, science, and engineering. (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the
Proceedings, British Columbia, Canada, 14 pages.14. Anderson-Rowland, M.R., Rodriguez, A.A., and Grierson, A.E. (2011) “Making a Difference: How to Recruit More Community College Women and Underrepresented Minority Students Into Engineering and Computer Science,” 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 9 pages.15. Anderson-Rowland, M.R., Rodriguez, A.A., and Grierson, A.E., (2012) “Determining the Community College Audience,” 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, San Antonio, TX, 11 pages.16. Anderson-Rowland, M. R., Rodriguez, A. A., Hall, R. A., McBride, P. B
. 1, 2005, pp. 87-102.[6] B. A. Karanian, L. G. Chedid, M. Lande, G. Monaghan, “Work in Progress - Behavioral Aspects of StudentEngineering Design Experiences” in Proceedings of the 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, NY,October 22 – 25, 2008.[7] L. Cooper and D. A. Kotys-Schwarts, “Designing the Design Experience – Identifying the Factors of StudentMotivation in Project-based Learning and Project Service-based Learning”, in Proceedings of the 120th ASEEAnnual Conference, Atlanta, June, 2013.[8] H. Guo and J. Dong, “Effective Collaborative Inquiry-based Learning in Undergraduate Computer NetworkingCurriculum”, in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, 2013[9] Pearl Chen and Jane Dong, “A
toinstill interest in advanced manufacturing research and careers among undergraduate students. Theprogram recruits 10 students each year and provides them with an opportunity to work on anadvanced manufacturing research project under the guidance of a faculty and a graduate studentmentor. The following are the main objectives of this program: a) improve research skills of thestudents in STEM fields in general, and in the fields of advanced manufacturing in particular; b)enhance student’s interest in advanced manufacturing as it relates to graduate education or industrycareer; c) provide guidance to students on their graduate school selections and applications; and d)provide the participants with engineering innovation and entrepreneurship
, MA, Nov. 2002, vol. 1, pp. T4A-1–T4A-15.14. Olds, B., and Miller, R. (2004). The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study. J. Eng. Educ., 93(1), 23–36.15. McLellan, J. H., et al. (1996). Using multimedia to teach the theory of digital multimedia signals. IEEE Trans. Educ., 38(3), 336–341.16. Munson, C.C. (1995). “Elements of a new Electrical Engineering curriculum at Illinois: A shift from circuits to signal processing,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems, Seattle, WA, vol. 1, pp. 1Sf–4Sf.17. Karweit, N. (1998). “Contextual learning: A review and synthesis”, in A.M. Milne (ed.), Educational reform and vocational education (pp. 53-84
Prairie View A&M University in 2005 and 2011, respectively. His doctoral disserta- tion title was ”Enabling Scatterometry as an In-line Measurement Technique for 32 nm BEOL Application and Variability Analysis.” Faruk has extensive research experience in modeling, design, simulation, and process integration of nanoscale semiconductor devices, analog mixed signal circuit design, mixed signal testing techniques, transistor level device characterization, nuclear radiation detection and analysis, and radiation effects on semiconductor devices. Faruk authored several peer reviewed referred journals, such as IEEE Transaction on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Physical Review B, and Journal of Physics. Cur- rently he is
Paper ID #6317Evaluation of a First-Year Retention Project: Findings at HalftimeProf. Alan D. Niemi, LeTourneau University Alan D. Niemi is a professor and chair of Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University. He re- ceived his B.S. in Electrical Engineering Technology from Lake Superior State University and his M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Illinois Institute of Technology. He has taught courses in Electrical Engi- neering and Technology for 26 years. In addition to teaching, Mr. Niemi has spent seven years in industry designing digital and microcontroller systems.Dr. Matthew G. Green, LeTourneau University
a psychometrician, program evaluator, and institutional data analyst. She has authored/co-authored more than 30 journal articles and conference proceedings and served as a reviewer of journals in engineering education, STEM education, and educational psychology, as well as an external evaluator and an advisory board member on several NSF-funded projects.Dr. Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard got his Ph. D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1989 & a B. S. at Boston University, 1984. He was at NASA Glenn, 1989-1995, taught at Northwestern for Fall 1995, worked at Argonne National Lab, 1996-1997, Chicago State, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is a Sr. Lecturer & Research Associate in
theworkforce in building-related fields. The purpose of this paper is to elaborate on challenges ofconducting this project for the first year as well as lessons learned in overcoming these challenges.The course was implemented for the first time in Fall 2016 in a minority serving university.Three core components of the project are (a) establishing a building energy efficiency laboratory;(b) developing and implementing a new elective course curriculum; and (c) developing partnershipwith local building-related industry.All three core components that were slated to happen as part of the initial planning anddevelopment phase were completed.The major challenge that inevitably altered the project timeline was with the logistics of the labestablishment
