Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melodie A. Selby PE, Walla Walla University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Methodology This study was designed as a first phase to study the effectiveness of teaching engineeringethics at the University. Later areas of study will build on this study and may include alongitudinal study and expansion to other institutions.Design This study was a non-experimental between-subjects non-equivalent groups design. Thisstudy was designed to compare the moral judgment of engineering students who are justbeginning their studies at the University with those who are completing their studies. The studydesign was approved by the University’s Ethics in Research Committee (EIRC).Hypothesis The University’s teaching of engineering ethics increases students’ engineering moraljudgment as reflected in scores on the Engineering

Conference Session

Circuits and Systems Education 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Evans, Louisiana Tech University; Paul Hummel, Louisiana Tech University; Miguel Gates

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

0.783 for Section 002.This is likely due to the makeup of students in each section and the time difference betweenwhen the two sections met for class. The lower performing section was the earlier 8 AM classwhen more students were apt to miss class, show up late, and be less engaged during the classlectures. The importance of the difference between the two sections is reflected in the unevendistribution of homework assignments. The section that performed better was assessed twicewith paper homework while the section that performed worse was assessed twice withWeBWorK homework. This would indicate the difference between paper-based homework andWeBWorK-based homework may be larger than directly indicated by the score averages weobtained. If only

Conference Session

Research to Practice: STRAND 2- Engineering Across the Curriculum: Integration with the Arts, Social Studies, Science, and the Common Core

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joyce Blandino P.E., Virginia Military Institute; Jon-Michael Hardin, Virginia Military Institute

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

be sought out to serve asthe basis of comparison for future studies.AcknowledgementsFunding for this study was provided by the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) EngineeringClub. The authors also thank the support from the VMI ASME student chapter. Page 26.249.8Bibliography 1. Bairaktarova, D., Pilotte, M., Evangelou, D., Cox, M.F. (2013) Examining Reflections of Current Engineering Students on Educational Outreach. Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013. 2. Salzman, N., Ricco, G.D., Ohland, M.W. (2014). Pre-College Engineering Participation Among First

Conference Session

Laboratory Experiences in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arshan Nazempour, Washington State University; Paul B. Golter, Washington State University; Cecilia Dianne Richards, Washington State University; Robert F. Richards, Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 2011. 100(1): p. 89-122.4. Kolb, D.A. and L.H. Lewis, Facilitating experiential learning: Observations and reflections. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1986. 1986(30): p. 99- 107.5. Abdul, B., et al., Addressing Student Learning Barriers in Developing Nations with a Novel Hands-on Active Pedagogy and Miniaturized Industrial Process Equipment: The Case of Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2011. 27(2): p. 458-476.6. Golter, P.B., et al., Combining modern learning pedagogies in fluid mechanics and heat transfer. chemical engineering, 2005. 39: p. 280-287.7

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Celine Manoosingh, Georgia Southern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

; and3) a small group cohort experience that emphasizes reflective and experiential learning through smallgroup team building, but also includes social activities. The BUILD program began in the summer of2006 and has continued uninterrupted to the present.The success of the BUILD program has fueled the initiative. BUILD cohorts consistently have higheraverage first term GPAs, high school GPA averages, and average SAT scores compared to the Universityaverages (The first-year retention rates for BUILD cohorts increased from 89% for the (2006 cohort) to ahigh of 95% (2012 cohort). This compared to the University rates which increased from 79% for the(2006 cohort) to a high of 81% for the (2012 cohort), with a high of 81% also occurring for the Fall

Conference Session

INDUSTRY DAY SESSION: CMC PANEL SESSION ONE

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rui (Celia) Pan, University of Oklahoma; Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma; Cindy E Foor, University of Oklahoma; Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma; Susan E. Walden, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Topics

Corporate Member Council, Diversity

ensure teams are inclusive and diverse. With a clearmessage delivered from the leadership, student, experiential-learning, engineering competitionteams can become early incubators of the diversity and inclusion ideals that are promoted byindustry.AcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge the funding that makes this work possible from the NationalScience Foundation's Directorate of Undergraduate Education's STEM Talent ExpansionProgram Grant No. DUE-1068453. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.Bibliography1. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics

