Exposition, pp. 2599-2606, 2001.18. Miller, R., and Olds, B., “Encouraging Critical Thinking in an Interactive Chemical Engineering Laboratory Environment,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 506-510, 1994.19. Bruno, B., and Anderson, A., “Using Objective Driven Heat Transfer Lab Experiences to Simultaneously Teach Critical Thinking Skills and Technical Content,” Innovations in Engineering Education, pp. 177-189, 2005.20. Nelson, S., “Impact of Technology on Individuals and Society: A Critical Thinking and Lifelong Learning Class for Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 3:S1B/14-S1B/18, 2001.21. Wiggins, and Grant. “Educative Assessment: Designing
crucial for them to quicklydevelop their scholarship foci, and research plans to allow them to achieve tenure.A successful tenure program requires a balance of teaching, scholarship, and service; however,developing a robust research and scholarship agenda while trying to maintain the excellence inteaching and a broad service agenda is a challenge. In addition, teaching-oriented colleges oftenlack research laboratories, have a very limited number of graduate students, and offer little or nostartup funds to new faculty. Because of economic constraints, both administrators and facultyare being asked to do more with less support [6]. Simply put, the “action figure” portrait oftoday’s engineering/engineering technology professor[7], who has to do it
primarily full-scale, field oriented, experimentation. He has served as Chief Scientist on over 35 Oceanographic Research Vessel cruises and as Director of the University’s Joint Research Institute with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Currently, he directs the Marine Hydrodynamics Laboratories and is Faculty Director of the M-STEM Academy. Page 15.191.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Are We Really “Crossing the Boundary”? Assessing a Novel Integrated Math/Science CourseIn recognition of the critical need for an increased and diverse
received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University.Brian Self, California Polytechnic State University Brian Self is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. Prior to joining the faculty at Cal Poly in 2006, he taught for seven years at the United States Air Force Academy and worked for four years in the Air Force Research Laboratories. Research interests include active learning and engineering education, spatial disorientation, rehabilitation engineering, sports biomechanics, and aerospace physiology. He worked on a team that developed the Dynamics Concept Inventory and is currently
knowledge of the field and also investconsiderable effort and resources in updating their technical curricula and laboratories toaccommodate these new developments in their field. Therefore instructional design in thisenvironment needs to respond to this continually changing technical landscape. Page 15.1109.1On the other hand, faculty tenure and promotion decisions in computing disciplines arefrequently based on successful research and peer-reviewed publication. Upgrading curricula isseldom well recognized and rewarded for faculty in higher education academic environments.Thus, updating of curricula places additional stress on busy faculty members
undergraduate students in developing thesehands-on activities for K-12 outreach. Since then other benefits have come from this course.There is now a dedicated Engineering K-12 Outreach Laboratory (Figure 16) in our School ofEngineering building. This provides us with an on-campus location where we can host groups ofscouts, individuals and schools interested in STEM fields. This course was instrumental instarting a K-12 STEM outreach “library” of hands-on activities, which can be used on- or off-site.Practicing engineers from the area are also excited with our K-12 STEM library. Many havevolunteered to host their own workshops at events such as Women in Engineering and MathOptions Career Day. However, most were uncomfortable with developing the
/solar_basics.html/.National Renewable Energy Laboratory, http://www.nrel.gov/.AGI’s EarthComm – Energy Resources, http://www.agiweb.org/earthcomm/naturalresources10. AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge Heather Woodyard for her work with us on this project,as well as, Andrew Spurgeon, Anant Kukreti, Karen Davis, Debbie Kinne, and everyoneelse involved with Project Step and these two fine high schools. Page 9.840.23
example, again consider the second term of the sophomore year for a typicalUniversity of Pittsburgh IE student. Students would take three IE courses – Probability andStatistics (ENGR 0020), Productivity Analysis (IE 1054), and Human Factors (IE 1061). Ifcertain topics were introduced in such a way that students simultaneously see their application indifferent areas, there would be better reinforcement as well as a much better appreciation forthese principles. For instance, when the normal distribution is introduced in ENGR 0020, onemight also do a work sampling study in IE 1054, and a signal detection theory laboratory in IE1061 that require the use of normal tables. We are currently working on implementing bothaspects of our model into the