, pp. 52-64, Mar 2010.7. Kroposki, B.; Lasseter, R.; et al, "Making Microgrids Work", IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, pp. 41-53, May/Jun 2008.8. Ipakchi, A.; and Albuyeh, F., "Grid of the Future", IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, pp.52-62, Mar/Apr 2009.9. Liserre, M.; Sauter, T.; et al, "Future Energy Systems", IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, pp. 18-37, Mar 2010.10. Bouhafs, F.; Mackay, M.; and Merabti, M., "Links to the Future", pp. 24-32, Jan/Feb 2012.11. Reder, W.; Bose, A.; et al, "Engineering the Future", pp. 27-35, Jul/Aug 2010.12. Venkata, S.S.; Brahma, S.; et al, "Continue Your Learning", pp. 37-43, Jul/Aug 2010.13. "Workforce Trends in the Electric Utility Industry", DOE Report to Congress, Aug
Paper ID #9119Engaged in Thermodynamics – Learning What We Don’t KnowDr. Patrick A. Tebbe, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Patrick Tebbe is a professor and chair of the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. Dr. Tebbe received B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering as well as the M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri–Columbia. He is currently a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), the American Nuclear Society (ANS), and a student branch advisor for
: (a) current knowledge, (b) a scale on perceptions ofentrepreneurship, (c) practice, (d) team and business model, and (e) program evaluation (post-survey only).Among those several sections, this study only utilized the data from perceptions ofentrepreneurship on the scale and practice of customer interview skills captured in open-endedquestions. As shown in Table 2, the scale was designed to assess student perceptions of the sixconstructs indicated by 33 items: (1) interest in entrepreneurship, (2) confidence in valueproposition, (3) self-efficacy in entrepreneurship, (4) self-efficacy in marketing/businessplanning, (5) self-efficacy in customer interview skills, and (6) current status of technology andbusiness model. As an attribute-focused
Paper ID #37921Board 217: Assessing Awareness and Competency of Engineering FreshmenonEthical and Responsible Research and PracticesDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. He currently serves as Associate Dean for Inclusion and Faculty Success in the College of Engineering. He is a member oProf. Amarnath Banerjee, Texas A&M University Dr. Banerjee is a Professor in the William Michael Barnes ’64 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Texas A&M University
integratewhat they learn in the course and apply it to real-life problem solving. Course topics includeprogrammable logic controller (PLC); sensor technology; industry robots; I/O interfacing; andmachine vision. Students are responsible for coming up with a process they want to automate,Project milestones include 1) develop concept paper; 2) build physical model; 3) perform wiringand interfacing; 4) write control program; 5) demonstrate model. Project deliverables include aworking system and a written report. The report should include (a) introduction, (b) problem tobe solved – process to be automated (c) construction of physical model - description of majorcomponents – CAD drawings, parts and sensors, (d) sequence of operations, (e) I/O
app using the different colorsof the bus icon displayed on a route screen (Figure 2 (a) & (b). When VIA services are detoured,changed, or canceled due to severe weather or construction, alerts for suspended, changed, ordetoured services are posted on the VIA website, or riders should call customer service to verifythe most up-to-date information. In extraordinary circumstances, they may change services withoutnotice [18]. SmartSAT system sends instant alerts to the developed app's registered riders forimportant updates and essential changes such as service schedules, route changes, ridershipreminders, and other unexpected changes in service (e.g., sporting events, natural disasters). Thiscan help prevent riders from missing vital
Zen Lee, Jyh Hwa Chou , and Hou Tin Leong, “Tele-Control of Rapid Prototyping Machine Via Internet for Automated Tele-Manufacturing,” Taiwan, 1999[5] Sanjay B. Joshi and Mark R. Supinski, “The development of a generic PC-based programmable logic controller simulator,” Pennsylvania, 1991[6] Darko Todorović, Zoran Jovanović, Goran S. Đorđević, “Monitoring the PLC based Industrial Control Systems through the Internet using Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio Technologies,” Serbia, 2011[7] Darshil, Sagar, Rajiv, Satyajit A. Pangaokar, and V.K. Sharma, “Development of a PLC Based Elevator System with Colour Sensing Capabilities for Material Handling in Industrial Plant,”Alandi,” Pune, 2008[8] Zafer Aydogmus, Member, IEEE
Politics in an Engineered World, edited by Miller, Jerónimo, and Zhu, 1–10. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2023. 12. C.E. Harris, S. Pritchard, J. Ray, E.E. Eanglehardt, M.J. Rabins, Engineering Ethics – Concepts and Cases, Sixth Edition, Cengage, Boston, MA, USA, 2019. 13. S.J. Bird, A. Briggle, “Research Ethics.” Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering: A Global Resource, edited by J. B. Holbrook, 2nd ed., vol. 3, Macmillan Reference USA, 2015, pp. 584-592. 14. D.H. Guston, T. Kowall, “Research Integrity.” Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering: A Global Resource, edited by J. Britt Holbrook, 2nd ed., vol. 3, Macmillan Reference USA, 2015, pp. 598-600.15. S.J. Bird, “Misconduct in
) increasing student engagement, success, and retention, and (b) ultimately seeing greater increases for underrepresented minority (URM), women, and first-generation students. Ten faculty teaching first- and second-year Engineering courses participated in the first cohort of ISE-2 in Summer 2017, which consisted of three workshops and six informal “coffee conversations”. At the conclusion of the workshops, each faculty was tasked with completing a teaching plan for the Fall 2017 semester, to incorporate the strategies and knowledge from ISE-2 into the courses they plan to teach. Focus groups with the ISE-2 faculty were conducted in Fall 2017 to obtain feedback about the faculty development program. Classroom observations were