Conference Session

Potpourri

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gretchen G. Achenbach, National Center for Women & IT; Leslie G. Cintron PhD, University of Virginia; J McGrath Cohoon, University of Virginia; Philip Michael Sadler, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; Gerhard Sonnert, Harvard University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

to succeed.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by a National Science Foundation grant (#1203206) to the NationalCenter for Women and Information Technology, and a National Science Foundation grant(#062444) for Project PRiSE. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this paper are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Page 26.328.16Science Foundation.References1. The White House. (2011). Women and girls in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp-women-girls-stem-november2011.pdf2

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Howe, Smith College; Sophia L Poulos, Smith College; R. Keith Stanfill, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

development. This paper is based upon worksupported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1037655. Any opinions,findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors anddo not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 26.335.14Bibliography1. Paretti, M., Howe, S., Blair, S., Rogers, P., Kanai, J., Stanfill, R. K., and Livesay, G. (2012) “Capstone Design Hub: Building the Capstone Design Community,” Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Conference.2. WordPress. (2015) https://wordpress.com/ Accessed March 2015.3. Kline, W

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Julia Ziyatdinova, Kazan National Research Technological University; Jacek Kropiwnicki, Gdansk University of Technology, Poland; Phuc Van Nguyen, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

this subscale. Furthermoreincreasing the awareness of engineering students to experiences in other cultures andunderstanding how these experiences may impact growth in their own lives could stimulatediscussion and reflection. American Professional Group Difference Diversity of Contact 19.77 26.27 6.50 Relative Appreciation 22.11 24.73 2.62 Emotional Comfort 25.36 24.91 -0.45 Table 8 A comparison of American undergraduate student attitudes to attitudes from a group of global professionals

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fabien R Durand, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jin Woo Kim, Georgia Institute of Technology; Dorian Henao; Joanna Tsenn, Texas A&M University; Daniel A. McAdams, Texas A&M University; Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology; Michael Helms, Georgia Institue of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

of effective ideas.AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the support provided by the National Science Foundation NSF EEC1025155/1338383. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. Kim JW, Tsenn J, Durand F, et al. Does the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Hurt Engineering Creativity and Design Self-Efficacy? Journal of Engineering Education. in preparation.2. Fabien Durand MEH, Joanna Tsenn, Erin McTigue, Daniel A. McAdams, Julie S. Linsey. Teaching Students to Innovate: Evaluating Methods for Bioinspired design and Their Impact on Design Self Efficacy IDETC

Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-oriented Studies: Electrical and Computer Engineering Labs

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Valentin Siderskiy, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering; Aatif Ahmed Mohammed, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering; Vikram Kapila, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

. IEEE Trans. Edu., 49(3):389–397, 2006.[24] J. Ma and L Jeffrey. Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 1–24, 2006.[25] R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7):674–681, 1988.[26] N.D. Fleming and C. Mills. Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11: 137–155, 1992. Page 26.348.15

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holt Zaugg, Brigham Young University; Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young University; Timothy L Elliott, Brigham Young University; Alan R Parkinson, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

student biases and misconceptions areexposed and a broader perspective is gained of the world in which we live and work [2, 3, 4, 5]. Inrecent years there has been a significant increase in the number of engineering-specificinternational programs reflecting the increasing globalization of the engineering enterprise.As engineering educators one might ask if engineering students learn differently on study abroadprograms than do students in other majors? And, if so, what implication does this have indeveloping and conducting these programs? The field of international education has, for sometime, sought to find ways to adequately assess international programs [3]. There is a consensus inmuch of the literature that studying abroad can have a positive

Conference Session

Visualization Within Engineering Design Graphics Education Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Norma L Veurink, Michigan Technological University; A. J. Hamlin, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

