March), Integrating Ethics Across the CivilEngineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2019 ASEE PNW Section Conference, Corvallis,Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/31883[4] Carpenter, W. (2004, June), Teaching Ethics To
Paper ID #30638Using Music Videos to Inspire Engineering (Evaluation)Ms. Krista Schumacher, University of St. Thomas Krista is an undergraduate Elementary Education and STEM Education major at the University of St. Thomas.Molly Roche, University of St. ThomasEsm´ee Julia Verschoor, Playful Learning Lab Esm´ee Verschoor is a Communication and Journalism major at the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, Minnesota. She is passionate about graphic design, visual communication and cultural studies. Currently, Esm´ee is the Visual Manager at the Playful Learning Lab, led by Dr. AnnMarie Thomas, where she creates, designs
Courses.” 2017 IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference (FIE).[13] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHiLAJGDGt4Appendix 1An example of the written proposal:Appendix 2The beam design problem on the final exam:A 30-ft-span simply supported beam is laterally supported at the ends and midspan. The beamcarries a uniform service dead load of 1.6 k/ft (not including the self-weight of the beam) and aconcentrated service live load of 15 kips at midspan. a) Determine the required moment per LRFD. b) Determine the required shear per LRFD. c) Determine the lateral-torsional buckling modification factor. d) Use A992 and select the lightest W-shape. The maximum permissible live load deflection is L/360.
during which the surveys were administered.MeasuresThe survey consists of (a) section of demographic information and (b) section of questions onself-beliefs in success (academic self-efficacy and subjective values), academic engagement(efforts and persistence), learning climate, and achievement emotions (enjoyment, anxiety,hopeless, shame, and anger before, during, and after class). In (a) section, the demographicitems measure students’ gender (male= 0, female =1), age, race, major, academic year, andself-reported GPA. The (b) section includes 98 Likert-scaled items from 1 (strongly disagree)to 5 (strongly agree) and from 1 (not at all true of me) to 7 (very true of me). All Likert-scaled items were adapted from existing research [9]. Some
, and M-I. Carnasciali, “Investigating the entrepreneurial mindset of engineering and computer science students,” Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conf., Salt Lake City, UT, Paper 21777, 2018.5. S. Brunhaver, J. Bekki, A. R. Carberry, J. S. London, and A. F. McKenna, “Development of the engineering student entrepreneurial mindset assessment (ESEMA),” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019.6. R. E. Kleine III, and J-D. Yoder, “Operationalizing and assessing the entrepreneurial mindset: A rubric based approach,” Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 2, no. 2, 2011, pp. 61-90.7. J. B. Hylton, and B. Hays, “Modifying the VALUE rubrics to assess the entrepreneurial mindset,” Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conf., Paper
Paper ID #30038Analyzing Changes in Student Graph Reasoning and Comprehension Re-gardingGraph Axis PresentationMr. Justin Cory Willis, University Of Maine- Orono Justin Willis is a Graduate Instructor at the University of Maine, for the Mechanical Engineering Tech- nology department. He is also a graduate student in UMaine’s Master of Science in Teaching program, and a volunteer math tutor for students and adults in Old Town, ME. Research interests include statistics education in engineering applications, and career and adult education.Dr. Brett D. Ellis, University of Maine Dr. Brett Ellis, P.E. is an Assistant
| 10.1093/cdj/35.1.41 | DeepDyve. (n.d.)Hatibu, N., H.F. Mahoo, B. Kayombo and O. Mzirai (1997) Evaluation and Promotion ofRainwater Harvesting in Semi-arid areas of Tanzania. (n.d.-a).
