initiated in 2009 by the Viterbi School of Engineering at University ofSouthern California. The goal is to leverage the emerging pedagogical and technologicalinnovations to enable students around the world to engage in collaborative and interactiveengineering learning across disciplinary, physical, institutional, and cultural boundaries. Usingmodern eLearning technologies enhanced by Telepresence capability over the Internet, studentsfrom different universities attend the same class in person at networked iPodia classrooms ontheir home campuses to learn with their classmates around the globe. iPodia students learntogether from the same teacher(s) with similar course syllabus and content materials, and theymust follow identical academic requirements
role and gain energy internally. The second category describes how a personprocesses information. A person who process data with their senses is referred to as a Sensors(S) and a person who sees where data is going in the future are called an iNtuitor (N). TheSensor versus iNtuitor category is an interesting area of study when it comes to engineeringeducation, because professors are historically intuitors while most engineering students aresensors49. The third category for MBTI preference describes the manner in which a personevaluates information. Those who tend to use a logical cause and effect strategy, Thinkers (T),differ from those who use a hierarchy based on values or the manner in which an idea iscommunicated, Feelers (F). The final
toward their postsecondary degree inthe area(s) of Mechanical Engineering Technology, Electrical and Computer EngineeringTechnology, Computer Information Technology, Construction Technology and ComputerGraphics Technology. Project PETE made it possible for IPS students to graduate withcore academic Advanced Placement credits, Technology Advanced Placement credits, an Page 10.1036.1Indiana Academic Honors Diploma and/or a Certificate of Technical Achievement.“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThis paper
S -Qc Fuel flow sensor E R LP / NATURAL GAS TANK CONDENSATE COLLECTION TANK Figure 2: Schematic of the Rankine Cycler2. Page 10.864.3Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society
Session 1566 AN ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR A CAPSTONE COURSE: DESIGN OF FLUID THERMAL SYSTEMS William S. Janna, John I. Hochstein Herff College of Engineering The University of Memphis Memphis TN 38152Extended AbstractAn assessment process has been developed in order to measure how well a capstone designcourse, Design of Fluid Thermal Systems, meets the needs of the students with regard to processeducational goals and educational objectives. The ultimate purpose of the process
Engineering Curriculum [6-11]that was initiated at TAMU in 1989. For the 1995–96 academic year or third year of the grant,each FC partner intended to improve its first-year curriculum pilot, implement a sophomorecurriculum pilot, and prepare plans for pilots of a junior curriculum in one or more engineeringmajor(s). The action plan called for work in the fourth and fifth years of the grant to continue in asimilar fashion until the entire undergraduate engineering curricula were restructured.FC faculty and administrators approached their task with a mental model of how curricular changeoccurs. The term “mental model” [12] refers to the mental representations of reality that peopleuse to understand phenomena. They contribute to people’s pictures, ideas
exercise, the computations performed, the differencesbetween theory and experiment, and the sources of error. It is easy to show the students themagnitude of error resulting from poor coordinate measurement by simply moving the supportpoint of a string from one support point to the next adjacent one. Accuracy of the experiment wasgenerally good, and this proved to be an effective learning experience. When tested on concurrentforces later in the course, the students did quite well.Analysis of Pinned Connections. Approximately 20 pinned connections were constructed fromwood (Figure 2). Groups of four students were required to examine a connector and measure thedimensions of each member and the pin(s). Based on these dimensions and an assumed axial
Session 2793 An Anonymous Electronic Journal System – Program Assessment Tool and Monday Morning Quarterback Richard J. Freuler, Matthew S. Gates, John A. Merrill, Mary M. Lamont, and John T. Demel The Ohio State UniversityAbstractDuring the past ten years, The Ohio State University's College of Engineering has moved from aseries of separate freshman courses for engineering orientation, engineering graphics, andengineering problem solving with computer programming to a dual offering of course sequencesin the Introduction to Engineering (IE
male 44 NA NA 12.3 ± 1.82006 female 6 NA NA 12.7 ± 1.4NA = not asked in that year of the surveyThe same survey measured students “universal diverse orientation” (UDO) using the previously-validated MGUDS-S instrument.10,18 UDO is “an attitude toward all other persons which isinclusive yet differentiating in that similarities and differences are both recognized andaccepted.”18 The three constructs that comprise UDO are: seeking diversity of contact,relativistic appreciation of self and others, and comfort with differences. UDO may correlate tostudent interest and comfort in different cultures. This instrument is comprised
these skills to be applied without the formal direction found in typicalengineering courses. Students are organized into design teams and are led by a student who actsas a project manager. Because of the variable nature of the proposed activities (i.e., field work,computer graphics, technical writing, oral presentations, etc.), the design teams identify therelative strengths of each team member. In addition to a final report, students prepare interimreports, attend business meetings, and give formal presentations. One or two faculty membersare assigned as the Senior Design Project Coordinator(s). However, all faculty members Page 6.10.3
college students in the late 1960's . The Perry Model has a rangeof "positions" from 1 to 9, where each level represents an increasingly complex and mature level Page 3.18.2Marra/Palmer/Litzinger 2of intellectual development. Table 1 summarizes the Perry positions. College freshman tend tobe somewhere between Positions 2 and 3 on the Perry scale. This means they are stronglydualistic thinkers who tend to rely heavily on authority when making decisions. A typical entrylevel professional should be at Perry Position 6. At position 6, individuals use evidence andlogic to make