. Page 26.381.7Student performance on a graphics exam in a first-year engineering course required by allengineering majors at Michigan Tech was compared for students taking the PSVT:R on paperand through the LMS to determine if there was a difference in spatial ability between thesegroups. In the first-year engineering course, ENG1101, approximately five 1.5 hour classsessions are spent on sketching topics, followed by an exam. The graphics topics covered in thiscourse include isometric and oblique sketching, orthographic projections of normal, inclined, andcurved surfaces, rotations, reflections, and planes of symmetry. Students scoring 60% or belowon the PSVT paper and LMS versions were excluded from this analysis because they wererequired to

Conference Session

Simulation

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natasha Smith P.E., University of Southern Indiana; Julian Ly Davis, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

the assigned programming projectswere slightly more substantial. Exam metrics reflected this change in emphasis as well. Studentswere more capable of generating global beam stiffness matrices by hand (87%), and slightly morefamiliar with shape functions (70%). However, nearly half of students could not answer a con-ceptual question regarding the difference between a finite element and continuous solution for anelastic bar.It should be noted that both class sizes were small (11 and 15), and that there were differences inexpectations in each group. In 2013, the students were nearer completion of the degree, with moreexperience from upper level courses with a significant programming component. Specifically,45% of the 2013 cohort had taken two or

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary J. Meixell, Quinnipiac University; Nebil Buyurgan, Quinnipiac University; Corey Kiassat, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

collaborativeeducational approaches.Lattuca and Stark’s academic planning model refer to these requirements as purposes andcontent. Additional considerations we took into account that are well reflected in the academicplanning model are instructional resources and processes, both of which were importantconsiderations in our program, especially considering the special issues associated with growinga new program where student enrollment is relatively low. For example, new program had topromote hands-on approaches in courses and outside the university to make it an active anddynamic learning experience. Lectures and in-class assignments had to be supported by Page

Conference Session

Software Engineering Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sally Sue Richmond, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley; Kailasam Satyamurthy, Penn State University; Joanna F. DeFranco, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

scale ranges from 1-10 and thereforeeach scale value reflects a 10% change). The data are also not ratio data, since zero is not a possible rating(a student would only receive a zero if they did not present their work, in which case there would be nopeer evaluation). This restricts the types of analysis that can be applied to the data, and reduces thesensitivity of any conclusions (Trochim, 2006). Nonetheless, interesting conclusions regarding bias andpotential cronyism can be drawn when we organized the ratings into ranges and looked at the frequencyof ratings in each range, as discussed below.Given the small amount of data and that reliability has been studied extensively, we chose to investigateto what extent students used the entire range

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel; Monika Bubacz, The Citadel; Jason Howison, The Citadel; Kevin Skenes, The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

] Tinto, V., “Research and practice of student retention: What next?”, Journal of College Student Retention:Research, Theory & Practice, 2007, v. 8 no. 1, p. 1-19.[2] Chen, X. “STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields”, National Center forEducation Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC, 2013.[3] Veenstra, C.P., Dey, E.L., Herrin, G.D., “Is Modeling of Freshman Engineering Success Different fromModeling of Non-Engineering Success?” Journal of Engineering Education, Washington, D.C., 2008, v. 97 no. 4,October, p. 467-79.[4] Harris, J. G., “Journal of Engineering Education Round Table: Reflections on the Grinter Report”, 1994 (1), p.69-94[5] Carr, R., Thomas, D

Conference Session

Labs & Hands-on Instruction II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth A. Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dianna Newman, University at Albany/SUNY; Kathy Ann Gullie Ph.D., Evaluation Consortium, University at Albany/SUNY; Paul M. Schoch, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

the PowerPoint files. He was completely involved indeveloping the “flip” but didn’t create any video content. Reflecting on this after the semester, itwas a mistake to attempt what might be called a partial flip. He agreed to take of EI because hewas given the opportunity to teach a well-developed flipped course. He also was building on hisexperience from the earlier course. The fundamental reason why he was interested is based onreading papers and forming a conviction that his time with the students is best served helpingthem get past difficulties by learning how they approach problems. Then he is able to help themdetermine where there are gaps in their knowledge and how to use the course resources to bridgethose gaps. A lecture isn’t

Conference Session

Software Applications in ET Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Orlando M Ayala, Old Dominion University; Mileta Tomovic, Old Dominion University; Alok K. Verma P.E., Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