Students’ Perceptions,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 570–601, 2005.[7] A. B. Frymier and M. L. Houser, “The Role of Oral Participation in Student Engagement,” Commun. Educ., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 83–104, 2016.[8] J. W. White, “Resistance to classroom participation: Minority students, academic discourse, cultural conflicts, and issues of representation in whole class discussions,” J. Lang. Identity Educ., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 250–265, 2011.[9] K. McDonald, “Increasing the class participation experience for engineers,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2006.[10] R. C. Jones, “The ‘Why’ of Class Participation: A Question Worth Asking,” Coll. Teach., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2008.[11] T. Docan-Morgan, “The
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper AC 2007-2234. 23 pp.[8] Pickering, M., E. Ryan, K. Conroy, B. Gravel, M. Portsmore. 2004. The Benefit of Outreach to Engineering Students. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition. Session 1692. 12 pp.[9] Bielefeldt, A.R., J. Lewis, M. Polmear, D. Knight, N. Canney, C. Swan. 2020. Educating civil engineering students about ethics and societal impacts via co-curricular activities. Journal of Civil Engineering Education. In press.[10] Cress, C.M., C. Burack, D.E. Giles, J. Elkins, M.C. Stevens. 2010. A Promising Connection: Increasing College Access and Success through Civic Engagement
about their research and use of HPC: (a) Gender distribution (b) Race/ethnicity (c) Class standingFig. 1: Demographics of the 53 applicants received by the Clarkson University HPC REU Sitein 2019.Point 1: Both the faculty researchers and their graduate students are short on professionaltraining regarding the use and development of HPC techniques. Therefore, it is often difficultfor them to develop full-fledged HPC applications by adopting and customizing state-of-the-artopen source HPC tools (e.g., OpenFOAM [12], Geant4 [13]) or by developing their ownin-house simulators to address their HPC needs. This is because the engineering researchersand students are unfamiliar with the specific parallel and distributed
following research question and sub-questions: How does the experience of learning differ between labatorials and traditional labs? a. How do social interactions in the lab impact the student learning experience? b. What elements of labs play a role in providing a satisfying learning experience? c. In what ways do labatorials affect student perspectives on physics? d. In what ways does students’ self-efficacy evolve through physics labs? e. In what ways do labatorials and traditional labs differ in promoting the development of conceptual understanding? The mixed methods design involves concurrent qualitative and quantitative datacollection, which was integrated at the data interpretation phase of the research
, because air has a index of refraction slightly greater than unity, there issome refractive bending, and thus, the signal may travel slightly beyond the horizon. (b) Thesurface wave, which is also called the Norton surface wave. Norton surface waves are waves thattravel along the earth’s surface in the same way a electromagnetic wave would travel along atransmission line[1]. The losses are dictated by the frequency, the higher the frequency, thegreater the signal attenuation. The Norton surface wave permits reasonable propagation ofsignals below the medium frequency (MF) bands and therefore, depending on the transmitterpower, AM broadcast signals can propagate up to a maximum of hundred or miles or so duringthe day via the surface wave. At
feedback. The authorswould also like to thank the staff of Department of the Electrical Engineering and ComputerScience (EECS) at the University of Michigan for their help in organizing the Electrify summercamp; special thanks to Silvia Dykstra for providing the pie charts in Figure-5 and 6.References[1] J. Rogelj, D. Shindell, K. Jiang, S. Fifita, P. Forster, V. Ginzburg, C. Handa, H. Kheshgi, S. Kobayashi, E. Kriegler et al., “Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5 c in the context of sustainable development,” 2018.[2] “Global ev outlook 2019: Scaling-up the transition to electric mobility,” IEA 2019, May 2019.[3] A. Daga, J. M. Miller, B. R. Long, R. Kacergis, P. Schrafel, and J. Wolgemuth, “Electric fuel pumps for wireless power
semester has been great. It's simply not feasible to carry multiple textbooks around, and not having it on-line would inhibit my ability to do homework problems from it and other textbooks while on campus.Focus Group ResultsFocus group students were engaged and happily willing to discuss eTextbooks and the library.We asked a series of eight questions (Appendix B) and allowed for tangents in the discussion asnecessary.eTextbook ProblemsOur most fruitful question was about problems the students ran into while using eTextbooks.These responses mirrored our survey responses about eTextbook problems, but we were able tolearn more details. Students do not like when they are forced to create a username and passwordbefore downloading a