work and co-op knowledge andskills that have brought them to the point where they are now ready to initiate andcomplete a significant design project. This addresses the Criterion 4 mandate that thecapstone experience should be the culmination of previously acquired knowledge andskills.Nearly all students mention that their course work and laboratories are valuable andcontribute to their ability to reinforce and extend their hands-on skills during co-op.Some examples from initial self-assessment essays include the following. Undertaking and completing a senior design project is going to involve bringing lots of skills from different areas together. These include theoretical concepts, teamwork, and the ability to learn new
software. Spreadsheet programs, for example Microsoft Excel, are alreadyentrenched in college computer laboratories with students and faculty having familiaritywith their use. We present our experiences in implementing this approach in one section(32 students) of a freshman introduction to engineering design course. A preliminaryassessment is also presented.1. IntroductionThe use of team projects as a way to teach engineering design is pervasive across allengineering disciplines and throughout the curriculum. The success of any design team --both in learning design concepts and performing well -- requires that students have agood grasp of technical and management aspects of the design process. Accordingly,poor management or lack of communication
software was placed on all classroom and computer laboratory computers and used extensively on student projects and classroom demonstrations. Also, the four core project management courses utilize the same set of primary textbooks, thereby saving students a significant amount of money and enabling the faculty to coordinate and collaborate on course content.ImplicationsAlthough funding is currently very tight for academic institutions, there is a path to grow newprograms and establish new departments that align with the needs and interests of students andemployers. The Citadel’s MSPM and the Department of Engineering Leadership and ProgramManagement were built with one tenured faculty member, one visiting professor, and liberal useof
, Page 24.468.18 complimenting what was already being done in the context of reliability.” • R8.13: “The required laboratory courses (Sophomore, Junior, Senior) emphasize statistics and uncertainty analysis in Design of Experiments. Students in the Junior level Machine Design course are taught to consider the variability of materials, manufacturing processes, and unpredictable factors of products in service such as variable loading, and the necessity for a factor of Safety. They analyze the empirical nature of fatigue analysis, and apply fundamental concepts of uncertainty in designing components.” • R8.14: “We focus on teaching them how to deal with uncertainty through prototyping and
then connected to a small electric water pumpwhich is itself driven by a photovoltaic panel. This gives students an opportunity to be sure theirsystem is working and to make preliminary observations of the water heating effect. As the initial system is observed and proven to be functional, student groups are asked todiscuss possible variables affecting performance, and select a variable to test during the follow-on lab the next day. This team discussion is critical in understanding how engineers reallydevelop their own investigations. From NGSS Appendix F - Science and Engineering Practicesin the NGSS: “In laboratory experiments, students are expected to decide which variables should betreated as results or outputs, which should
with Dr. Brian Adams, a well-known hand surgeon. In the summer of 2006, he began a post-doctoral fellowship at Mayo Clinic, working on orthopaedic biomechanics and physiology cellular imaging laboratories. This provided the opportunity to work with outstanding clinical and research mentors like Drs. Kai-Nan An, Kenton Kauf- man, Gary Sieck, Ann Reed, Harold Kitaoka, as well as others. His research at that time focused on non-invasive imaging of muscle tissue as well as cadaveric studies of the foot and ankle. Dr. McCullough is a faculty member of the first bioengineering program independently housed at a Historically Black College or University and is a part of the NSF ERC-RMB which includes research on the
me an opportunity to further develop my interpersonal andcommunication skills essential in a team environmentAll of these design projects involve group exercises, discussion and presentations. For example,the capstone course requires students to make four oral presentations (including a posterpresentation and a final presentation) and to submit three reports and a professional logbook.APSC 170 and APSC 258 projects include interactive tutorials, laboratory work and designcompetitions. All of these factors contribute to the development of students’ interpersonal andcommunication skills. The majority of students generally agreed to this, as can be seen in Table 8and Figure 9. From students’ comments, we realize that some groups faced