. One of the main idea of Socratic principles oflearning is focusing on systematic questioning method (Overholser, 1993). This method isspecifically important for different liberal art fields such as in law (Hawkins-Leon, 1998; Kerr,1999), psychotherapy (Overholser, 1994) and other fields. Questions as sole method of teachingemphasizes involving students in conversations in which they would discover limits of theirknowledge and get inspired to learn more (Paraskevas & Wickens, 2003). Moreover, applicationof constructivism principles which focuses on arguments, discussions, debates, conflicts anddilemmas, sharing ideas with others, working towards the solution, creating reflections, addressingstudent needs and connecting what is learned to

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Strategies Beyond the Classroom to Tackle Gender Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eddie L Jacobs, University of Memphis; Amy L de Jongh Curry, University of Memphis; Russell J. Deaton, University of Memphis; Carmen Astorne-Figari, University of Memphis; Douglas Clark Strohmer, University of Memphis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

more relevant to societal needs.It is not just about gender equity — it is about doing better engineering for us all.”References [1] National Society of Professional Engineers. http://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/engineers-creed, 1954. [2] IEEE. IEEE Mission Statement. http://www.ieee.org/about/vision mission.html. [3] James A. Stieb. Understanding Engineering Professionalism: A Reflection on the Rights of Engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(1):149–169, 2011. [4] A. Kirn and L. Benson. Quantitative assessment of student motivation to characterize difference between engineering majors. Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013. [5] M. F. Fox, G. Sonnert, and I. Nikiforova. Programs for Undergraduate Women in

Conference Session

Assessing Literacies in Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bryan A. Jones, Mississippi State University; Mahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

a deeper, more experi-ential level, this typeset output reinforces the belief that a program is a document, encouragingprogrammers to write documents, instead of disjointed comments. Finally, this underlying beliefthat a program is a document then opens to the authors the multitude of advantages which accrueto writers: creation of and reflection on the overall structure of the essay; the ability to easily in-clude others in the development process; the inclusion of the creative ideas which produced aparticular implementation.This last point bears further investigation. Traditional programming focuses on the what – the code,which defines a specific implementation. This information provides a compiler all the informationneeded to blindly

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

R. Danner Friend, Norwich University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

the knowledge and tools necessary for being successful in this course. 5 Work effectively as a member of a team. Teamwork 6 Use written, oral, and graphical communication to convey methods, results, and Communication conclusions. 7 Demonstrate a capacity for self-directed, lifelong learning, including goal Lifelong Learning setting, decision-making, project planning, resource discovery and evaluation, personal development (autonomy, self-motivation, self-confidence, self- reflection). 8 Develop and apply attitudes and skills for creativity within the context of Creativity materials science and engineering. 9 Develop

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University; Noemi V. Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University; Tanya Dugat Wickliff, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

their sessions, some measures were not utilized by Instructor B.The outcomes of student performance were categorized into two levels: (a) individuallevel performance and (b) team level performance. Here, individual level performanceindicates individual students’ scores from their own performance on enculturation factorsand team level performance indicates that students in the same team received the samescores as reflection of teamwork for an activity on enculturation factors. The mostfrequent number of team members was four and a few teams had three, due to the lack ofstudents or attrition. Table 2 shows characteristics of the measures utilized in this study,related enculturation factors of each measure, and the level of performance. Details

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas - El Paso; Pedro Arturo Espinoza, University of Texas - El Paso; Hugo Gomez, University of Texas - El Paso; Randy Hazael Anaya, University of Texas - El Paso; Hector Erick Lugo Nevarez, University of Texas - El Paso; Herminia Hemmitt, University of Texas - El Paso; Peter Golding, University of Texas - El Paso; Oscar Antonio Perez, University of Texas - El Paso

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

) teach with examples andcases, 5) prime student motivation and use formative assessment.8 Learning blocks werecreated, refined, and utilized in our two most recent Tech-E camps to see if they couldmaintain the same level of engagement with learners while involving deeper learning andentrepreneurship concepts in them.Learning blocks were designed to take advantage of key strategies found in project-basedlearning, such as, tackling realistic problems using the learner’s knowledge, increasinglearners control over their learning, involving instructors that serve as coaches/facilitatorsof inquiry and reflection, and utilizing either pairs or groups in the process. 9,10 Thechallenge portions of the blocks introduce some key entrepreneurship components