. Hanna, "Contemporary issues in thermal gasification of biomass and its application to electricity and fuel production," Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 32, pp. 573-581, 2008.7. Gómez-Barea, A. and B. Leckner, "Modeling of biomass gasification in fluidized bed," Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 36, pp. 444-509, 2010.8. Dry, M.E., "The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000," Catalysis Today, vol. 71, pp. 227-241, 2002.9. Chu, W., L.N. Wang, P.A. Chernavskii, and A.Y. Khodakov, "Glow-discharge plasma-assisted design of cobalt catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis," Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 47, pp. 5052-5055, 2008.10. Iglesia, E., "Design, synthesis, and use of cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch
;T RED project. Withthis, we can course-correct and adjust to provide an optimal learning experience for our students. References[1] S. Chandrasekaran, J. M. Long and M. A. Joordens, "Evaluation of student learning outcomesin fourth year engineering mechatronics through design based learning curriculum," in 2015IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), El Paso, TX, Oct 2015, pp. 1-7.[2] C. E. Hmelo-silver, "Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?"Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, (3), pp. 235-266, 2004.[3] T. N. Walton, S. B. Knisley and M. B. A. McCullough, "Board 154: Model-building inengineering education," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, June
Civic Innovation at the University of Notre Dame. She was the Science and Engineering Academic Community Engagement Program Manager and Executive Director of the Northern Indiana Regional Science and Engineering Fair from 2012 to 2016 and her committee work includes several initiatives to broaden participation of underrepresented groups in STEM. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Criminal Justice and a Master of Public Affairs degree with a concentration in Nonprofit Administration from Indiana University South Bend.Dr. Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame Dr. Jay Brockman is the Associate Dean of Engineering for Experiential Learning and Community En- gagement. He received his Ph.D. in Computer
Paper ID #17915Diversity across Engineering Disciplines: Factors that Influence Student En-gineering Major ChoiceDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Amanda L Griffith, Wake Forest UniversityXinrui (Rose) Xu, Purdue University Xinrui (Rose) Xu is a currently a doctoral student in the School of Engineering
National Science Foundation’s Division ofUndergraduate Education: Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (Grant Number: NSF-DUE-1712089). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.ReferencesMacNell, L. (2015). What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9313- 4Matz, R. L., Koester, B. P., Fiorini, S., Grom, G., Shepard, L., Stangor, C. G., … McKay, T. A. (2017). Patterns of Gendered Performance Differences in Large Introductory Courses at Five Research Universities. AERA Open, 3(4
Ruth Streveler in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include creating systems for sustainable improvement in engineering education, promoting intrinsic motivation in the classroom, conceptual change and development in engi- neering students, and change in faculty beliefs about teaching and learning. He serves as the webmaster for the ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division.Irene B. Mena, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development.Prof. Matthew West, University of Illinois
Paper ID #11321Factors Associated with Student Participation in Cooperative Education Pro-grams (Co-Ops)Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer
technical nature of engineering. His current research includes exploring a) how integrating holistic, socio-culturally responsive practices and His- panic/Latine cultural assets and values into educational success strategies influences Hispanic/Latine stu- dents’ sense of belonging in engineering and b) how Hispanics/Latines experience values conflicts in engineering and then navigate/reconcile those conflicts, as students or professionals. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Promoviendo el Éxito Estudiantil a través de un Sistema de Apoyo (PromESA):Promoting Student Success through a Social, Academic, and Institutional Support System in Engineering
Austin, her M.S. from Youngstown State University, and her Ph.D. from the University of Akron. She is currently Professor of Mechanical EngineeringDr. Faisal Aqlan, University of Louisville Dr. Faisal Aqlan is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at The University of Louisville. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering form The State University of New York at Binghamton.Dr. Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame Dr. Jay Brockman is the Associate Dean of Engineering for Experiential Learning and Community Engagement. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and previously worked for Intel Corporation. He is also a founder ofDr. Kerry Meyers
Paper ID #13104Understanding the Communicative and Social Processes of Engineering Ethicsin Diverse Design TeamsDr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment
: Insertion Force vs Displacement Figure 11: Insertion Force vs Displacement Fastener B Non-treated Sample 1 Fastener B Non-treated Sample 2 Compression results for the epoxy-treated fasteners show an increase of insertion forcefor both sets of fasteners. This increase in force is a result of two factors: the diameter increaseof the fastener with the layer of epoxy and the epoxy’s rigid effect on the flexibility of the braidsduring compression. The compression test results for the epoxy-treated fasteners show theaverage of 5 pounds of force required for the 30/45 degree fastener and an average of 15 poundsof force for the 30
geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests broadly include the professional formation of engineers and diversity and inclusion in engineering, with specific interests in human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, assistive-technology, and