fully aware of the resource until late in their academic career. “I wish I had knownabout it earlier,” lamented one student. Some students said they stumbled upon the videos whilesearching for any online resources, while other students reported discovering the resourcethrough word-of-mouth (classmates or instructors). They expressed the need for frequentreminders by faculty that ME Online exists, especially when students are in their early years inthe program. One student noted: “When I first learned about the videos, I think it was, like, the end of my second year or early third year, and I remember looking at all of the videos there. And I was like, ‘Oh shoot! I could have used these!’ … [The college should] make it clear
hands-on, multi-faceted “tools” and marketable skills they can use to pursueengineering careers ranging from entrepreneur in a startup venture, to intrapreneur working in acorporate enterprise, to senior executive leading a multinational organization.The course centers around the creation of an “Innovation Playbook,” which is a semester longgroup project. It begins with students individually identifying problems and drafting needstatements [27] for a problem they would want to work on over the course of the semester. Oncestudents individually identified need statements, students would then pitch their statements as aone-minute elevator pitch to the class and then would be given time to self-create teams of fiveto six individuals per team. They
inclusion in engineering. Before coming to Stanford, she was a bilingual educator at low-income elementary schools in Texas. Prior to starting her career in education, Greses was an engineer project manager in the Caribbean. She holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Santo Domingo Technological Institute, a M.Eng. in Civil Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez, and a M.Ed. in School Leadership from Southern Methodist Uni- versity. Her work seeks to improve education for students who experience a cultural mismatch between the ways of knowing and speaking in their communities and those in STEM.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical
related to the outcomes of fluency and elaboration, but not reflection.IntroductionOne of the most timely and pressing goals of promoting early STEM education is to createeducational experiences that will both broaden enduring participation in the study of STEMtopics [1] and that will establish a long-term learning framework to encourage students to trainfor important STEM careers [2]. In the field of engineering education, this idea is bound up inmetaphors like those of “the pipeline”, “the ecosystem”, and “the pathways” [3,4], all of whichinclude a multitude of diverse trajectories in the course of study and skill development wherebystudents can access their opportunities to become expert engineers [5].There are many ways in which pre-college
unrecognized. The number of responses is small, and individuals who elected torespond to the survey may be those who placed greater value on ethics and/or had a greaterconnection to the instructor that emailed the survey invitation. Further, the survey instrumentwas not fully validated using rigorous methods [39, 44]. The majority of the survey respondentshad not worked very long as engineers after graduation. Those interviewed represented a broadrange of different career lengths post-graduation. Not all engineering disciplines and types ofengineering work are represented among the results.Results and DiscussionRQ1. Extent of impactThe survey results are summarized in Table 2. For all nine activity options listed on the survey,one or more individuals
then used these scenarios to identify “the ideal attributes ofthe engineer of 2020” and describe “ways to improve the training of engineers to prepare themfor addressing the complex technical, social, and ethical questions raised by emergingtechnologies.” The Engineer of 2020 casts engineers in the role of change agents and leaders in both theprivate and public sector and focuses on the opportunities that lay ahead: “The years between thepresent and 2020 offer engineering the opportunity to strengthen its leadership role in society andto define an engineering career as one of the most influential and valuable in society and one thatis attractive for the best and the brightest” (p. 48). Realizing these aspirations, the report’sauthors
produce scholarship linking their experiences to broader cultural phenomenaaround engineering and labor, further shaping a theory of change.PositionalityThe first and third authors, Valle and Bowen, are labor organizers with the American FederationFigure 1: Mapping of the components of this study to the liberatory engineering education modelproposed in [13].of Teachers (AFT) local GEO-3550, marginalized engineers, graduate student workers, childrenof union members, and participants within this study. As engineering graduate students whoseprimary fields of study are not engineering education, this work represents a departure from thetechnical scholarship of our fields. As early career scholars, we recognize forms of political riskinherent to
Equity, through games. He is the coauthor of books relating to gaming and energy and has published papers in international journals. He is an active participant in national and international conferences with papers and presentations. Before his teaching career, he had a very successful corporate management career working in R&D at Lucent Technologies and as the Director of Global Technology Management at Qualcomm. He had initiated and managed software development for both the companies in India. Prof. Radhakrishnan holds three graduate Degrees (M. Tech, M.S., M.B.A), and Sustainable Business Practices certification.Dr. James Jay Jaurez, National University Dr. Jaurez is a dedicated Academic Program Director and
on the country and the world sometimes.” The hydraulic fracturing activity helped thisstudent understand the potential implications of his future career and this was an importantoutcome since he planned to pursue employment in the oil industry.The narrow technical focus of individual courses in the engineering curriculum can obscureconnections between, and implications of, engineering concepts. One student described thatSustainable Energy as a whole course supported the broader integration of engineering conceptsand their practical applications. It helps put all the other classes into the wider focus and give more perspective… It helps us see the connections between everything, and Sustainable Energy definitely helps with that.An