mechanics course that incorporates traditionallectures with interactive hands-on learning, as well as web-based instruction and homework. Theweb-based activities vary in level of interaction with the student. High interaction activitiesfeature active learning with instant feedback; low interaction activities feature readings andlectures with demonstrations. Exercises focused on creating and using free body diagrams havebeen developed, and initial data on self-efficacy has been obtained. Additional studies will beconducted throughout the academic year.The introductory mechanics course for which these web-based exercises are being created istaught to 80-90 students per term and involves hands-on laboratory exercises weekly within theclass meeting
including serving as director of the Georgia Tech Air Quality laboratory from 1988 to 2008. He currently serves as deputy director for Research and Technology Transfer for National Center for Transportation Productivity and Management at Georgia Tech.Dr. Caroline R. Noyes, Georgia Institute of Technology Caroline Noyes is trained as an educational psychologist, and her education and work have focused on assessing student learning both in and outside of the classroom. Experiences in both academic affairs and student affairs provide her with a holistic understanding of the modern university and a broad collection of assessment methodologies suitable to a variety of situations. As her intellectual pursuits turned in
Learning Returns to College: What Evidence is There That it Works?”, Change, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.25-35, July, 1998.18. P.T. Terenzini, et. al., “Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students’ Reported Learning Gains”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 1, pp.123-130, January 2001.19. P. Ram, “Problem Based Learning in Undergraduate Education: A Sophomore Chemistry Laboratory”, Journal of Chemistry Education, Vol. 76, No. 8, pp.1122-1126, 1999.20. R. Ryan et. al., “A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education” In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 2. The classroom milieu (pp. 13-51). Orlando , FL : Academic Press, 1985.21. R. M. Ryan, and E. L
students are expected to prepare for class by simply reading or skimming assignedportions of the text book. The instructor provides an engaging lecture using physical models,laboratory exercises, demonstrations, and multi-media assets whenever possible. Timepermitting, instructors or student groups work example problems in class. Instructors evaluatestudent performance using conventional instruments, most notably timed examinations. [2] Over the past year, the authors developed and implemented an instructional method thatemploys blended classroom methods to improve student learning. Dubbed “Thayer 2.0,” [Figure4], the method leverages technology and blends what the authors considered to be some of thebest characteristics of the CME method, the
theory.Dr. Owe G. Petersen, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Petersen is Assistant VP of Institutional Research and Assessment, Professor Emeritus and former Department Chair of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He is a former Member Technical Staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories and received his Ph.D. de- gree from the University of Pennsylvania in 1971. His technical work ranges over topics such as Optical Data Links, Integrated Circuit Technology, RF semiconductor components, and semiconductor compo- nent reliable. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and an ABET EAC program evaluator in Electrical Engineering
Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #8492Architecture, Fault-Tolerance, Distributed and Parallel Computing. He is the founder and Co-Director ofthe Computer Networks Laboratory at UWM. Dr. Hosseini has published over 120 research papers in ref-ereed journals and conference proceedings. One of his co-authored papers has won the Best Paper Award.He has published two book chapters. He is the co-recipient of a patent in the field of Computer Networks.He has received funding from NSF and industry in support of his research and education. He has super-vised nine PhD and over 60 MS students. Dr. Hosseini is an internationally known figure. He has servedon the
experience and motive using student comments and survey data on perceptions of the Page 24.189.2course. Those who work in graduate teacher training and graduate student development may beinterested in this paper.IntroductionMany universities and colleges provide teacher training for graduate teaching assistants (GTAs).The GTAs play an important role as instructors, lecturers, laboratory and recitation teachers,graders, tutors, proctoring exams and grading homeworks. An Internet search on trainingmanuals or programs will bring up dozens of these teaching tools for GTAs, suggesting thatthere are a variety of methods and strategies to prepare graduate