Engineering, 3) and comparing these tocontent from the new study that is publicly available. An additional aim of this article is to raiseawareness of the upcoming NAE report and encourage thought-provoking discussions about it atthe ASEE 2024 Annual Conference.IntroductionEngineering has long been characterized by the benefits it imparts on society. As early as the1800’s when American engineers began to delineate professional guidelines and codes ofconduct, engineering has been associated with “societal uplift” [1, p. 2]. Current day, theforemost engineering professional societies have similar mission and vision statements such as“advancing engineering for the benefit of humanity” [2], “engineered and natural systemswork[ing] in harmony for the
provides an introduction. After the introduction assignments are due, students arestrongly encouraged to look through those of classmates on the discussion board.Homework assignment 2 (safety training) is required for all, and the research laboratoryinstructor may require safety training well in advance of the deadline for Homework 2. Thesafety training includes the Lab Safety Training session offered by the institution’s Environment,Health & Safety office, which is required annually for all students, faculty, and staff conductingresearch. Depending on the lab, the laboratory instructor may require safety training beyond theEH&S Lab Safety Training program. All students, whether working in a laboratory or not, mustalso complete the
designed to create a space for students to try on a criticalmindset about technology in their classes, so they may eventually take that perspective into theirinternships and careers [7,8]. The first feature aims to heal the modern mind/body fracture byhelping students develop a sense of how bodies and emotions contribute to knowledgeproduction and engineering design. The second feature provides students with analyticalapproaches grounded in STS theory (e.g., locating power, interpretive flexibility,democratization of S&T, etc.) to ask questions about their everyday encounters with engineeringeducation and technology. The third feature consists of data collection techniques (e.g.,interviews, participant observation, visual representations, etc
equipment — makes scheduling in-sync with whole-class lecturespossible.The working section of the flow loop is a transparent square tube with internal sides of h = 44 mmand a length of at least 300 mm depending on the model. Water is pumped from a source by anelectric submersible pump, for example an aquarium pump, providing flow rates on the order ofup to 300 litres per hour (Q = 83 × 10−6 m3 /s), leading to channel Reynolds numbers up toReh ≡ Q/(hν) ≈ 1900 where ν is the kinematic viscosity. At these flow rates the flow is laminar,but the channel boundary layers are thin.Flow conditioning using a sponge and honeycomb was effective to achieve a uniform flow at theentrance — if bubbles are absent. Tracer fluid with neutral buoyancy can be sourced
and refinement of Criterion 5 components, manufacture of a working version of Curriculum, with component, and serviceability of component respect to MET This applies to the following systems: program specific Suspension, steering, brakes, drivetrain/powertrain, Criterion B) 4WD/AWD, and chassis and ergonomics Demonstrate the ability to propose various idea(s) SO-1, PI 1 SO-1, PI 1 for possible cost reduction SO-2, PI 3 SO-2, PI 3 Demonstrate the ability to fully
: Detection of Cheating at Online Examinations Using Deep Learning Approach -- A Case Study.”[8] Bonilla, J. M., Valarezo, M. S., Villacrés, B. D., and Guerra, M. A., 2023, “Board 44A: Work in Progress: Unannounced Frequent Examinations to Contribute Student Learning and Building Academic Integrity,” 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[9] Paucarina, S. E., Batallas, J. D., Guerra, M. A., and Guerra, V., 2023, “Board 44B: Work in Progress: TikTok Format Videos to Improve Communicating Science in Engineering Students,” 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[10] Knight, M., and Cooper, R., 2019, “Taking on a New Grading System: The Interconnected Effects of Standards-Based Grading on Teaching
copy and paste the answer without understanding the learning concept, it could be affect[ing] the way they learn. If they only want to complete an assignment to get a good grade or pass the class, it could be a bad idea. So I think it depends on the way the student use[s] it.Another student connected this reasoning to the question around continuing to allow access to AIin class: “I feel that if it was not allowed, people would use it without trying to learn from it, itbeing acknowledged encourages people to use it in a learning way.” Engineering educators mayfind this perspective comforting as they make choices about acknowledging or encouraging theuse of AI in their own classrooms.Other students talked about how one’s own
damagingeffects of isolation and to help promote graduate student retention. Page 22.660.14Bibliography1. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.2. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub.3. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology,94(1), 95- 120.4. National Science Foundation. (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008. Retrieved July, 2008, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/5. Mednick, M., & Thomas, V. (2008). Women and
take the first engineering course, normally during their first semester as GE students, they are assigned reading from the textbook about the different fields of engineering. In the Fall Semester each department presents an Information Session in the evening to give interested students information about their degree program(s). There are thus 13 of these sessions, all on different evenings (since they are offered from the same department, AE/OE and CpE/EE are offered together), including one for the Green Engineering Minor. Students are encouraged to attend at least four information sessions by making attendance a homework grade in the engineering course. The Student Engineers Council normally hosts a