on the current course, andprovides a slow path to improvement. This study presents a student-centered assessment modelthat provides timely actionable feedback allowing optimization of course instruction during thesemester with the objective of maximizing student learning and the overall student satisfaction.The proposed model uses a simple structured approach that incorporates questions requiringnumerical scores and open-ended questions to solicit student feedback.This model includes four surveys administered over the semester. The first survey is given on thefirst week of classes to familiarize the instructor with the background and career goals of eachstudent and their course expectations. Based on the findings of this survey, the
engineering students in order to promote collaborative problem solving and provide experience relevant to authentic work in industry.Ms. Esmee VernooijCatherine LaBore, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Catherine LaBore is a sociocultural anthropologist and media production professional. She has had a long career producing educational media. As an ethnographer and media/content producer, she spent nine years supporting engineering research with colleagues developing intelligent systems for education. She’s worked on problems of user experience and design and higher-level content development (e.g. expert ontology and schemata) for systems designed to teach language skills, cross-cultural social interaction
En- gineering and STEM Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Borrego is Senior Associaate Editor for Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. She previously served as Deputy Editor for Journal of Engineering Education, a Program Director at the National Science Foundation, on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education, and as an associate dean and director of in- terdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstand- ing publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All
classroom, faculty encounterstudents through a narrow lens that can hide or spotlight particular identities while stereotypingor simplifying more nuanced experiences. Considering the compelling aspect of inclusion thatpromotes acceptance of people with all their uniqueness [18], we argue engineering cultures thatdo not allow students to bring their whole selves are fundamentally at odds with the idea ofcreating an inclusive environment.A student's well-being depends on a wide range of experiences, including many beyond thebounds of the classroom, such as career prospects, living conditions, financial stability, academicpreparation, social connections, and mentor relationships. Alice's story conveys a broad andcomplex story that intersects her
NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revo- lutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program fo- cused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Susannah C. Davis, Oregon
with a minor in Spanish. She started her career in education as a member of the Baltimore City Teaching Residency. She taught at a neighborhood public high school while earning her Master’s degree from Johns Hopkins University. After three years in Baltimore, she relocated to Washington, D. C. to teach at a public charter middle school. After four years teaching middle school, she decided to pursue her doctorate from Temple University. Her dissertation focused on novice teachers’ perceptions of their preparation for teaching at the middle level. Dr. Hesson’s current research interests include science education and middle level teacher preparation. c American Society for Engineering
experience greater levels of anxietythan male students (Papanastasiou, 2008). In order to encourage strong students to pursuegraduate study and to prepare for research-based professional positions, a strong exposure toundergraduate research is critical and the experiences students have with conductingundergraduate research can be very influential in continuing education decisions.Undergraduate engineering students also are often not exposed to the roles people outside oftheir major play in projects they may work on in their careers. In a recent study, Coso et al.(2010) researched second year engineering students conducting an interdisciplinary researchproject to identify the personnel who should be involved in the creation of a retaining wall
interviews taking place in the years following.For example, it was found that of the original 20 graduate students interviewed, only five weremaster’s degree candidates, which is not representative of the larger population in whichmaster’s students make up over 60% of the engineering and textiles graduate students. Toaddress this, five more master’s students were interviewed in the spring of 2012. An additionalthree PhD students offered to speak to us at that time, so they were interviewed as well. Deeperanalysis of the faculty interviews revealed early-career faculty as users that the library might beable to better support, and so additional interviews of faculty in this category were conducted inthe spring of 2013 to acquire more data from this
AC 2007-1609: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND'S VENTUREACCELERATORScott Laughlin, University of Maryland Scott Laughlin is Director of the VentureAccelerator at the Maryland Technology Enterprise Institute (MTECH). Mr. Laughlin is a former Partner in IDG Ventures, a $600M family of private funds invested in early stage technology companies. Prior to his career in venture capital, Mr. Laughlin was a successful senior executive in Silicon Valley-based start-up companies, including a company sold to Microsoft. Mr. Laughlin received his B.A. from Princeton University (’90).Scott Magids, University of Maryland Scott Magids is Director of MTECH Ventures, one of the two main branches of the Maryland
