education policy, and academic motivation.Miss Raeven Carmelita WatersMs. Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Ashley Taylor is a doctoral student in engineering education at Virginia Polytechnic and State University, where she also serves as a program assistant for the Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity and an advisor for international senior design projects in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Ashley received her MS in Mechanical Engineering, MPH in Public Health Education, and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include broadening participation in engineering, the integration of engineering education and international development, and
conducted.Observation, survey, and interview methods are anticipated being used. A visitation templatewill be created to ensure consistent results. Second, structured visits to obtain the assessmentinformation. Third, involve the AT Industrial Advisory Committee in a parallel process toprovide input and feedback on suggested curriculum changes. Fourth, develop methods meetingthe identified needs and working them into the academic curriculum.Development of a visitation template and visitation areas is in progress. Grants and air carrierpartners will provide travel support. Once the visits are completed, a specific set of performanceobjectives will be determined. Then, the AT department can provide curriculum and otheropportunities for students to become
facilitating that difficult transition byengaging in discussion and creating pedagogical resources. This project was one of many funded. The assessment and evaluation of the projects aredriven by dedicated university faculty that work as part of the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP).The primary output is integrating developed assignments and projects as regular part of courses.These projects are based on the High Impact Practices (HIPs) identified by the Association ofAmerican Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). These activities are then embedded into thewriting-intensive courses; collaborative assignments and projects serve as a vehicle ofcommunication for an undergraduate research project; reports are developed related to theundergraduate
type of controller and must show that the desired requirements are not met. Thisprovides an opportunity for the students to see how design constraints are established. Based onmy observations so far, as well as on student feedback, students become very highly motivatedby the design component of the course, and many end up with a thorough grasp of thefundamental principles of control systems design. The open-ended approach allows forcreativity and flexibility in the design process, with both the instructor and students benefittingfrom an array of designs. A few examples of actual student projects will be presented.MotivationThe incorporation of project-based learning (PBL) in the curriculum has been known to helpstudents develop an intuitive
success for entering students, À Development of linked projects and/or assignments, À Comparison of studentsÀ progress in each cluster course to identify students who are having difficulty in one or more courses, and À Multiple interventions for at-risk students.Seminar in Critical InquiryDuring 2000, all components of the University of Texas System, including UTEP, adopted a newcore curriculum. The UTEP core includes Seminar in Critical Inquiry as an institutionallydesignated option. It is often referred to within the UTEP community as just University Seminar.All students entering UTEP, who have undertaken less than 30 hours of college course work, arerequired to enroll
minimize unexpected failure, whichinvolves activities from developing experiments within resource constraints, acquiringmeasurement data, and conducting statistical analysis. Through assessing potential failure modesand iterations in specimen-test designs, the research projects provided an effective platform toallow hands-on learning experience where students used various course knowledge in mechanics,probability/statistics, and finite element modeling to achieve the objective. In this paper, wepresent how the mechanical integrity of 3D-printed structures depends on the printing orientationand its implications in predicting failure probability under mass production. Also, considerationsand implementation of the intensive and immersive summer
EngineeringBody of Knowledge (CEBOK), with the third edition (CEBOK3) [2] being published in thespring of 2019. ASCE developed and proposed changes to the CEPC following completion ofboth prior editions of the CEBOK.To manage change in the CEPC, ASCE has established a timeline to consider possible revisionsto the CEBOK and subsequent changes to the CEPC [3], including the CEBOK3. Many civilengineering programs may consider modifying their curriculum based on the CEBOK3,regardless of if or when ASCE actually proposes any changes to the CEPC or whether anychanges in the CEPC even occur based on the CEBOK3. Therefore, an important step inevaluating the CEBOK3 in terms of undergraduate education, whether considering accreditationor curricular design, is to
information fluencycontent for the Engineering 101 curriculum. Using a PBL approach, the curriculum has evolvedover the past three years and used a combination of venues, including in–person lectures, in-library assignments, and online learning modules. An overview of the current format of theinformation fluency cycle is presented in Appendix A. Despite changes, PBL has remained animportant part of the teaching/learning environment. Collaboration has also been an importantpart in the development of the information literacy curriculum. Weekly meetings with faculty inthe Fall 2013 semester allowed for increased dialog and feedback for the course. Thediscussions in these meetings have brought greater buy-in from the professors as well as requestsfor
Integrated STEM Instructional Leadership (PreK-6) Post-Baccalaureate Certificate Program at TU. She currently serves as the Chair of the Pre-College Engineering Education Division of ASEE, and is a member of the ASEE Board of Directors Committee on P12 Engineering Education.Ms. Elizabeth A. Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth (Liz) Parry Elizabeth Parry is an engineer and consultant in K-12 Integrated STEM through Engineering Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and a Coordinator and Instructor of Introduction to Engineering at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past sixteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school
