generation superconducting wire led to an R&D 100 Award in 2004. He received his Ph. D. in Materials from the Pennsylvania State University in 1998. Dr. Gibbons is a 2012 NSF CAREER awardee, as well. That program is designed to develop new environmentally benign piezoelectric materials, which can be used for a variety of sensing and actuation applications including sonar, ultrasound, energy harvesting, and microelectromechanical systems.Mr. Sean Maass Currently pursuing a Masters Degree in Materials Science and Engineering. Passionate about enhancing Engineering Education across the globe as well as continuing to learn more about Materials, Design, Manufacturing, Data Mining and Analysis, and Statistics.Prof
/Associations and Careers Page 24.318.6Other tabs used:Alerts and RSS Feeds; Avoid Plagiarism; Collection policy; Contact a Librarian (chat); ElectricalEngineering Basics; Faculty Resources; FAQ; Find Conferences; Helpful Tools (library);Intellectual Property Issues in Engineering; Intellectual Property; MATLAB; Mobile Apps;News Resources; One Search; Other resources; Publication Types; Publishing; RCR and Ethics;Web Sites; Web Resources; Research Assistance (library); Research help; Safety/MSDSSources; Society News Feeds; Software and Programs; Tutorials/Database tutorials; UsingFindIt; and Using Knovel.EE BoxesTen major areas were found in EE guides
University prior to beginning his faculty career in Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, where he co-founded Automated Cell, Inc. He has been a Visiting Professor of Bioengineering at the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering as well as a Visiting Scholar in Biomedical Engineering at Boston University. He also has led R&D teams at Organogenesis Inc. and Polymerix Corporation developing tissue-engineered medical products and drug- generating biodegradable polymers, respectively. He is the inventor on ten issued US patents. He has been the recipient of the first Whitaker Young Investigator Award from the Biomedical Engineering Society, a Searle Scholar Award, and an Early Career
) ______ Page 24.762.15BONUS! This Presentation Rocked!! (0-5) ______ CE350 Modified January 4, 2014 DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGCE490: SPECIAL TOPICS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING - ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS Three Minute Follies Conveying Technical Information Quickly and Effectively Communication…your ability to convey information, often technical and complex, will be of crucial importance throughout your career. Can
, Lafayette College Arthur D. Kney has been a resident of Bethlehem, Penn. since 1993. He lives with his lovely wife Linda, their brilliant eight-year-old daughter, and two wonderful cats. Kney received his doctorate of philosophy (Ph.D.) in environmental engineering from Lehigh University in 1999 and his professional engineering li- cense in 2007. He is currently serving as an Associate Professor and Department Head in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Throughout Kney’s career, he has been active in the community, at the local, state, and national level. He has served as chair of the Pennsylvania Water Environment Association (PWEA) research committee, Chair of the Bethlehem
the University of Washington at Seattle in 1982, 1987, and 1995, respectively. He began his academic career in 1998, and is currently the chair of the Department of Com- puter Science at Eastern Washington University in Cheney, Wash. His research interest includes numerical Page 23.224.2 methods for forward and inverse solutions to partial differential equations with biomedical applications. Prior to his academic career, he was employed as a senior principal design engineer in the electronics industry, where he enjoyed fifteen years of experience developing parallel embedded signal and image
what they told me to take, and so advising was a big issue for me. Similar to experiences with faculty during office hours, students reported both positiveand negative experiences with advisors. It appears that early in the students’ careers they hadpoor experiences with their advisors, but as time wore on the experiences improved. Male Political Science Switcher: I was having some problems freshman term and I went in and talked with him and thought he was really helpful giving me advice. Male Mechanical Engineer: I've had a horrible experience with counselors until right now. This last counselor visit was the first time the counselor was nice to me and actually cared that I was there
EPSC course structure wasmodified for the 2005 term as described below: • The first class session consisted of a course overview, a pre-test assessment activity, and laboratory safety training. The pre-test assessment activity will provide a basis to measure the change in student skill, knowledge, and behavior as a result of their experiences in the EPSC course. • The next ten class periods will occur in the laboratory setting with the students split into teams of two or three; every team will spend two weeks on each of the unit processes, which include adsorption, air stripping, ion exchange, jar testing, and SBRs. Since students will be faced with open-ended problems in future careers, a real-world
for urgency of reform of undergraduate engineeringeducation to better prepare young engineering students for entry into engineering practice,22 urgency ofreform exists within graduate engineering education as well. But reform is not to change traditionalresearch-based graduate education, which is “excellent” for its intended purpose to prepare futureacademic researchers in the context of inquiry-based learning. The need for graduate reform is to build a Page 9.826.9new type of post-baccalaureate professional graduate education that better supports the career-long “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education
); Page 10.114.8 c) Performing quality control (e.g., reviewing all self-studies); Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education d) Coordinating with other organizations to obtain/evaluate data (e.g., Career Services, centralized campus assessment office); e) Investigating possible assessment tools; and f) Coordinating/organizing/helping programs get ready.Q. 4 Consistent Approach to AccreditationWhen asked if they employed a consistent approach to accreditation across their programs,twenty respondents indicated that they did not – that departments and programs were free to dowhatever they wanted