Paper ID #10108Assessing BS–CS Student Outcomes Using Senior ProjectMr. Norman Pestaina, Florida International University Mr. Norman Pestaina is a Senior Instructor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences (SCIS) at Florida International University (FIU). Mr. Pestaina completed the B.Sc. in Mathematics (Special) at the University of the West Indies in 1972, and the MS in Computer Science at the Pennsylvania State University in 1979. He has been an Assistant Staff member of the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy’s Lincoln Laboratory, and Lecturer in the Department of Mathematics at the Cave Hill campus of the
topics.Dr. Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Carol Haden is s Senior Evaluator with Magnolia Consulting, LLC. She holds a doctorate in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis on program evaluation from Northern Arizona University. Dr. Haden has extensive experience in the evaluation of formal STEM education projects across the K-20 spectrum and the evaluation of informal STEM Education and Public Outreach (E/PO) programs. She has designed and implemented evaluations of programs funded by the National Science Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Arizona Board of Regents, Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Arizona Department of Education, among others. She has
withindividual students or student teams when discussing case studies on Page 24.223.17engineering/technology concerns. For example, when discussing case studies on thefuture roles engineering and technology students will undertake in their careers,instructors can use the Leadership Approach to help students develop ideas for dealingwith specific problems they will likely encounter in the workplace.Laboratory Work: For courses involving laboratory work, instructors can use some orall of the eight leadership behaviors when discussing and evaluating appropriatelaboratory behavior. The instructor can integrate the leadership behaviors for improvingstudent conduct
Graduate Group in Education at the University of California, Davis, where he is also the Director of the UC Davis Center for Integrated Computing and STEM Education (http://c-stem.ucdavis.edu) and Director of the Integration Engineering Laboratory. His current research includes developing computing and robotics technologies and integrate them into STEM education in both formal and informal settings for integrated learning. From 1989 to 1992, he was a Senior Engineer for robotic automation systems with the Research and Development Division, United Parcel Service. He has authored and coauthored more than 170 papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings. He holds two U.S. patents. He is the author of the book ”C
. culminating in a major design students who graduate meet all experience. graduation requirements. Resources and Infrastructure Criterion 6 Criterion 7 Criterion 8 Faculty must be of sufficient Facilities including classrooms, Institutional support and leadership number and must have the offices, laboratories, and associated must be adequate to ensure the competencies to cover all of the equipment must be adequate to quality and continuity of the curricular areas of the program. support attainment of the student
experience in construction, engineering, and research and eight years of academic experience. He was Co-Chair of the ASCE Civil Engineering in the Oceans V conference. He was the only manager in the 55-year history of the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory ever to win the Employee-of-the-Year Award. He has won numerous awards for project management. He has conducted research for the Construction Industry Institute, Center for Construction Industry Studies, U.S. Navy, U.S. Army, OSHA and other organizations. He has published 45 journal and conference pa- pers. He holds a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin and the M.S. and B.S. in Ocean Engineering from Texas A&M University
Paper ID #10792Correlating Experience and Performance of On-Campus and On-Line Stu-dents Assisted by Computer Courseware: a Case StudyDr. Hong Man, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES) Dr. Hong Man joined the faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Stevens in January 2000. He received his Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in December 1999. Dr. Man is currently an associate professor in the department of ECE. He is serving as the director of the undergraduate Computer Engineering program, and the director of the Visual Information Envi- ronment Laboratory at Stevens
students will eventually practice in, they will allutilize project management skills.The main constraint on the CE Management course content derives from the fact that it is theconstruction engineering component of a civil engineering program. All civil engineeringprograms are required to provide a broad education, which includes several design subdisciplinecourses with attendant laboratory experience. Consequently, the credits available for projectmanagement courses are severely limited. While a construction management curriculum mayinclude two project management courses and possibly a separate scheduling course, there areinsufficient credits available in a civil engineering curriculum to provide such coverage.Consequently, CE Management is