, thinking as part of a team, and thinking and communicating inseveral “languages” of design. Fry12 has also discussed the importance of “design thinking” inengineering education and underscores the value of multidisciplinary teams. Until designpractices are fully integrated into engineering curricula, capstone design programs will bear asubstantial burden to better prepare undergraduates for careers that inevitably emphasize the“practice” of design.At RIT, the infusion of multidisciplinary design into the curriculum represents a strategicimperative for the KGCOE. Without strong top-down commitment, the likelihood of making anoticeable impact on the broader challenge outlined above seems remote. In addition to theMSD program discussed in this paper
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She received her M.S. in Counselor Education, Student Affairs Administration from Radford University, and M.S. in Career and Technical Education and B.S. in Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise both from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Christi Boone, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University C. L. BOONE is the Coordinator of Academic Support Services for the College Of Engineering at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She received her M.A. & B.A. degrees in English from Radford University.Bevlee Watford, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University DR. BEVLEE A. WATFORD, P.E. is the
industry. Students learning the design optimizationprocess early in their career will benefit from this experience greatly. In fluid mechanicsengineering a product development cycle starts with a design, and this initial design is optimizedusing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The purpose of the CFD is to minimize the number Page 13.463.1of tests that needs to be performed during the validation process of the design. This reduces thecost of development as tests are more expensive then the computational effort. The optimized Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Knowledge for the 21st Century,2nd edition, Draft 8 (herein referred to as BOK2)1.The LEAP Report challenges schools, colleges, and universities to fulfill the promise of a liberaleducation in a “new century marked by increasing global complexity, interconnectedness and Page 13.853.5rapid change.” In rethinking general education, the report addresses long-held assumptionsabout liberal education, namely: • That liberal education is not about careers or practical economic benefit. • That liberal education is only the province of certain departments in the arts and sciences and through narrow categories. • That liberal education is
positive feedback. It is quite another task to then gaugehow effective the professional development was based on student factors, such as academicachievement, science/engineering interest, and/or future academic and career directions ofstudents. The problem, as stated by Borko25 is that research is only beginning to understand “theimpact of teacher change on student outcomes.”Research conducted directly on student impact from RET style programs has shown to be adifficult task. Virtually all of the assessments on how RET model programs impact students havebeen through teacher participant reports instead of observing student outcomes directly10, 24.Although teacher participant reports may show seemingly significant gains in student awareness
from asking the participation of the entirefaculty in the seminar course, making the seminar topics more diverse and less detailed, toincluding discussion of current relevant topics in the field and inclusion of alumni talks in theseminar about their career experiences.B. Graduate Coursework. Survey questions 21 to 30 were formulated to address studentconcerns about graduate coursework in the program. Question 21 was aimed at determiningfactors motivating students’ decisions to register for courses. Relevance to the PhDcomprehensive examination and applicability to research and job prospects were the significantfactors influencing students to choose a particular class. Also the advisor’s recommendation andcore course requirements to obtain a
mystudents were surveyed after a 50 to 75 minute class, while the reported groups participated in asix-week program, involving a three-hour case study and three writing assignments.Finally, near the end of the semester, I gave a survey to get the students’ opinion of whether theoutcomes of the course had been accomplished. Answers were again on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1indicating strongly disagree and 5 indicating strongly agree. The response to the question, “Thematerial covered in the ethics case study discussion helped me to understand the ethicalresponsibilities of a career in engineering technology,” has yielded an average score over 4.0each semester, indicating the students did believe the class discussion was useful
fall completed and presented their course assessments to theentire faculty team. Table 2: UT Tyler Program Educational Objectives1. Graduates have the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to become engineeringleaders and assume responsibility for multidisciplinary engineering design; project,construction, and asset management; and ethical decision making in professional practice.2. Graduates continue to grow intellectually and professionally through participation inprofessional society activities, continuing engineering education, graduate studies, and/orself study during their professional career.3. Graduates have effective oral, written, and graphical communication skills.4. Graduates become registered engineers.The
thatstudents understood critical thinking and its role in the practice of engineering. Subsequentinterviews with incoming engineering students found a limited understanding of critical thinking.In an effort to help students become better critical thinkers and appreciate the importance of itspractice throughout their education and careers, critical thinking and engineering reasoning arenow explicit parts of the engineering school’s recently introduced, ―Introduction to Engineering‖(ENGR 100) course.To maintain consistency with the University’s overall QEP, the Paul-Elder model of criticalthinking is used to define and operationalize critical thinking. Critical thinking is now both anexplicit and implicit component of the ―Introduction to Engineering