students), perceptions (of students), and extrapolations (of what the future wouldbe). This three-pronged data collection would involve US academics, industry executives andstudents soliciting information in each country from engineers and managers, workers andacademics as shown in Figure 4. As shown in the Figure, while we would be collecting datafrom our counterparts in industry and academia, we also wanted to encourage an informationexchange among all the entities. In addition, participating students kept journals that enabledthem to reflect upon their changing career and voyage expectations as the progressed around thePacific Rim. At the end of the voyage they were encouraged to reassess their professionalexpectations and further reflect on
with respect toteaching/advising/tutoring freshman engineering students.” Information on advising servicesprovided in first-year programs compiled from these open-ended questions is summarized inTables 5 and 6. Respondents often listed more than one comment. Course schedule planningand career planning were the types of advising services most often mentioned, as shown in Table5. Respondents’ comments on how advising is handled are shown in Table 6. The mostfrequently mentioned advising method was department-specific advising. Interestingly, over halfthe department-specific comments were generated in Categories II, III, and VI. Page
Page 9.685.3“Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”internalization of social signs, and of the internalization of culture and of social interactions”10.Thus, epistemologically, knowledge and understanding are personal but socially constructed bythe learner.As students progress through the program they will have repeated practice at developing the so-called career skills of teamwork and communication in addition to enhancing their engineeringcontent knowledge. According to Reynold’s11 model of developing competency, consistent andreliable performance of a skill occurs after a number of attempts
faculty are largely deficient in the practices of engineering and have little or no firsthand knowledge or experience to pass on to students being educated for careers in engineering practice as opposed to research. Systemic engineering education reform is at least partially dependent on the resolution of this and other interrelated problems;85Professor Splitt has apparently raised the ironic possibility of unethical academic resistance toimplementing (by way of EC2000) the study of ethics into engineering curricula.Recapitulating, the literature indicates considerable interest in ethics and unethical conduct isdetrimental to higher education, the practice of engineering and engineering education. Throughits
experiences at the center of undergraduate education, starting inthe freshman year. We briefly outline the goals, history, structure, and our evaluation of ourIntegrated Business and Engineering Freshman Workshop, a team-project-based learning courseemphasizing entrepreneurial product development. The main goal of the Workshop, and theinterdisciplinary curricula which it leads into, is to enable graduates to move more rapidly alongtheir chosen career paths, graduating both competent in their functional disciplines—whetherbusiness or engineering—and better prepared for long-term success. Freshmen, by and large,come as a blank slate in terms of disciplinary biases and expectations about college“coursework.” By working in teams on original
true spirit of academia – in order to prepare students for successfulengineering careers.1. Introduction Seeing conflict as an opportunity to create art from our very being is a challenge for the artist in all of us. Our lives are not dependent on whether or not we have conflict. It is what we do with conflict that makes the difference.1 Thomas F. CrumThe beneficial role of inner conflict in helping learning and as a source of innovation is not a Page 8.1307.1new concept1, 3. However, it does appear to be an uncommon and thus a largely
during the pre-college years, has adversely affected outcome and personal traits. Measures should be taken to overcome the negative effects of the “undesirable” traits, acquired during school years, and to encourage students to develop attributes for success in their college education. 4) To expose students to engineering work environment: In an attempt to create an awareness of the role of engineers in the work place, students in the program would be given the opportunity to perform engineering tasks, as junior members of a team. This type of experience would help students become more familiar with opportunities that await them, and help them decide on their future career objectives. This experience can also help build
thefollowing: a) Reasons for choosing engineering as a career (male students, Université deSherbrooke); b) Reasons for choosing engineering as a career (female students, Université deSherbrooke; c) Reasons for dropping out of engineering (male and female students, Universitéde Sherbrooke); d) Peer training for the 1st co-op work term; e) College students’representations of the engineering profession; f) Role of faculty members as models forengineering students. It is expected that the first essay to be completed will be so in late winter2002. COMPETENCIES IN S & T METACOMPETENCY IN COMMUNICATION
to the Three Gorges Dam in China. In that way, all students were required to thinkabout an international project to some degree. This was another suitable model to teach studentsabout globalization. The older Three Gorges Dam assignments were no longer available forcontent analysis as part of this research. Final Reflective EssaysIn the first part of the final essay assignment, students were required to write about oneprofessional society meeting (such as ASCE, AGC, SWE, etc.) or professional developmentactivity (such as the career fair, design expo, civil engineering graduate seminar) that they hadattended during the semester. Of these options, EWB represents the opportunity that is the mostobviously global in nature. The percentages
evidence of faculty teaching effectiveness (policy) and working closely with the Center for Teaching and Learning (university-wide) to provide customized workshops to COEN faculty (professional development). The COEN‟s Research and Scholarly Activities Committee has been charged to identify, develop and lead efforts directed toward the establishment of financial reporting systems and consistent, flexible workload policy that support annual evaluation processes (procedure and policy). The COEN‟s Promotion and Tenure Committee has developed criteria and guidelines for promotion of research faculty (policy). Plans are underway to provide a similar career progression pathway for non-tenure