allowed us to see that minimallyaddressing “thinking about thinking” or “learning to learn” can help expand students’ approachesto learning if not knowing when to apply a given approach as opposed to others--all puttinglearning more squarely into the hands of the learners themselves [19].References[1] A. Gibson, K. Kitto, and P. Bruza (2016). “Towards the discovery of learner metacognition from reflective writing.” Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), pp. 22-36.[2] J. H. Flavell (1976). “Metacognitive aspects of problem solving.” In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.[3] M. Hora and A. Oleson (2017). “Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative
. 93, no. 6, pp. 44–54, 2015.[2] R. Roy and J. C. k. h. Riedel, “Design and innovation in successful product competition,” Technovation, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 537–594, Oct. 1997.[3] G. Gemser and M. A. Leenders, “How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management: AN INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION OF THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 28–38, 2001.[4] J. H. Hertenstein and M. B. Platt, “Performance Measures and Management Control in New Product Development,” Accounting Horizons, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 303–323, Sep. 2000.[5] “Industrial Design Market 2019: Global Industry Trends, Sales Revenue, Industry
Paper ID #30032Changes in Teacher Self-Efficacy Through Engagement in an EngineeringProfessional Development Partnership (RTP)Malle R Schilling, Virginia Tech Malle Schilling is currently pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Malle gradu- ated in 2018 with a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Dayton. Her re- search interests include broadening participation in engineering, K-12 STEM education, and engineering identity. She has previously researched engineering camps and their effects on participants’ engineering self-efficacy, promotion and tenure policies, and the use
, cultural, social, environmental, and economicfactors.”17Disciplines have a variety of ways to approach problems. In this section, three different methodsare described: the scientific method, the engineering design process, and the creative processcommon to visual arts. A summary of each method, its attributes, and a comparison between thethree is provided in Table 1.The Scientific MethodIn scientific disciplines, one of the first methods taught to students is the scientific method. Asdescribed in one source “The scientific method has five basic steps, plus one feedback step: (a)Make an observation, (b) Ask a question, (c) Form a hypothesis, or testable explanation, (d)Make a prediction based on the hypothesis, (e) Test the prediction, [and] (f
. 2014.[16] N. Madter, N. Brookes, D. Bower and G. Hagan, “Exploring project managementcontinuing professional development in engineering construction,” Construction Managementand Economics, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 639-651, Aug. 2012.[17] A. Van Vianen, B. Dalhoeven and I. De Pater, “Aging and training and developmentwillingness: Employee and supervisor mindsets,” Journal Of Organizational Behavior, vol. 32,no. 2, pp. 226-247, Feb. 2011.[18] K. Buse, D. Bilimoria and S. Perelli, “Why they stay: Women persisting in US engineeringcareers”, Career Development International, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 139-154, May 2013.[19] Y. Li and A. Peguero, “Professional Women's Dilemma between Work and Family: AnExamination of the ADVANCE Program,” Gender, Technology and
the double-bind: WIE and MEP Programs and servingthe needs of women of color in engineering. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/18963[3] T. Holloman, W.C. Lee, J. London, A. Halkiyo, G. Jew, and B. Watford (2018). A historicaland policy perspective on broadening participation in STEM: Insights from National Reports(1974–2016). Paper presented at The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference, Crystal City, VA. Retrieved from http://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10080892[4] C. D. Matt (2007, June), Wepan History And Current Update Paper presented at 2007Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/2125[5] K. Moore
Paper ID #30380Understanding how Novice Indian Faculty Engage in Engineering EducationResearchMr. Javeed Kittur, Arizona State University Javeed Kittur is currently a doctoral student (Engineering Education Systems & Design) at Arizona State University, USA. He received a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Mas- ter’s degree in power systems from India in 2011 and 2014 respectively. He has worked with Tata Con- sultancy Services as Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011-2012, India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014 to 2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics
to Professor Hamid Namdar (department chair), Professor Stuart Asser (formerdepartment chair), and Mr. Jerry Sitbon (chief college laboratory technician) for their supports,encouragement, and guidance.6. References[1] B. Thompson, “How 3D Printing Will Impact The Manufacturing Industry,” Manufacturing Business Technology, Jan., 2016.[2] B. Jackson, “GE Aviation Celebration 30,000th 3D Printed Fuel Nozzle”, 3D Printing Industry, Oct. 2018.[3] N. Sankar, K. Natarayan, G. Iyer, A. Kalathil, “Printing the Future: From Prototype to Production,” Cognizant 20-20 Insights, pp. 1-8, Nov., 2015.[4] T. Letcher, M. Waytashek, “Material Property Testing of 3D-Printed Specimen in PLA on an Entry-Level 3D Printer,” ASME IMECE 2014 Proceedings