understand the key elementsof strategic planning, and be exposed to the operational challenges of the company, includingfailures and successes. This EIP at Lawrence Tech fosters the involvement of companiesfounded and operated by entrepreneurial alumni. The Legends of Lawrence Tech is anorganization of entrepreneurial alumni that has taken a strong interest in the EIP.Internship ProgramsAt the heart of a strong internship experience is the ability to integrate concepts and theories thatare taught in a classroom setting and bring those concepts to a higher level of understandingthrough observation and practice in an actual work environment. At Drexel University co-opactivities are integrated into every student’s experience. They point-out the value
how the integration ofsuch a tool into the course curriculum might affect student performance.For both collection methods, students were asked to produce one original submission on anapproximately per week schedule corresponding with the submission deadlines for their normalhomework assignments. Each original submission was expected to include a photograph or videoand a brief descriptive statement that demonstrated the concepts discussed in that week’s lectures.After the transition to Twitter posts, students were also asked to submit at least two comments onthe posts of their classmates.To facilitate archiving of student Twitter posts related to the class, all posts containing the#mech293 hashtag were collected and analyzed using the Twitter
Paper ID #8611Educating Engineering Educators to Nurture 21st Century Indian EngineersProf. Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma Farrokh Mistree holds the L. A. Comp Chair in the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Oklahoma. Farrokh’s passion is to have fun in providing an opportunity for highly motivated and talented people to learn how to define and achieve their dreams. Farrokh received his B. Tech (Hons) degree in Naval Architecture in 1967 from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur and his Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of California
undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Fron- tiers of Engineering Education Symposium in 2013 and awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research
AC 2010-420: THE EEES/CONNECTOR FACULTY PROGRAM: SURVEYS OFATTITUDES, EXPERIENCE AND EVALUATIONSDaina Briedis, Michigan State Univesity Dr. Daina Briedis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research including student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a
such statement, thisproportion increased to 52.3% and 58.5% in Phase II and Phase III, respectively. This growthdoes not necessarily imply growth in academic misconduct. However, this is an alarming statisticbecause it shows the inefficiency of employed alternatives. The present study does not documentinstructional practices among Civil Engineering and Construction Management faculty at CSUS.However, from conversations with colleagues, I am aware that all faculty were concernedprimarily with online exams' integrity and security. We all, therefore, implemented some controlmeasures in our classes, among those, are encouraging students to share their camera duringexams (cannot be required at CSUS), employing "Canvas LockDown Browser
. Her research interests include empathy, design education, ethics education and community engagement in engineering. She currently teaches Cornerstone of Engineering, a first-year two-semester course series that integrates computer programming, computer aided design, ethics and the engineering design process within a project based learning environment. She was previously an engineering education postdoctoral fellow at Wake Forest University supporting curriculum development around ethics/character education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Student Engagement – IoT-Based Learning Materials and ProjectsAbstractEven with a return to in-person learning by many institutions
student and faculty perceptions of productive conflict. Themain conflicts that were reported in our study included conflicts of commitment, differentideas about the project direction as well as different working styles.Results from this research will enable us to rethink common models of team conflict anddevelop direct and indirect intervention strategies that can help students to better integrateemotion and intellect in engineering design and innovation.IntroductionAlthough design projects and course structures may vary, there has been a consistentattempt to integrate team experiences into the engineering design curriculum 1-5. Whilethere has been significant work that describes instructional approaches for integrating andassessing teamwork
as feedback. Lecture notes andreadings are posted in advance to allow efficient coverage of the theory and more time for in-class examples and assessment. In-class “board-work” using the document camera is scannedand placed on the class webpage. Electronic submission of homework and projects isencouraged, allowing students to make fewer trips to campus. Fourth, flexibility should beincorporated into the course syllabus. Most non-traditional students have outside commitmentssuch as work and family which require missing at least 1 class per semester. Allowing studentsto drop their worst exam, quiz, homework, etc., helps students overcome such absences. Finally,assessment needs to be an integral part of each course. Instructors need to
line with contemporary trends of various disciplines’ integration in theconstruction industry. The main objective of the proposed model was to foster the potentialbenefits that arises from shared educational goals between different technical areas. Throughcoordination with an existing Architectural class, the project involved students in Architecture,Civil Engineering, and Construction Engineering. The senior project mimics an Integrated ProjectDelivery process that simulates the complete development of a commercial building, fromconceptual design to construction. Architecture students led the first phase of the conceptual designof the project, with Civil and Construction Engineering students setting constraints in term ofstructural efficiency
research focuses on designing the user experience of machine learning systems, particularly in social computing contexts.Prof. Joe Gibbs Politz, University of California San Diego Joe Gibbs Politz is an Associate Teaching Professor of Computer Science & Engineering at University of California San Diego. His research interests and experience include programming languages and systems as well as education for computer science and adjacent fields. He teaches broadly across the computer science curriculum with a focus on introductory programming and programming languages, and develops tools for teaching computing in both collegiate and secondary school settings. When not programming or teaching, he goes to the dog beach