Conference Session

Information and Network Security

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Pickard, East Carolina University; John B. Southworth, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

test is not a reflection of the protocols themselves butrather a byproduct of implementations and possibly routing policies along the packet paths.Figure 9. Example output from v6Sonar showing the results of a performance test towww.google.com from six globally distributed monitoring agents. The test performed was HTTPGet of Web content.Discussion of findingsCzyz et al’s 2014 study provided a model for assessing IPv6 adoption through the first at largeempirical study of the state of IPv6 adoption by analyzing ten different datasets and producingresults on twelve adoption metrics. Their study provided qualitative and quantitative evidencethat IPv6 “is being used natively for production and at a rapidly-increasing rate” 3. In this studywe

Conference Session

Novel Teaching Methods In Engineering Technology

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R Haughery, Iowa State University; D. Raj Raman, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

geared motors, integrated motor drive circuits, three-axisaccelerometer/compass, piezo-electric buzzer, status light emitting diodes (LEDs), a userpushbutton, and an infrared reflectance sensor array for high contrast sensing. The mostadvantageous aspect of this chassis was the wide range of microcontroller boards it accepted.While we selected the well-known Arduino UNO Rev3 microcontroller, many others aresuitable, including all Pololu’s A-Star 32U4 family and other similar form factor third-partyofferings. One board and cable were given to each individual student, while one chassis wasshared across teams of two students.The most costly support equipment item was the rolling storage case by Lista. This five-drawer,tool chest style case was

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shawna Fletcher, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

requirements.ConclusionIn conclusion, public educational institutions are responsible for educating students in a safe andeffective environment. Across the US, the number of female students engaging in PLTW doesnot reflect the population as a whole. Therefore, women will continue to be underrepresented inthese programs unless measures are taken. Offering all-female PLTW cohorts have proven theirsuccess to attract and retain more female students. Though the evidence is clear, all-femalePLTW cohorts are slow to be adopted. There is a fear that single-sex education in a mixedsetting gives preferential treatment and an unfair advantage to some students. However, withoutthese interventions, the representation of women in PLTW and engineering programs willincrease

Conference Session

Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum and Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Polinpapilinho Katina, Old Dominion University; Joseph M Bradley, Leading Change, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

Keating 38 39; Keating Methodology semiautonomous subsystems et al. 40Classification Systems-based Description Primary Proponents Methodology Critical Systems A process of critical reflection based on a set of boundary Ulrich 41 42 Heuristics questions that examine the legitimacy of designs by contrasting what ‘is’ proposed versus what ‘ought’ to be Organizational Makes explicit individual and organizational models that enable Argyris and Learning organizations to make

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea M. Ogilvie P.E., Virginia Tech; David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin; Arturo A Fuentes, University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley; Patricia A. Nava, University of Texas, El Paso; Valarie E. Taylor, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

this study: Dean Tonie Badillo, El Paso CommunityCollege; Dr. Monica Cortez, Texas A&M University; Dr. Eli Esmaeili, South Texas College; Dr.Ben Flores, UTEP; Assistant Dean Patricia A. Gore, UT Austin; Dr. Julie Martin, ClemsonUniversity; Dr. Sylvia McMullen, Blinn College; Dr. MaryJane McReynolds, Austin CommunityCollege; Ms. Jackie Perez; Texas A&M University; Dr. Soko S. Starobin, Iowa State University;Dr. Cristina Villalobos, UT Rio Grande Valley.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1428502. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech; Angela Harris, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. This research is funded by the NSF as acollaborative research grant (EEC-1360665, 1360956, and 1360958). Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.Bibliography[1] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, 2010 SESTAT Integrated Data System, 2013, Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/sestat.[2] G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, H. L. Chen, K. Jackson, and S. D. Sheppard, “An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors,” J. Eng. Ed., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 227-234.[3] National Center