(BER) and the signal detection of the transmitted message, and, therefore,take advantage of the BER variation, which depends on the underwater acoustic channel environment. Furthermore, we use information theory to analyze and study the impact of mobile/moving sensornodes, as opposed to fixed nodes in UWSNs. Transition from fixed sensor nodes scenario to moving sensornodes cases enables many advantages in UWSNs, but also introduces several challenges. The two main significant advantages of using mobile sensor nodes over fixed nodes are; a) The reduction of sensor nodes needed, and b) The ability to handle dynamic situation. Thus, the same work can be accomplished by fewer mobile nodes
/15348431.2019.1648269[5] Palmer, R. & Gasman, M., “It takes a village to raise a child”: The role of social capital inpromoting academic success for African American Men at a Black College, Journal of CollegeStudent Development 49/1 (2008): 52-70.[6] Becker, H. & Carper, J. The development of an identification with an occupation, AmericanJournal of Sociology 61/4 (1956): 289-298.[7] Becker, H., Geer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss, A., Boys in white: Student culture in medicalschool. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.[8] AAMC, Diversity in Medical Education. Report, 2016. Online.https://www.aamcdiversityfactsandfigures2016.org/. (Accessed 2/3/2020)[9] Sarah Appelhans
outcomes.) The change in outcomes did not affectthe course objectives, but only the mapping of the outcomes. Since the principles of studentachievement are generally preserved from one set of outcomes to the other, and in the interest ofconsistency in evaluation across the course offerings, the evaluation will be based on themapping to the 2018-2019 cycle presented in Table 3.Table 3. Course objectives for CON 357 mapped to ABET program outcomes. ABET program outcomes Course objectives a b c d e f g h i 1. explain the estimation process for construction projects, including bid X preparation, project
experiential learning project. Future such projects willconcentrate on the design of mini-processor belonging to other processor families.References[1] Dua, R., “Digital System Design - 8051 Microcontrollers Home Page” January 2015.[online]. Available: http://web.mst.edu/~rdua/Digital%20Systems%20Design.htm [Accessed:December 30, 2019][2] Marshall, M., Moss, A., Garringer, L. G., & Dua, R. (2015, June), “WIMP51 Processor:Envisioning and Recreating the Platform for Implementing Student Design Projects”, Paperpresented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington.10.18260/p.25078[3] Hur, B. (2019, June), “ARM Cortex M4F-based, Microcontroller-based, and Laboratory-oriented Course Development in Higher Education”, Paper
University of California, San Diego sserslev@ucsd.edu Madison Edwards Chemistry and Biochemistry University of California, San Diego m4edward@ucsd.edu Abstract This study explores how industry internships, paired with scaffolded reflection, shape student attitudes and learning behaviors. Building upon the literature on student motivation, we seek to answer the following question: how do internships influence student attitudes towards their studies and their future approaches towards learning? Data at three critical points in a student
-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem- Solving Learning Outcome,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 65-94, 1997.[3] W. Hung, “Team‐based complex problem solving: A collective cognition perspective,” Educational Technology Research & Development, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 365-384, 2013.[4] X. Ge, and S.M. Land, “Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 51 no. 1, pp. 21–38, 2003.[5] C.E. Hmelo-Silver, “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?” Educational Psychology Review, pp. 235–266, 2004.[6] B. Barron, “When smart groups fail
Paper ID #29694Embedding Teacher Professional Learning into the Student-Focused GEARUPEngineering Summer Camp (Evaluation)Ryan Barlow, Utah State University Ryan Barlow obtained his Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Utah in 2012 and his Master’s Degree in Science Education from the University of Maryland in 2016. He is currently a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Utah State University where his research focuses on continuing professional development of engineering educators.Dr. Max L Longhurst, Utah State University Dr. Longhurst is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in
Paper ID #30061Hey, You Got Business in My Engineering! : Collaborating to SupportEntrepreneurship ResearchMs. Kelly Giles, James Madison University Libraries Kelly Giles is the Applied Sciences Librarian at James Madison University. She serves as liaison librar- ian to the departments of Engineering, Computer Science, Geographic Science, Integrated Science and Technology, and Intelligence Analysis. She holds an MA in Library and Information Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a BA from Randolph-Macon Woman’s College.Ms. Elizabeth Price, James Madison University Libraries Elizabeth Price is the Business