. ObjectivesThe objectives of this phase of the research project are to: • Team with several instructors in integrating this experimental project and lessons learned into engineering curriculum. • Demonstrate this experimental project and evaluate its effectiveness as an innovative engineering design for students. • In collaboration with industrial partners, evaluate and explore the possibility of commercialization upon demonstrated success. Page 11.1185.3 • Work with industrial partners and other academic collaborators, to constantly improve on the modeling and simulation system design, based on the evaluations of this
number of works in engineering education, including a Statics workbook for undergraduate engineering students. She is the Director of Innovation Programs and Operations for the non-profit research collaborative, Ad- vancing Engineering Excellence in P-12 Engineering Education. Dr. Gurganus teaches several first and second year Mechanical Engineering classes along with the Mechanical Engineering Senior Capstone design course for UMBC.Dr. Tanner J Huffman, The College of New Jersey Dr. Tanner Huffman is an assistant professor in the Department of Integrative STEM Education and Director of the Center for Excellence in STEM Education in School of Engineering at The College of New Jersey. Dr. Huffman has served as a
- Individual student teaching to help guide students toward integrating classroom and co-op learning experiences with personal goals for an international co-op assignment - Identifying companies and developing partnerships to create co-op job opportunities with international companies in the US and abroad - Working with language faculty to develop specialized intensive language and culture programs that prepare students to work abroad - Program evaluation and assessmentJennifer Oliver, IAESTE United States Jennifer Oliver is currently the Outbound Program Manager and East Regional Coordinator of IAESTE United States, a membership and exchange organization dedicated to developing global
Session 2209 A Biomedical Engineering Design Experience from Freshman Year to Senior Year Lisa M. Milkowski, Ph.D., P.E., Vincent R. Canino, Ph.D., P.E. Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE)AbstractThis paper presents a methodology of integrating design throughout the engineeringstudent’s years of study.Students have sufficient time to learn and achieve more in a design experience startingwith a two credit freshmen course, continuing with one credit courses throughout thesophomore and junior years, and ending with two credit design courses in each term ofthe senior year. With sufficient
search for ways toreduce their expenses in order to become or remain financially stable.Combining the challenge for higher-education to give students industry experience whileproviding a method for organizations to maximize their services with little or no fiscalexpenditures, results in a process called service-learning [1]. This term refers to educationalactivity in partnership with a public or non-profit agency, organization, or project within thecommunity. Service-learning from an academic viewpoint is normally completed in one of twoways. The first, curricular service-learning, is a process in which the project is integrated into anacademic course and carries academic credit. The second, co-curricular service-learning,complements academic
likely be put to use.2. HistoryIn 1994, I inherited this class as part of the regular teaching rotation in the School ofMME. The capstone class was given over the course of one semester, and structured asmany of these classes are, with the following educational goals: 1. The class was to be a capstone class, integrating a majority of the students’ educational experiences in the curriculum. 2. The class was to be structured around a team experience, with students working in teams of 4-6 students on a given project, to be completed over the course of the semester. 3. The class was a WSU “Writing in the Major” class, which meant that the class had to have a large writing component, including a couple of large reports, and
Biswas is a Professor of Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Engineering Manage- ment in the EECS Department and a Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Software Integrated Systems (ISIS) at Vanderbilt University. He has an undergraduate degree in Electrical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) in Mumbai, India, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science from Michigan State University in E. Lansing, MI. Prof. Biswas conducts research in Intelligent Systems with primary interests in hybrid modeling, sim- ulation, and analysis of complex embedded systems, and their applications to diagnosis, prognosis, and fault-adaptive control. As part of this work, he has worked on fault
campus resources, active listening skills, role boundaries andexpectations, and college and university policies and procedures. EPALs continue their trainingwith 6 hours of online synchronous training in August that focuses on team building, advisingtools, communication skills, university policies, and curriculum details [6].During the fall, EPALs take a 1-credit course called ENGR 291, designed to supplement EPALgrowth and development while creating a space to ask questions while serving as an EPAL.Returning EPALs offer advice and assist newer EPALs in how to answer questions, which helpsbuild a cohesive team. Self-discovery and growth in leadership skills are the cornerstones of theclass. Peer advisers benefit from the program as much as the
campus, never to address it again. Theexperience cannot simply be placed in a "shoebox".18 Rather, education abroad must be seen as alonger learning process that becomes a key component of an engineering education. Studentsmust be prepared for the experience, guided through the experience, and then assisted in theprocessing of the experience upon their return, so that they can integrate it into theirunderstanding of the world and of engineering. Such a "wrap-around" approach to educationabroad has long been recognized among intercultural communications scholars and scholars ofeducation abroad as an excellent means to cultivate learning from that experience.18,22Despite the benefits of a “wrap-around” approach for maximizing learning from
lifelong learning, barriers to lifelong learning, and impact Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2001, American Society for Engineering Educationof lifelong learning for individual engineers. Many of these studies are summarized in a 1985report by an NRC panel.2Lifelong learning is an issue of importance for engineers around the world. UNESCO sponsoredseveral significant studies including “Advances in the continuing education of engineers.”3 Thereport resulting from this study summarizes practices in continuing education in a number ofcountries, both developed and developing, and also the delivery systems used. UNESCO playeda central role in the