engagement. Middle school science studentswho reported fulfillment of their needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness were morelikely to continue enrolling in science courses and plan to pursue careers in science.5 Incomparing junior-high and elementary students’ autonomous motivation to complete homeworkassignments, researchers attributed the older students’ decreased motivation to their teachers’poor support of the students’ psychological needs, when compared to elementary school studentsand teachers.6 Students in physical education classes that perceived a more supportiveenvironment reported greater need fulfillment and engagement in physical education activities.7While fewer researchers have utilized self-determination theory among college
grant), advancing problem based learning methodologies (NSF CCLI grant), assessing student learning, as well as understanding and integrating complex problem solving in undergraduate engineering education (NSF CAREER grant). Her other research interests lie in cardiovascular fluid mechanics, sustainability research, and K-12 engineer- ing outreach.Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineer- ing at the University of Colorado - Boulder (CU). She has taught the capstone design for environmental engineering since 1998 and began incorporating service learning projects into the course in 2001. She also
education to improve itsquality and direction. Former president of the National Academy of Engineering, William A.Wulf, said it best in his statement, “Incorporating a set of "new fundamentals" into theengineering curriculum and encouraging faculty to practice their craft are among the stepsneeded to bring engineering education into the 21st century.” 1The engineering student can nolonger be instructed through “chalk and talk” practices, but rather, there is a need to makeengineering education more dynamic and engaging to produce well-rounded engineeringstudents for the careers of the 21st century1,2. According to the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) Engineer of 2020 Attributes3 report, engineers will be called upon to adapt tonew trends in
from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a Ph.D. minor in Women’s Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s ADVANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist Engineering (RIFE) group, whose projects are described at the group’s website, http://feministengineering.org/. She is interested in creating new models for thinking about gender and race in the context of engineering education. She was recently awarded a CAREER grant for the project, ”Learning from Small Numbers: Using personal narratives by underrepresented undergraduate students to
engineering and in computer science, Pat worked in computer chip design before changing careers to teach high school. He is currently a graduate student in STEM Education at The University of Texas at Austin and his research interests include measuring the educational benefits of middle school and high school robotics programs.Stephanie Baker Peacock, The University of Texas, Austin Stephanie received her BS and MS of Mathematics at branch campuses of The University of Texas and is pursuing her PhD in Science and Mathematics Education at The University of Texas at Austin. Her predominate research interest focuses on development of algebraic reasoning and symbolic understand- ing. Special attention is paid to students in
AC 2011-2430: MOVING BEYOND THE DOUBLE-BIND: WIE AND MEPPROGRAMS AND SERVING THE NEEDS OF WOMEN OF COLOR INENGINEERINGLisa M Frehill, National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Lisa Frehill is the Director of Research, Evaluation and Policy at the National Action Council for Mi- norities in Engineering (NACME), a Senior Program Officer with the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine at the National Research Council, and a senior analyst at Energetics Technol- ogy Center. Since earning her doctoral degree Dr. Frehill has developed expertise in the science and engineering workforce with a focus on how gender and ethnicity impact access to careers in these fields. While she was an
Technology Policy Fellowship at the National Science Foundation. Her research interests focus on interdisciplinary faculty members and graduate students in engineering and science, with engineering education as a specific case. Dr. Borrego holds U.S. NSF CAREER and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) awards for her engineering education research. Dr. Borrego has developed and taught graduate level courses in engi- neering education research methods and assessment from 2005-2010. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison.Jefferey E. Froyd, Texas A&M
in P-12 career and technical educa- tion for the Illinois State Board of Higher Education/Illinois State University; research and evaluation for the Illinois Assessment and Accountability Project (Illinois State Board of Higher Education/University of Illinois); and the Entrepreneurial Leadership in STEM Teaching and Learning (Project EnLiST - Na- tional Science Foundation/University of Illinois). Her research focus and area of expertise is personal development, sustainable transformative learning environments, and curricular change. She has worked with curriculum/programs in a variety of areas, including teaching centers, engineering, business, honors, national scholarship advising, animal sciences, human
University. She has a B.Eng. in chemical engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering with a Ph.D. minor in women’s studies from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s AD- VANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist Engineering (RIFE) group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at the web- site http://feministengineering.org/. She is interested in creating new models for thinking about gender and race in the context of engineering education. She was awarded a CAREER grant in 2010 for the project, ”Learning from Small Numbers: Using
Society of Civil Engineers for curriculum redesign supporting the civil engineering body of knowledge. He is actively engaged in developing strategies for enhancing the STEM education pipeline in Texas and nationally and has testified before the Texas Senate Higher Education Committee in that regard. He served on a committee of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to develop a statewide articulation compact for mechanical engineering and currently chairs the council for developing articulation compacts in other engineering disciplines. He also served on the Texas State Board of Education committee preparing the standards for career and technical education.Dr. Mary Eileen Smith, Texas Higher Education Coordinating